Dental CariesNCT01683851
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation
An observational study of Dental Caries, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Hypothesis The use of Isolite® system does not produce upper airway obstruction in the pediatric population during dental treatment with conscious sedation. Purpose: Report the changes in airway patency and pediatric patient's behavior when Isolite® system is used for dental treatment with conscious sedation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 7 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries
- What is being tested?
- Isolite System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 7 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: Pediatric patients in need of a sedation dental appointment
Who may be able to join
- ASA I (no systemic disease), ASA II (mid systemic disease-well controlled)
- 4-7 years of age
- Patients English and Spanish speaking
Who cannot join
- Upper airway infection
- Craniofacial anomalies
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Texas Health Science Center-Dental School
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
University of Texas Health Science Center-Ricardo Salinas Dental Clinic
San Antonio, Texas, 78237
About this study
Official title: Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation: a Pilot Study to Assess the Upper Airway in a Pediatric Population
Hypothesis
The use of Isolite® system does not produce upper airway obstruction in the pediatric population during dental treatment with conscious sedation.
Purpose:
Report the changes in airway patency and pediatric patient's behavior when Isolite® system is used for dental treatment with conscious sedation.
Objectives:
- Determine changes in pulse rate
- Determine changes in SpO2
- Recognize breath sound's changes possibly associated with airway blockage
- Evaluate if the isolite® system is well tolerate by the pediatric population for dental treatment under conscious sedation
- Relate the use of Isolite® with the frequency of head reposition to open the airway.
Read the detailed description
Report the changes in airway patency and pediatric patient's behavior when Isolite® system is used for dental treatment with conscious sedation.
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Being tested
- Isolite System
- Keywords
- pediatric, conscious sedation, mouthpiece, airway, isolite system
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Isolite SystemDevice
Also called Isolite
A type of isolation system used in dentistry. It protects soft tissues, and also has a mouth prop, which helps keep mouth open.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation
In this study all patients were Mallampati 1 and Brodsky 2. The device comes in 4 sizes: pedo, small, medium and large. The most commonly used was pedo 65% (13) and small 35% (7). Eighty percent (16) of sedations had a satisfactory experience with Isolite ®, Twenty percent (4) had unsatisfactory outcome due to disruptive behavior. Of these 4 cases 2 patients were medicated with meperidine + hydroxyzine and the other 2 with midazolam.
Fifty percent (8) of the patients successfully treated with Isolite ® experienced snoring and head reposition was performed to open airway. The level of sedation according to the AAPD guidelines was moderate in these events in which snoring occurred. The concentration of nitrous oxide-oxygen was adjusted so that more oxygen was given and the patient would be more alert. No significant changes in SpO2 (mean 99.8) or pulse were observed (mean 90.6).
Measured: 120 minutes (sedation appointment time)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation
Finally, it is important to recognize that this is a pilot study with limitations, including:
- A small number of participants
- No group control
Therefore, this study's findings need to be tempered by implications contained within these limitations and further research seems indicated.
Conclusions:
The results of this pilot study suggest the following conclusions:
- Isolite ® may be safely used during pediatric dental treatment under conscious sedation.
- The successful use of Isolite ® is related to the patient's behavior. The weakness aspect of Isolite ® is the soft bite block that allows the youngest patients to chew on it.
Therefore, this study's findings need to be tempered by implications contained within these limitations and further research seems indicated.
Measured: 120 minutes (sedation appointment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claudia Isabel Contreras, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Investigators
- Claudia I Contreras, DDS, Principal investigator, University of Texas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01683851
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC200120233H
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kameyama A, Asami M, Noro A, Abo H, Hirai Y, Tsunoda M. The effects of three dry-field techniques on intraoral temperature and relative humidity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Mar;142(3):274-80. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0166.
PubMed 21357861Pena BM, Krauss B. Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
PubMed 10499949Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):633-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.633.
PubMed 11015502Cote CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):805-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.805.
PubMed 10742324Noro A, Kameyama A, Asami M, Sugiyama T, Morinaga K, Kondou Y, Tsunoda M. Clinical usefulness of "Isolite Plus" for oral environment of Japanese people. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2009 Aug;50(3):149-55. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.50.149.
PubMed 19887758Collette J, Wilson S, Sullivan D. A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: efficacy and patient acceptance. Pediatr Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;32(2):146-50.
PubMed 20483019American Academy on Pediatrics; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):143-59.
PubMed 19216414Leelataweedwud P, Vann WF Jr. Adverse events and outcomes of conscious sedation for pediatric patients: study of an oral sedation regimen. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Nov;132(11):1531-9; quiz 1596. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0086.
PubMed 11811136Meurice JC, Marc I, Carrier G, Series F. Effects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;153(1):255-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542125.
PubMed 8542125MORIKAWA S, SAFAR P, DECARLO J. Influence of the headjaw position upon upper airway patency. Anesthesiology. 1961 Mar-Apr;22:265-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196103000-00016. No abstract available.
PubMed 13772661Verin E, Series F, Locher C, Straus C, Zelter M, Derenne JP, Similowski T. Effects of neck flexion and mouth opening on inspiratory flow dynamics in awake humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Jan;92(1):84-92. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2002.92.1.84.
PubMed 11744646Dickison AE. The normal and abnormal pediatric upper airway. Recognition and management of obstruction. Clin Chest Med. 1987 Dec;8(4):583-96.
PubMed 3322644Iwatani K, Matsuo K, Kawase S, Wakimoto N, Taguchi A, Ogasawara T. Effects of open mouth and rubber dam on upper airway patency and breathing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jun;17(5):1295-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0810-5. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
PubMed 22864529Ito H, Kawaai H, Yamazaki S, Suzuki Y. Maximum opening of the mouth by mouth prop during dental procedures increases the risk of upper airway constriction. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010 May 25;6:239-48. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s10187.
PubMed 20526442Bingham RM, Proctor LT. Airway management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;55(4):873-86, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.004.
PubMed 18675024
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation: a Pilot Study to Assess the Upper Airway in a Pediatric Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01683851
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC200120233H
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Keywords
- pediatric, conscious sedation, mouthpiece, airway, isolite system
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis
The use of Isolite® system does not produce upper airway obstruction in the pediatric population during dental treatment with conscious sedation.
Purpose:
Report the changes in airway patency and pediatric patient's behavior when Isolite® system is used for dental treatment with conscious sedation.
Objectives:
- Determine changes in pulse rate
- Determine changes in SpO2
- Recognize breath sound's changes possibly associated with airway blockage
- Evaluate if the isolite® system is well tolerate by the pediatric population for dental treatment under conscious sedation
- Relate the use of Isolite® with the frequency of head reposition to open the airway.
Detailed description
Report the changes in airway patency and pediatric patient's behavior when Isolite® system is used for dental treatment with conscious sedation.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 7 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Pediatric patients in need of a sedation dental appointment
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA I (no systemic disease), ASA II (mid systemic disease-well controlled)
- 4-7 years of age
- Patients English and Spanish speaking
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Upper airway infection
- Craniofacial anomalies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Isolite SystemAlso: IsoliteA type of isolation system used in dentistry. It protects soft tissues, and also has a mouth prop, which helps keep mouth open. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation
Time frame: 120 minutes (sedation appointment time)
In this study all patients were Mallampati 1 and Brodsky 2. The device comes in 4 sizes: pedo, small, medium and large. The most commonly used was pedo 65% (13) and small 35% (7). Eighty percent (16) of sedations had a satisfactory experience with Isolite ®, Twenty percent (4) had unsatisfactory outcome due to disruptive behavior. Of these 4 cases 2 patients were medicated with meperidine + hydroxyzine and the other 2 with midazolam. Fifty percent (8) of the patients successfully treated with Isolite ® experienced snoring and head reposition was performed to open airway. The level of sedation according to the AAPD guidelines was moderate in these events in which snoring occurred. The concentration of nitrous oxide-oxygen was adjusted so that more oxygen was given and the patient would be more alert. No significant changes in SpO2 (mean 99.8) or pulse were observed (mean 90.6).
1 secondary outcome
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation
Time frame: 120 minutes (sedation appointment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 21357861Kameyama A, Asami M, Noro A, Abo H, Hirai Y, Tsunoda M. The effects of three dry-field techniques on intraoral temperature and relative humidity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Mar;142(3):274-80. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0166.
- Background: PubMed 10499949Pena BM, Krauss B. Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
- Background: PubMed 11015502Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):633-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.633.
- Background: PubMed 10742324Cote CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):805-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.805.
- Background: PubMed 19887758Noro A, Kameyama A, Asami M, Sugiyama T, Morinaga K, Kondou Y, Tsunoda M. Clinical usefulness of "Isolite Plus" for oral environment of Japanese people. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2009 Aug;50(3):149-55. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.50.149.
- Background: PubMed 20483019Collette J, Wilson S, Sullivan D. A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: efficacy and patient acceptance. Pediatr Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;32(2):146-50.
- Background: PubMed 19216414American Academy on Pediatrics; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):143-59.
- Background: PubMed 11811136Leelataweedwud P, Vann WF Jr. Adverse events and outcomes of conscious sedation for pediatric patients: study of an oral sedation regimen. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Nov;132(11):1531-9; quiz 1596. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0086.
- Background: PubMed 8542125Meurice JC, Marc I, Carrier G, Series F. Effects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;153(1):255-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542125.
- Background: PubMed 13772661MORIKAWA S, SAFAR P, DECARLO J. Influence of the headjaw position upon upper airway patency. Anesthesiology. 1961 Mar-Apr;22:265-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196103000-00016. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11744646Verin E, Series F, Locher C, Straus C, Zelter M, Derenne JP, Similowski T. Effects of neck flexion and mouth opening on inspiratory flow dynamics in awake humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Jan;92(1):84-92. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2002.92.1.84.
- Background: PubMed 3322644Dickison AE. The normal and abnormal pediatric upper airway. Recognition and management of obstruction. Clin Chest Med. 1987 Dec;8(4):583-96.
Related trials for Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claudia I Contreras, DDS principal investigator
University of Texas
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Dental Caries, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Isolite and Dental Treatment Under Conscious Sedation (time frame: 120 minutes (sedation appointment time)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01683851, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2013.