Type 2 Diabetes MellitusDINGSNCT01703611
Diabetes in India Nutrition Guidelines Study (DINGS)
A study testing MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM and Usual Nutrition Care in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics at 14 sites in India.
Trial summary
A clinical trial to compare the patient outcomes from usual nutrition therapy by dietitians in India to patient outcomes from guideline-based Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM and Usual Nutrition Care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 238 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesIndia
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- RD and Indian ICC CDE RD
- Active practice (at least two years post-professional degree), with enough newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients or patients not seen by an RD for the previous year, to be able to recruit four to six of them into the study each week
- Work in an Diabetes centers and hospital diabetes outpatient or private practice with diabetologist to provide medical oversight for study
- Have written approval from immediate supervisor and diabetologist indicating that MNT visits can be provided without cost to research study in accordance with ADA EBNPG and data collection can be accommodated.
- Have computer and internet access. Minimum requirements are Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 with 1024 x 768 screen resolution in 256 colors. The browser must be enabled for Java, JavaScript and cookies
- Have stable internet connection (no prolonged periods without or frequent disruptions in internet service
Show all 11Show fewer
- Have land phone line and faxing capabilities
- Able to provide data documentation electronically or in a paper format
- Obtain approval from their facility's Independent Ethics Committee (equivalent to US Institutional Review Board) for participation in the study (if required by the institution)
- Able to adjust the institution's habitual counseling session schedule and duration as required by the study protocol
- Commit to attendance during the full course of face to face training for three days (including part of a weekend), to be held at Chennai, India, and participate in the Webinars and conference calls
Who cannot join
- Small clientele of adult type 2 DM,
- Fewer than two years' active clinical practice experience post-professional degree,
- Unable to comply with the other inclusion criteria (see inclusion section above).
- Patient Participant
- Patients' Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be over 19 years of age
Show all 31Show fewer
- Must have medical diagnosis for treatment of type 2 DM,
- Patient must agree to return for follow-up visits (or data collection visit) during the 12 months study period
- Not seen by RD for one year prior to being recruited to the study
- Patients' Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently being seen by RD for MNT
- Participated in nutritional consults with RD in past year
- Having insulin prescribed for DM treatment at time of recruitment
- Pregnant or lactating at time of study
- History of end stage renal disease or renal insufficiency; history of CVA, CAD or MI; COPD; CHF; untreated depression; severe psychiatric illness; cancer diagnosis in previous two years or on-going radiation or chemotherapy treatment
- Unplanned surgery requiring more than one overnight stay in the hospital within the previous week to initial visit
- The presence of cognitive or physical limitations that preclude making lifestyle or dietary changes as assessed by the RD during the initial interview
- Unable to return to office for data collection at 6 and 12 months and unable to commit to follow-up visits for EBNPG.
- Patient Dis-enrollment or Stop Point for Study Participation
- Patient will no longer be in the study after he/she reports the onset of:
- End stage renal disease or renal insufficiency;
- CVA, CAD or MI;
- COPD;
- Depression, severe psychiatric illness;
- Cancer diagnosis and treatment;
- CHF;
- Unplanned surgery requiring more than one overnight stay in the hospital within the previous week;
- Pregnant,
- Any onset of cognitive or physical limitations that preclude making lifestyle or dietary changes per RD assessment during study period,
- Other acute/chronic complications that could exacerbate the patient's diabetic condition or general well-being.
- Physician starts injectable insulin therapy
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
India14 sites
Dia Care 1 & 2
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380015
Malabar Institute of Medical Sciences
Calicut, Kerala
Sundaram Medical Foundation
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600040
PSG Hospitals
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641004
Fortis Escorts Hospital
Faridabad, Haryana, 121007
Asian Institute of Medical Sciences
Faridabad, Haryana
Barman Diabetes Specialties
Guwahati, Assam
Star Hospitals
Hyderabad, Pradesh
Santokba Durlabji Memorial Hospital
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302015
Caritis Hospital
Kottayam, Kerala
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute
Lucknow, 226014
BhaktiVedanta Hospital
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Fortis Hospital
Uttar Pradesh
Nagajuna Hospital
Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 520007
About this study
A clinical trial to compare the patient outcomes from usual nutrition therapy by dietitians in India to patient outcomes from guideline-based Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT).
Read the detailed description
A cluster randomized clinical trial to compare patient outcomes from two different nutrition interventions by dietitians in India for persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (usual care vs Medical Nutrition Therapy provided according to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines)
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM, Usual Nutrition Care
- Keywords
- Nutrition, Medical Nutrition Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Nutrition outcomes, Evidence Based Guidelines
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DMOther
Also called Nutrition Counseling, Nutrition Care, Nutrition Therapy, Evidence Based Nutrition Practice
Six or more Medical Nutrition Therapy visits(education and counseling on diet, self management, and lifestyle changes) provided over a 12 month period according to Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic Evidence Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines (EBNPG)(www.guidelines.gov)
Usual Nutrition CareOther
Also called Nutrition Counselling, Nutrition Therapy
Usual nutrition care in India
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM | Experimental | Six or more Medical Nutrition Therapy visits(education and counseling on diet, self management, and lifestyle changes) provided over a 12 month period according to Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic Evidence Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines (EBPGN) (www.guidelines.gov) Receives: Other: MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM |
| Usual Nutrition Care | Active comparator | Visits for usual nutrition therapy (diet and lifestyle changes) provided by dietitians over a 12 month period. Receives: Other: Usual Nutrition Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HbAIc decrease
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Weight change
Measured: 6 month and 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Indian Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Abbott Healthcare Private Limited (in India)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Esther F Myers, PhD, Principal investigator, Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsVarsha (none), PhD, Principal investigator, Shri Shradda HospitalNaomi Trostler, PhD, Principal investigator, Hebrew University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703611
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Academy-India-1
- Other IDs
- IINS-ANDF/2011/01
- Acronym
- DINGS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diabetes in India Nutrition Guidelines Study (DINGS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703611
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DINGS / Academy-India-1
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Nutrition, Medical Nutrition Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Nutrition outcomes, Evidence Based Guidelines
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Indian Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Abbott Healthcare Private Limited (in India)
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A clinical trial to compare the patient outcomes from usual nutrition therapy by dietitians in India to patient outcomes from guideline-based Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT).
Detailed description
A cluster randomized clinical trial to compare patient outcomes from two different nutrition interventions by dietitians in India for persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (usual care vs Medical Nutrition Therapy provided according to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM | Experimental | Other: MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DMSix or more Medical Nutrition Therapy visits(education and counseling on diet, self management, and lifestyle changes) provided over a 12 month period according to Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic Evidence Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines (EBPGN) (www.guidelines.gov) |
| Usual Nutrition Care | Active comparator | Other: Usual Nutrition CareVisits for usual nutrition therapy (diet and lifestyle changes) provided by dietitians over a 12 month period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- RD and Indian ICC CDE RD
- Active practice (at least two years post-professional degree), with enough newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients or patients not seen by an RD for the previous year, to be able to recruit four to six of them into the study each week
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Small clientele of adult type 2 DM,
- Fewer than two years' active clinical practice experience post-professional degree,
- Unable to comply with the other inclusion criteria (see inclusion section above).
- Patient Participant
- Must be over 19 years of age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DMAlso: Nutrition Counseling, Nutrition Care, Nutrition Therapy, Evidence Based Nutrition PracticeSix or more Medical Nutrition Therapy visits(education and counseling on diet, self management, and lifestyle changes) provided over a 12 month period according to Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic Evidence Based Nutrition Practice Guidelines (EBNPG)(www.guidelines.gov) | Other | MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM |
| Usual Nutrition CareAlso: Nutrition Counselling, Nutrition TherapyUsual nutrition care in India | Other | Usual Nutrition Care |
Primary outcome
HbAIc decrease
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
1 secondary outcome
Weight change
Time frame: 6 month and 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2016.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
A Nurse-Led Digital Coaching Program to Improve Blood Sugar Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Clinical Decision Support for SGLT2i After AKI in Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acute Kidney Injury
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of LY3457263 Compared With Placebo in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes on a Stable Dose of Semaglutide or Tirzepatide
Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Persistent Obesity Who Are Treated With a Weekly Incretin
Overweight, Obesity
Recruiting
Perioperative Meditation Music Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing Elective Surgery
Diabetes Type 2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Esther F Myers, PhD principal investigator
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Varsha (none), PhD principal investigator
Shri Shradda Hospital
Naomi Trostler, PhD principal investigator
Hebrew University
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MNT according to AND EBNPG for Type 2 DM and Usual Nutrition Care in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics at 14 sites in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HbAIc decrease (time frame: 6 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2016.