Acute Ischaemic StrokePISTENCT01745692
Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation
A study testing Mechanical thrombectomy and Intravenous rtPA in people with Acute Ischaemic Stroke, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Ischaemic strokes (those caused by blockage in an artery in the brain caused by a blood clot) can be treated with very early use of clot-busting (thrombolytic) drugs to attempt to restore the blood supply and limit the damage, resulting in an increased proportion of people making a recovery to independence after… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischaemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Mechanical thrombectomy and Intravenous rtPA
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of supratentorial acute ischaemic stroke
- Male or nonpregnant female ≥18 years of age
- Clinically significant neurological deficit and NIHSS score ≥6.
- Eligible for IV rtPA according to standard guidelines and able to be commenced on IV treatment <4.5h after symptom onset.
- Enrolment, randomisation and procedure commencement (groin puncture) possible within 90 minutes of the start of IV rtPA treatment (groin puncture maximum 5.5h after stroke onset).
- Occlusion of the main middle cerebral artery (MCA) trunk, MCA bifurcation or intracranial internal carotid artery(carotidT, M1 or single proximal M2 branch) demonstrated on CTA, MRA, or DSA.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Interventional device delivery (guide catheter placed beyond aortic arch and angio obtained) can be achieved within 6 hours of onset of the stroke.
- Consent of patient or representative.
- Independent prior to the stroke (estimated mRS 02)
- Expected to be able to be followed up at 3 months
Who cannot join
- CT evidence of intracranial haemorrhage, or evidence of extensive established hypodensity on CT.
- Clinical history suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage even if CT normal.
- Known vascular access contraindications e.g. femoral bypass surgery, tight ipsilateral carotid stenosis, unsuitable proximal vascular anatomy likely to render endovascular catheterisation difficult or impossible.
- Extracranial ICA occlusion or basilar artery occlusion
- Alternative intracranial pathology potentially responsible for the new symptoms
- Medical comorbidities which would preclude safe cerebral vessel catheterisation or which are expected to limit life expectancy to <3 months (eg severe cardiac, renal or hepatic failure, significant coagulopathy, metastatic malignancy)
- Known allergy to radiological contrast
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Adjunctive Mechanical Thrombectomy Compared With Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Due to an Occluded Major Intracranial Vessel.
Ischaemic strokes (those caused by blockage in an artery in the brain caused by a blood clot) can be treated with very early use of clot-busting (thrombolytic) drugs to attempt to restore the blood supply and limit the damage, resulting in an increased proportion of people making a recovery to independence after stroke. However, drug treatment only succeed in restoring blood flow in a minority of people with clots in the larger arteries (10-25% depending on the size of the blood vessel) and these people also have the most severe strokes and highest risk of death or dependence as a result of the stroke. Current best treatment is therefore least effective in the group with the most severe strokes. Devices that can be fed through the blood vessels to either remove or break up the blood clot in the brain vessels can open this type of large artery blockage. However, using these devices is a highly skilled procedure and it takes some time both to set up the necessary facilities (including anaesthetic, nurses and medical support) and to reach the blockage. The extra time that is required to use these devices may mean that brain tissue is already irreversibly damaged. If so, then an individual patient cannot benefit and indeed may be harmed by opening the artery. There are no completed clinical trials comparing the outcome in people treated with standard stroke treatment and those treated with devices. PISTE is a randomised, controlled trial to test whether additional mechanical thrombectomy device treatment improves functional outcome in patients with large artery occlusion who are given IV thrombolytic drug treatment as standard care.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischaemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Mechanical thrombectomy, Intravenous rtPA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mechanical thrombectomyDevice
Intravenous rtPADrug
Also called alteplase
All patients receive IV alteplase
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous rtPA | Active comparator | IV alteplase (rtPA) 0.9mg/kg (10% of dose as bolus followed by 90% as infusion over 1 hour, to a maximum dose of 90mg total) given within 4.5 hours of onset of stroke symptoms Receives: Drug: Intravenous rtPA |
| Intravenous rtPA and Mechanical Thrombectomy | Experimental | IV alteplase (rtPA) 0.9mg/kg (10% of dose as bolus followed by 90% as infusion over 1 hour, to a maximum dose of 90mg total) given within 4.5 hours of onset of stroke symptoms + additional mechanical thrombectomy procedure to commence within 90 minutes of start of IV rtPA infusion Receives: Device: Mechanical thrombectomy; Drug: Intravenous rtPA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
modified Rankin Scale
The proportion with favourable functional outcome defined as mRS 0-2 at 90 (+/-7) days based on the modified Rankin scale structured interview
Measured: Day 90 +/-7
Secondary outcomes (10)
modified Rankin Scale
Full neurological recovery (mRS 0-1 versus 2-6)
Measured: Day 90+/-7
Mortality
Measured: Day 90 +/-7
modified Rankin Scale
Change in distribution of mRS scores adjusted for baseline variables
Measured: Day 90 +/-7
NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Early major neurological improvement of 8 or more points, or return to NIHSS total score of 0 or 1, at 72 hours (or discharge if earlier)
Measured: 72 hours
Angiographic patency
Angiographic patency at 22-36 hours (Core lab assessed), using CTA or MRA
Measured: 22-36 hours
Immediate recanalisation rate
Immediate (i.e. end of procedure) recanalisation rates in subjects undergoing interventional procedures (core lab assessed).
Measured: End of procedure
Home Time
Days spent at home between stroke and day 90
Measured: Day 90 +/-7
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage rates defined as local or remote parenchymal haemorrhage type 2 (PH2 or PHr2 ICH by ECASS 2 definition) on the 22-36 h post-treatment imaging scan, combined with a neurological deterioration of 4 points or more on the NIHSS from baseline, or from the lowest NIHSS value between baseline and 24 h, or leading to death (SITS-MOST definition)
Measured: 22-26h
Intracranial haemorrhage
Any intracranial haemorrhage on 22-36h CT or MRI
Measured: 22-36 hours
Significant extracranial bleeding
Extracranial bleeding, groin haematoma requiring evacuation / surgery or transfusion
Measured: Up to day 90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Why it stopped: IDMC decision - recommended on basis of results from other relevant clinical trials, there were not safety concerns
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Ischaemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Glasgow, University of Edinburgh, Newcastle University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Keith W Muir, MD, FRCP, Principal investigator, University of Glasgow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01745692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GN11NE257
- Other IDs
- TSA 2011/06
- Acronym
- PISTE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Heggie R, Wu O, White P, Ford GA, Wardlaw J, Brown MM, Clifton A, Muir KW. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A cost-effectiveness and value of implementation analysis. Int J Stroke. 2020 Oct;15(8):881-898. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879656. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
PubMed 31564243Muir KW, Ford GA, Messow CM, Ford I, Murray A, Clifton A, Brown MM, Madigan J, Lenthall R, Robertson F, Dixit A, Cloud GC, Wardlaw J, Freeman J, White P; PISTE Investigators. Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;88(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314117. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PubMed 27756804Hurford R, Tyrrell PJ. Stroke thrombolysis: where are we and where are we going? Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Dec;13 Suppl 6:s20-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-6-s20.
PubMed 24298176
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Adjunctive Mechanical Thrombectomy Compared With Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Due to an Occluded Major Intracranial Vessel.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01745692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PISTE / GN11NE257
- Conditions
- Acute Ischaemic Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: IDMC decision - recommended on basis of results from other relevant clinical trials, there were not safety concerns
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Glasgow, University of Edinburgh, Newcastle University
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ischaemic strokes (those caused by blockage in an artery in the brain caused by a blood clot) can be treated with very early use of clot-busting (thrombolytic) drugs to attempt to restore the blood supply and limit the damage, resulting in an increased proportion of people making a recovery to independence after stroke. However, drug treatment only succeed in restoring blood flow in a minority of people with clots in the larger arteries (10-25% depending on the size of the blood vessel) and these people also have the most severe strokes and highest risk of death or dependence as a result of the stroke. Current best treatment is therefore least effective in the group with the most severe strokes. Devices that can be fed through the blood vessels to either remove or break up the blood clot in the brain vessels can open this type of large artery blockage. However, using these devices is a highly skilled procedure and it takes some time both to set up the necessary facilities (including anaesthetic, nurses and medical support) and to reach the blockage. The extra time that is required to use these devices may mean that brain tissue is already irreversibly damaged. If so, then an individual patient cannot benefit and indeed may be harmed by opening the artery. There are no completed clinical trials comparing the outcome in people treated with standard stroke treatment and those treated with devices. PISTE is a randomised, controlled trial to test whether additional mechanical thrombectomy device treatment improves functional outcome in patients with large artery occlusion who are given IV thrombolytic drug treatment as standard care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous rtPA | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous rtPAIV alteplase (rtPA) 0.9mg/kg (10% of dose as bolus followed by 90% as infusion over 1 hour, to a maximum dose of 90mg total) given within 4.5 hours of onset of stroke symptoms |
| Intravenous rtPA and Mechanical Thrombectomy | Experimental | Device: Mechanical thrombectomy, Drug: Intravenous rtPAIV alteplase (rtPA) 0.9mg/kg (10% of dose as bolus followed by 90% as infusion over 1 hour, to a maximum dose of 90mg total) given within 4.5 hours of onset of stroke symptoms + additional mechanical thrombectomy procedure to commence within 90 minutes of start of IV rtPA infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of supratentorial acute ischaemic stroke
- Male or nonpregnant female ≥18 years of age
- Clinically significant neurological deficit and NIHSS score ≥6.
- Eligible for IV rtPA according to standard guidelines and able to be commenced on IV treatment <4.5h after symptom onset.
- Enrolment, randomisation and procedure commencement (groin puncture) possible within 90 minutes of the start of IV rtPA treatment (groin puncture maximum 5.5h after stroke onset).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- CT evidence of intracranial haemorrhage, or evidence of extensive established hypodensity on CT.
- Clinical history suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage even if CT normal.
- Known vascular access contraindications e.g. femoral bypass surgery, tight ipsilateral carotid stenosis, unsuitable proximal vascular anatomy likely to render endovascular catheterisation difficult or impossible.
- Extracranial ICA occlusion or basilar artery occlusion
- Alternative intracranial pathology potentially responsible for the new symptoms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical thrombectomy | Device | Intravenous rtPA and Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| Intravenous rtPAAlso: alteplaseAll patients receive IV alteplase | Drug | Intravenous rtPA, Intravenous rtPA and Mechanical Thrombectomy |
Primary outcome
modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Day 90 +/-7
The proportion with favourable functional outcome defined as mRS 0-2 at 90 (+/-7) days based on the modified Rankin scale structured interview
10 secondary outcomes
modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Day 90+/-7
Mortality
Time frame: Day 90 +/-7
modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Day 90 +/-7
NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: 72 hours
Angiographic patency
Time frame: 22-36 hours
Immediate recanalisation rate
Time frame: End of procedure
Home Time
Time frame: Day 90 +/-7
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage
Time frame: 22-26h
Intracranial haemorrhage
Time frame: 22-36 hours
Significant extracranial bleeding
Time frame: Up to day 90
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: IDMC decision - recommended on basis of results from other relevant clinical trials, there were not safety concerns). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31564243Heggie R, Wu O, White P, Ford GA, Wardlaw J, Brown MM, Clifton A, Muir KW. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A cost-effectiveness and value of implementation analysis. Int J Stroke. 2020 Oct;15(8):881-898. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879656. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27756804Muir KW, Ford GA, Messow CM, Ford I, Murray A, Clifton A, Brown MM, Madigan J, Lenthall R, Robertson F, Dixit A, Cloud GC, Wardlaw J, Freeman J, White P; PISTE Investigators. Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;88(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314117. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24298176Hurford R, Tyrrell PJ. Stroke thrombolysis: where are we and where are we going? Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Dec;13 Suppl 6:s20-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-6-s20.
Related trials for Acute Ischaemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Recombinant Human Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Extended Window Selected by CT-Based Artificial Intelligence
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Rapid Local Ischemic Postconditioning on Stroke After Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Safety and Feasibility of NRICM301 Added to Usual Care for Adults With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Different Transfer Models
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Keith W Muir, MD, FRCP principal investigator
University of Glasgow
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mechanical thrombectomy and Intravenous rtPA in people with Acute Ischaemic Stroke, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: IDMC decision - recommended on basis of results from other relevant clinical trials, there were not safety concerns). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
modified Rankin Scale (time frame: Day 90 +/-7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01745692, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2015.