AzTrials
AzTrials

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsPhase 4NCT01758341

Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

A Phase 4 study testing Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Biliary Tract Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Dec 2012to May 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. RFA procedures performed in Austria so far will be analyzed with regard to feasibility and safety of the technique. Therefore, the following parameters will be assessed: (among others) technical failures during the RFA procedure, complications during the RFA procedure, hospital stay, adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure), 30-day and 90-day mortality. The results of this study should help to better understand important aspects of biliary RFA which may positively influence future applications of this method.

Read the detailed description

Introduction

Biliary obstruction is the most relevant life limiting factor in patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. Underlying tumors, such as extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCa) of Klatskin type, pancreatic adenocarcinoma or metastases of colorectal cancer, are often diagnosed at an advanced stage when presenting with biliary obstruction. This mostly restricts treatment strategies to palliative management. Within this setting the prevention of biliary complications like jaundice, cholangitis or cholangiosepsis is one of the therapeutic key factors to extend survival and maintain quality of life [De Groen, Skipworth]. Endoscopic stenting of the biliary tract is an easy and safe approach to restore biliary drainage [Smith]. Self-expanding metal stents are preferred to plastic stents because of the lower risk of stent occlusion [Kaassis, Soderlund]. In addition to stenting endoscopic therapies that directly affect the local tumor mass, have been developed within the past years. First of all, photodynamic therapy using different photosensitizers has shown promising results for the reduction of tumor size and maintenance of biliary drainage [Ortner, Zoepf]. However, the patient management for this treatment involving peri-interventional photosensitivity remains cumbersome.

Recently, an endoscopically applicable radiofrequency catheter for the biliary tract, the so called HabibTM EndoHBP catheter, was introduced into the market. It uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination. RFA is well known from transcutaneous applications, where it already proved to be effective as a treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic CCa [Minami]. The new HabibTM EndoHBP catheter was already evaluated ex vivo [Itoi] and showed promising results concerning safety and prevention of stent occlusion in the context of one small retrospective clinical study [Steel].

Primary objective

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction

Study Design

Retrospective analysis of prospectively gained clinical data

Primary endpoint

Technical failures during the RFA procedure

Secondary endpoints

  1. Complications during the RFA procedure
  2. Hospital stay
  3. Adverse events during hospital stay and unil first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure)
  4. 30-day and 90-day mortality

Study Population

All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction between November 2010 and December 2012 in Austria.

Methods

Endoscopic examination report databases will be screened for "radiofrequency ablation" in the context of an "endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" to identify the mentioned study population. Examination reports, discharge letters and patient curves of the study patients will be screened to yield the following parameters:

  • Demographics
  • Sex
  • Age at first RFA-intervention
  • Underlying disease that led to malignant biliary obstruction
  • Type of underlying disease
  • Time from diagnosis to first RFA-intervention
  • Previous treatment attempts (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy)
  • Procedure related parameters
  • Prior biliary stents (type, amount)
  • Date of RFA procedure
  • Amount of RFA-applications during the procedure (energy, time)
  • Technical failure of the RFA catheter during the RFA procedure (defined as any technical problem that hinders the satisfactory application of RFA)
  • Complications during the RFA procedure (defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device)
  • Stenting after the procedure (type, amount)
  • Post-interventional parameters
  • Days of hospitalization after the RFA procedure
  • Adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure) defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device
  • Survial status (dead/alive) at the time of the data collection
  • (Cause of death)
  • (Time between first RFA procedure and death)

Data processing will be done after pseudonymization using continuous patient identification numbers. All parameters will be assessed descriptively. For scaled parameters (e.g. age) median and range will be calculated, for nominal parameters (e.g. type of underlying disease) the proportions of sub-items will be reported. Mortality will be assessed creating a Kaplan Meyer curve. 30-day and 90-day mortality will be extrapolated from this curve. All data processing will be done with SPSS 19.0.

Risk/Benefit assessment

Due to its retrospective design this study does not inherit any risk for the study patients.

Expected impact and Outlook

The results of this study may help to better understand the feasibility and safety profile of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter with potential effects on future applications.

Being tested
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), HabibTM EndoHPB catheter
Keywords
Malignant biliary obstruction, Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Therapeutic endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Biliary Tract Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery

    Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination to treat malignant biliary strictures.

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)Procedure or surgery

    ERCP is used to guide the RFA-catheter under radiological control to the location of the malignant stricture.

  • HabibTM EndoHPB catheterDevice

    Used to apply radiofrequency energy to the malignant biliary stricture (see also intervention "endoscopic radiofrequency ablation")

Study groups in NCT01758341
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Malignant biliary obstructionExperimentalAll patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation; Procedure: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Device: HabibTM EndoHPB catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures

    The technical feasibility in this study will be specified as ratio of all technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended. A RFA-application will be classified as technically successful if it is possible to introduce the RFA-catheter into the biliary system, place it adequately accross the malignant stricture, apply RFA-energy and withdraw the RFA-catheter after RFA-application.

    Measured: During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of patients with interventional complications

    Clinically relevant complications occuring during the use of RFA, defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device (e.g. bleeding, perforation).

    Measured: During the respective RFA-procedure (an expected average of 1 hour)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2012
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
58 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01758341
Sponsor's protocol ID
EK 1837/2012
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
11 Dec 2012
Last updated
23 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411807. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10536130
  • Skipworth JR, Olde Damink SW, Imber C, Bridgewater J, Pereira SP, Malago M. Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):1063-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04851.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

    PubMed 21933219
  • Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90455-3.

    PubMed 7996958
  • Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, Canard JM, Fritsch J, Rey JF, Burtin P. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):178-82. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.66.

    PubMed 12556780
  • Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.052.

    PubMed 16733114
  • Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.

    PubMed 14598251
  • Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.

    PubMed 16279895
  • Minami Y, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. World J Radiol. 2010 Nov 28;2(11):417-24. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i11.417.

    PubMed 21179308
  • Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tamura M, Watanabe Y, Moriyasu F, Kahaleh M, Habib N, Nagao T, Yokoyama T, Kasuya K, Kawakami H. Evaluation of effects of a novel endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation biliary catheter using an ex-vivo pig liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0465-7.

    PubMed 22038500
  • Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.

    PubMed 21184881

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures (time frame: During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01758341, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in