AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT01734967

Needle-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Examination of Pancreatic Masse

A study testing needle based CLE and EUS-FNA in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, run by Herlev Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with only 5% of patients being alive at five years. EUS (endoscopic ultra sound) is an established, sensitive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer and for staging purposes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
What is being tested?
needle based CLE and EUS-FNA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2012to Jul 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years old, male or female
  • Patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic masses with an indication for EUS-FNA
  • Signed informed consent for EUS with FNA and nCLE examination

Who cannot join

  • Failure to provide informed consent
  • Patients with a contraindication for EUS-FNA
  • Known allergy to fluorescein
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patients

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Denmark1 site
  • Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev

    Herlev, 2730

Other trials in Denmark

Romania1 site
  • Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,

    Craiva, 200349,

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: Needle-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Examination of Pancreatic Masses

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with only 5% of patients being alive at five years. EUS (endoscopic ultra sound) is an established, sensitive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer and for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling method has its drawbacks, due to a relatively low negative predictive value. Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel method that enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Recently, confocal laser endomicroscopy has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible laser probe (nCLE) that can pass through a 19-gauge needle. Combined with EUS, descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm has been developed in a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of solid pancreatic masses have been described with nCLE.

Aim and Method: To describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. XX patients were included all presenting with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer or imaging studies showing a pancreatic mass. During the procedure an nCLE preloaded 19G FNA needle was advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance. A contrast agent was administered intravenously (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%). The data was stored digitally for post procedural analysis. Afterwards EUS-FNA was performed for cytology smears to enable a final pathological diagnosis. Correlations between the nCLE images and the conventional pathology were identified.

Read the detailed description

Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with mortality rates following closely the incidence rates. The incidence is increasing and the prognosis is grim especially because of late diagnosis and metastatic potential. While surgical treatment is currently the only potential curative intervention, 80-85% of the PC cases are unfortunately detected in late unresectable stages of the disease. In spite of advances in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer less than 5% of patients are alive at five years.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a highly valuable tool in the management of pancreatic cancer patients. As a minimally invasive technique that enables high-resolution imaging of the pancreatic parenchyma and surrounding structures it is considered the method of choice for the detection of clinically suspected pancreatic tumors, with a negative predictive value close to 100%. Its diagnostic sensitivity was shown by previous studies to be superior compared to other imaging techniques, especially in the case of smaller tumors. Additionally EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) which is currently recommended as the firs-line procedure whenever pathological diagnosis is required. However, EUS-FNA as a sampling technique has its drawbacks, mainly represented by the relatively low negative predictive value in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. It thus cannot reliably rule out a diagnosis of malignancy and patients with high clinical suspicion usually need repeated FNA.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy has emerged in recent years as a novel technique that actually enables in vivo microscopic analysis during ongoing endoscopy. Endomicroscopy can be performed either with dedicated (eCLE) or with miniprobe-based systems (pCLE). It is a contrast based technique, the most widely used agent being the intravenously administered fluorescein. The probe-based endomicroscopy system consists of a flexible catheter probe representing a bundle of optical fibers linked to a micro-objective, a laser scanning unit and the control and acquisition software (Cellvizio; Mauna Kea Technology, Paris, France). The flexible confocal miniprobes were specifically designed to be passed through the working channels of standard endoscopes, biliary catheters or cholangioscopes and thus the pCLE system can be easily integrated in any endoscopy unit. The principle of the technique is based on a laser beam of defined wavelength being focused towards the targeted tissue and the recaptured signal is displayed as 'optical biopsies' in a single horizontal plane.

The potential role of CLE has been explored in pathology of both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, showing good accuracy for predicting the final histopathological diagnosis based on immediate evaluation of tissue and vascular patterns. Recently CLE has gone beyond the superficial luminal indications with the development of a new microprobe, i.e. a flexible probe thin enough that it can be passed through a 19-gauge needle. Thus under EUS guidance solid organs can be accessed for real-time microscopic information. nCLE imaging of abdominal organs has been so far achieved in animal models. The feasibility of the technique was also proved in a clinical study and descriptive criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm were developed from a multicentre trial. However, only a limited number of cases of pancreatic solid masses have been described with nCLE.

Aim The aim of the proposed study is to describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases identified during EUS procedures performed for pancreatic cancer staging (EUS-nCLE), while evaluating also the feasibility and safety of nCLE examination. The hypothesis is that EUS-nCLE could allow targeted tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions resulting in more accurate diagnosis. With further validation of the technique real-time pathological diagnosis could be obtained with immediate initiation of the adequate therapy after a single investigation.

Patients The study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI).

Patients will be selected according to the following criteria used throughout the study:

Data collected for each participant will include:

  • Personal data (name, surname, age, sex)
  • EUS variables (tumor characteristics)
  • Histological and immunohistochemical findings (final diagnosis)

Imaging tests All patients with a suspicion (clinical, US, CT/MRI) of pancreatic masses will be evaluated by EUS, nCLE and EUS-FNA for pathological diagnosis.

For EUS examination linear instruments will be used to perform complete examination of the pancreas.

Tumor characteristics (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described.

The presence of regional lymph nodes will be reported with their maximal size, echogenicity, shape and margins.

Identification of liver metastasis will also be looked upon.

EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:

The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance.

nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%).

Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis. EUS-FNA will be also performed after image acquisition for cytology smears and cell blocks to enable a final pathological diagnosis Confocal images will be analyzed during the examination by the principal investigator, with clinical and other procedural information in mind. In a second step offline analysis, the correlations between representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections will be identified.

Final diagnosis The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. Pathology samples obtained from duodeno-pancreatectomies or caudal pancreatectomies done with curative intent, as well as microhistological fragments obtained through EUS-FNA biopsy will be processed by paraffin embedding with usual stainings (haematoxylin-eosin), with subsequent immune-histochemistry where necessary.

For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months.

Being tested
needle based CLE, EUS-FNA
Keywords
confocal laser endomicroscopy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, Endoscopic ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • needle based CLEDevice

    Also called nCLE

    EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:

    The confocal microprobe will be preloaded in a 19G FNA needle as previously described and advanced into the lesion under EUS guidance.

    nCLE examination will follow after the intravenous administration of the contrast agent (2.5 ml fluorescein 10%).

    Image data will be stored digitally for offline analysis.

  • EUS-FNAProcedure or surgery

    Also called Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration

    Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an established tool in pancreatic masses used both for diagnosis, but also for staging purposes. Additionally, EUS enables guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is currently recommended as the first-line procedure whenever a pathological diagnosis is required.

Study groups in NCT01734967
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
needle based CLE & EUS-FNAExperimentalThe study will prospectively include patients referred to our department for EUS and EUS-FNA of suspected pancreatic masses during a 12 months period. The indication for this investigation will be based on the patient's clinical history and previous imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI).
Receives: Device: needle based CLE; Procedure: EUS-FNA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases

    Tumor characteristics (EUS) (echogenicity, echostructure, size, vascular invasion) will be described.

    EUS-nCLE will be performed after EUS identification of the pancreatic tumor / lymph node / liver metastasis:

    Confocal images will be analyzed to correlate representative confocal images and classical hematoxylin and eosin sections.

    The final diagnosis will be based on EUS-FNA cytology and/or histological specimens in those patients that will be further referred for surgery. For the patients without positive cytology or histology the diagnosis will be based on EUS tumor characteristics and other relevant information (clinical, imaging tests) with follow-up for at least six months

    The outcome is fully descriptive.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Safety

    Number of adverse events related til the procedure

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Feasibility

    Feasibility of nCLE examination measured by the number of patients, where nCLE is accomplished

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01734967
Sponsor's protocol ID
herlev
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
19 Nov 2012
Last updated
23 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.

    PubMed 21620466
  • Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Molinari M. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):867-97. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867.

    PubMed 21412497
  • Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-17. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20534.

    PubMed 18932265
  • DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):753-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00006.

    PubMed 15545675
  • Iglesias Garcia JJ, Larino Noia J, Alvarez Castro A, Cigarran B, Dominguez Munoz JE. Second-generation endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Pancreatic cancer vs. inflammatory mass in chronic pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Oct;101(10):723-30. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082009001000009. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 19899942
  • Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Frossard JL, Heresbach D, Pujol B, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gines A; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):897-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256754. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

    PubMed 21842456
  • Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P, von Delius S, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Voermans RP, Meining A. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

    PubMed 20421104
  • Konda VJ, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1049-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

    PubMed 21924718
  • Karstensen JG, Cartana T, Klausen PH, Hassan H, Popescu CF, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study for use in focal pancreatic masses. Pancreas. 2015 Jul;44(5):833-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000345. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26061561

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing needle based CLE and EUS-FNA in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and CHRONIC PANCREATITIS, run by Herlev Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark, Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Describe confocal imaging criteria for pancreatic masses, lymph nodes or liver metastases (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01734967, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in