AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 2CTS-HVNCT01756820

Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Versus Knifelight for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial

A Phase 2 study testing Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®) and Knifelight in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by University of Ioannina at 1 site in Greece.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Agee technique, SmartRelease™, MicroAire) and mini-open technique (Knifelight®, Stryker) are equally effective and safe surgical options for the treatment of primary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?
Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®) and Knifelight
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jan 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • primary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • no symptoms' relief after 3 months of conservative treatment (NSAIDS, Cast, rest)
  • electrophysiological examination confirms the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Who cannot join

  • Secondary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Pregnancy
  • Rheumatoid diseases
  • Previous trauma at hand or other condition that may effect the anatomy (eg infections)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Greece1 site
  • University Hospital of Ioannina

    Ioannina, 45500

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release vs Knifelight for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Control Trial.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Agee technique, SmartRelease™, MicroAire) and mini-open technique (Knifelight®, Stryker) are equally effective and safe surgical options for the treatment of primary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Being tested
Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®), Knifelight
Keywords
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, transverse ligament, carpal tunnel release, endoscopic, minimal invasive, mini-open, median nerve
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®)Procedure or surgery

    Also called SmartRelease® ECTR endoscopic carpal tunnel release system of MicroAire.

    SmartRelease® ECTR endoscopic carpal tunnel release system of MicroAire (http://www.microaire.com/products/ectr-endoscopic-carpal-tunnel/smart-release-ctrs/).

  • KnifelightProcedure or surgery

    Also called Knifelight®, Stryker

    A mini-open single portal technique using the Knifelight® device (Stryker) according to the surgical technique as described by the manufacturer (antegrade approach)

Study groups in NCT01756820
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®)Active comparatorSingle-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®) will be used, according to the endoscopic technique described by Agee at al.
Receives: Procedure: Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®)
Knifelight®Active comparatorA mini-open technique will be performed, using the Knifelight® (Stryker).
Receives: Procedure: Knifelight

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Satisfaction

    Satisfaction will be assessed by two ways

    • by answering to the question "are you happy with the result of the surgery?"
    • with a VAS score (0-100) assessing the satisfaction

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

  2. Complications

    Any complication will be reported including remaining numbness, pain in incision, painful scar, complex regional pain syndrome, infection etc

    Measured: up to 6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Pain

    Pain will be assessed

    • as a dichotomous outcome (yes/no)
    • as a continuous outcome (VAS score)

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

  2. Grip strength

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

  3. key pinch

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

  4. Time to return to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and return to work

    Time to return to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) will be reported. Return to work will also be reported for participants that are employed.

    Measured: up to the end of the study

  5. Recurrences and reoperations

    Measured: up to the end of study

  6. Symptom Severity Scale (SSS)

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

  7. Function Severity Status (FSS)

    Measured: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionJan 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2016 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The principal investigator of the study relocated to another institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01756820
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ioannina-CTS-HV
Acronym
CTS-HV
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
20 Dec 2012
Last updated
11 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Single-portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release (Microaire®) and Knifelight in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by University of Ioannina at 1 site in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Satisfaction (time frame: at 1 and 6 months postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in