Biliary Tract NeoplasmsPhase 4NCT01758341
Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
A Phase 4 study testing Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Austria1 site
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Vienna
About this study
Official title: Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. RFA procedures performed in Austria so far will be analyzed with regard to feasibility and safety of the technique. Therefore, the following parameters will be assessed: (among others) technical failures during the RFA procedure, complications during the RFA procedure, hospital stay, adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure), 30-day and 90-day mortality. The results of this study should help to better understand important aspects of biliary RFA which may positively influence future applications of this method.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Biliary obstruction is the most relevant life limiting factor in patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. Underlying tumors, such as extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCa) of Klatskin type, pancreatic adenocarcinoma or metastases of colorectal cancer, are often diagnosed at an advanced stage when presenting with biliary obstruction. This mostly restricts treatment strategies to palliative management. Within this setting the prevention of biliary complications like jaundice, cholangitis or cholangiosepsis is one of the therapeutic key factors to extend survival and maintain quality of life [De Groen, Skipworth]. Endoscopic stenting of the biliary tract is an easy and safe approach to restore biliary drainage [Smith]. Self-expanding metal stents are preferred to plastic stents because of the lower risk of stent occlusion [Kaassis, Soderlund]. In addition to stenting endoscopic therapies that directly affect the local tumor mass, have been developed within the past years. First of all, photodynamic therapy using different photosensitizers has shown promising results for the reduction of tumor size and maintenance of biliary drainage [Ortner, Zoepf]. However, the patient management for this treatment involving peri-interventional photosensitivity remains cumbersome.
Recently, an endoscopically applicable radiofrequency catheter for the biliary tract, the so called HabibTM EndoHBP catheter, was introduced into the market. It uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination. RFA is well known from transcutaneous applications, where it already proved to be effective as a treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic CCa [Minami]. The new HabibTM EndoHBP catheter was already evaluated ex vivo [Itoi] and showed promising results concerning safety and prevention of stent occlusion in the context of one small retrospective clinical study [Steel].
Primary objective
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction
Study Design
Retrospective analysis of prospectively gained clinical data
Primary endpoint
Technical failures during the RFA procedure
Secondary endpoints
- Complications during the RFA procedure
- Hospital stay
- Adverse events during hospital stay and unil first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure)
- 30-day and 90-day mortality
Study Population
All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction between November 2010 and December 2012 in Austria.
Methods
Endoscopic examination report databases will be screened for "radiofrequency ablation" in the context of an "endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" to identify the mentioned study population. Examination reports, discharge letters and patient curves of the study patients will be screened to yield the following parameters:
- Demographics
- Sex
- Age at first RFA-intervention
- Underlying disease that led to malignant biliary obstruction
- Type of underlying disease
- Time from diagnosis to first RFA-intervention
- Previous treatment attempts (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy)
- Procedure related parameters
- Prior biliary stents (type, amount)
- Date of RFA procedure
- Amount of RFA-applications during the procedure (energy, time)
- Technical failure of the RFA catheter during the RFA procedure (defined as any technical problem that hinders the satisfactory application of RFA)
- Complications during the RFA procedure (defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device)
- Stenting after the procedure (type, amount)
- Post-interventional parameters
- Days of hospitalization after the RFA procedure
- Adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure) defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device
- Survial status (dead/alive) at the time of the data collection
- (Cause of death)
- (Time between first RFA procedure and death)
Data processing will be done after pseudonymization using continuous patient identification numbers. All parameters will be assessed descriptively. For scaled parameters (e.g. age) median and range will be calculated, for nominal parameters (e.g. type of underlying disease) the proportions of sub-items will be reported. Mortality will be assessed creating a Kaplan Meyer curve. 30-day and 90-day mortality will be extrapolated from this curve. All data processing will be done with SPSS 19.0.
Risk/Benefit assessment
Due to its retrospective design this study does not inherit any risk for the study patients.
Expected impact and Outlook
The results of this study may help to better understand the feasibility and safety profile of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter with potential effects on future applications.
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), HabibTM EndoHPB catheter
- Keywords
- Malignant biliary obstruction, Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Therapeutic endoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination to treat malignant biliary strictures.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)Procedure or surgery
ERCP is used to guide the RFA-catheter under radiological control to the location of the malignant stricture.
HabibTM EndoHPB catheterDevice
Used to apply radiofrequency energy to the malignant biliary stricture (see also intervention "endoscopic radiofrequency ablation")
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Malignant biliary obstruction | Experimental | All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012. Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation; Procedure: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Device: HabibTM EndoHPB catheter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures
The technical feasibility in this study will be specified as ratio of all technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended. A RFA-application will be classified as technically successful if it is possible to introduce the RFA-catheter into the biliary system, place it adequately accross the malignant stricture, apply RFA-energy and withdraw the RFA-catheter after RFA-application.
Measured: During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of patients with interventional complications
Clinically relevant complications occuring during the use of RFA, defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device (e.g. bleeding, perforation).
Measured: During the respective RFA-procedure (an expected average of 1 hour)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Biliary Tract NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Werner Dolak, MD, Medical University of Vienna
- Investigators
- Werner Dolak, MD, Principal investigator, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterologie and Hepatologie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01758341
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EK 1837/2012
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411807. No abstract available.
PubMed 10536130Skipworth JR, Olde Damink SW, Imber C, Bridgewater J, Pereira SP, Malago M. Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):1063-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04851.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
PubMed 21933219Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90455-3.
PubMed 7996958Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, Canard JM, Fritsch J, Rey JF, Burtin P. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):178-82. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.66.
PubMed 12556780Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.052.
PubMed 16733114Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.
PubMed 14598251Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.
PubMed 16279895Minami Y, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. World J Radiol. 2010 Nov 28;2(11):417-24. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i11.417.
PubMed 21179308Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tamura M, Watanabe Y, Moriyasu F, Kahaleh M, Habib N, Nagao T, Yokoyama T, Kasuya K, Kawakami H. Evaluation of effects of a novel endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation biliary catheter using an ex-vivo pig liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0465-7.
PubMed 22038500Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.
PubMed 21184881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01758341
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EK 1837/2012
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Malignant biliary obstruction, Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Therapeutic endoscopy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Biliary obstruction is importantly influencing quality of life and survival of patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. The aim of this retrospective data analysis is to evaluate endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. RFA procedures performed in Austria so far will be analyzed with regard to feasibility and safety of the technique. Therefore, the following parameters will be assessed: (among others) technical failures during the RFA procedure, complications during the RFA procedure, hospital stay, adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure), 30-day and 90-day mortality. The results of this study should help to better understand important aspects of biliary RFA which may positively influence future applications of this method.
Detailed description
Introduction
Biliary obstruction is the most relevant life limiting factor in patients suffering from primary or secondary bile duct malignancies. Underlying tumors, such as extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCa) of Klatskin type, pancreatic adenocarcinoma or metastases of colorectal cancer, are often diagnosed at an advanced stage when presenting with biliary obstruction. This mostly restricts treatment strategies to palliative management. Within this setting the prevention of biliary complications like jaundice, cholangitis or cholangiosepsis is one of the therapeutic key factors to extend survival and maintain quality of life [De Groen, Skipworth]. Endoscopic stenting of the biliary tract is an easy and safe approach to restore biliary drainage [Smith]. Self-expanding metal stents are preferred to plastic stents because of the lower risk of stent occlusion [Kaassis, Soderlund]. In addition to stenting endoscopic therapies that directly affect the local tumor mass, have been developed within the past years. First of all, photodynamic therapy using different photosensitizers has shown promising results for the reduction of tumor size and maintenance of biliary drainage [Ortner, Zoepf]. However, the patient management for this treatment involving peri-interventional photosensitivity remains cumbersome.
Recently, an endoscopically applicable radiofrequency catheter for the biliary tract, the so called HabibTM EndoHBP catheter, was introduced into the market. It uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination. RFA is well known from transcutaneous applications, where it already proved to be effective as a treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic CCa [Minami]. The new HabibTM EndoHBP catheter was already evaluated ex vivo [Itoi] and showed promising results concerning safety and prevention of stent occlusion in the context of one small retrospective clinical study [Steel].
Primary objective
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction
Study Design
Retrospective analysis of prospectively gained clinical data
Primary endpoint
Technical failures during the RFA procedure
Secondary endpoints
- Complications during the RFA procedure
- Hospital stay
- Adverse events during hospital stay and unil first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure)
- 30-day and 90-day mortality
Study Population
All patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction between November 2010 and December 2012 in Austria.
Methods
Endoscopic examination report databases will be screened for "radiofrequency ablation" in the context of an "endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" to identify the mentioned study population. Examination reports, discharge letters and patient curves of the study patients will be screened to yield the following parameters:
- Demographics
- Sex
- Age at first RFA-intervention
- Underlying disease that led to malignant biliary obstruction
- Type of underlying disease
- Time from diagnosis to first RFA-intervention
- Previous treatment attempts (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy)
- Procedure related parameters
- Prior biliary stents (type, amount)
- Date of RFA procedure
- Amount of RFA-applications during the procedure (energy, time)
- Technical failure of the RFA catheter during the RFA procedure (defined as any technical problem that hinders the satisfactory application of RFA)
- Complications during the RFA procedure (defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device)
- Stenting after the procedure (type, amount)
- Post-interventional parameters
- Days of hospitalization after the RFA procedure
- Adverse events during hospital stay and until first clinical control after discharge (an expected average of 4 weeks after RFA procedure) defined as any adverse change from the subject's baseline condition, i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease which is considered to be clinically relevant by the physician, whether or not considered related to the medical device
- Survial status (dead/alive) at the time of the data collection
- (Cause of death)
- (Time between first RFA procedure and death)
Data processing will be done after pseudonymization using continuous patient identification numbers. All parameters will be assessed descriptively. For scaled parameters (e.g. age) median and range will be calculated, for nominal parameters (e.g. type of underlying disease) the proportions of sub-items will be reported. Mortality will be assessed creating a Kaplan Meyer curve. 30-day and 90-day mortality will be extrapolated from this curve. All data processing will be done with SPSS 19.0.
Risk/Benefit assessment
Due to its retrospective design this study does not inherit any risk for the study patients.
Expected impact and Outlook
The results of this study may help to better understand the feasibility and safety profile of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter with potential effects on future applications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Malignant biliary obstruction | Experimental | Procedure: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Procedure: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Device: HabibTM EndoHPB catheterAll patients who underwent endoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP as a treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in Austria between November 2010 and December 2012. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic radiofrequency ablationEndoscopic radiofrequency ablation with the HabibTM EndoHBP catheter uses bipolar electrical energy for tissue coagulation and can be applied without any special patient preparation in the context of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination to treat malignant biliary strictures. | Procedure or surgery | Malignant biliary obstruction |
| Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)ERCP is used to guide the RFA-catheter under radiological control to the location of the malignant stricture. | Procedure or surgery | Malignant biliary obstruction |
| HabibTM EndoHPB catheterUsed to apply radiofrequency energy to the malignant biliary stricture (see also intervention "endoscopic radiofrequency ablation") | Device | Malignant biliary obstruction |
Primary outcome
Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures
Time frame: During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour)
The technical feasibility in this study will be specified as ratio of all technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended. A RFA-application will be classified as technically successful if it is possible to introduce the RFA-catheter into the biliary system, place it adequately accross the malignant stricture, apply RFA-energy and withdraw the RFA-catheter after RFA-application.
1 secondary outcome
Number of patients with interventional complications
Time frame: During the respective RFA-procedure (an expected average of 1 hour)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2014.
- Background: PubMed 10536130de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411807. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21933219Skipworth JR, Olde Damink SW, Imber C, Bridgewater J, Pereira SP, Malago M. Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;34(9):1063-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04851.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 7996958Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90455-3.
- Background: PubMed 12556780Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, Canard JM, Fritsch J, Rey JF, Burtin P. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):178-82. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.66.
- Background: PubMed 16733114Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.052.
- Background: PubMed 14598251Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.
- Background: PubMed 16279895Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.
- Background: PubMed 21179308Minami Y, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. World J Radiol. 2010 Nov 28;2(11):417-24. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i11.417.
- Background: PubMed 22038500Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tamura M, Watanabe Y, Moriyasu F, Kahaleh M, Habib N, Nagao T, Yokoyama T, Kasuya K, Kawakami H. Evaluation of effects of a novel endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation biliary catheter using an ex-vivo pig liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):543-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0465-7.
- Background: PubMed 21184881Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.
Related trials for Biliary Tract Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CDX-1140, a CD40 Agonist, in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and Keytruda in Subjects With Biliary Tract Carcinoma (BTC)
Biliary Cancer, Bile Duct Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
NAPOLI-2: Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Biliary Cancer
Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Gemcitabine, Toripalimab and Dose- Modified Lenvatinib in Elderly Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Intolerant to Conventional Chemotherapy
Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1/1B Study of ST-01156, a Small Molecule RBM39 Degrader, in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies
Advanced Solid Tumors, Ewing Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ifinatamab Deruxtecan (I-DXd) in Subjects With Recurrent or Metastatic Solid Tumors (IDeate-PanTumor02)
Recurrent or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Werner Dolak, MD principal investigator
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterologie and Hepatologie
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and HabibTM EndoHPB catheter in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of RFA-procedures with technical failures (time frame: During the respective RFA-examination (an expected average of 1 hour)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01758341, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2014.