SpondylolisthesisNCT01711203
The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis
A study testing General Strengthening in people with Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis, run by Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPT at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of an augmented Pilates program, when combined to a multimodal strengthening program, for patients under the age of 21, who have spondylolysis and/or spondylolisthesis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spondylolisthesis, Spondylolysis, Children
- What is being tested?
- General Strengthening
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of subject must be between 8-21 years old
- Ability to read and understand the English language
- Parent/caregiver attendance and consent for initial evaluation
- Written medical diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolithesis from the physician with or without imaging
Who cannot join
- Not meeting the inclusion criteria
- Not able to attend therapy 2x's per week
- If physician prescription requests only physical bracing as rendered treatment
- If patient presents with signs of neurological compromise
- Red flags during the medical screening that would require the patient to see the physician
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Akron Children's Hospital Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Center
Akron, Ohio, 44308
About this study
Official title: The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Self Report and Physical Functions With Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of an augmented Pilates program, when combined to a multimodal strengthening program, for patients under the age of 21, who have spondylolysis and/or spondylolisthesis.
Significance of the topic: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are often diagnosed in children and adolescents presenting with low back pain.
Read more
A randomized, clinical trial, test-retest design, with a 3 week and 6 week assessment with functional performance test measures, exercise logs, adherence scale for patient and parent perception, and outcome measures (Global rating of change (GROC) and Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)). This study will attempt to obtain at least 120 subjects that will be randomized into two groups: bracing and a general strengthening program vs. bracing and a Pilates/motor learning program combined with a general strengthening program.
This study will begin with an initial examination and continue with treatment sessions 2x/week for 6 weeks. A follow up phone call will be conducted at 3 months after completing the 6-week protocol. The follow up phone call will be an oral conducted GROC and ODI outcome measures.
Read the detailed description
Location: Akron Children's Hospital, Sports Medicine. For research purposes, the study will conclude at the end of the 6 weeks, however, if the patient has not met their physical therapy goals, then physical therapy may continue upon collaboration with the patient and his/her parents (if a minor), physical therapist, and referring physician.
Initially, there will be a letter to discuss the opportunity to participate in the research study within initial intake paperwork. This will allow the patient and parent to have some preliminary information prior to consulting with the therapist. As is customary, the patient will be assigned to a licensed PT for the initial examination. The initial examining therapist will be responsible to discuss and provide the patient with the pre-enrollment information and informed consent (estimation of time needed approximately 15 minutes) and may obtain consent any time after the pre-enrollment discussion or until the start of the patient's second session. Upon agreement of participation in the study, the patient will be able to complete the additional paperwork required as part of the study (outcome measures). The patient will be randomized after self-inclusion in to the study into one of two groups by role of dice where 1, 3, 5 is the intervention group and 2, 4, 6 is the clinical control group.
The initial examination will include a subjective history taking, and objective assessment with physical testing of the spine including active range of motion, passive range of motion, strength assessment/endurance assessment of the lumbar musculature. The examination will take approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour in length.
Description of Subjects (include age range, selection criteria, recruitment procedures, anticipated and desired sample size)-
Subjects of the ages 8-21 are eligible to participate in this study. Due to the inclusion of a vulnerable subject the responsible party/parent or guardian must grant inclusion and must be able to attend the initial physical therapy evaluation of the minor and sign all consenting documents. The physician offices within the surrounding hospital area and doctors that typically refer to this clinic will be notified of the research study (attachment physician letter and flyer for the facility). Patients will be included in the study if they meet the following criteria:
- Age of subject must be between 8-21 years old
- Ability to read and understand the English language
- Parent/caregiver consent
- Written medical diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolithesis from the physician with or without imaging.
The investigators plan to target a maximum of 120 subjects for the large study, allowing a 20% drop out rate. This study is powered at n=100 subjects for at least a minimal effect to be calculated.
The investigators hypothesize a minimal effect on the patient group who receives the investigational "motor control" or Pilates based exercise compared to the general core strengthening program patient group.
Outcome Measures:
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients were asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable"). The average of the three ratings was used to represent the patient's level of pain over the previous 24 hours. This procedure has been shown to have adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with LBP and has a minimally clinical important difference of 2-point change in patients with mechanical low back pain.
Global Rating of Change Scale
At the follow-up evaluation, each patient will complete a global rating of change (GROC). Patients will rate their overall perception of improvement since beginning treatment on a scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to zero (about the same) to +7 (a very great deal better). It has been recommended that scores on the GROC between ±3 and ±1 represent small changes; scores between ±4 and ±5 represent moderate changes, and scores of ±6 or ±7 large changes.
The Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
The Modified ODI is a self-administered questionnaire that requires 5 minutes to complete and 1 minute to score. Scores are associated with degree of disability ranging from minimal to bedbound. The ODI is a condition-specific disability scale for patients with LBP, consisting of 10 items addressing different aspects of function, each scored from 0-5 with higher values representing greater disability. This modified ODI has been found to have high levels of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The MCID for the ODI has been identified at six points .On this scale, 0-20 equates to minimal disability, 20-40 moderate disability, 40-60 severe disability, 60-80 crippled, and 80-100 bed-bound or exaggerating.
Physical Endurance Tests/Measures McGill has established a performance test to examine the endurance profiles of healthy young men and women for the spine stabilizing musculature. Given the growing support for quantification of endurance, these data of endurance times and their ratios between extensor, flexor, and lateral flexor groups in healthy normal subjects are useful for patient evaluation and for providing clinical training targets. To establish isometric endurance holding times, as well as ratios between torso extensors, flexors, and lateral flexors (stabilizers), for clinical assessment and rehabilitation targets. The tests proved reliable, with reliability coefficients of >.97 for the repeated tests on 5 consecutive days and again 8 weeks later.
- Conditions
- Spondylolisthesis, Spondylolysis, Children
- Being tested
- Motor Control, General Strengthening
- Keywords
- Spondylolysis, Spondylolisthesis, Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Children
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylolisthesis, Spondylolysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motor ControlOther
Exercises and verbal cues to facilitate deep abdominal control and contraction for muscular stabilization/re-training.
General StrengtheningOther
General abdominal and lower quarter musculature strengthening
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Control | Experimental | Pilates-based exercise with verbal cues to facilitate motor control Plank progression, use of feedback tool VERBAL CUES FOR MOTOR CONTROL GROUP (could also include above cues) "Maintain neutral spine" "Not too arched, not too flexed" "Remember your pilates position" "Inhale, exhale" "Let me hear your breath" Receives: Other: Motor Control |
| General strengthening | Active comparator | Patient group that will receive active strengthening without specific verbal cueing to recruit deeper abdominal musculature. Core strengthening and lower quarter strengthening is the focus of this group.
Verbal cuing will include:
VERBAL CUEING FOR NON-MOTOR CONTROL GROUP
"Keep your back straight" "Don't slouch" "Don't arch your back" "Don't let your body move" "Nothing should move but your arms" "tighten up your abs" "suck in your stomach" "feet shoulder-width apart, knees bent, shoulders back, hold your stomach tight" Time will be kept the same as the intervention group. Receives: Other: General Strengthening |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Global Rating of Change Scale
Patients will rate their overall perception of improvement since beginning treatment on a scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to zero (about the same) to +7 (a very great deal better). It has been recommended that scores on the GROC between ±3 and ±1 represent small changes; scores between ±4 and ±5 represent moderate changes, and scores of ±6 or ±7 large changes .
Measured: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months post discharge
Secondary outcomes (1)
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
The Modified ODI is a self-administered questionnaire that requires 5 minutes to complete and 1 minute to score. Scores are associated with degree of disability ranging from minimal to bedbound. The ODI is a condition-specific disability scale for patients with LBP, consisting of 10 items addressing different aspects of function, each scored from 0-5 with higher values representing greater disability. This modified ODI has been found to have high levels of reliability, validity, and responsiveness . The MCID for the ODI has been identified at six points .On this scale, 0-20 equates to minimal disability, 20-40 moderate disability, 40-60 severe disability, 60-80 crippled, and 80-100 bed-bound or exaggerating.
Measured: Initial evaluation, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months post discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SpondylolisthesisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPT
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Akron Children's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPT, Walsh University
- Investigators
- Megan B Donaldson, PT PhD, Principal investigator, Walsh University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01711203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Spondy 12-35
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dreisinger TE, Nelson B. Management of back pain in athletes. Sports Med. 1996 Apr;21(4):313-20. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199621040-00006.
PubMed 8726348Klein G, Mehlman CT, McCarty M. Nonoperative treatment of spondylolysis and grade I spondylolisthesis in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Mar;29(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181977fc5.
PubMed 19352240Cavalier R, Herman MJ, Cheung EV, Pizzutillo PD. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: I. Diagnosis, natural history, and nonsurgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):417-24. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00004.
PubMed 16822889
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Self Report and Physical Functions With Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01711203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Spondy 12-35
- Conditions
- Spondylolisthesis, Spondylolysis, Children
- Keywords
- Spondylolysis, Spondylolisthesis, Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Children
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPTUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Akron Children's Hospital
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of an augmented Pilates program, when combined to a multimodal strengthening program, for patients under the age of 21, who have spondylolysis and/or spondylolisthesis.
Significance of the topic: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are often diagnosed in children and adolescents presenting with low back pain.
A randomized, clinical trial, test-retest design, with a 3 week and 6 week assessment with functional performance test measures, exercise logs, adherence scale for patient and parent perception, and outcome measures (Global rating of change (GROC) and Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)). This study will attempt to obtain at least 120 subjects that will be randomized into two groups: bracing and a general strengthening program vs. bracing and a Pilates/motor learning program combined with a general strengthening program.
This study will begin with an initial examination and continue with treatment sessions 2x/week for 6 weeks. A follow up phone call will be conducted at 3 months after completing the 6-week protocol. The follow up phone call will be an oral conducted GROC and ODI outcome measures.
Detailed description
Location: Akron Children's Hospital, Sports Medicine. For research purposes, the study will conclude at the end of the 6 weeks, however, if the patient has not met their physical therapy goals, then physical therapy may continue upon collaboration with the patient and his/her parents (if a minor), physical therapist, and referring physician.
Initially, there will be a letter to discuss the opportunity to participate in the research study within initial intake paperwork. This will allow the patient and parent to have some preliminary information prior to consulting with the therapist. As is customary, the patient will be assigned to a licensed PT for the initial examination. The initial examining therapist will be responsible to discuss and provide the patient with the pre-enrollment information and informed consent (estimation of time needed approximately 15 minutes) and may obtain consent any time after the pre-enrollment discussion or until the start of the patient's second session. Upon agreement of participation in the study, the patient will be able to complete the additional paperwork required as part of the study (outcome measures). The patient will be randomized after self-inclusion in to the study into one of two groups by role of dice where 1, 3, 5 is the intervention group and 2, 4, 6 is the clinical control group.
The initial examination will include a subjective history taking, and objective assessment with physical testing of the spine including active range of motion, passive range of motion, strength assessment/endurance assessment of the lumbar musculature. The examination will take approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour in length.
Description of Subjects (include age range, selection criteria, recruitment procedures, anticipated and desired sample size)-
Subjects of the ages 8-21 are eligible to participate in this study. Due to the inclusion of a vulnerable subject the responsible party/parent or guardian must grant inclusion and must be able to attend the initial physical therapy evaluation of the minor and sign all consenting documents. The physician offices within the surrounding hospital area and doctors that typically refer to this clinic will be notified of the research study (attachment physician letter and flyer for the facility). Patients will be included in the study if they meet the following criteria:
- Age of subject must be between 8-21 years old
- Ability to read and understand the English language
- Parent/caregiver consent
- Written medical diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolithesis from the physician with or without imaging.
The investigators plan to target a maximum of 120 subjects for the large study, allowing a 20% drop out rate. This study is powered at n=100 subjects for at least a minimal effect to be calculated.
The investigators hypothesize a minimal effect on the patient group who receives the investigational "motor control" or Pilates based exercise compared to the general core strengthening program patient group.
Outcome Measures:
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients were asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable"). The average of the three ratings was used to represent the patient's level of pain over the previous 24 hours. This procedure has been shown to have adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with LBP and has a minimally clinical important difference of 2-point change in patients with mechanical low back pain.
Global Rating of Change Scale
At the follow-up evaluation, each patient will complete a global rating of change (GROC). Patients will rate their overall perception of improvement since beginning treatment on a scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to zero (about the same) to +7 (a very great deal better). It has been recommended that scores on the GROC between ±3 and ±1 represent small changes; scores between ±4 and ±5 represent moderate changes, and scores of ±6 or ±7 large changes.
The Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
The Modified ODI is a self-administered questionnaire that requires 5 minutes to complete and 1 minute to score. Scores are associated with degree of disability ranging from minimal to bedbound. The ODI is a condition-specific disability scale for patients with LBP, consisting of 10 items addressing different aspects of function, each scored from 0-5 with higher values representing greater disability. This modified ODI has been found to have high levels of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The MCID for the ODI has been identified at six points .On this scale, 0-20 equates to minimal disability, 20-40 moderate disability, 40-60 severe disability, 60-80 crippled, and 80-100 bed-bound or exaggerating.
Physical Endurance Tests/Measures McGill has established a performance test to examine the endurance profiles of healthy young men and women for the spine stabilizing musculature. Given the growing support for quantification of endurance, these data of endurance times and their ratios between extensor, flexor, and lateral flexor groups in healthy normal subjects are useful for patient evaluation and for providing clinical training targets. To establish isometric endurance holding times, as well as ratios between torso extensors, flexors, and lateral flexors (stabilizers), for clinical assessment and rehabilitation targets. The tests proved reliable, with reliability coefficients of >.97 for the repeated tests on 5 consecutive days and again 8 weeks later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Control | Experimental | Other: Motor ControlPilates-based exercise with verbal cues to facilitate motor control Plank progression, use of feedback tool VERBAL CUES FOR MOTOR CONTROL GROUP (could also include above cues) "Maintain neutral spine" "Not too arched, not too flexed" "Remember your pilates position" "Inhale, exhale" "Let me hear your breath" |
| General strengthening | Active comparator | Other: General StrengtheningPatient group that will receive active strengthening without specific verbal cueing to recruit deeper abdominal musculature. Core strengthening and lower quarter strengthening is the focus of this group. Verbal cuing will include: VERBAL CUEING FOR NON-MOTOR CONTROL GROUP "Keep your back straight" "Don't slouch" "Don't arch your back" "Don't let your body move" "Nothing should move but your arms" "tighten up your abs" "suck in your stomach" "feet shoulder-width apart, knees bent, shoulders back, hold your stomach tight" Time will be kept the same as the intervention group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age of subject must be between 8-21 years old
- Ability to read and understand the English language
- Parent/caregiver attendance and consent for initial evaluation
- Written medical diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolithesis from the physician with or without imaging
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Not meeting the inclusion criteria
- Not able to attend therapy 2x's per week
- If physician prescription requests only physical bracing as rendered treatment
- If patient presents with signs of neurological compromise
- Red flags during the medical screening that would require the patient to see the physician
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motor ControlExercises and verbal cues to facilitate deep abdominal control and contraction for muscular stabilization/re-training. | Other | Motor Control |
| General StrengtheningGeneral abdominal and lower quarter musculature strengthening | Other | General strengthening |
Primary outcome
Global Rating of Change Scale
Time frame: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months post discharge
Patients will rate their overall perception of improvement since beginning treatment on a scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to zero (about the same) to +7 (a very great deal better). It has been recommended that scores on the GROC between ±3 and ±1 represent small changes; scores between ±4 and ±5 represent moderate changes, and scores of ±6 or ±7 large changes .
1 secondary outcome
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: Initial evaluation, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months post discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 8726348Dreisinger TE, Nelson B. Management of back pain in athletes. Sports Med. 1996 Apr;21(4):313-20. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199621040-00006.
- Background: PubMed 19352240Klein G, Mehlman CT, McCarty M. Nonoperative treatment of spondylolysis and grade I spondylolisthesis in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Mar;29(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181977fc5.
- Background: PubMed 16822889Cavalier R, Herman MJ, Cheung EV, Pizzutillo PD. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: I. Diagnosis, natural history, and nonsurgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):417-24. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00004.
Related trials for Spondylolisthesis
RecruitingObservational study
Thoracic-Lumbar Arthrodesis- Implanet Jazz
Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis
Recruiting
Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens
Juvenile; Scoliosis, Scoliosis Idiopathic
Not yet recruiting
Kore Fiber PLF Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases, Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Active, not recruiting
SLIP II Registry: Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw Fusion
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis
Recruiting
Evaluation of NB1 Bone Graft Following Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spondylolisthesis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Megan B Donaldson, PT PhD principal investigator
Walsh University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing General Strengthening in people with Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis, run by Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPT at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Global Rating of Change Scale (time frame: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months post discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01711203, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2015.