AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 or HigherVNUS vs TULIPNCT01722019

Prospective Multicentric Trial Between Radiofrequency Ablation With VNUS Closure Fast ® and Endovenous Ablation With 1470 nm Diode Laser and Tulip Fiber ® for Treatment of Primary Venous Insufficiency.

A study testing Tulip fiber and VNUS closure fast in people with Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 or Higher, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 3 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endovenous ablation of the greater saphenous vein has nowadays the same outcome as open crossectomy and stripping. The two most performed techniques for endovenous ablation are the endovenous laser ablation and the radiofrequency ablation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Tulip fiber and VNUS closure fast
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
3 sitesBelgium
Study dates
1 Jan 2014to 31 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) planned
  • Patient signed informed consent
  • Patient must complete the 1 year follow-up
  • CEAP between 2 and 6
  • BMI=<35
  • Diameter of the GSV in upward position less than 20 mm diameter
  • No problems in deep venous system

Who cannot join

  • No informed consent is signed
  • Latex allergy
  • Arterial insufficiency
  • Deep vein thrombosis or deep vein insufficiency
  • Klippel Trenaunay
  • Diameter fo GSV > 20 mm
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Cross dilation with 2 or more insufficient side branches
  • Previous GSV operation
  • Redo-operation
  • Carcinoma less than 1 year ago
  • BMI > 35
  • Liver-insufficiency with contraindication for local tumescence
  • Intake of warfarins
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, < 3 months after pregnancy
  • Bilateral GSV insufficiency that has to be treated
  • Cross insufficiency of the accessory saphenous vein or insufficiency of the subterminal valve of the GSV

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Belgium3 sites
  • Ghent University Hospital

    Ghent, 9000

  • University Hospital Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

  • Sint-Andriesziekenhuis Tielt

    Tielt, 8700

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Prospective Multicentric Randomised Trial Between Radiofrequency Ablation With VNUS Closure Fast ® and Endovenous Ablation With 1470 nm Diod Laser and Tulip Fiber ® for Treatment of Primary Venous Insufficiency.

Endovenous ablation of the greater saphenous vein has nowadays the same outcome as open crossectomy and stripping. The two most performed techniques for endovenous ablation are the endovenous laser ablation and the radiofrequency ablation. According to the trial of Rasmussen, they are equivalent for occlusion but the lower laser wave lengths resulted in more pain and paresthesia. The newer wave length of 1470 nm showed lesser side effects in observational studies. The aim of this study is to compare radiofrequency ablation with the VNUS closure fast ® with laser ablation with a 1470 nm wave length in combination with a new fiber, the Tulip fiber ®. This fiber has the shape of a tulip at his tip which avoids point necroses of the vessel wall and on consequence results in lesser side effects from wall perforations such as pain, haematoma,…

Being tested
Tulip fiber, VNUS closure fast
Keywords
venous insufficiency
Medical subject headings
Venous Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tulip fiberDevice

    Laser ablation with a wavelength of 1470 nanometers will be performed, in combination with a new sort of fiber: the tulip tip fiber.

  • VNUS closure fastDevice

    Radiofrequent ablation will be performed in combination with the catheter 'VNUS closure fast'.

Study groups in NCT01722019
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
radiofrequency ablation with VNUS closure fastActive comparatorRadiofrequency ablation will be performed with VNUS closure fast.
Receives: Device: VNUS closure fast
laser ablation and Tulip fiberExperimentalLaser ablation with a 1470 nm wave length in combination with a new fiber, the Tulip fiber.
Receives: Device: Tulip fiber

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Closure of the greater saphenous vein at 12 months.

    Closure of the greater saphenous vein will be measured by venous duplex, Kabnick score and modified Gelev score. This will be performed after 5 days, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months.

    Measured: 12 months after procedure

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Pain.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 5 days

  2. Pain.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 14 days

  3. Pain.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 1 month

  4. Pain.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 6 months

  5. Pain.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 1 year.

  6. Patient satisfaction rate.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 5 days

  7. Patient satisfaction rate.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 14 days.

  8. Patient satisfaction rate.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 1 month

  9. Pain satisfaction rate.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 6 months

  10. Patient satisfaction rate.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 1 year.

  11. Incapacity to work.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: after 5 days

  12. Incapacity to work.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 14 days

  13. Incapacity to work.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 1 month

  14. Incapacity to work.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 6 months

  15. Incapacity to work.

    This will be measured with the VAS score, VCSS score, CIVIQ score, clinical evaluation and hematoma score.

    Measured: After 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
280 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01722019
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012/693
Acronym
VNUS vs TULIP
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
29 Oct 2012
Last updated
29 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tulip fiber and VNUS closure fast in people with Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 or Higher, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 3 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Closure of the greater saphenous vein at 12 months. (time frame: 12 months after procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in