AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac Output MeasurementPRAMNCT01678950

MostCare Versus Echo-Doppler for Cardiac Output Measurement

An observational study of Cardiac Output Measurement, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 14 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recently, an uncalibrated minimally invasive Pulse-code Modulator (PCM) has been developed: the MostCare system. This monitoring system is powered by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), which is based on the mathematical analysis of the arterial pressure profile changes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Output Measurement
How many people
400 participants
Where
14 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jun 2011to Jun 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients in Intensive Care Unit, under different clinical conditions

Who may be able to join

  • Patients equipped with a standard arterial catheter-line (femoral or radial artery) for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring.
  • Patients requiring an echocardiographic evaluation - Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation (TEE)or Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation (TOE) - as a routine need or in the context of Acute Cardiocirculatory failure with suspected implication of cardiac dysfunction or Acute Respiratory failure and suspicion of cardiac failure.
  • *When a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC, standard bolus thermodilution, ThD) is used or a central venous catheter linked with a femoral artery catheter to measure the transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO system: Continuous pulse contour cardiac analysis), the comparison will be done as a secondary end point of the protocol.
  • The point n.3 is optional

Who cannot join

  • Related to MostCare:
  • pathologies that could affect the quality and reliability of the arterial signal (aortic valve pathologies, aortic aneurysms) and arrhythmias that generate hemodynamic instability (i.e., variations in mean BP measurements > 10%); poor quality of the arterial pressure signal after a standard flush test (i.e., over-damped or under-damped arterial trace).
  • Related to Echo-Doppler: non-feasibility to obtain a fulfilled quality of the images.
  • Patients younger than 18.

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 4 countries.

14 sites in 4 countries

Italy11 sites
  • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Torrette University Hospital

    Ancona, Ancona, 60100

  • Intensive Care Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital

    Florence, Florence, 50122

  • Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Italy

    Florence, Florence, 50141

  • Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio - Torregalli Hospital

    Florence, Florence, 50143

  • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedali Riuniti Foggia University Hospital

    Foggia, Foggia, 71100

  • Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele University Hospital

    Milan, Milan, 20132

  • Policlinico Universitario Padova

    Padova, 35128

  • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Pisa University Hospital

    Pisa, Pisa, 56126

  • Ospedale S. Antonio Abate di Pontremoli

    Pontremoli, 54027

  • Cardiovascular Anesthesia, Policlinico Umberto I°

    Rome, Rome, 00161

  • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Siena University Hospital

    Siena, Siena, 53100

Other trials in Italy

France1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care - Lariboisière University Hospital University Paris 7 Diderot. France

    Paris, Paris, 75007

Other trials in France

Spain1 site
  • of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera

    Valencia, Valencia, 46600

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • (Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital

    Wolverhampton, England, WV10

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between MostCare and Echo-Doppler for Cardiac Output Measurement: an Observational Study

Recently, an uncalibrated minimally invasive Pulse-code Modulator (PCM) has been developed: the MostCare system. This monitoring system is powered by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), which is based on the mathematical analysis of the arterial pressure profile changes. It allows beat-to-beat Stroke Volume (SV) assessment from the pressure signal recorded invasively in radial, brachial, or femoral arteries. The most innovative features of this method are: 1) the lack of a calibration requirement, 2) the analysis of the arterial wave signal is performed at 1000 Hz, 3) a dedicated arterial catheter-transducer is unnecessary. MostCare is powered by PRAM (Pressure Recording Analytical Method) algorithm. The investigators primary end-point was to evaluate the relationship between Cardiac Output (CO) measured by MostCare with CO calculated with Echo-Doppler in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients under different clinical conditions. As a secondary end-point the investigators evaluated the relationship between CO measured by MostCare with CO obtained with thermodilution techniques (standard bolus thermodilution or transpulmonary thermodilution, i.e. PiCCO system). This is a prospective multicentre observational study.

Read the detailed description

(*) Study design

  1. MostCare system data acquisition Before each CO measurement, the arterial pressure catheter and transducer quality will be assessed as follows: easy aspiration of 5 ml of blood easily re-injected without resistance; visual assessment of the quality of the arterial waveform contour; adequate response to the flush test (square wave). If necessary, the best position for the signal quality will be checked by extending the wrist and manipulating the catheter. For each determination of Echo-Doppler (and ThD-CO when applicable), a corresponding value for MostCare must be obtained by averaging the individual beats over the same time necessary to obtain the Echo-doppler-CO (and ThD-CO when applicable) measurements.
  2. Echo-Doppler data acquisition (transoesophageal - TOE - or transthoracic - TTE - echo) Echo-Doppler-CO will be measured using the standard formula CSA x VTI (cross sectional area x velocity time integral x heart rate in ml/min). 2D measurement of the aortic annulus diameter allows calculation of the flow CSA which is then multiplied by the VTI (velocity time integral) of the Pulsed Doppler flow velocity profile across the aortic valve to determine the SV.

Other hemodynamic variables as an ancillary part of the study will compare shortening fraction (SF) or EF fraction from Echocardiography with CCE and dp/dt.

  1. Thermodilution data acquisition (ThD-CO) (when applicable) Data coming from ThD pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or a CVC + femoral artery catheter (transpulmonary thermodilution, PiCCO system) will be collected from the monitor itself or the system for patient monitoring used in the units.

For standard PAC-ThD-CO, five consecutive injections of 10 ml of 5% glucose cold solution will be randomly injected during respiratory cycle over a 5-min period. Thermodilution-CO (or PiCCO-CO) will be calculated as the average of the five measurements. All these 5 measurements will be collected.

MostCare, Echo-doppler (and Thermodilution when applicable) Change in ventilator parameters, sedation drugs, or fluid infusions or vasopressor dose will not be allowed during the acquisition time.

(*) Study timing and procedure

For each patient CO determinations will be performed as follows:

Mandatory measurements:

  • Baseline: (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = single comparison between techniques.

Recorded but not mandatory measurements (fitting to the therapeutic protocol used in each center):

  • Pre- and post- treatment (fluid challenge, vasoactive drugs and inotropics changes) (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = dynamic comparison between techniques (two measures). This will allow a sub-analysis of CO (the trend of CO) changes, validity of trend, for both SV and CO before and after a therapeutic intervention.

Data to be collected:

Patient: demographic, anthropometric, pre-medical history, indication(s) for ICU admission; (cardiovascular diseases and cardiac function, respiratory diseases, etc...), severity scores (SAPS II, SOFA, ….).

All patients enrolled will be analysed in intention-to-treat even data recording failed. In this case, that would be a limit if any, for the tested technique.

Hemodynamic MostCare: SV, HR, CO, CCE, ∆P/∆T, ABPs, ABPd, ABPm. Other hemodynamic data: CVP, PaoP, SvO2, lactate,... Echocardiography: stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output. Other hemodynamic variables are allowed to be collected by Echo according to the centre protocols and the experience of each centre.

Cardiac and vasoactive drugs dose or infusion rate will be collected: dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, nitrates, beta-blockers, ACE-I,ecc.

Ventilatory: mechanical ventilation settings: mode of ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, VC, PC), pressure support (if applicable), peak and plateau pressure, PEEP level, FiO2 oxygenation (SaO2, PaO2,…) ICU stay and outcome: morbidity (number and type of complications), length of stay, mortality.

(*) Statistical analysis and methodology, number of patients to be enrolled, duration of the study:

Collected data will be copied on an excel file to be properly independently analyzed with a statistical software. Correlation tests (Spearman or Pearson), Student paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analysis will be applied. A minimum of 30 patients per centre will be enrolled in the study in a period of 18 months.

This "minimum number" of patients is mandatory as: 1) the enrollment of 30 patients per centre eliminates the potential bias that may occur when few data come from a single centre, 2) minimum 300 patients enrolled represents a suitable number to obtain the "statistical power" necessary to validate the comparison between the different methods, and 3) further analysis and comparisons in subgroup of patients having similar clinical settings can be performed.

Keywords
Cardiac output monitoring, Echocardiography, Pulse contour system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cardiac output

    comparison of cardiac output monitoring systems

    Measured: comparison of monitoring systems

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01678950
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRAM2012
Acronym
PRAM
Status last verified
Jun 2014
First submitted
31 Aug 2012
Last updated
25 Jun 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Output Measurement, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 14 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Italy, France, Spain, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cardiac output (time frame: comparison of monitoring systems). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in