AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental CariesNCT07902323

Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings

A study testing Xylitol and Erythritol in people with Dental Caries and Dental Plaque, run by Loma Linda University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the effectiveness of erythritol and xylitol in suppressing biofilm activity, using both within-subject and between-group comparisons. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
What is being tested?
Xylitol and Erythritol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2026to Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects are 18 years or older;
  • Subjects who will comply with study protocol;
  • Subjects who can read and understand the consent form;
  • Subjects available during the study period;
  • Subjects have 20 or more natural teeth.

Who cannot join

  • Allergy or intolerance to study product ingredients;
  • Systemic antibiotic use within the preceding 30 days;
  • Active oral infections;
  • History of systemic diseases.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

So Ran Kwon, DDS, MS, PhD contact

909-558-4621

sorankwon@llu.edu

About this study

Official title: Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)-Bioluminescence Readings: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will assess the effectiveness of erythritol and xylitol in suppressing biofilm activity, using both within-subject and between-group comparisons.

Read the detailed description

Xylitol and erythritol are sugar alcohols that cariogenic bacteria cannot readily ferment. Most clinical evidence comes from chewing gum; few studies have tested polyol mints in people, and none has compared xylitol and erythritol mints with a real-time measure of plaque activity.

This is a single-center, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, examiner-blinded trial in 80 healthy adults at Loma Linda University School of Dentistry. The randomization sequence is generated in jamovi. The xylitol group takes two Epic Xylitol mints (about 0.25 g xylitol each) twice daily; the erythritol group takes one DC24 Daily Care erythritol mint (about 0.5 g erythritol) twice daily. Both groups receive about 1 g of polyol per day for 7 days.

Participants arrive in the morning without brushing or eating. A trained, calibrated examiner who does not know the group assignment swabs the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth for about 5 seconds, and the CariScreen meter reports a reading from 0 to 9,999 within about 15 seconds. A different, unblinded team member handles randomization and dispenses the mints. Measurements are taken at Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (after one week). Participants avoid other sugar-alcohol products during the study week. Adverse events are reviewed at Visit 2.

Being tested
Xylitol, Erythritol
Keywords
Biofilm, Sugar, xylitol, erythritol
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XylitolDietary supplement

    Participants will consume two Epic Xylitol mints (~0.25 g xylitol each) twice daily for one week

  • ErythritolDietary supplement

    Participants will consume one DC24 erythritol mint (~0.5 g erythritol) twice daily for one week

Study groups in NCT07902323
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XylitolActive comparatorTwo Epic Xylitol mints (about 0.25 g xylitol each) dissolved in the mouth twice daily for one week, about 1 g xylitol per day.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Xylitol
ErythritolActive comparatorOne DC24 Daily Care erythritol mint (about 0.5 g erythritol) dissolved in the mouth twice daily for one week, about 1 g erythritol per day.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Erythritol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Biofilm Metabolic Activity Assessment with Xylitol

    Plaque from the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth is swabbed and read immediately with the CariScreen ATP meter (relative light units, 0-9,999; higher = more bacterial metabolic activity). Change = 1 week post-baseline minus baseline, reported within each arm.

    Measured: Change in biofilm activity between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (1 week post-baseline)

  2. Biofilm Metabolic Activity Assessment with Erythritol

    Plaque from the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth is swabbed and read immediately with the CariScreen ATP meter (relative light units, 0-9,999; higher = more bacterial metabolic activity). Change = 1 week post-baseline minus baseline, reported within each arm.

    Measured: Change in biofilm activity between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (1 week post-baseline)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in ATP reading by baseline caries risk category

    Change from baseline in CariScreen reading, by American Dental Association (ADA) Caries Risk Assessment category (low, moderate, high).

    Measured: Change in biofilm activity between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (1 week post-baseline) by risk category (low, moderate, high)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are randomized 1:1 to xylitol mints or erythritol mints for one week.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07902323
Sponsor's protocol ID
SRK1234
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
21 Oct 2026
Last updated
28 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Burt BA. The use of sorbitol- and xylitol-sweetened chewing gum in caries control. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;137(2):190-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0144.

    PubMed 16521385
  • Soderling E, Pienihakkinen K. Effects of xylitol and erythritol consumption on mutans streptococci and the oral microbiota: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Nov;78(8):599-608. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1788721. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

    PubMed 32633595
  • Salli KM, Gursoy UK, Soderling EM, Ouwehand AC. Effects of Xylitol and Sucrose Mint Products on Streptococcus mutans Colonization in a Dental Simulator Model. Curr Microbiol. 2017 Oct;74(10):1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1299-6. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

    PubMed 28717846
  • Rechmann P, Chaffee BW, Rechmann BMT, Featherstone JDB. Efficacy of an adenosine triphosphate meter for evaluating caries risk in clinical dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Oct;150(10):873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

    PubMed 31472759
  • Martins ML, Monteiro ASN, Vieira TI, Guimaraes MBCT, de Abreu LCL, Cabral LM, Cavalcanti YW, Maia LC, Fonseca-Goncalves A. Effect of xylitol tablets with and without red propolis on salivary parameters, dental biofilm and sensory acceptability of adolescents: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Biofouling. 2020 Nov;36(10):1182-1195. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1858063. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

    PubMed 33334195

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Xylitol and Erythritol in people with Dental Caries and Dental Plaque, run by Loma Linda University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact So Ran Kwon, DDS, MS, PhD (909-558-4621, sorankwon@llu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Biofilm Metabolic Activity Assessment with Xylitol (time frame: Change in biofilm activity between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (1 week post-baseline)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07902323, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in