AzTrials
AzTrials

Capsule OpacificationNCT01732484

Posterior Capsule Opacification and Frequency of Nd:YAG Treatment and of Two Microincision IOLs: Hoya iMics NY-60 vs Acrysof SN60WF

A study testing intraocular lens implantation in people with Capsule Opacification and Pseudophakia, run by Medical University of Vienna.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide. In the UK, more than half of people who are over 65 have some cataract development in one or both eyes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Capsule Opacification, Pseudophakia, Cataract
What is being tested?
intraocular lens implantation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2009to Sep 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • bilateral age-related cataract
  • good overall physical constitution

Who cannot join

  • history of ocular disease or intraocular surgery
  • laser treatment
  • diabetes requiring medical control
  • glaucoma
  • severe retinal pathology that would make a postoperative visual acuity of 20/40 (decimal equivalent = 0.5) or better unlikely

About this study

Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide. In the UK, more than half of people who are over 65 have some cataract development in one or both eyes. The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted. It is estimated that around 10 million cataract operations are performed around the world each year. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications. The most common risk is developing a condition called posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which causes impaired vision to return.

During the past two decades, cataract surgery underwent tremendous change and modernisation resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery and a safe technique with a short rehabilitation time for the patient. The most frequent long-term complication of cataract surgery remains to be posterior capsule opacification (PCO). In the past few years, refinements in surgical technique and modifications in IOL design and material have led to a decrease in the incidence of PCO.

Read more

It has been shown that a sharp posterior optic edge inhibits migration of lens epithelial cells (LEC) behind the IOL optic and therefore have a lower incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Most IOL designs have open-loop haptics that are connected to the optic towards the end of the production process, also called multipiece designs.

For several reasons such as better ease of use with injector systems and higher efficiency in the production process, companies have developed IOLs with open-loop haptics out of one block of material, also called single-piece designs. In the case of such single-piece IOLs, the haptics tend to be much thicker than with multipiece IOLs. A potential drawback of the thick haptics maybe an incomplete closure of the capsule at the optic rim with a reduced bending effect of the posterior capsule around the posterior optic edge. Additionally, the posterior sharp edge is often discontinuous in the region of the haptic-optic junctions. These locations may serve as a scaffold for LECs to migrate behind the IOL optic resulting in PCO. Nowadays a multitude of different single piece IOLS are available, many of them similar but of course with some differences in regard to the chemical composition of the acrylic material and the IOL design.

The purpose of this study is to compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between two different 1-piece foldable hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) over a period of 3 years.

Being tested
intraocular lens implantation
Medical subject headings
Capsule Opacification, Pseudophakia, Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intraocular lens implantationProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01732484
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
iMics1 NY-60Othereyes with implantation of iMics1 NY-60 IOL
Receives: Procedure: intraocular lens implantation
AcrySof SN60WFOthereyes with implantation of AcrySof SN60WF IOL
Receives: Procedure: intraocular lens implantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO)

    PCO = migration of lens epithelial cells behind the IOL optic after cataract surgery; scale 0-10 (0: no PCO; 10: maximum PCO)

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percentage of Eyes With Neodymium:Yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) Capsulotomy

    Treatment of PCO in neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy. The frequency of this treatment will be asseseed in percentage values

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01732484
Sponsor's protocol ID
EK1444/2012
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
19 Nov 2012
Last updated
5 Jun 2013

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intraocular lens implantation in people with Capsule Opacification and Pseudophakia, run by Medical University of Vienna.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in