Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT01734967
Needle-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Examination of Pancreatic Masse
A study testing needle based CLE and EUS-FNA in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, run by Herlev Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with only 5% of patients being alive at five years. EUS (endoscopic ultra sound) is an established, sensitive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer and for staging purposes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
- What is being tested?
- needle based CLE and EUS-FNA
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years old, male or female
- Patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic masses with an indication for EUS-FNA
- Signed informed consent for EUS with FNA and nCLE examination
Who cannot join
- Failure to provide informed consent
- Patients with a contraindication for EUS-FNA
- Known allergy to fluorescein
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Romania1 site
Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Craiva, 200349,
About this study
Official title: Needle-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Examination of Pancreatic Masses
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with only 5% of patients being alive at five years. EUS (endoscopic ultra sound) is an established, sensitive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer and for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling method has its drawbacks, due to a relatively low negative predictive value. Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel method that enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Recently, confocal laser endomicroscopy has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible laser probe (nCLE) that can pass through a 19-gauge needle. Combined with EUS, descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm has been developed in a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of solid pancreatic masses have been described with nCLE.
Aim and Method: To describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. XX patients were included all presenting with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer or imaging studies showing a pancreatic mass. During the procedure an nCLE preloaded 19G FNA needle was advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance. A contrast agent was administered intravenously (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%). The data was stored digitally for post procedural analysis. Afterwards EUS-FNA was performed for cytology smears to enable a final pathological diagnosis. Correlations between the nCLE images and the conventional pathology were identified.
Read the detailed description
Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with mortality rates following closely the incidence rates. The incidence is increasing and the prognosis is grim especially because of late diagnosis and metastatic potential. While surgical treatment is currently the only potential curative intervention, 80-85% of the PC cases are unfortunately detected in late unresectable stages of the disease. In spite of advances in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer less than 5% of patients are alive at five years.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a highly valuable tool in the management of pancreatic cancer patients. As a minimally invasive technique that enables high-resolution imaging of the pancreatic parenchyma and surrounding structures it is considered the method of choice for the detection of clinically suspected pancreatic tumors, with a negative predictive value close to 100%. Its diagnostic sensitivity was shown by previous studies to be superior compared to other imaging techniques, especially in the case of smaller tumors. Additionally EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) which is currently recommended as the firs-line procedure whenever pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling technique has its drawbacks, mainly represented by the relatively low negative predictive value in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. It thus cannot reliably rule out a diagnosis of malignancy and patients with high clinical suspicion usually need repeated FNA.
Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel technique that actually enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Endomicroscopy can be performed either with dedicated (eCLE) or with miniprobe-based systems (pCLE). It is a contrast based technique, the most widely used agent being the intravenously administered fluorescein. The probe-based endomicroscopy system consists of a flexible catheter probe representing a bundle of optical fibers linked to a micro-objective, a laser scanning unit and the control and acquisition software (Cellvizio; Mauna Kea Technology, Paris, France). The flexible confocal miniprobes were specifically designed to be passed through the working channels of standard endoscopes, biliary catheters or cholangioscopes and thus the pCLE system can be easily integrated in any endoscopy unit. The principle of the technique is based on a laser beam of defined wavelength being focused towards the targeted tissue and the recaptured signal is displayed as 'optical biopsies' in a single horizontal plane.
The potential role of CLE has been explored in pathology of both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, showing good accuracy for predicting the final histopathological diagnosis based on immediate evaluation of tissue and vascular patterns. Recently CLE has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible probe thin enough that it can be passed through a 19-gauge needle. Thus under EUS guidance solid organs can be accessed for real-time microscopic information. nCLE imaging of abdominal organs has been so far achieved in animal models. The feasibility of the technique was also proved in a clinical study and descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm were developed from a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of pancreatic solid masses have been described with nCLE.
Aim The aim of the proposed study is to describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. With further validation of the technique real-time pathological diagnosis could be obtained with immediate initiation of the adequate therapy after a single investigation.
Patients The study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI).
Patients will be selected according to the following criteria used throughout the study:
Data collected for each participant will include:
- Personal data (name, surname, age, sex)
- EUS variables (tumor characteristics)
- Histological and immunohistochemical findings (final diagnosis)
Imaging tests All patients with a suspicion (clinical, US, CT/MRI) of pancreatic masses will be evaluated by EUS, nCLE and EUS-FNA for pathological diagnosis.
For EUS examination linear instruments will be used to perform complete examination of the pancreas.
Tumor characteristics (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described.
The presence of regional lymph nodes will be reported with their maximal size, echogenicity, shape and margins.
Identification of liver metastasis will also be looked upon.
EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:
The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance.
nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%).
Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis. EUS-FNA will be also performed after image acquisition for cytology smears and cell blocks to enable a final pathological diagnosis Confocal images will be analyzed during the examination by the principal investigator, with clinical and other procedural information in mind. In a second step offline analysis, the correlations between representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections will be identified.
Final diagnosis The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. Pathology samples obtained from duodeno-pancreatectomies or caudal pancreatectomies done with curative intent, as well as microhistological fragments obtained through EUS-FNA biopsy will be processed by paraffin embedding with usual stainings (haematoxylin-eosin), with subsequent immune-histochemistry where necessary.
For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
- Being tested
- needle based CLE, EUS-FNA
- Keywords
- confocal laser endomicroscopy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, Endoscopic ultrasound
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
needle based CLEDevice
Also called nCLE
EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:
The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance.
nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%).
Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis.
EUS-FNAProcedure or surgery
Also called Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an established tool in pancreatic masses used both for diagnosis, but also for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| needle based CLE & EUS-FNA | Experimental | The study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI). Receives: Device: needle based CLE; Procedure: EUS-FNA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases
Tumor characteristics (EUS) (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described.
EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:
Confocal images will be analyzed to correlate representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections.
The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months
The outcome is fully descriptive.
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety
Number of adverse events related til the procedure
Measured: 30 days
Feasibility
Feasibility of nCLE examination measured by the number of patients, where nCLE is accomplished
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Gasdal Karstensen, Herlev Hospital
- Investigators
- john G Karstensen, M.D., Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01734967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- herlev
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.
PubMed 21620466Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Molinari M. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):867-97. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867.
PubMed 21412497Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-17. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20534.
PubMed 18932265DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):753-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00006.
PubMed 15545675Iglesias Garcia JJ, Larino Noia J, Alvarez Castro A, Cigarran B, Dominguez Munoz JE. Second-generation endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Pancreatic cancer vs. inflammatory mass in chronic pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Oct;101(10):723-30. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082009001000009. English, Spanish.
PubMed 19899942Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Frossard JL, Heresbach D, Pujol B, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gines A; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):897-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256754. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
PubMed 21842456Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P, von Delius S, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Voermans RP, Meining A. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
PubMed 20421104Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1049-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
PubMed 21924718Karstensen JG, Cartana T, Klausen PH, Hassan H, Popescu CF, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study for use in focal pancreatic masses. Pancreas. 2015 Jul;44(5):833-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000345. No abstract available.
PubMed 26061561
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Needle-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Examination of Pancreatic Masses
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01734967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- herlev
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
- Keywords
- confocal laser endomicroscopy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, Endoscopic ultrasound
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with only 5% of patients being alive at five years. EUS (endoscopic ultra sound) is an established, sensitive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer and for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling method has its drawbacks, due to a relatively low negative predictive value. Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel method that enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Recently, confocal laser endomicroscopy has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible laser probe (nCLE) that can pass through a 19-gauge needle. Combined with EUS, descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm has been developed in a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of solid pancreatic masses have been described with nCLE.
Aim and Method: To describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. XX patients were included all presenting with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer or imaging studies showing a pancreatic mass. During the procedure an nCLE preloaded 19G FNA needle was advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance. A contrast agent was administered intravenously (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%). The data was stored digitally for post procedural analysis. Afterwards EUS-FNA was performed for cytology smears to enable a final pathological diagnosis. Correlations between the nCLE images and the conventional pathology were identified.
Detailed description
Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with mortality rates following closely the incidence rates. The incidence is increasing and the prognosis is grim especially because of late diagnosis and metastatic potential. While surgical treatment is currently the only potential curative intervention, 80-85% of the PC cases are unfortunately detected in late unresectable stages of the disease. In spite of advances in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer less than 5% of patients are alive at five years.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a highly valuable tool in the management of pancreatic cancer patients. As a minimally invasive technique that enables high-resolution imaging of the pancreatic parenchyma and surrounding structures it is considered the method of choice for the detection of clinically suspected pancreatic tumors, with a negative predictive value close to 100%. Its diagnostic sensitivity was shown by previous studies to be superior compared to other imaging techniques, especially in the case of smaller tumors. Additionally EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) which is currently recommended as the firs-line procedure whenever pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling technique has its drawbacks, mainly represented by the relatively low negative predictive value in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. It thus cannot reliably rule out a diagnosis of malignancy and patients with high clinical suspicion usually need repeated FNA.
Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel technique that actually enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Endomicroscopy can be performed either with dedicated (eCLE) or with miniprobe-based systems (pCLE). It is a contrast based technique, the most widely used agent being the intravenously administered fluorescein. The probe-based endomicroscopy system consists of a flexible catheter probe representing a bundle of optical fibers linked to a micro-objective, a laser scanning unit and the control and acquisition software (Cellvizio; Mauna Kea Technology, Paris, France). The flexible confocal miniprobes were specifically designed to be passed through the working channels of standard endoscopes, biliary catheters or cholangioscopes and thus the pCLE system can be easily integrated in any endoscopy unit. The principle of the technique is based on a laser beam of defined wavelength being focused towards the targeted tissue and the recaptured signal is displayed as 'optical biopsies' in a single horizontal plane.
The potential role of CLE has been explored in pathology of both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, showing good accuracy for predicting the final histopathological diagnosis based on immediate evaluation of tissue and vascular patterns. Recently CLE has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible probe thin enough that it can be passed through a 19-gauge needle. Thus under EUS guidance solid organs can be accessed for real-time microscopic information. nCLE imaging of abdominal organs has been so far achieved in animal models. The feasibility of the technique was also proved in a clinical study and descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm were developed from a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of pancreatic solid masses have been described with nCLE.
Aim The aim of the proposed study is to describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. With further validation of the technique real-time pathological diagnosis could be obtained with immediate initiation of the adequate therapy after a single investigation.
Patients The study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI).
Patients will be selected according to the following criteria used throughout the study:
Data collected for each participant will include:
- Personal data (name, surname, age, sex)
- EUS variables (tumor characteristics)
- Histological and immunohistochemical findings (final diagnosis)
Imaging tests All patients with a suspicion (clinical, US, CT/MRI) of pancreatic masses will be evaluated by EUS, nCLE and EUS-FNA for pathological diagnosis.
For EUS examination linear instruments will be used to perform complete examination of the pancreas.
Tumor characteristics (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described.
The presence of regional lymph nodes will be reported with their maximal size, echogenicity, shape and margins.
Identification of liver metastasis will also be looked upon.
EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:
The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance.
nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%).
Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis. EUS-FNA will be also performed after image acquisition for cytology smears and cell blocks to enable a final pathological diagnosis Confocal images will be analyzed during the examination by the principal investigator, with clinical and other procedural information in mind. In a second step offline analysis, the correlations between representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections will be identified.
Final diagnosis The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. Pathology samples obtained from duodeno-pancreatectomies or caudal pancreatectomies done with curative intent, as well as microhistological fragments obtained through EUS-FNA biopsy will be processed by paraffin embedding with usual stainings (haematoxylin-eosin), with subsequent immune-histochemistry where necessary.
For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| needle based CLE & EUS-FNA | Experimental | Device: needle based CLE, Procedure: EUS-FNAThe study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 18 years old, male or female
- Patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic masses with an indication for EUS-FNA
- Signed informed consent for EUS with FNA and nCLE examination
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Failure to provide informed consent
- Patients with a contraindication for EUS-FNA
- Known allergy to fluorescein
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| needle based CLEAlso: nCLEEUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis: The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance. nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%). Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis. | Device | needle based CLE & EUS-FNA |
| EUS-FNAAlso: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspirationEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an established tool in pancreatic masses used both for diagnosis, but also for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required. | Procedure or surgery | needle based CLE & EUS-FNA |
Primary outcome
Describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases
Time frame: 6 month
Tumor characteristics (EUS) (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described. EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis: Confocal images will be analyzed to correlate representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections. The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months The outcome is fully descriptive.
2 secondary outcomes
Safety
Time frame: 30 days
Feasibility
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21620466Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.
- Background: PubMed 21412497Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Molinari M. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):867-97. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867.
- Background: PubMed 18932265Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-17. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20534.
- Background: PubMed 15545675DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):753-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00006.
- Background: PubMed 19899942Iglesias Garcia JJ, Larino Noia J, Alvarez Castro A, Cigarran B, Dominguez Munoz JE. Second-generation endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Pancreatic cancer vs. inflammatory mass in chronic pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Oct;101(10):723-30. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082009001000009. English, Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 21842456Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Frossard JL, Heresbach D, Pujol B, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gines A; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):897-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256754. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
- Background: PubMed 20421104Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P, von Delius S, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Voermans RP, Meining A. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 21924718Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1049-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26061561Karstensen JG, Cartana T, Klausen PH, Hassan H, Popescu CF, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study for use in focal pancreatic masses. Pancreas. 2015 Jul;44(5):833-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000345. No abstract available.
Related trials for Pancreatic Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
john G Karstensen, M.D. principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing needle based CLE and EUS-FNA in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, run by Herlev Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark, Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01734967, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2018.