AzTrials
AzTrials

Persian Gulf SyndromePhase 2GWINISNCT01700725

Gulf War Illness Nasal Irrigation Study

A Phase 2 study testing Nasal Irrigation - Saline and Nasal Irrigation - Xylitol in people with Persian Gulf Syndrome and Chronic Sinusitis, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal irrigation with Xylitol or saline are effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and fatigue symptoms associated with Gulf War Illness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Persian Gulf Syndrome, Chronic Sinusitis, Fatigue
What is being tested?
Nasal Irrigation - Saline and Nasal Irrigation - Xylitol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2012to May 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English fluency and basic reading and writing literacy.
  • Deployment to the Persian Gulf (e.g., Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia) for the purpose of Operation Desert Shield or Operation Desert Storm during the first Gulf War (1990-1991).
  • Meeting criteria for a diagnosis of GWI as based on the "Kansas" GWI case definition; only the Kansas case definition (from among the several currently used case definitions) can differentiate between Gulf War-deployed and non-deployed Gulf era veterans.
  • Meeting criteria for a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) using self-reported symptoms and based on clinical guidelines; eligible subjects will report: • sinonasal symptoms for at least 12 weeks; • a constellation of sinonasal symptoms including either two or more major factors, or 1 major and 2 minor factors (see Table 1 below), or chronic nasal purulence for 12 or more weeks; and • a moderate to severe HRQoL impact (≥ 3 points on a 0-10 Likert severity scale) as assessed by a single item question:11 "What has been the average level of your sinus symptoms daily over the past month on a 0-10 scale?" This item is consistent with eligibility criteria used in prior NI studies.
  • Chronic fatigue of moderate-to-severe severity defined as scoring at least 3 points on a single question (0-10 Likert scale): "What has been the average level of your daily fatigue over the past month on a 0-10 scale?"

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported pregnancy.
  • Current use of liquid NI or xylitol nasal spray; regular use is defined as 1 or more irrigations weekly for 3 consecutive weeks.
  • Self-reported neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that could facilitate aspiration, or patients who otherwise cannot physically perform the NI procedure.
  • Self-reported borderline personality disorder.
  • Inability or stated reluctance to reliably participate in study activities.
  • Severe or unstable mental health problems that would preclude safe or reliable study participation as based on an in-person evaluation by a psychiatry team; active delusional disorder, depressive disorder or alcohol/drug abuse or dependence will be a primary target of this interview using both a structured clinical interview (MINI ref) and psychiatry team evaluation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Nasal Irrigation for Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Fatigue in Patients With Gulf War Illness

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal irrigation with Xylitol or saline are effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and fatigue symptoms associated with Gulf War Illness.

Read the detailed description

Background: Gulf War Illness (GWI) results in tremendous impact to quality of life. Symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and fatigue are the first (47%) and third (41%) most common symptoms of patients with GWI, respectively. These symptoms are biologically characterized by a milieu of elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines; to date, the profile of these cytokines in serum and nasal secretions is incompletely understood and has not been assessed in response to therapy. Nasal irrigation (NI) is a therapy which bathes the nasal cavity with a solution (liquid). There are two promising forms of NI; saline NI (S-NI) is hypothesized to improve sinus symptoms by thinning and clearing mucus and inflammatory mediators, decreasing mucosal edema and improving ciliary function. Xylitol NI (X-NI) has been shown to change the salinity of the mucosal surface resulting in enhanced antimicrobial properties. Although NI is an evidence-based adjunctive therapy for CRS and has been reported to be effective for CRS and fatigue, it has not been assessed in a GWI population.

Specific Aims, Hypotheses and Study Design: The specific aims of this proposal are to determine whether routine care plus S-NI, or X-NI, compared to routine care alone, result in improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are cost-effective and decrease proinflammatory bias in subjects with GWI who suffer from CRS and fatigue.

Consistent with our specific aims, we will test the following hypotheses: In an RCT setting, at 26 weeks post-enrollment, adults with GWI and symptoms of CRI and fatigue, treated with routine care plus S-NI or X-NI, compared to those treated with routine care alone, will demonstrate:

H1: improved HRQoL: a) sinus-disease specific HRQoL as evaluated by the validated Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-20) questionnaire (primary outcome measure); b) fatigue-specific HRQoL as assessed by the validated questionnaire, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI); and c) overall HRQoL as assessed by the validated questionnaire the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36; mental and physical health domains) augmented with 18 sleep- and breathing related questions.

H.2: greater cost-effectiveness as measured by the average cost of the intervention divided by the average effectiveness (as assessed by a improvement in SNOT-20 scores), and reported as the "dollars spent per subject restored to health."

H.3: improved treatment satisfaction as assessed by a single-item treatment satisfaction score and a qualitative exit interview.

H.4: improved proinflammatory bias: a) reduced activation and dysregulation of proinflammatory pathways as determined by a reduction in URI-specific inflammatory cytokines in serum and nasal secretions; and b) improved serum-based complete blood count, sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, or nasal swab-based neutrophil or eosinophil counts.

Study Design: 26 week duration of follow-up, 3-arm RCT (N=75). All groups will utilize routine care for their GWI and symptoms of CRS and fatigue. Groups 1 and 2 will in addition add S-NI or X-NI twice daily to their routine care, respectively. Group 3 will continue to use routine care with no other additions (control group); control group participants will be offered NI training and related materials (xylitol or saline per subject preference) after they complete their 26-week follow-up period.

Impact: Positive findings would suggest a number of important effects:

  • Statistically positive results on HRQoL outcome measures would suggest that NI can provide effective adjunctive therapy for CRS and fatigue in adults with GWI, improving health of affected patients and potentially providing gains to society through reduced health care utilization and absenteeism related costs.
  • Positive biomarker findings would contribute to our better understanding of the etiology of CRS and fatigue in the GWI population and of possible biological pathways underlying the NI efficacy.
  • The finding that either form of NI is cost effective would provide economic justification for its clinical use.
Being tested
Nasal Irrigation - Saline, Nasal Irrigation - Xylitol
Keywords
Gulf War Illness, xylitol, nasal irrigation, Desert Storm, Persian Gulf Conflicts, neti pot, cytokines, nasal mucus, inflammatory mediator, lactoferrin, lysozyme
Medical subject headings
Persian Gulf Syndrome, Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nasal Irrigation - SalineOther

    Also called 2% buffered saline

    Liquid-based nasal irrigation (NI) is performed using a nasal irrigation cup ("neti pot"), a simple hand-held vessel that uses the force of gravity to gently irrigate the user's nasal cavity. Subjects will be requested to perform NI twice daily. The subjects will prepare the saline solution by themselves using the study-provided kit which will include packets of salt powder and the neti pot; subjects will dissolve the powder in lukewarm tap water to achieve a 2% buffered saline solution. The solution is then delivered to the nasal cavity using neti pot.

  • Nasal Irrigation - XylitolDrug

    Also called 5% Xylitol solution

    Liquid-based nasal irrigation (NI) is performed using a nasal irrigation cup ("neti pot"), a simple hand-held vessel that uses the force of gravity to gently irrigate the user's nasal cavity. Subjects will be requested to perform NI twice daily. The subjects will prepare the Xylitol solution by themselves using the study-provided kit which will include packets of Xylitol powder and the neti pot; subjects will dissolve the powder in lukewarm tap water to achieve a 5% Xylitol solution. The solution is then delivered to the nasal cavity using neti pot.

Study groups in NCT01700725
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nasal Irrigation - SalineExperimentalnasal irrigation using saline plus routine care for symptoms of CRS and fatigue
Receives: Other: Nasal Irrigation - Saline
Nasal Irrigation - XylitolExperimentalNasal Irrigation with Xylitol plus routine care for symptoms of CRS and fatigue
Receives: Drug: Nasal Irrigation - Xylitol
Control GroupNo interventionControl group subjects continue to use routine care only

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) Score From Baseline

    Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) is a recommended tool for clinical trial research involving CRS. Sinus disease specific quality of life will be measured using the total score of this validated 20 item questionnaire. It is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with CRS (Cronbach's α 0.9, test-retest r = 0.9) that describes the health burden and is sensitive to clinical change. Patients who are more affected by CRS tend to have greater SNOT-20 scores (P < 0.01). The SNOT-20 score is expected to improve in NI-treated subjects compared to controls. Findings of the PI's prior RCT of adults with CRS are consistent with the above evidence. The total range of possible scores is 0-100. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.

    Measured: Change from baseline week 8, change from baseline week 26

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Over Baseline

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory is a validated disease specific outcome measure for fatigue. The instrument has good internal consistency (average Cronbach's alpha 0.84). Construct validity was established after comparisons between and within groups, assuming differences in fatigue based on differences in circumstances and/or activity level. Convergent validity was investigated by correlating the MFI-scales with a Visual Analogue Scale measuring fatigue. Fatigue is expected to improve in the NI-treated patients compared to controls. The total range of possible scores is 0-100. The higher the score, the more fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline to weeks 8 & 26

  2. Change in Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) Over Baseline

    SF-36 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess health status, function and overall health related quality of life. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. Gulf War Illness and chronic rhinosinusitis both affect sleep and breathing parameters. Prior studies suggest that both may be improved with SNI in some subjects. Eighteen relevant sleep and breathing related questions to the SF-36. The total range is 0-100. The lower the score, the more disability.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 8 & 26

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01700725
Sponsor's protocol ID
GW100054 US Dept of Defense
Other IDs
2011-0843
Acronym
GWINIS
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
14 Aug 2012
Last updated
21 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hayer SD, Rabago DP, Amaza IP, Kille T, Coe CL, Zgierska A, Zakletskaia L, Mundt MP, Krahn D, Obasi CN, Molander RC. Effectiveness of nasal irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis and fatigue in patients with Gulf War illness: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

    PubMed 25625809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Nasal Irrigation - Saline and Nasal Irrigation - Xylitol in people with Persian Gulf Syndrome and Chronic Sinusitis, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) Score From Baseline (time frame: Change from baseline week 8, change from baseline week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01700725, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in