AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound InfectionPOvIVNCT01714596

Randomized Trial to Assess PO Versus IV Antibiotics

A study testing PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation in people with Wound Infection, run by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium at 24 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of treatment of post-op wound infection in long bones after fracture fixation or joint fusion and either: (Group 1) operative debridement and PO antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks; or (Group 2) operative debridement and IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 84 years
Conditions the study is for
Wound Infection
What is being tested?
PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
233 participants
Where
24 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Dec 2013to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 84 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with any fractures of any bone at or proximal to and including the tarsal/metatarsal joint (Lisfranc) or proximal to the carpal joints (includes distal radius fractures), excluding the spine, treated with any type of internal fixation, or
  • Patients undergoing fusion of any bone at or proximal to and including the subtalar joint or radial carpal joint, (excluding the spine) that develop a post op wound infection at any time.
  • Patients diagnosed with a wound infection of the study injury, defined as patients with at least one of the following:
  • Deep culture positive after operative debridement.
  • Cultures positive in thio only after operative debridement.
  • Negative culture after operative debridement if wound infection meets the Center for Disease control and Prevention (CDC) criteria.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Patients who are English or Spanish competent.
  • Patients aged 18 - 84.
  • Patients with bacteria susceptible to both PO and IV antibiotics.
  • Patients able to be treated for their infection at the METRC facility for at least 12 months following definitive surgical procedure
  • Patients may have multiple eligible study-eligible injuries.
  • Patients may have temporary external fixation prior to definitive fixation.
  • Patients may have received antibiotics prior to operative wound debridement.
  • Patient is able to obtain study medication(s).
  • Patient may be pregnant at the time of screening.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have high risk of amputation of the study limb (based on opinion of the initial managing physician).
  • Patients undergoing treatment with any other investigational therapy within the month preceding implantation or planned within the 12 months following implantation.
  • Patients with history of chronic infection at the site of study injury, defined as:
  • patients with chronic osteomyelitis identified by radiographic erosion or sequestrum; or patients with more than one instance of surgical treatment of infection and approximately 6 week course of antibiotics.
  • Patients with pathological fractures; a known history of Paget's disease.
  • Patients for whom the definitive treatment of the study injury was an external fixator.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Patients who are currently on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication (e.g. Zoloft, Prozac, Celexa), and bacteria is MRSA
  • Patients with cultures positive in thio only.
  • Patients who are incarcerated or who have unstable housing situations due to concerns regarding ability to receive home care, adherence phone calls, and maintain follow up. .
  • Patients or designated proxy who are unwilling to provide consent.
  • Patients with a history of IV drug use who in the investigator's opinion are unsuitable candidates for IV therapy.
  • Patients likely to have severe problems maintaining follow-up, including patients diagnosed with a severe psychiatric conditions, patients who live too far outside the hospital's catchment area.
  • Patients with traumatic brain injury or who are intellectually challenged and who lack adequate family support to ensure adherence to the protocol.
  • Patients unable to swallow oral medications or without adequately functioning GI tract.
  • Patients who, based upon the clinical judgment of the treating clinician, are NOT equally suited for treatment with either oral or intravenous antibiotics (i.e., those for whom there is a clinical treatment preference).

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 1 country.

24 sites in 1 country

United States24 sites
  • University of Maryland R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Boston Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Carolinas Medical Center

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia

  • MetroHealth Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Denver Health and Hospital Authority

    Denver, Colorado

  • Inova Fairfax Hospital

    Falls Church, Virginia

  • Penn State University M.S. Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Eskenazi Health

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa

  • Jamaica Hospital Medical Center

    Jamaica, New York

  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California

  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin

  • University of Miami Ryder Trauma Center

    Miami, Florida

  • Hennepin County Medical Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • NYU Langone Medical Center

    New York, New York

  • Naval Medical Center Portsmouth

    Portsmouth, Virginia

  • San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC)

    San Antonio, Texas

  • University of California at San Francisco

    San Francisco, California

  • University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington

  • St. Louis University Medical Center

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess PO Versus IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Post-op Wound Infection After Extremity Fractures (POvIV)

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of treatment of post-op wound infection in long bones after fracture fixation or joint fusion and either: (Group 1) operative debridement and PO antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks; or (Group 2) operative debridement and IV antibiotics for 6 weeks.

Primary Hypothesis 1: The rate of study injury related surgical interventions by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Read more

Secondary Hypothesis 1: The rate of treatment failure by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2. Treatment failure is defined as wound problems that require surgery >2 weeks after initial debridement, infection recurrence, infection with a new pathogen, joint erosion, implant failure, medical problems related to the treatment administration which necessitates a switch from one arm to the other.

Secondary Hypothesis 2: The rate of re-hospitalization for complications, infection, non-union and amputation by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Secondary Hypothesis 3: Following discharge for treatment of infection, per patient treatment costs at 1 year will be lower in Group 1 than in Group 2.

Secondary Hypothesis 4: Adherence in Group 1 will be non-inferior to adherence in Group 2.

Secondary Hypothesis 5: Patient satisfaction with treatment in Group 1 will be non-inferior to adherence in Group 2.

Specific Aim 2: To build and validate a risk prediction model for failure of treatment of early post-op wound infections after fixation of fractures and joint fusions.

Conditions
Wound Infection
Being tested
PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation
Keywords
Oral Antibiotic, Intravenous Antibiotic, Wound infection, Randomized Controlled Trial
Medical subject headings
Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluationOther

    Also called based on local practices and bacterial susceptibilities

    This is a study of oral (per os, (PO)) antibiotic therapy versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics in the treatment of acute infection after fixation of fractures and joint fusions. This is not a study of an experimental drug but a study of route of administration of standard use antibiotics. Antibiotic regimen options decision will be made by the Study Surgeon at each site in consult with local Infectious Disease experts based on local standard practices and bacterial susceptibilities.

Study groups in NCT01714596
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral AntibioticActive comparatorOral Antibiotic Arm; Participants assigned to this group will receive oral antibiotics as prescribed by their treating physician.
Receives: Other: PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation
IV AntibioticActive comparatorParticipants assigned to this group will receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics as prescribed by their treating physician.
Receives: Other: PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study injury related surgical interventions by 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Treatment Failure by 1 year

    Treatment failure is defined as wound problems that require surgery >2 weeks after initial debridement, infection recurrence, infection with a new pathogen, joint erosion, implant failure, medical problems related to the treatment administration which necessitates a switch from one arm to the other.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Re-hospitalizations by 1 year

    Re-hospitalization for complications, such as infection, non-union and amputation

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Healthcare costs

    Cost of PO versus IV medications include medical record and bill abstracted costs associated with outpatient clinic visits, home health visits, medication, subsequent hospital readmission, and other types of medical care as identified over the course of the study.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Medication Adherence

    Patient adherence to PO and IV medications

    Patient adherence with PO antibiotics will be monitored through wireless-enabled microchip monitors embedded in pill bottles by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and weekly adherence questionnaire.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Satisfaction with treatment

    Patient satisfaction with treatment measured by Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18)

    The PSQ-18 measures 6 domains: technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects of care, time spent with doctor, and accessibility. A score of 0.8 or higher in each domain correlates with improved satisfaction.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Dec 2013
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
233 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01714596
Sponsor's protocol ID
METRC POvIV
Acronym
POvIV
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
30 Apr 2012
Last updated
11 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC); Obremskey WT, O'Toole RV, Morshed S, Tornetta P 3rd, Murray CK, Jones CB, Scharfstein DO, Taylor TJ, Carlini AR, DeSanto JM, Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, Karunakar MA, Seymour RB, Sims SH, Weinrib DA, Churchill C, Carroll EA, Pilson HT, Goodman JB, Holden MB, Miller AN, Sietsema DL, Stahel PF, Mir H, Schmidt AH, Westberg JR, Mullis B, Shively KD, Hymes RA, Konda SR, Vallier HA, Breslin MA, Smith CS, Crickard CV, Egol KA, Reid JS, Baker M, Eglseder WA, LeBrun C, Manson T, Mascarenhas DC, Nascone J, Pollak AN, Schloss MG, Sciadini MF, Degani Y, Miclau T, Weiss DB, Yarboro SR, McVey ED, Firoozabadi R, Agel J, Whiting PS, Haleem A, Domes C, Lang GJ, Kuhn GR, Archer KR, Talbot T, Burgos EJ, Gajari V, Herrera LN, Rodriguez-Buitrago A, Tummuru RR, Abraham CM, Trochez KM. Oral vs Intravenous Antibiotics for Fracture-Related Infections: The POvIV Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):276-284. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6439.

    PubMed 39841468

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PO versus IV antibiotics Route of administration evaluation in people with Wound Infection, run by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium at 24 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study injury related surgical interventions by 1 year (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01714596, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in