Myeloid LeukemiaNCT01779882
Cyclophosphamide and Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen Before Allogeneic HSCT
A study testing Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in people with Myeloid Leukemia and Precursor Myeloid Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloid Leukemia, Precursor Myeloid Neoplasms, Lymphoid Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to 6 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients planned to undergo an allogeneic HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
- Age 18 - 65 years
- Myeloid leukemia respectively related precursor neoplasms (acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome), or lymphoid neoplasms (acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, mature B-/T-/natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms).
- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor or matched unrelated (min. 10/10 Ag matched)
- Patients with a history of hepatitis might be included, if no contraindication for HSCT exists.
- Patient must give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Indication other than myeloid leukemia respectively related precursor neoplasms, or lymphoid neoplasms.
- Severe liver damage for > 2 weeks (bilirubin > 3xupper limit normal (ULN) or ASAT/ALAT > 5xULN)
- HIV infection
- Donor other than HLA-identical sibling or min. 10/10 matched unrelated donor
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Lack of written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland3 sites
University Hospital, Basel
Basel, 4031
University Hospital Geneva
Geneva, 1205
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan Versus Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Leukemia: a Prospective Randomized Study to Assess Liver Toxicity
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY.
- Being tested
- Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDrug
Test the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY.
Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDrug
Test the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BU-CY | Active comparator | Group A (standard group): conditioning regimen with Busulfan (BU) followed by Cyclophosphamide (CY) Receives: Drug: Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
| CY-BU | Experimental | Group B (experimental group): conditioning regimen with Cyclophosphamide (CY) followed by Busulfan (BU) Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Liver toxicity
Liver toxicity, assessed as absolute serum values of ASAT, ALAT, GGT, Alkaline Phosphatase, bilirubin at day 30.
Measured: Day 30
Secondary outcomes (6)
VOD
Incidence and severity of "veno occlusive disease (VOD)" at day 30
Measured: Day 30
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)
Incidence and severity of acute GVHD, by organ (skin, liver, gut) at day 30 and day 100
Measured: Day 30 and Day 100
Toxicity
Organ toxicity at day 30 and day 100
Measured: Day 30 and Day 100
Efficacy
Survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality at day 30 and day 100
Measured: Day 30 and Day 100
Cumulative liver values
Cumulative serum values of aspartate transaminase (ASAT), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase, bilirubin for days 0, 10, 20 and 30
Measured: Day 0, 10, 20 and 30
Maximum liver values
Maximum serum values of ASAT, ALAT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase (AP), bilirubin at any time between day 0 and day 30
Measured: Day 0, 10, 20 and 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completion6 Jan 2018
- Study completion6 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Zürich, University Hospital, Geneva
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nathan Cantoni, MD, Study chair, Kantonsspital Aarau, SwitzerlandSabine Gerull, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandGayathri Nair, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, ZürichYves Chalandon, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Geneva, SwitzerlandJakob Passweg, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01779882
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BuCyBu study
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Cantoni N, Gerull S, Heim D, Halter J, Bucher C, Buser A, Tsakiris DA, Passweg J, Tichelli A, Stern M, Gratwohl A. Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;46(3):344-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.137. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
PubMed 20548339Seydoux C, Uppugunduri CRS, Medinger M, Nava T, Halter J, Heim D, Chalandon Y, Schanz U, Nair G, Cantoni N, Passweg JR, Ansari M. Effect of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics in adults with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation conditioned with Busulfan. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Jul;58(7):811-816. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-01963-z. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
PubMed 37085674
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan Versus Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Leukemia: a Prospective Randomized Study to Assess Liver Toxicity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01779882
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BuCyBu study
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Zürich, University Hospital, Geneva
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- 6 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BU-CY | Active comparator | Drug: Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGroup A (standard group): conditioning regimen with Busulfan (BU) followed by Cyclophosphamide (CY) |
| CY-BU | Experimental | Drug: Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGroup B (experimental group): conditioning regimen with Cyclophosphamide (CY) followed by Busulfan (BU) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients planned to undergo an allogeneic HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
- Age 18 - 65 years
- Myeloid leukemia respectively related precursor neoplasms (acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome), or lymphoid neoplasms (acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, mature B-/T-/natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms).
- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor or matched unrelated (min. 10/10 Ag matched)
- Patients with a history of hepatitis might be included, if no contraindication for HSCT exists.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Indication other than myeloid leukemia respectively related precursor neoplasms, or lymphoid neoplasms.
- Severe liver damage for > 2 weeks (bilirubin > 3xupper limit normal (ULN) or ASAT/ALAT > 5xULN)
- HIV infection
- Donor other than HLA-identical sibling or min. 10/10 matched unrelated donor
- Pregnant or lactating women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTest the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY. | Drug | BU-CY |
| Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTest the hypothesis, that the order of application of Busulfan (BU) and Cyclophosphamide (CY) has an impact on toxicity after allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and that CY-BU reduces liver toxicity compared to BU-CY. | Drug | CY-BU |
Primary outcome
Liver toxicity
Time frame: Day 30
Liver toxicity, assessed as absolute serum values of ASAT, ALAT, GGT, Alkaline Phosphatase, bilirubin at day 30.
6 secondary outcomes
VOD
Time frame: Day 30
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)
Time frame: Day 30 and Day 100
Toxicity
Time frame: Day 30 and Day 100
Efficacy
Time frame: Day 30 and Day 100
Cumulative liver values
Time frame: Day 0, 10, 20 and 30
Maximum liver values
Time frame: Day 0, 10, 20 and 30
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 20548339Cantoni N, Gerull S, Heim D, Halter J, Bucher C, Buser A, Tsakiris DA, Passweg J, Tichelli A, Stern M, Gratwohl A. Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;46(3):344-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.137. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37085674Seydoux C, Uppugunduri CRS, Medinger M, Nava T, Halter J, Heim D, Chalandon Y, Schanz U, Nair G, Cantoni N, Passweg JR, Ansari M. Effect of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics in adults with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation conditioned with Busulfan. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Jul;58(7):811-816. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-01963-z. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
Related trials for Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase II Study of Asciminib for Second-line Treatment of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Malignant Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase II Study Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Asciminib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Universal 4SCAR7U Targeting CD7-positive Malignancies
T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Study Of PLM-102 In Patients With Relapsed And Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nathan Cantoni, MD study chair
Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
Sabine Gerull, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Gayathri Nair, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Zürich
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cyclophosphamide-Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in people with Myeloid Leukemia and Precursor Myeloid Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Liver toxicity (time frame: Day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01779882, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2018.