Myelodysplastic SyndromePhase 2VIOLETNCT01673308
Lenalidomide After Failure of Hypomethylating Agents in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide in people with Myelodysplastic Syndrome, run by Ulsan University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This is a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of second-line lenalidomide monotherapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who failed to hypomethylating agents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Myelodysplastic syndrome by world health organization (WHO) classification
- Treatment failure after hypomethylating agents (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine); Intolerant to hypomethylating agents or Progressive disease after HMA
- Age over 18 years old
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2
- Adequate organ function (serum creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dL, serum aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase ≤ 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN), and serum direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL).
Who cannot join
- Previous therapy history for MDS except for hypomethylating agents, cytokines (granulocyte-stimulating agents or erythropoietin) or supportive care.
- Patients who cannot keep the strict contraception or who willing to be pregnant.
- Contraindication to lenalidomide: Females who are or may become pregnant; Lenalidomide is contraindicated in any patients who have demonstrated hypersensitivity to the drug or its components; Lenalidomide capsules contain lactose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicinal product.
- Patients who cannot take lenalidomide orally
- Current enrollment to other clinical trial
- Presence of uncontrolled bleeding
Show all 13Show fewer
- Severe or life-threatening other medical conditions
- Any coexisting major illness or organ failure
- Patients with psychiatric disorder or mental deficiency severe as to make compliance with the treatment unlike, and making informed consent impossible
- History of congenital or acquired coagulopathy unrelated to malignancy
- History of non-compliance or patient who cannot sign informed consent
- Patients with a diagnosis of prior malignancy unless disease-free for at least 5 years following therapy with curative intent (except curatively treated nonmelanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia)
- Candidate of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation who cannot complete 4 cycles of lenalidomide.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Salvage in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Failure of Hypomethylating Agents: Lenalidomide as a Second-line Therapy
This is a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of second-line lenalidomide monotherapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who failed to hypomethylating agents.
Read the detailed description
There is no standard therapy after the failure of hypomethylating agents only providing supportive cares including transfusion or cytokine therapies. Lenalidomide is the treatment of choice in case of MDS with 5q deletion. A study of lenalidomide for non-5q deletion MDS patients showed that transfusion independency rate was 26% which was relatively acceptable and suggested that lenalidomide could be used for non-5q deletion MDS patients. There is no datum for second-line lenalidomide therapy after hypomethylating agents. MDS which has highly complex pathogenesis backgrounds will have distinctive subtype for each therapy and each treatment drug can have distinctive subgroup for the response. In fact the investigators don't know which patient will be responsive hypomethylating agents or lenalidomide except for 5q deletion. This suggests that second line therapy after the first line failure in MDS will be different with other type of relapsed/refractory disease which will be tend to more resistant to subsequent therapies. In this regard, there is a possibility to have a relatively high response rate to second line lenalidomide in this selected subset who has failed to the hypomethylation therapy or some patients will be responsive regardless of treatment line. Recent data suggested that MDS with JAK2 mutation will be responsive to lenalidomide. The investigators will analyze the JAK2 mutation status in response evaluation.
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenalidomideDrug
Also called Revlimid
Lenalidomide 10 mg orally on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle for at least 4 cycles until intolerance or disease progression.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | Lenalidomide treatment arm Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response criteria by international working group (IWG) 2006 criteria
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Safety
Safety assessed by national cancer institute (NCI) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ulsan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cooperative Study Group A for Hematology
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hawk Kim, Ulsan University Hospital
- Investigators
- Hawk Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01673308
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RV-MDS-PI-0722
- Acronym
- VIOLET
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 11 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Prebet T, Gore SD, Esterni B, Gardin C, Itzykson R, Thepot S, Dreyfus F, Rauzy OB, Recher C, Ades L, Quesnel B, Beach CL, Fenaux P, Vey N. Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3322-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8135. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
PubMed 21788559Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G, Batty N, Shan J, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Ravandi F, Issa JP, Kantarjian H. Outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after failure of decitabine therapy. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3830-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25247.
PubMed 20564137List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, Rimsza L, Heaton R, Knight R, Zeldis JB. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):549-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041668.
PubMed 15703420Ades L, Boehrer S, Prebet T, Beyne-Rauzy O, Legros L, Ravoet C, Dreyfus F, Stamatoullas A, Chaury MP, Delaunay J, Laurent G, Vey N, Burcheri S, Mbida RM, Hoarau N, Gardin C, Fenaux P. Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion: results of a phase 2 study. Blood. 2009 Apr 23;113(17):3947-52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-175778. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
PubMed 18987358Jadersten M, Hellstrom-Lindberg E. Myelodysplastic syndromes: biology and treatment. J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;265(3):307-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02052.x. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
PubMed 19141095Heise C, Carter T, Schafer P, Chopra R. Pleiotropic mechanisms of action of lenalidomide efficacy in del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Oct;10(10):1663-72. doi: 10.1586/era.10.135.
PubMed 20942636Nomdedeu M, Maffioli M, Calvo X, Martinez-Trillos A, Baumann T, Diaz-Beya M, Aguilar JL, Rozman M, Costa D, Esteve J, Cervantes F, Colomer D, Nomdedeu B. Efficacy of lenalidomide in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) and JAK2V617F mutation. Leuk Res. 2011 Sep;35(9):1276-8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 21764129Raza A, Reeves JA, Feldman EJ, Dewald GW, Bennett JM, Deeg HJ, Dreisbach L, Schiffer CA, Stone RM, Greenberg PL, Curtin PT, Klimek VM, Shammo JM, Thomas D, Knight RD, Schmidt M, Wride K, Zeldis JB, List AF. Phase 2 study of lenalidomide in transfusion-dependent, low-risk, and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes with karyotypes other than deletion 5q. Blood. 2008 Jan 1;111(1):86-93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-068833. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
PubMed 17893227Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
PubMed 16609072
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Salvage in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Failure of Hypomethylating Agents: Lenalidomide as a Second-line Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01673308
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VIOLET / RV-MDS-PI-0722
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ulsan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cooperative Study Group A for Hematology
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of second-line lenalidomide monotherapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who failed to hypomethylating agents.
Detailed description
There is no standard therapy after the failure of hypomethylating agents only providing supportive cares including transfusion or cytokine therapies. Lenalidomide is the treatment of choice in case of MDS with 5q deletion. A study of lenalidomide for non-5q deletion MDS patients showed that transfusion independency rate was 26% which was relatively acceptable and suggested that lenalidomide could be used for non-5q deletion MDS patients. There is no datum for second-line lenalidomide therapy after hypomethylating agents. MDS which has highly complex pathogenesis backgrounds will have distinctive subtype for each therapy and each treatment drug can have distinctive subgroup for the response. In fact the investigators don't know which patient will be responsive hypomethylating agents or lenalidomide except for 5q deletion. This suggests that second line therapy after the first line failure in MDS will be different with other type of relapsed/refractory disease which will be tend to more resistant to subsequent therapies. In this regard, there is a possibility to have a relatively high response rate to second line lenalidomide in this selected subset who has failed to the hypomethylation therapy or some patients will be responsive regardless of treatment line. Recent data suggested that MDS with JAK2 mutation will be responsive to lenalidomide. The investigators will analyze the JAK2 mutation status in response evaluation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | Drug: LenalidomideLenalidomide treatment arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Myelodysplastic syndrome by world health organization (WHO) classification
- Treatment failure after hypomethylating agents (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine); Intolerant to hypomethylating agents or Progressive disease after HMA
- Age over 18 years old
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2
- Adequate organ function (serum creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dL, serum aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase ≤ 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN), and serum direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL).
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Previous therapy history for MDS except for hypomethylating agents, cytokines (granulocyte-stimulating agents or erythropoietin) or supportive care.
- Patients who cannot keep the strict contraception or who willing to be pregnant.
- Contraindication to lenalidomide: Females who are or may become pregnant; Lenalidomide is contraindicated in any patients who have demonstrated hypersensitivity to the drug or its components; Lenalidomide capsules contain lactose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicinal product.
- Patients who cannot take lenalidomide orally
- Current enrollment to other clinical trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenalidomideAlso: RevlimidLenalidomide 10 mg orally on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle for at least 4 cycles until intolerance or disease progression. | Drug | Treatment arm |
Primary outcome
Response criteria by international working group (IWG) 2006 criteria
Time frame: 12 months
1 secondary outcome
Safety
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 21788559Prebet T, Gore SD, Esterni B, Gardin C, Itzykson R, Thepot S, Dreyfus F, Rauzy OB, Recher C, Ades L, Quesnel B, Beach CL, Fenaux P, Vey N. Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3322-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8135. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 20564137Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G, Batty N, Shan J, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Ravandi F, Issa JP, Kantarjian H. Outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after failure of decitabine therapy. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3830-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25247.
- Background: PubMed 15703420List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, Rimsza L, Heaton R, Knight R, Zeldis JB. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):549-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041668.
- Background: PubMed 18987358Ades L, Boehrer S, Prebet T, Beyne-Rauzy O, Legros L, Ravoet C, Dreyfus F, Stamatoullas A, Chaury MP, Delaunay J, Laurent G, Vey N, Burcheri S, Mbida RM, Hoarau N, Gardin C, Fenaux P. Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion: results of a phase 2 study. Blood. 2009 Apr 23;113(17):3947-52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-175778. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 19141095Jadersten M, Hellstrom-Lindberg E. Myelodysplastic syndromes: biology and treatment. J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;265(3):307-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02052.x. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 20942636Heise C, Carter T, Schafer P, Chopra R. Pleiotropic mechanisms of action of lenalidomide efficacy in del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Oct;10(10):1663-72. doi: 10.1586/era.10.135.
- Background: PubMed 21764129Nomdedeu M, Maffioli M, Calvo X, Martinez-Trillos A, Baumann T, Diaz-Beya M, Aguilar JL, Rozman M, Costa D, Esteve J, Cervantes F, Colomer D, Nomdedeu B. Efficacy of lenalidomide in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) and JAK2V617F mutation. Leuk Res. 2011 Sep;35(9):1276-8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 20. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17893227Raza A, Reeves JA, Feldman EJ, Dewald GW, Bennett JM, Deeg HJ, Dreisbach L, Schiffer CA, Stone RM, Greenberg PL, Curtin PT, Klimek VM, Shammo JM, Thomas D, Knight RD, Schmidt M, Wride K, Zeldis JB, List AF. Phase 2 study of lenalidomide in transfusion-dependent, low-risk, and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes with karyotypes other than deletion 5q. Blood. 2008 Jan 1;111(1):86-93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-068833. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 16609072Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hawk Kim, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide in people with Myelodysplastic Syndrome, run by Ulsan University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response criteria by international working group (IWG) 2006 criteria (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01673308, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2016.