Osteoarthritis, KneeNCT01747070

Effect of Cranial Stimulation and Acupuncture on Pain, Functional Capability and Cerebral Function in Osteoarthritis

A study testing tDCS and EAC in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Chronic Pain, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and electro acupuncture (EAC) compared to sham treatment in reducing pain, improving functional capacity and functioning of the neuro-immune-endocrine system in patients with chronic pain due to knee… Read more about this study

Who is it for?: Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for: Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Pain
What is being tested?: tDCS and EAC
Could I receive a placebo?: Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people: 60 participants
Where: 1 siteBrazil
Study dates: Mar 2014to Dec 2016
Phase: Interventional
Are there results?: None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 18 years and older
Women only
No healthy volunteers
Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria:- Provision of informed consent to participate.

Women with over 18 years old,with chronic pain because of primary osteoarthritis of the knee.
Pain stable for at least three months. Score greater than or equal to 3 cm (0 cm = "no pain" and "worst possible pain" = 10cm) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain perception at baseline.
No contraindications to electroacupuncture, transcranial direct current stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Exclusion Criteria:-Clinically significant or unstable disorder, medical or psychiatric.

Presence of neurological or rheumatic comorbidity.
Pregnancy.
Already having been treated with acupuncture.
Having performed with corticosteroid infiltration in the last six weeks or are using this.
Having performed with hyaluronic acid infiltration in the last year.
Previous surgery on the limb to be treated or have surgical program for the next 6 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035903

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Electro Acupuncture in Pain, Functional Capability and Cortical Excitability in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

The knee osteoarthritis has high prevalence, which tends to increase with the aging population. The limited efficacy of pharmacological interventions stimulates the search for other options, in order to increase the therapeutic success. Acupuncture is widely used for pain control in several pathologies. A modality of intramuscular stimulation to quantify the intensity of the stimulus is electro acupuncture (EAC) that the intensity of 2 Hz accelerates the release of enkephalins, endorphins and beta-endorphins. The application of electric currents to modify brain function is a very old technique. The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is based on applying transcranial direct weak current (usually above 2mA) through electrodes in a non-invasive, simple and painless. Other advantages include low cost and the possibility of a placebo reliable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability to reduce pain and improve functionality in chronic pain for knee osteoarthritis with two techniques, one that promotes a bottom-up approach (EAC) and other top-down (tDCS). We will seek to analyze the efficacy of them separately and together, seeking summation of results.

Conditions: Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Pain
Being tested: tDCS and EAC sham, tDCS sham and EAC sham, tDCS sham and EAC, tDCS and EAC
Keywords: Electro Acupuncture, Knee Osteoarthritis, Chronic pain, Cortical Excitability
Medical subject headings: Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

tDCS and EAC shamOther
Also called Transcranial direct current stimulation.
The tDCS apparatus is operated on battery power, will be used rubber electrodes soaked in saline solution. The anode is placed in M1 and the cathode in the supraorbital region.
tDCS sham and EAC shamOther
Also called DIMST: deep intramuscular stimulation.
For the EAC sham we will use rubber electrodes. They will be applied in the same areas of active EAC. They are connected to the same electroacupuncture device, but without current passing for the patient. All subjects receive one 30min session.
tDCS sham and EACOther
Also called DIMST
For the sham tDCS we will use the same apparatus in the same location, but the current is stopped after 30 seconds.
tDCS and EACOther
Also called DIMST
For the acupuncture we will use needles with guide tubes that are 40 mm in length and 0.25 mm in diameter. The needling will be applied using an electro acupuncture device in the dermatomes, myotome, or sclerotome corresponding to the nerve roots involved in the knee (L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, S1, and S2). All patients received one 30min session using a frequency of 2 Hz.

Study groups in NCT01747070
Study group	Role	What they receive
tDCS and EAC sham	Active comparator	Subjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS. The tDCS consist of application of current of 2 mA, the anode being placed in the motor cortex (M1) and the cathode in the supraorbital region, for 30 minutes,using electrodes with saline solution. The sham DIMST consist of the use of rubber electrodes placed in the same places that active treatment. Will use the same electrical apparatus, but without pass of current to the electrodes. The unit will be in front of the patient on with their lights blinking. Receives: Other: tDCS and EAC sham
tDCS sham and EAC sham	Placebo comparator	The subjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS sham and EAC sham. The sham tDCS be performed in the same way as the active, although the Electro device is turned off 30 seconds after the beginning of treatment, the session will have the same duration of 30 minutes. The EAC sham consists of placement of rubber electrodes in the same areas of active stimulation (beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, muscles vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus). The electrodes are connected to the same device electro, for 30 minutes, but without passage of electrical stimulation to the patient. The device is kept on and in front of the patient, with the lights blinking. Receives: Other: tDCS sham and EAC sham
tDCS sham and EAC	Active comparator	Subjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS sham and EAC.The sham tDCS be performed in the same way as the active, although the Electro device is turned off 30 seconds after the beginning of treatment, the session will have the same duration of 30 minutes. The EAC consist of electrical stimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz for 30 min. The needles are placed beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, with a depth of 3 cm and in the muscles: vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus. Receives: Other: tDCS sham and EAC
tDCS and EAC	Experimental	Subjects will receive 05 sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) and electroacupuncture(EAC). The tDCS consist of application of current of 2 mA, the anode being placed in the motor cortex (M1) and the cathode in the supraorbital region, for 30 minutes,using electrodes with saline. The electroacupuncture consist of electrical stimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz for 30 min. The needles are placed beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, with a depth of 3 cm and in the muscles: vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus. Receives: Other: tDCS and EAC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Change in the intensity of daily pain.
Measurement of outcomes by clinical parameters: Pain - The pain daily, in the course of treatment will be measured by the Visual Analog Scale, (VAS) 10 cm where zero corresponds to no pain and 10 cm maximum pain.
Measured: The treatment will be 5 daily sessions.The pain level will be assessed before treatment, after each session and at the end of treatment.Totaling six days.
Change in the pressure pain threshold.
Measurement of outcomes by parameters of pain threshold: Threshold Tolerance Test Algometry Pressure: the tolerance threshold pressure is measured by pressure algometer digital, with an area of 1 cm2 in area with muscle trigger point that triggers more pain. The maximum pressure to be applied will be 1400 kPa (Kilopascal) to avoid tissue damage. The patient will be instructed to indicate when the stimulus becomes unbearable and the value of tolerance threshold will be constituted by the average of three measurements.
Measured: The pressure pain threshold will will be evaluated before and after 5 daily sessions of treatment.Totaling six days.

Secondary outcomes (4)

State of physical and mental health.
The quality of life and health status will be assessed through the WHOQOL ( World Health Organization Quality of Life), reduced form, adapted to Portuguese in Brazil. The level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed by the scale of catastrophic thoughts.
Measured: The state of physical and mental health will be assessed before and after treatment. Totaly five days.
Level of depressive symptoms .
Depressive symptoms are measured by the Beck Depression Scale, which covers neurovegetative symptoms of depression .
Measured: Depressive symptoms will be assessed before and after treatment. Totaly five days.
Daily sleep quality.
Sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the 10cm scale of sleep quality.
Measured: Sleep quality will be evaluated daily, totaling five days of evaluation.
Change in the level of functionality.
WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Questionnaire) - assessment of pain, stiffness and functional ability.
Measured: The functionality level will be evaluated before and after 5 daily sessions of treatment.Totaling six days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

Mar 2014Dec 2016

First posted11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
Study startMar 2014
Primary completionMar 2016
Study completionDec 2016

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
More trials run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase N/A
Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: Single blind
Who is masked: Participant
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01747070
Sponsor's protocol ID: 110013
Other IDs: U1111-1130-1855
Status last verified: Aug 2017
First submitted: 15 Oct 2012
Last updated: 22 Aug 2017
Results posted: No
Data monitoring committee: Yes
Individual data sharing: Undecided

Publications

Lima MC, Fregni F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurology. 2008 Jun 10;70(24):2329-37. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314649.38527.93.
PubMed 18541887
Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1568-74. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242731.10074.3c.
PubMed 17101886
Zaghi S, Thiele B, Pimentel D, Pimentel T, Fregni F. Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):439-51. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0615.
PubMed 22124038
Zunhammer M, Eichhammer P, Franz J, Hajak G, Busch V. Effects of acupuncture needle penetration on motor system excitability. Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Jun;42(4):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2012.02.134. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
PubMed 22632870
Lo YL, Cui SL. Acupuncture and the modulation of cortical excitability. Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 1;14(9):1229-31. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200307010-00008.
PubMed 12824765
Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, Cutait MM, Fregni F, Camanho GL. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31. doi: 10.1002/art.24120.
PubMed 18821657
Srbely JZ, Dickey JP, Lee D, Lowerison M. Dry needle stimulation of myofascial trigger points evokes segmental anti-nociceptive effects. J Rehabil Med. 2010 May;42(5):463-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0535.
PubMed 20544158
Schwenkreis P, Scherens A, Ronnau AK, Hoffken O, Tegenthoff M, Maier C. Cortical disinhibition occurs in chronic neuropathic, but not in chronic nociceptive pain. BMC Neurosci. 2010 Jun 11;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-73.
PubMed 20540759
Laste G, Caumo W, Adachi LN, Rozisky JR, de Macedo IC, Filho PR, Partata WA, Fregni F, Torres IL. After-effects of consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a rat model of chronic inflammation. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;221(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3149-x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
PubMed 22752510
Le Bars D, Dickenson AH, Besson JM. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). II. Lack of effect on non-convergent neurones, supraspinal involvement and theoretical implications. Pain. 1979 Jun;6(3):305-327. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90050-2.
PubMed 460936
Boggio PS, Amancio EJ, Correa CF, Cecilio S, Valasek C, Bajwa Z, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Edwards DJ, Fregni F. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study. Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):691-5. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414.
PubMed 19920718
da Graca-Tarrago M, Lech M, Angoleri LDM, Santos DS, Deitos A, Brietzke AP, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Intramuscular electrical stimulus potentiates motor cortex modulation effects on pain and descending inhibitory systems in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, factorial, sham-controlled study. J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 3;12:209-221. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S181019. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30655690

Want to know more?

The sponsor has not listed a contact. The official record may have more details.

Talk to your doctor first and take this page with you. Only the study team can confirm whether you can join.

Questions to ask the study team

What is the study trying to find out?
What would I need to do, and how often would I visit?
Could I receive a placebo instead of the treatment?
What are the possible risks and benefits for me?
Will it cost me anything? Are travel or time paid for?
Can I keep seeing my own doctor during the study?
What happens when the study ends?

See locations

Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis

All Osteoarthritis, Knee trials

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Electro Acupuncture in Pain, Functional Capability and Cortical Excitability in Patients With Osteoarthritis.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01747070
Acronym / sponsor ID: 110013
Conditions: Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Pain
Keywords: Electro Acupuncture, Knee Osteoarthritis, Chronic pain, Cortical Excitability
Study type: Interventional
Recruitment status: Completed
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)
Lead sponsor: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
Collaborators: Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
Study start: Mar 2014
Primary completion: Mar 2016 (actual)
Study completion: Dec 2016 (actual)
First posted: 11 Dec 2012 (estimated)
Results: Not posted in the source record

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Detailed description

Study design

Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: Single blind (participant)
Number of arms: 4

Arm	Type	Receives
tDCS and EAC sham	Active comparator	Other: tDCS and EAC shamSubjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS. The tDCS consist of application of current of 2 mA, the anode being placed in the motor cortex (M1) and the cathode in the supraorbital region, for 30 minutes,using electrodes with saline solution. The sham DIMST consist of the use of rubber electrodes placed in the same places that active treatment. Will use the same electrical apparatus, but without pass of current to the electrodes. The unit will be in front of the patient on with their lights blinking.
tDCS sham and EAC sham	Placebo comparator	Other: tDCS sham and EAC shamThe subjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS sham and EAC sham. The sham tDCS be performed in the same way as the active, although the Electro device is turned off 30 seconds after the beginning of treatment, the session will have the same duration of 30 minutes. The EAC sham consists of placement of rubber electrodes in the same areas of active stimulation (beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, muscles vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus). The electrodes are connected to the same device electro, for 30 minutes, but without passage of electrical stimulation to the patient. The device is kept on and in front of the patient, with the lights blinking.
tDCS sham and EAC	Active comparator	Other: tDCS sham and EACSubjects will receive 05 sessions of tDCS sham and EAC.The sham tDCS be performed in the same way as the active, although the Electro device is turned off 30 seconds after the beginning of treatment, the session will have the same duration of 30 minutes. The EAC consist of electrical stimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz for 30 min. The needles are placed beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, with a depth of 3 cm and in the muscles: vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus.
tDCS and EAC	Experimental	Other: tDCS and EACSubjects will receive 05 sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) and electroacupuncture(EAC). The tDCS consist of application of current of 2 mA, the anode being placed in the motor cortex (M1) and the cathode in the supraorbital region, for 30 minutes,using electrodes with saline. The electroacupuncture consist of electrical stimulation with a frequency of 2 Hz for 30 min. The needles are placed beside the spinous processes of L1 to S2, with a depth of 3 cm and in the muscles: vastus lateralis, rectus anterioris, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus and insertion of the pes anserinus.

Who may qualify

Ages: 18 years and older
Sex: Female only
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Adult, Older adult

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Intervention	Type	Arms
tDCS and EAC shamAlso: Transcranial direct current stimulation.The tDCS apparatus is operated on battery power, will be used rubber electrodes soaked in saline solution. The anode is placed in M1 and the cathode in the supraorbital region.	Other	tDCS and EAC sham
tDCS sham and EAC shamAlso: DIMST: deep intramuscular stimulation.For the EAC sham we will use rubber electrodes. They will be applied in the same areas of active EAC. They are connected to the same electroacupuncture device, but without current passing for the patient. All subjects receive one 30min session.	Other	tDCS sham and EAC sham
tDCS sham and EACAlso: DIMSTFor the sham tDCS we will use the same apparatus in the same location, but the current is stopped after 30 seconds.	Other	tDCS sham and EAC
tDCS and EACAlso: DIMSTFor the acupuncture we will use needles with guide tubes that are 40 mm in length and 0.25 mm in diameter. The needling will be applied using an electro acupuncture device in the dermatomes, myotome, or sclerotome corresponding to the nerve roots involved in the knee (L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, S1, and S2). All patients received one 30min session using a frequency of 2 Hz.	Other	tDCS and EAC

Primary outcome

Change in the intensity of daily pain.
Time frame: The treatment will be 5 daily sessions.The pain level will be assessed before treatment, after each session and at the end of treatment.Totaling six days.
Measurement of outcomes by clinical parameters: Pain - The pain daily, in the course of treatment will be measured by the Visual Analog Scale, (VAS) 10 cm where zero corresponds to no pain and 10 cm maximum pain.
Change in the pressure pain threshold.
Time frame: The pressure pain threshold will will be evaluated before and after 5 daily sessions of treatment.Totaling six days.
Measurement of outcomes by parameters of pain threshold: Threshold Tolerance Test Algometry Pressure: the tolerance threshold pressure is measured by pressure algometer digital, with an area of 1 cm2 in area with muscle trigger point that triggers more pain. The maximum pressure to be applied will be 1400 kPa (Kilopascal) to avoid tissue damage. The patient will be instructed to indicate when the stimulus becomes unbearable and the value of tolerance threshold will be constituted by the average of three measurements.

4 secondary outcomes

State of physical and mental health.
Time frame: The state of physical and mental health will be assessed before and after treatment. Totaly five days.
Level of depressive symptoms .
Time frame: Depressive symptoms will be assessed before and after treatment. Totaly five days.
Daily sleep quality.
Time frame: Sleep quality will be evaluated daily, totaling five days of evaluation.
Change in the level of functionality.
Time frame: The functionality level will be evaluated before and after 5 daily sessions of treatment.Totaling six days.

Results and safety

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2017.
Background: PubMed 18541887Lima MC, Fregni F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurology. 2008 Jun 10;70(24):2329-37. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314649.38527.93.
Background: PubMed 17101886Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1568-74. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242731.10074.3c.
Background: PubMed 22124038Zaghi S, Thiele B, Pimentel D, Pimentel T, Fregni F. Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):439-51. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0615.
Background: PubMed 22632870Zunhammer M, Eichhammer P, Franz J, Hajak G, Busch V. Effects of acupuncture needle penetration on motor system excitability. Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Jun;42(4):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2012.02.134. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Background: PubMed 12824765Lo YL, Cui SL. Acupuncture and the modulation of cortical excitability. Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 1;14(9):1229-31. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200307010-00008.
Background: PubMed 18821657Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, Cutait MM, Fregni F, Camanho GL. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31. doi: 10.1002/art.24120.
Background: PubMed 20544158Srbely JZ, Dickey JP, Lee D, Lowerison M. Dry needle stimulation of myofascial trigger points evokes segmental anti-nociceptive effects. J Rehabil Med. 2010 May;42(5):463-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0535.
Background: PubMed 20540759Schwenkreis P, Scherens A, Ronnau AK, Hoffken O, Tegenthoff M, Maier C. Cortical disinhibition occurs in chronic neuropathic, but not in chronic nociceptive pain. BMC Neurosci. 2010 Jun 11;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-73.
Background: PubMed 22752510Laste G, Caumo W, Adachi LN, Rozisky JR, de Macedo IC, Filho PR, Partata WA, Fregni F, Torres IL. After-effects of consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a rat model of chronic inflammation. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;221(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3149-x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Background: PubMed 460936Le Bars D, Dickenson AH, Besson JM. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). II. Lack of effect on non-convergent neurones, supraspinal involvement and theoretical implications. Pain. 1979 Jun;6(3):305-327. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90050-2.
Background: PubMed 19920718Boggio PS, Amancio EJ, Correa CF, Cecilio S, Valasek C, Bajwa Z, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Edwards DJ, Fregni F. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study. Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):691-5. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414.
Derived from this study: PubMed 30655690da Graca-Tarrago M, Lech M, Angoleri LDM, Santos DS, Deitos A, Brietzke AP, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Intramuscular electrical stimulus potentiates motor cortex modulation effects on pain and descending inhibitory systems in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, factorial, sham-controlled study. J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 3;12:209-221. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S181019. eCollection 2019.
Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided

Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

Wolnei Caumo, PhD study director

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS and EAC in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Chronic Pain, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the intensity of daily pain. (time frame: The treatment will be 5 daily sessions.The pain level will be assessed before treatment, after each session and at the end of treatment.Totaling six days.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01747070, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2017.