Cardiac Output MeasurementPRAMNCT01678950
MostCare Versus Echo-Doppler for Cardiac Output Measurement
An observational study of Cardiac Output Measurement, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 14 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Recently, an uncalibrated minimally invasive Pulse-code Modulator (PCM) has been developed: the MostCare system. This monitoring system is powered by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), which is based on the mathematical analysis of the arterial pressure profile changes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Output Measurement
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients in Intensive Care Unit, under different clinical conditions
Who may be able to join
- Patients equipped with a standard arterial catheter-line (femoral or radial artery) for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring.
- Patients requiring an echocardiographic evaluation - Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation (TEE)or Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation (TOE) - as a routine need or in the context of Acute Cardiocirculatory failure with suspected implication of cardiac dysfunction or Acute Respiratory failure and suspicion of cardiac failure.
- *When a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC, standard bolus thermodilution, ThD) is used or a central venous catheter linked with a femoral artery catheter to measure the transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO system: Continuous pulse contour cardiac analysis), the comparison will be done as a secondary end point of the protocol.
- The point n.3 is optional
Who cannot join
- Related to MostCare:
- pathologies that could affect the quality and reliability of the arterial signal (aortic valve pathologies, aortic aneurysms) and arrhythmias that generate hemodynamic instability (i.e., variations in mean BP measurements > 10%); poor quality of the arterial pressure signal after a standard flush test (i.e., over-damped or under-damped arterial trace).
- Related to Echo-Doppler: non-feasibility to obtain a fulfilled quality of the images.
- Patients younger than 18.
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 4 countries.
14 sites in 4 countries
Italy11 sites
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Torrette University Hospital
Ancona, Ancona, 60100
Intensive Care Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital
Florence, Florence, 50122
Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Italy
Florence, Florence, 50141
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio - Torregalli Hospital
Florence, Florence, 50143
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedali Riuniti Foggia University Hospital
Foggia, Foggia, 71100
Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele University Hospital
Milan, Milan, 20132
Policlinico Universitario Padova
Padova, 35128
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Pisa University Hospital
Pisa, Pisa, 56126
Ospedale S. Antonio Abate di Pontremoli
Pontremoli, 54027
Cardiovascular Anesthesia, Policlinico Umberto I°
Rome, Rome, 00161
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Siena University Hospital
Siena, Siena, 53100
France1 site
Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care - Lariboisière University Hospital University Paris 7 Diderot. France
Paris, Paris, 75007
Spain1 site
of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera
Valencia, Valencia, 46600
United Kingdom1 site
(Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton, England, WV10
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between MostCare and Echo-Doppler for Cardiac Output Measurement: an Observational Study
Recently, an uncalibrated minimally invasive Pulse-code Modulator (PCM) has been developed: the MostCare system. This monitoring system is powered by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), which is based on the mathematical analysis of the arterial pressure profile changes. It allows beat-to-beat Stroke Volume (SV) assessment from the pressure signal recorded invasively in radial, brachial, or femoral arteries. The most innovative features of this method are: 1) the lack of a calibration requirement, 2) the analysis of the arterial wave signal is performed at 1000 Hz, 3) a dedicated arterial catheter-transducer is unnecessary. MostCare is powered by PRAM (Pressure Recording Analytical Method) algorithm. The investigators primary end-point was to evaluate the relationship between Cardiac Output (CO) measured by MostCare with CO calculated with Echo-Doppler in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients under different clinical conditions. As a secondary end-point the investigators evaluated the relationship between CO measured by MostCare with CO obtained with thermodilution techniques (standard bolus thermodilution or transpulmonary thermodilution, i.e. PiCCO system). This is a prospective multicentre observational study.
Read the detailed description
(*) Study design
- MostCare system data acquisition Before each CO measurement, the arterial pressure catheter and transducer quality will be assessed as follows: easy aspiration of 5 ml of blood easily re-injected without resistance; visual assessment of the quality of the arterial waveform contour; adequate response to the flush test (square wave). If necessary, the best position for the signal quality will be checked by extending the wrist and manipulating the catheter. For each determination of Echo-Doppler (and ThD-CO when applicable), a corresponding value for MostCare must be obtained by averaging the individual beats over the same time necessary to obtain the Echo-doppler-CO (and ThD-CO when applicable) measurements.
- Echo-Doppler data acquisition (transoesophageal - TOE - or transthoracic - TTE - echo) Echo-Doppler-CO will be measured using the standard formula CSA x VTI (cross sectional area x velocity time integral x heart rate in ml/min). 2D measurement of the aortic annulus diameter allows calculation of the flow CSA which is then multiplied by the VTI (velocity time integral) of the Pulsed Doppler flow velocity profile across the aortic valve to determine the SV.
Other hemodynamic variables as an ancillary part of the study will compare shortening fraction (SF) or EF fraction from Echocardiography with CCE and dp/dt.
- Thermodilution data acquisition (ThD-CO) (when applicable) Data coming from ThD pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or a CVC + femoral artery catheter (transpulmonary thermodilution, PiCCO system) will be collected from the monitor itself or the system for patient monitoring used in the units.
For standard PAC-ThD-CO, five consecutive injections of 10 ml of 5% glucose cold solution will be randomly injected during respiratory cycle over a 5-min period. Thermodilution-CO (or PiCCO-CO) will be calculated as the average of the five measurements. All these 5 measurements will be collected.
MostCare, Echo-doppler (and Thermodilution when applicable) Change in ventilator parameters, sedation drugs, or fluid infusions or vasopressor dose will not be allowed during the acquisition time.
(*) Study timing and procedure
For each patient CO determinations will be performed as follows:
Mandatory measurements:
- Baseline: (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = single comparison between techniques.
Recorded but not mandatory measurements (fitting to the therapeutic protocol used in each center):
- Pre- and post- treatment (fluid challenge, vasoactive drugs and inotropics changes) (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = dynamic comparison between techniques (two measures). This will allow a sub-analysis of CO (the trend of CO) changes, validity of trend, for both SV and CO before and after a therapeutic intervention.
Data to be collected:
Patient: demographic, anthropometric, pre-medical history, indication(s) for ICU admission; (cardiovascular diseases and cardiac function, respiratory diseases, etc...), severity scores (SAPS II, SOFA, ….).
All patients enrolled will be analysed in intention-to-treat even data recording failed. In this case, that would be a limit if any, for the tested technique.
Hemodynamic MostCare: SV, HR, CO, CCE, ∆P/∆T, ABPs, ABPd, ABPm. Other hemodynamic data: CVP, PaoP, SvO2, lactate,... Echocardiography: stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output. Other hemodynamic variables are allowed to be collected by Echo according to the centre protocols and the experience of each centre.
Cardiac and vasoactive drugs dose or infusion rate will be collected: dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, nitrates, beta-blockers, ACE-I,ecc.
Ventilatory: mechanical ventilation settings: mode of ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, VC, PC), pressure support (if applicable), peak and plateau pressure, PEEP level, FiO2 oxygenation (SaO2, PaO2,…) ICU stay and outcome: morbidity (number and type of complications), length of stay, mortality.
(*) Statistical analysis and methodology, number of patients to be enrolled, duration of the study:
Collected data will be copied on an excel file to be properly independently analyzed with a statistical software. Correlation tests (Spearman or Pearson), Student paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analysis will be applied. A minimum of 30 patients per centre will be enrolled in the study in a period of 18 months.
This "minimum number" of patients is mandatory as: 1) the enrollment of 30 patients per centre eliminates the potential bias that may occur when few data come from a single centre, 2) minimum 300 patients enrolled represents a suitable number to obtain the "statistical power" necessary to validate the comparison between the different methods, and 3) further analysis and comparisons in subgroup of patients having similar clinical settings can be performed.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Output Measurement
- Keywords
- Cardiac output monitoring, Echocardiography, Pulse contour system
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cardiac output
comparison of cardiac output monitoring systems
Measured: comparison of monitoring systems
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac Output MeasurementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sabino Scolletta, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678950
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRAM2012
- Acronym
- PRAM
- Status last verified
- Jun 2014
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between MostCare and Echo-Doppler for Cardiac Output Measurement: an Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678950
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRAM / PRAM2012
- Conditions
- Cardiac Output Measurement
- Keywords
- Cardiac output monitoring, Echocardiography, Pulse contour system
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria SeneseUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recently, an uncalibrated minimally invasive Pulse-code Modulator (PCM) has been developed: the MostCare system. This monitoring system is powered by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), which is based on the mathematical analysis of the arterial pressure profile changes. It allows beat-to-beat Stroke Volume (SV) assessment from the pressure signal recorded invasively in radial, brachial, or femoral arteries. The most innovative features of this method are: 1) the lack of a calibration requirement, 2) the analysis of the arterial wave signal is performed at 1000 Hz, 3) a dedicated arterial catheter-transducer is unnecessary. MostCare is powered by PRAM (Pressure Recording Analytical Method) algorithm. The investigators primary end-point was to evaluate the relationship between Cardiac Output (CO) measured by MostCare with CO calculated with Echo-Doppler in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients under different clinical conditions. As a secondary end-point the investigators evaluated the relationship between CO measured by MostCare with CO obtained with thermodilution techniques (standard bolus thermodilution or transpulmonary thermodilution, i.e. PiCCO system). This is a prospective multicentre observational study.
Detailed description
(*) Study design
- MostCare system data acquisition Before each CO measurement, the arterial pressure catheter and transducer quality will be assessed as follows: easy aspiration of 5 ml of blood easily re-injected without resistance; visual assessment of the quality of the arterial waveform contour; adequate response to the flush test (square wave). If necessary, the best position for the signal quality will be checked by extending the wrist and manipulating the catheter. For each determination of Echo-Doppler (and ThD-CO when applicable), a corresponding value for MostCare must be obtained by averaging the individual beats over the same time necessary to obtain the Echo-doppler-CO (and ThD-CO when applicable) measurements.
- Echo-Doppler data acquisition (transoesophageal - TOE - or transthoracic - TTE - echo) Echo-Doppler-CO will be measured using the standard formula CSA x VTI (cross sectional area x velocity time integral x heart rate in ml/min). 2D measurement of the aortic annulus diameter allows calculation of the flow CSA which is then multiplied by the VTI (velocity time integral) of the Pulsed Doppler flow velocity profile across the aortic valve to determine the SV.
Other hemodynamic variables as an ancillary part of the study will compare shortening fraction (SF) or EF fraction from Echocardiography with CCE and dp/dt.
- Thermodilution data acquisition (ThD-CO) (when applicable) Data coming from ThD pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or a CVC + femoral artery catheter (transpulmonary thermodilution, PiCCO system) will be collected from the monitor itself or the system for patient monitoring used in the units.
For standard PAC-ThD-CO, five consecutive injections of 10 ml of 5% glucose cold solution will be randomly injected during respiratory cycle over a 5-min period. Thermodilution-CO (or PiCCO-CO) will be calculated as the average of the five measurements. All these 5 measurements will be collected.
MostCare, Echo-doppler (and Thermodilution when applicable) Change in ventilator parameters, sedation drugs, or fluid infusions or vasopressor dose will not be allowed during the acquisition time.
(*) Study timing and procedure
For each patient CO determinations will be performed as follows:
Mandatory measurements:
- Baseline: (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = single comparison between techniques.
Recorded but not mandatory measurements (fitting to the therapeutic protocol used in each center):
- Pre- and post- treatment (fluid challenge, vasoactive drugs and inotropics changes) (MostCare + Echo-doppler simultaneously, and MostCare + Echo-doppler + Thermodilution when applicable) = dynamic comparison between techniques (two measures). This will allow a sub-analysis of CO (the trend of CO) changes, validity of trend, for both SV and CO before and after a therapeutic intervention.
Data to be collected:
Patient: demographic, anthropometric, pre-medical history, indication(s) for ICU admission; (cardiovascular diseases and cardiac function, respiratory diseases, etc...), severity scores (SAPS II, SOFA, ….).
All patients enrolled will be analysed in intention-to-treat even data recording failed. In this case, that would be a limit if any, for the tested technique.
Hemodynamic MostCare: SV, HR, CO, CCE, ∆P/∆T, ABPs, ABPd, ABPm. Other hemodynamic data: CVP, PaoP, SvO2, lactate,... Echocardiography: stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output. Other hemodynamic variables are allowed to be collected by Echo according to the centre protocols and the experience of each centre.
Cardiac and vasoactive drugs dose or infusion rate will be collected: dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, nitrates, beta-blockers, ACE-I,ecc.
Ventilatory: mechanical ventilation settings: mode of ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, VC, PC), pressure support (if applicable), peak and plateau pressure, PEEP level, FiO2 oxygenation (SaO2, PaO2,…) ICU stay and outcome: morbidity (number and type of complications), length of stay, mortality.
(*) Statistical analysis and methodology, number of patients to be enrolled, duration of the study:
Collected data will be copied on an excel file to be properly independently analyzed with a statistical software. Correlation tests (Spearman or Pearson), Student paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analysis will be applied. A minimum of 30 patients per centre will be enrolled in the study in a period of 18 months.
This "minimum number" of patients is mandatory as: 1) the enrollment of 30 patients per centre eliminates the potential bias that may occur when few data come from a single centre, 2) minimum 300 patients enrolled represents a suitable number to obtain the "statistical power" necessary to validate the comparison between the different methods, and 3) further analysis and comparisons in subgroup of patients having similar clinical settings can be performed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients in Intensive Care Unit, under different clinical conditions
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients equipped with a standard arterial catheter-line (femoral or radial artery) for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring.
- Patients requiring an echocardiographic evaluation - Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation (TEE)or Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation (TOE) - as a routine need or in the context of Acute Cardiocirculatory failure with suspected implication of cardiac dysfunction or Acute Respiratory failure and suspicion of cardiac failure.
- *When a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC, standard bolus thermodilution, ThD) is used or a central venous catheter linked with a femoral artery catheter to measure the transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO system: Continuous pulse contour cardiac analysis), the comparison will be done as a secondary end point of the protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Related to MostCare:
- pathologies that could affect the quality and reliability of the arterial signal (aortic valve pathologies, aortic aneurysms) and arrhythmias that generate hemodynamic instability (i.e., variations in mean BP measurements > 10%); poor quality of the arterial pressure signal after a standard flush test (i.e., over-damped or under-damped arterial trace).
- Related to Echo-Doppler: non-feasibility to obtain a fulfilled quality of the images.
- Patients younger than 18.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
cardiac output
Time frame: comparison of monitoring systems
comparison of cardiac output monitoring systems
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2014.
Related trials for Cardiac Output Measurement
RecruitingObservational study
Urine Output Response to Fluid and Diuretic Therapy in Cardiac ICU Patients Monitored With FIZE kUO®
AKI - Acute Kidney Injury, Cardiac Surgery
Recruiting
Assessment of Pulmonary Perfusion and Hemodynamic Measurements by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy.
Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy, Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
CTICU Device Study CRUISE
Open Heart Surgery
Recruiting
Electrical Impedance Tomography for Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension
Pulmonary Hypertension, Pulmonary Thromboembolisms
RecruitingObservational study
Discontinuous Echocardiographic Subcostal Cardiac Output Measurement
Cardiac Output Measurement
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
14 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiac Output Measurement, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 14 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Italy, France, Spain, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cardiac output (time frame: comparison of monitoring systems). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2014.