AzTrials
AzTrials

Anorectal DisorderNOMADNCT01710579

Normal Values in Ano-rectal 3D High Resolution Manometry

A study testing Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry, Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) and Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial) in people with Anorectal Disorder and Fecal Incontinence, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ano-rectal manometry is indicative in patients with either fecal incontinence or constipation. Recently anorectal 3D- high resolution manometry has been developed. Pressure variations are measured circumferentially along the anal canal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry, Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) and Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
127 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Sep 2012to Sep 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject older than 18 years Absence of anorectal symptoms (no constipation, no fecal incontinence) Absence of pelvic floor disorders Vaizey score = 0 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent Non inclusion criteria: Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Previous ano-rectal surgery Pelvic radiotherapy Neurological disorder Diabetes mellitus
  • Arm 2: 50 patients with fecal incontinence
  • Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Fecal incontinence as main complain Vaizey score > 6 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent
  • Non inclusion criteria:
  • Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula Arm 3: 50 patients with constipation
  • Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Constipation as main complain Feeling of incomplete evacuation and/or manual disimpaction defined as needing to press in or around the anus to aid defecation Vaizey score < 6 Kess score < 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent
  • Non inclusion criteria:
  • Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Unité d'Exploration Fonctionnelle Digestive Hôpital Edouard Herriot

    Lyon, 69437

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Ano-rectal 3D High Resolution Manometry: Normal Values and Comparison With Ultrasound Examination in Healthy Volunteers, Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Patients With Constipation

Ano-rectal manometry is indicative in patients with either fecal incontinence or constipation. Recently anorectal 3D- high resolution manometry has been developed. Pressure variations are measured circumferentially along the anal canal. It may allow a better understanding of anorectal disorders by displaying anal pressure asymmetry and it could be useful to assess the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor better than conventional manometry.

Being tested
Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry, Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe), Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)
Keywords
Primary esophageal achalasia, endoscopic myotomy, high resolution manometry
Medical subject headings
Rectal Diseases, Fecal Incontinence, Constipation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometryProcedure or surgery

    Anorectal probe is used with a single-use protective sheath with an inflation balloon Control of balloon deflation Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° (this position is the most commonly use and the most convenient) Transanal insertion 2 minutes resting period: resting anal pressure will be evaluated the second minute of rest Sustained voluntary maximal squeeze for at least 30 seconds; the maneuver will be repeated once Valsalva Bear down maneuver; the maneuver will be repeated once Anorectal reflexes evaluation with 20-, 40- and 60-ml intra-rectal balloon inflation Probe removal

  • Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe)Procedure or surgery

    Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° Transanal probe insertion Evaluation of internal and external anal sphincter integrity and puborectalis muscle at rest

  • Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)Procedure or surgery

    Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° Rectum is filled with 50-ml water Probe is covered with a water-filled balloon to maintain the acoustic window for the ultrasound wave Transanal probe insertion Slow and manual rotation of the linear probe through 360° to identify the various layers constituting the anal wall (mucosa, IAS, EAS), the layer forming the rectal wall and the perirectal tissues (puborectalis muscle, bladder, and vagina or prostate) After the initial examination, the patient will be asked to make a defecation effort with the probe left in the same position

Study groups in NCT01710579
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ARM 1 Healthy VolunteersOtherAno-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography
Receives: Procedure: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry; Procedure: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe); Procedure: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)
ARM 2: Patients with fecal incontinenceOtherAno-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography
Receives: Procedure: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry; Procedure: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe); Procedure: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)
ARM 3 Patients with constipationOtherAno-rectal 3D high resolution manometry, ano-rectal radial endsonography, dynamic ano-rectal endosonography
Receives: Procedure: Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry; Procedure: Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe); Procedure: Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down

    Following parameters will be measured at the level of anal sphincter:

    • Minimal pressure (amplitude and location)
    • Maximal pressure (amplitude and location)
    • Mean pressure
    • Asymmetry

    Measured: during procedure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. presence of ano-rectal reflex.

    Measured: during procedure

  2. Ano-rectal radial endosonography

    Evaluation of internal and external anal sphincter integrity and puborectalis muscle at rest

    Measured: During procedure

  3. Dynamic ano-rectal endoconography

    presence of pelvic floor disorder (rectocele, enterocele)

    Measured: During procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
127 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01710579
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012.729
Acronym
NOMAD
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
14 Sep 2012
Last updated
28 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, Vitton V, Ropert A, Bouvier M, Damon H, Siproudhis L, Roman S. 3D High-definition anorectal manometry: Values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Aug;29(8). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13049. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

    PubMed 28251732

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anorectal 3D-high resolution manometry, Anorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe) and Dynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial) in people with Anorectal Disorder and Fecal Incontinence, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down (time frame: during procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01710579, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in