Inherited ErythromelalgiaPhase 2IEMNCT01769274
Evaluation Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Single Doses Of PF-05089771 In Patients With Primary (Inherited) Erythromelalgia
A Phase 2 study testing PF-05089771 in people with Inherited Erythromelalgia, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single doses of PF-05089771 against placebo in treatment of pain in patients with primary, inherited erythromelalgia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 78 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Inherited Erythromelalgia
- What is being tested?
- PF-05089771
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Oct 2012to 12 Jul 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 78 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and or female subjects between the ages of 18-78 years
- Subject has clinical signs of IEM
- Minimum BMI 17.5kg/m2 and total body weight >50kg
Who cannot join
- Other severe pain conditions, e.g. rheumatologic, that may impair subject's self-assessment of pain due to IEM.
- Evidence of clinically significant hypertension, clinically significant hematological, dermatological, renal, endocrine (except diabetes mellitus), pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological (other than IEM), or allergic disease (including drug allergies but excluding untreated asymptomatic seasonal allergies).
- Subjects with severe obesity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New Haven Clinical Research Unit
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
About this study
Official title: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND THIRD PARTY OPEN PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EXPLORATORY STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SINGLE DOSES OF PF-05089771 IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY (INHERITED) ERYTHROMELALGIA
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single doses of PF-05089771 against placebo in treatment of pain in patients with primary, inherited erythromelalgia.
- Conditions
- Inherited Erythromelalgia
- Being tested
- PF-05089771, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-05089771Drug
A single oral dose of PF-05089771 1600 mg solution to be administered on Day 1 of each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of PF-05089771 will be adminstered.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo for PF-05089771 1600 mg solution administered in each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of placebo will be administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PF-05089771 1600 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PF-05089771 |
| Placebo comparator: matching placebo | Placebo comparator | Single oral dose of placebo for PF-05089771 1600 mg Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose.
Measured: Every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose
Secondary outcomes (22)
Average PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP2 to 8 hours post-dose.
Measured: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP3 to 10 hours post-dose.
Measured: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.
Measured: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Maximum pain score in 4 hours period post-dosing is reported.
Measured: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.
Measured: From post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP3 to 10 hours post-dose is reported.
Measured: From the end of EP3 to 10 hours post dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose is reported.
Measured: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score greater than 5 from the 0 hours to 4 hours post-dose.
Measured: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score >5 from in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.
Measured: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score >5 from the post EP3 to 10 hours post dose.
Measured: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score >5 from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.
Measured: After EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Number of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction Score
Participant was asked "How would you rate the study medication you received for pain?". The participant was provided the following choices as an answer: excellent=4; good=3; fair=2; poor=1. Response to this question, was participant's overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication at 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue treatment or medication, which ever occurred first.
Measured: At 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue therapy, whichever occurred first
Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication
Time to rescue medication (hour) was calculated as: date/time of rescue medication minus date/time of first dose for each period. If participant who did not receive rescue medication, the time of censoring was cut off at 24 hours or the time of withdrawal, whichever was earlier. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Up to maximum of 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771
Measured: Predose, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771
Measured: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05089771
Measured: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05089771
Measured: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.
Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit, red blood cell count: less than(<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: <0.5*LLN/greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell: <0.6*LLN/>1.5*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil (absolute, %):<0.8*LLN/>1.2*ULN, total neutrophil <0.8*LLN;basophil, eosinophil, monocyte (absolute, %):>1.2*ULN; mean corpuscular (MC) volume, mean cell hemoglobin, MC hemoglobin concentration, mean platelet volume: <0.9*LLN/>1.1*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:> 3.0*ULN, total protein, albumin: <0.8*LLN/>1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:>1.3*ULN, uric acid >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN/>1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: <0.9*LLN/>1.1*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN/>1.5*ULN; urine (specific gravity <1.003/>1.030, pH <4.5/>8, glucose, ketone, protein, blood/Hgb, urobilinogen, bilirubin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase >=1).
Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 73
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature
The minimum starting temperature to measure core body temperature used was 33 degree Celsius. Clinically significant changes from baseline in core body temperature was judged by investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Criteria for clinically significant blood pressure abnormalities: systolic blood pressure >=30 millimetre of Mercury (mmHg) change from baseline in same posture, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >=20 mmHg change from baseline in same posture, diastolic blood pressure <50 mmHg.
Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Criteria for clinically significant abnormalities in ECG : PR interval >=300 millisecond (msec) and 25 percent (%) increase when baseline >200 msec, 50% increase when baseline less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec; QRS interval >=140 msec, >=50% increase from baseline; QT interval >=500 msec; QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) 450 msec to <480 msec, >=480 msec, 30 to <60 msec increase from baseline, >=60 msec increase from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study start22 Oct 2012
- Primary completion12 Jul 2013
- Study completion12 Jul 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inherited ErythromelalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01769274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B3291006
- Acronym
- IEM
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Cao L, McDonnell A, Nitzsche A, Alexandrou A, Saintot PP, Loucif AJ, Brown AR, Young G, Mis M, Randall A, Waxman SG, Stanley P, Kirby S, Tarabar S, Gutteridge A, Butt R, McKernan RM, Whiting P, Ali Z, Bilsland J, Stevens EB. Pharmacological reversal of a pain phenotype in iPSC-derived sensory neurons and patients with inherited erythromelalgia. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Apr 20;8(335):335ra56. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7653.
PubMed 27099175
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND THIRD PARTY OPEN PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EXPLORATORY STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SINGLE DOSES OF PF-05089771 IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY (INHERITED) ERYTHROMELALGIA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01769274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IEM / B3291006
- Conditions
- Inherited Erythromelalgia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single doses of PF-05089771 against placebo in treatment of pain in patients with primary, inherited erythromelalgia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PF-05089771 1600 mg | Experimental | Drug: PF-05089771 |
| Placebo comparator: matching placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSingle oral dose of placebo for PF-05089771 1600 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 78 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male and or female subjects between the ages of 18-78 years
- Subject has clinical signs of IEM
- Minimum BMI 17.5kg/m2 and total body weight >50kg
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Other severe pain conditions, e.g. rheumatologic, that may impair subject's self-assessment of pain due to IEM.
- Evidence of clinically significant hypertension, clinically significant hematological, dermatological, renal, endocrine (except diabetes mellitus), pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological (other than IEM), or allergic disease (including drug allergies but excluding untreated asymptomatic seasonal allergies).
- Subjects with severe obesity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-05089771A single oral dose of PF-05089771 1600 mg solution to be administered on Day 1 of each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of PF-05089771 will be adminstered. | Drug | PF-05089771 1600 mg |
| PlaceboPlacebo for PF-05089771 1600 mg solution administered in each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of placebo will be administered. | Drug | Placebo comparator: matching placebo |
Primary outcome
Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose
Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose.
22 secondary outcomes
Average PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: From post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: From the end of EP3 to 10 hours post dose
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose
Time frame: After EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose
Number of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction Score
Time frame: At 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue therapy, whichever occurred first
Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication
Time frame: Up to maximum of 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771
Time frame: Predose, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771
Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05089771
Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05089771
Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 73
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature
Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27099175Cao L, McDonnell A, Nitzsche A, Alexandrou A, Saintot PP, Loucif AJ, Brown AR, Young G, Mis M, Randall A, Waxman SG, Stanley P, Kirby S, Tarabar S, Gutteridge A, Butt R, McKernan RM, Whiting P, Ali Z, Bilsland J, Stevens EB. Pharmacological reversal of a pain phenotype in iPSC-derived sensory neurons and patients with inherited erythromelalgia. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Apr 20;8(335):335ra56. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7653.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Inherited Erythromelalgia
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1b Study of BHV-7000 in Participants With Inherited Erythromelalgia
Familial Erythromelalgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-05089771 in people with Inherited Erythromelalgia, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose (time frame: Every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01769274, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2019.