AzTrials
AzTrials

DysphagiaPhase 2NCT01723358

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Treatment Technique Therapy in the Management of Young Infants With Severe Dysphagia

A Phase 2 study testing Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in people with Dysphagia, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to obtain data that well help inform the feasibility and design of a randomized control trial of the therapeutic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) technique in improving the swallowing function of young infants presenting with severe dysphagia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 weeks to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Dysphagia
What is being tested?
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2010to Jul 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 weeks to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants with severe dysphagia on VFFS as defined by dysphagia resulting in aspiration with swallow of at least 2 food textures (e.g. thin and thick liquid).
  • We will include children with dysphagia due to a central neurologic deficit. The neurologic diagnosis will be based on the diagnosis from the treating physician.

Who cannot join

  • Infants with a known or suspected neurodegenerative or peripheral neuromuscular condition or a medical condition that is a contraindication for NMES treatment (tumours in the neck region and neck soft tissue infections).
  • Children with neurodegenerative disorders have been excluded as their natural history of dysphagia would be different from those with a static neurologic disorder.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a New Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Treatment Technique (VitalStim® Therapy) in the Management of Young Infants With Severe Dysphagia: a Prospective Pilot Study

The goal of this study is to obtain data that well help inform the feasibility and design of a randomized control trial of the therapeutic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) technique in improving the swallowing function of young infants presenting with severe dysphagia.

Read the detailed description

Infants with severe neurologic disability often have difficulty in eating by mouth due to a disruption in the swallowing process. This swallowing dysfunction, also known as dysphagia, is often evident early in life and when severe can be permanent. Dysphagia can lead to an inability to take in enough food to maintain an adequate weight and result in malnutrition. It also can result in food going into the lungs instead of the stomach, resulting in an illness called aspiration pneumonia. Both of these complications may require feeding by tube either through the nose into the stomach or directly into the stomach via the abdominal wall, to bypass the swallowing process. This process is resource intense, can be associated with a number of complications and may result in a reduced quality of life for both the infant and caregivers. Currently, there are no effective treatments to change the natural course of dysphagia in this context.

Conditions
Dysphagia
Being tested
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Keywords
pediatrics, dysphagia
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)Device

    Also called VitalStim® therapy

    The intervention will consist of a period of treatment with NMES. This treatment will involve 20-45 minute feeding therapy sessions during which NMES will be administered by an Occupational Therapist. Frequency of therapy sessions will be 4 times per week for the first 2 weeks (as in inpatient, if hospitalized) and then biweekly for 14 weeks for a total of 36 sessions (over 16 weeks). For patients who are discharged prior to the first 2 weeks of treatment, outpatient sessions will be biweekly.

Study groups in NCT01723358
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness

    The primary outcome will be an improvement in swallowing function as determined by videofluoroscopic feeding study from baseline to end of treatment (4 months after baseline). The swallowing function will be graded as to the number of textures the infant can safely swallow at three measurement points (baseline, 2 months and 4 months). An improvement in the number of textures the infant can swallow will define improvement. This will be recorded using a standard reporting form.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Resolution of dysphagia

    The proportion of children whose dysphagia resolves (i.e. safe to feed on all consistencies of solids and liquids) at 4 months will be calculated.

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Feeding ability

    The feeding ability will be assessed using a clinical exam by an occupational therapist.

    Measured: baseline, 2 months and 4 months from enrollment

  3. Oral feeding ability and need for tube feeding

    Oral feeding ability and the need for tube feeding will be assessed using a structured scale based on parental report of dietary intake that includes: Level 1: Nothing by mouth, all nutrition by tube feeds, Level 2: <50% intake by mouth, tube feeding requirement, Level 3: >50% intake by mouth, tube feeding, requirement, Level 4: All by mouth, no tube feeding.

    Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months from enrollment

  4. Hospitalizations for lower respiratory tract illness

    The frequency of hospitalizations for lower respiratory tract illnesses in the 4 months following enrollment into the study will be determined by administering a structured questionnaire to parents.

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Safety and Adverse events

    Data collection of adverse events will occur through administration of a structured questionnaire by the occupational therapist at the end of each treatment session and just prior to the subsequent session.

    Measured: duration of subjects involvment in the study

  6. Caregiver acceptability and perception of feeding

    Two questions using a 10 cm visual analogue scale will ask whether parents were satisfied with the treatment process and whether the caregiver felt that their child's feeding ability improved during treatment. Two further open ended questions will probe what aspects of the treatment they felt were positive and what aspects they felt were negative.

    Measured: at 4 months

  7. Data on treatment procedures

    Data will be collected by the occupational therapist after each treatment session. This will include method of feeding, amount of food taken, response to treatment, length of treatment session, location of electrode placement and amplitude of stimulation used.

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01723358
Sponsor's protocol ID
1000020206
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
5 Nov 2012
Last updated
20 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Marcus S, Friedman JN, Lacombe-Duncan A, Mahant S. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment of dysphagia in infants and young children with neurological impairment: a prospective pilot study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Jan 23;3(1):e000382. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000382. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30740545

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in people with Dysphagia, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effectiveness (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01723358, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in