GlaucomaPhase 3SLTRepeatNCT01687465
A Trial to Compare the Laser Treatment (SLT vs. ALT) in Glaucoma Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Argon laser trabeculoplasty and Selective laser trabeculoplasty in people with Glaucoma, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 7 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Lasers are important therapy in glaucoma. They are a pivotal point in treatment between medical and surgical care. Over the last 10 years a new laser has emerged as the usual laser treatment: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). SLT works as well as the older laser used: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- Argon laser trabeculoplasty and Selective laser trabeculoplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over age of 18 yo.
- OAG including pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pseudoexfoliation
- OAG has been treated with 360 degrees of SLT
- two sighted eyes,
- willing to participate after being informed of and reading the patient information material.
Who cannot join
- Narrow angle glaucoma
- Previous glaucoma surgery
- Eye surgery expected in the next 12 months
- Severe corneal disease
- On or anticipated steroid in 6 months
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Canada7 sites
Rockyview General Hospital, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T3E 7M8
Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9
Eye Care Centre, Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2R1
McMaser University, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, CAHS Regional Eye Institute
Hamilton, Ontario, L8G 5E4
Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital, Western University
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
McGill University, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital,
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) in Open Angle Glaucoma Who Had Been Previously Treated With Complete SLT
Lasers are important therapy in glaucoma. They are a pivotal point in treatment between medical and surgical care. Over the last 10 years a new laser has emerged as the usual laser treatment: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). SLT works as well as the older laser used: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). However SLT has many theoretical benefits over ALT including causing less damage to the tissue it affects. One of the potential patient centered benefits of this laser is that it may be repeatable. It is even possible that the old laser ALT may be useable after an SLT treatment. This study aims to uncover whether repeat laser is possible after SLT and if so which laser is more effective (ALT vs SLT). The potential of repeating laser therapies may delay surgical treatment and its complications. Also understanding which laser to use will help eye doctors know how to treat their patients at this point of the disease.
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Being tested
- Argon laser trabeculoplasty, Selective laser trabeculoplasty
- Keywords
- glaucoma, laser, SLT, ALT
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Argon laser trabeculoplastyProcedure or surgery
With Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), thermal energy is used directed towards the Trabecular Meshwork (the site of aqueous drainage from the eye),which causes focal scarring of trabecular meshwork, thus enable fluid drainage more effectively. However, this procedure may not be repeatable since it causes too much damage to the trabecular meshwork.
Selective laser trabeculoplastyProcedure or surgery
Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a relatively newer technology that uses a Nd:YAG laser to target specific cells within the trabecular meshwork. SLT does not cause coagulative damage to the trabecular meshwork, and thus has the advantage of being repeatable.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Argon laser trabeculoplasty | Active comparator | Up to the year 2005, the vast majority of ophthalmologists used Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) as the mode of laser therapy. ALT is effective but its most significant problem is that its effectiveness decreases with re-treatment since the tissue it targets (the trabecular meshwork) is changed by the laser rendering repeat treatments less effective. Receives: Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty; Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty |
| selective laser trabeculoplasty | Active comparator | Post 2005, a newer mode of laser therapy, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) has emerged as the standard of care laser. There are many potential advantages to SLT but to date these advantages are only theoretical. The most important potential clinical advantage of SLT is that it causes less damage to the tissue it targets. Receives: Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty; Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraocular Pressure
IOP difference between baseline and 12 month post-laser.
Measured: 12 months post operatively
Secondary outcomes (5)
To compare the IOP lowering effect between the groups at other postoperative visits
IOP difference between baseline, 1hr, 1 wk, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 mon post-laser.
Measured: 12 months
To compare the visual acuity between the groups at all visits.
VA difference between baseline, 1hr, 1 wk, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 mon post-laser.
Measured: 12 months
To compare the trabecular meshwork pigmentation between the groups at all visits.
Measured: 12 months
To compare any adverse events between the two groups at all visits.
Measured: 12 months
SLT repeatability of long term follow up in glaucoma patients
The follow up time has been extended two more years. Patients will be followed up Q6 months.
Measured: 36 months after initial enrollment of the primary study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionMar 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, William Hodge, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- William G Hodge, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Lawson Research Institute, Univ. of Western Ontario
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01687465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIHR granted glaucoma RCT
- Acronym
- SLTRepeat
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rolim-de-Moura CR, Paranhos A Jr, Loutfi M, Burton D, Wormald R, Evans JR. Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub3.
PubMed 35943114Hutnik C, Crichton A, Ford B, Nicolela M, Shuba L, Birt C, Sogbesan E, Damji KF, Dorey M, Saheb H, Klar N, Guo H, Hodge W. Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Glaucoma Patients Treated Previously with 360 degrees Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Equivalence Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
PubMed 30278197
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) in Open Angle Glaucoma Who Had Been Previously Treated With Complete SLT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01687465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SLTRepeat / CIHR granted glaucoma RCT
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Keywords
- glaucoma, laser, SLT, ALT
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lasers are important therapy in glaucoma. They are a pivotal point in treatment between medical and surgical care. Over the last 10 years a new laser has emerged as the usual laser treatment: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). SLT works as well as the older laser used: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). However SLT has many theoretical benefits over ALT including causing less damage to the tissue it affects. One of the potential patient centered benefits of this laser is that it may be repeatable. It is even possible that the old laser ALT may be useable after an SLT treatment. This study aims to uncover whether repeat laser is possible after SLT and if so which laser is more effective (ALT vs SLT). The potential of repeating laser therapies may delay surgical treatment and its complications. Also understanding which laser to use will help eye doctors know how to treat their patients at this point of the disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Argon laser trabeculoplasty | Active comparator | Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty, Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplastyUp to the year 2005, the vast majority of ophthalmologists used Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) as the mode of laser therapy. ALT is effective but its most significant problem is that its effectiveness decreases with re-treatment since the tissue it targets (the trabecular meshwork) is changed by the laser rendering repeat treatments less effective. |
| selective laser trabeculoplasty | Active comparator | Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty, Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplastyPost 2005, a newer mode of laser therapy, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) has emerged as the standard of care laser. There are many potential advantages to SLT but to date these advantages are only theoretical. The most important potential clinical advantage of SLT is that it causes less damage to the tissue it targets. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Over age of 18 yo.
- OAG including pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pseudoexfoliation
- OAG has been treated with 360 degrees of SLT
- two sighted eyes,
- willing to participate after being informed of and reading the patient information material.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Narrow angle glaucoma
- Previous glaucoma surgery
- Eye surgery expected in the next 12 months
- Severe corneal disease
- On or anticipated steroid in 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Argon laser trabeculoplastyWith Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), thermal energy is used directed towards the Trabecular Meshwork (the site of aqueous drainage from the eye),which causes focal scarring of trabecular meshwork, thus enable fluid drainage more effectively. However, this procedure may not be repeatable since it causes too much damage to the trabecular meshwork. | Procedure or surgery | Argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty |
| Selective laser trabeculoplastySelective laser trabeculoplasty is a relatively newer technology that uses a Nd:YAG laser to target specific cells within the trabecular meshwork. SLT does not cause coagulative damage to the trabecular meshwork, and thus has the advantage of being repeatable. | Procedure or surgery | Argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty |
Primary outcome
Intraocular Pressure
Time frame: 12 months post operatively
IOP difference between baseline and 12 month post-laser.
5 secondary outcomes
To compare the IOP lowering effect between the groups at other postoperative visits
Time frame: 12 months
To compare the visual acuity between the groups at all visits.
Time frame: 12 months
To compare the trabecular meshwork pigmentation between the groups at all visits.
Time frame: 12 months
To compare any adverse events between the two groups at all visits.
Time frame: 12 months
SLT repeatability of long term follow up in glaucoma patients
Time frame: 36 months after initial enrollment of the primary study
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35943114Rolim-de-Moura CR, Paranhos A Jr, Loutfi M, Burton D, Wormald R, Evans JR. Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30278197Hutnik C, Crichton A, Ford B, Nicolela M, Shuba L, Birt C, Sogbesan E, Damji KF, Dorey M, Saheb H, Klar N, Guo H, Hodge W. Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Glaucoma Patients Treated Previously with 360 degrees Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Equivalence Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
Related trials for Glaucoma
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
AI-Assisted vs Conventional Teleglaucoma Referral
Glaucoma
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
Recruiting
Automated Applanation Tonometry - Updated
Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Suspect
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pregabalin Eye Drops Comparing With Timolol Eye Drops in Adults With Glaucoma or High Eye Pressure.
Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William G Hodge, MD, PhD principal investigator
Lawson Research Institute, Univ. of Western Ontario
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Argon laser trabeculoplasty and Selective laser trabeculoplasty in people with Glaucoma, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 7 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraocular Pressure (time frame: 12 months post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01687465, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2018.