Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaGCC 1210NCT01764659
4D-CT for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Radiotherapy Simulation
An observational study of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to study the feasibility and efficacy of individually optimized CE 4D-CT for PDA in radiotherapy simulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: GI/GU multi-d clinic
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years old or older
- Patients with PDA who have not had surgical removal of their tumor and who are planned for treatment with radiotherapy in the Radiation Oncology Department at the University of Maryland.
- Patients who have signed the contrast consent form and have been recommended by physicians to have contrast-enhanced CT scans.
- Patients who have signed the consent form for this study
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
- Patients with severely decreased renal function19-21.
- Patients with known severe allergic reactions to contrast.
- Patients who have difficulty lying flat on their back for extended periods of time.
- Patients with breaths per minute (BPM) rate less than 10, due to the limitation of 4D-CT image reconstruction software.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Individually Optimized Contrast-Enhancement 4D-CT for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Radiotherapy Simulation
The primary objective is to study the feasibility and efficacy of individually optimized CE 4D-CT for PDA in radiotherapy simulation.
Read the detailed description
Compared with current clinical practice, the individually optimized CE 4D-CT can potentially provide much improved tumor-to-parenchyma conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This will help the radiation oncologists or radiologists to contour the tumor with higher precision and confidence, and compute the tumor volume and tumor motion more accurately.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Being tested
- Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography
- Keywords
- 4D-CT, Contrast Enhanced CT, Radiotherapy Simulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomographyOther
All enrolled patients each underwent three CT scans: a 4DCT immediately following a contrast-enhanced 3DCT and an individually optimized contrast-enhanced 4DCT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All enrolled patients | Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography Receives: Other: Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Individually Optimized Contrast-enhanced 4DCT for Radiotherapy Simulation
Image quality (anatomic details, motion artifacts, beam hardening and enhancement of pancreatic tissue and tumor were scored from 1 to 5, with 1 being very poor and 5 being excellent), CT number of pancreas and tumor, tumor-to-pancreas contrast, image noise and contrast-to-noise ration (CNR) were compared among contrast-enhanced (CE) 4DCT, CE 3DCT and 4DCT without contrast enhancement.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Maryland, BaltimoreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Investigators
- Wei Lu, Ph. D., DABR, Principal investigator, UMMC MSGCCHao H Zhang, Ph. D., Principal investigator, UMMC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01764659
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HP-00052534
- Acronym
- GCC 1210
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Individually Optimized Contrast-Enhancement 4D-CT for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Radiotherapy Simulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01764659
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCC 1210 / HP-00052534
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Keywords
- 4D-CT, Contrast Enhanced CT, Radiotherapy Simulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to study the feasibility and efficacy of individually optimized CE 4D-CT for PDA in radiotherapy simulation.
Detailed description
Compared with current clinical practice, the individually optimized CE 4D-CT can potentially provide much improved tumor-to-parenchyma conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This will help the radiation oncologists or radiologists to contour the tumor with higher precision and confidence, and compute the tumor volume and tumor motion more accurately.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All enrolled patients | – | Other: Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomographyContrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- GI/GU multi-d clinic
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients 18 years old or older
- Patients with PDA who have not had surgical removal of their tumor and who are planned for treatment with radiotherapy in the Radiation Oncology Department at the University of Maryland.
- Patients who have signed the contrast consent form and have been recommended by physicians to have contrast-enhanced CT scans.
- Patients who have signed the consent form for this study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
- Patients with severely decreased renal function19-21.
- Patients with known severe allergic reactions to contrast.
- Patients who have difficulty lying flat on their back for extended periods of time.
- Patients with breaths per minute (BPM) rate less than 10, due to the limitation of 4D-CT image reconstruction software.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomographyAll enrolled patients each underwent three CT scans: a 4DCT immediately following a contrast-enhanced 3DCT and an individually optimized contrast-enhanced 4DCT. | Other | All enrolled patients |
Primary outcome
Individually Optimized Contrast-enhanced 4DCT for Radiotherapy Simulation
Time frame: 1 year
Image quality (anatomic details, motion artifacts, beam hardening and enhancement of pancreatic tissue and tumor were scored from 1 to 5, with 1 being very poor and 5 being excellent), CT number of pancreas and tumor, tumor-to-pancreas contrast, image noise and contrast-to-noise ration (CNR) were compared among contrast-enhanced (CE) 4DCT, CE 3DCT and 4DCT without contrast enhancement.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wei Lu, Ph. D., DABR principal investigator
UMMC MSGCC
Hao H Zhang, Ph. D. principal investigator
UMMC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Individually Optimized Contrast-enhanced 4DCT for Radiotherapy Simulation (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2020.