Dental FearNCT01784276
Dental Fear Among Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
A study testing Video in people with Dental Fear, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Specific Aims Our study objective is to investigate if video peer modeling before the visit, plus immersive virtual reality during a preventive dental visit, reduces dental fear and uncooperative behaviors among children with ASD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Fear
- What is being tested?
- Video
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- subjects aged 7-17 years with a known diagnosis of autism, who had a history of dental fear, per parental report.
Who cannot join
- children with motor handicaps (e.g. cerebral palsy), and sensory, vision and hearing impairments (as these would have limited their ability to utilize intervention materials);
- children with parents who did not speak English or Spanish; and
- children who presented to clinic without their legal guardian.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Children'S Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: A PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ELECTRONIC SCREEN MEDIA TO REDUCE DENTAL FEAR AMONG CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
Specific Aims Our study objective is to investigate if video peer modeling before the visit, plus immersive virtual reality during a preventive dental visit, reduces dental fear and uncooperative behaviors among children with ASD.
SPECIFIC AIM: To pilot and test the feasibility and effectiveness of video peer modeling and immersive virtual reality in reducing dental fear among children with autism undergoing preventive dental visits.
Read more
Methods: The investigators will enroll eighty (80) subjects aged 7-17 years with a known diagnosis of autism, who had a history of dental fear, per parental report.
Study hypotheses:
The primary hypotheses of interest are:
(i) The mean change in the Venham Anxiety Score (VAS) over the 4 month period in children with ASD who receive the video intervention (Group B) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
(ii) The mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD who receive the immersive VR intervention (Group C) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
(iii) The mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD who receive the video intervention plus the immersive VR intervention (Group D) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
The secondary hypothesis is:
(i) The mean change in the Venham Behavior Score over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group D is different from the mean change in the Venham Behavior Score over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group B or C.
Read the detailed description
Dental care is a significant unmet health care need for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Many children with ASD do not receive dental care because of fear associated with dental procedures; oftentimes they require general anesthesia for regular dental procedures, placing them at risk of associated complications. Many children with ASD have a strong preference for visual stimuli, particularly electronic screen media; this affinity has been utilized in their educational instruction.
Objective: To determine if an innovative strategy using two types of electronic screen media was feasible and beneficial in reducing fear and uncooperative behaviors in children with ASD undergoing dental visits.
Study procedures
For this randomized control study, we will randomize participants into one of 4 groups: a) control group (Group A); b) video peer modeling only group (Group B); c) immersive VR only group (Group C) and d) video peer modeling plus immersive VR group (Group D). All enrolled children will have a pre-visit in the dental clinic, where they will receive usual care and baseline values of all parameters will be obtained. Medical records of all study children will be flagged so that they are identified upon arrival by the RA. In the exam room, the dental assistant will measure their pulse rate using a pulse oximeter. The dentist and RA will complete the Venham Anxiety and Behavioral Scale during the dental procedure for all study children. All study subjects will be scheduled to return for a follow up preventive dental visit in 4-6 months, which is the usual practice at CHB, depending on the child's oral health status. Children assigned to intervention Groups B and D will be mailed a copy of a DVD of the pre-recorded peer modeled visit 4 weeks before the scheduled return for the preventive dental visit. The parents will be asked to review the video with their child to orient them to all stages of the dental visit. In addition, children assigned to Group C and D will be given a virtual reality headset to watch movies or images during the dental visit. Children assigned to Group A (control group) will receive neither the DVD nor VR headset during the visit. We will repeat all measurements during the return visit for all study children.
Participant randomization: Once we identify the entire sample of eligible subjects, we will generate a list of subjects that have enrolled for the study. With the assistance of the statistician, we will do a random allocation of each subject to Group A, B, C or D.
Sample size calculation:
In order to have an 80% chance of detecting a difference of 1 unit in either the mean change in the Venham anxiety score (VAS) over the 4-month period in children with ASD assigned to Group B, C or D, with the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group A, allowing for a 20% dropout rate, a total sample size of 80 children will be required. Subjects are being allocated equally between the 4 groups and each group will be randomly assigned 20 subjects. Data Analyses: After obtaining values of the Venham Anxiety and Behavior Scores for each group at baseline and 4 month period, the change in score will be calculated for each subject and a mean change in score and standard deviation generated for each group. WE will use a two-sided t-test to test each of these hypotheses. Bonferroni adjustments will be used to account for the multiple comparisons being carried out. The association of important covariates, such as the level of cognitive functioning, IQ, age, gender and number of hours of ABA received with the change in VAS will be modeled using linear regression analyses, with the outcome variable being the mean change in score for each subject. (A separate model will be fit for each outcome variable). Further analyses will include examining the association of pulse rate (a continuous outcome measure) with the covariates listed above. All analyses will be conducted by the study statistician and PI.
Data Management Methods The RA will collect and manage all study data. We will enter personal information of study subjects obtained at enrollment in the study database. All subjects will be assigned codes which will be used throughout the study. No subject identifying personal information will be used to make up the study code for a specific patient. The link between the study-ID and medical record number will be kept in a locked/double password protected file. The Dr Isong and the RA will be the only ones who know the key/passwords.
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Every 6 months, all study data and protocols will be reviewed by the RA and PI to ensure that they confirm to written stipulations. Any missing data will be noted and collected.
To prevent disclosure, information about participation and the results of the research will not be placed in the medical record. Study data will be coded and the key to the code kept in a separate locked file. All research data will be entered into a database. No names are entered into this database, only the codes assigned to the research record. All results will remain confidential. Only anonymized data will be shared among collaborators.
Safety monitoring Risks associated with this study are expected to be minimal. Any report of risk or discomfort as a result of the study (please see below) experienced by study subjects will be documented and appropriate treatment and referrals will be provided. Subjects will be informed that they can dis-enroll from the study at any time if they experience any adverse effects.
- Conditions
- Dental Fear
- Being tested
- Video
- Keywords
- Children, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Electronic Screen Media, Dental fear
- Medical subject headings
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VideoBehavioural
Video peer modeling: The video demonstrates various stages of the dental visit experience. Children assigned to intervention Groups B or D reviewed the video at least once, but as many times as possible before the follow up visit.
Video goggles: This is a sunglass style video eyewear that contains two computer screens that can be used to watch 2 or 3D movies. Subjects randomized to Group C or D watched a 2D movie during the return visit, using the video goggles. Subjects who refused or were unable to wear the goggles watched the movie using a hand held portable DVD player.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Children assigned to Group A (control group) received usual care and therefore had no intervention before or during the return visit. |
| Video peer modeling | Experimental | Video peer modeling (at home, the child watched a DVD recording of a typically developing child undergoing a dental visit); Receives: Behavioral: Video |
| Video goggles or portable DVD only | Experimental | Video goggles/DVD (during the dental visit, the child watched their favorite movie using sunglass style video eyewear, or portable DVD player); Receives: Behavioral: Video |
| Video peer modeling plus video goggles | Experimental | Video peer modeling plus video goggles/DVD. At home, the child watched a DVD recording of a typically developing child undergoing a dental visit; During the dental visit, the child watched their favorite movie using sunglass style video eyewear, or portable DVD player. Receives: Behavioral: Video |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety
Primary outcome:
Anxiety: To assess the subject's level of anxiety, we will use the Venham Anxiety Rating Scale which assigns numerical values to the child's observable behaviors. It consists of 5 behaviorally defined categories that range from 0-5, and higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety.(ref) The treating dentist and RA will use the Venham Scale to indicate their perception of level of anxiety experienced by the participant during the dental procedure.
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Uncooperative behavior
Behavior: To assess the subject's behavior during the dental visit, we will use the Venham Behavior Rating Scale.(ref) The Behavior Scale also consists of 5 behaviorally defined categories that range from 0-5, and higher scores indicate greater levels of uncooperative behavior.(ref) The Venham Anxiety and Behavior Rating Scales have been used extensively in behavior research to assess the level of anxiety and behavior of children in dental settings.(ref) The RA and treating dentist will rate te child's behavior once during the dental visit. The PI will train the dentist and RA on procedures to administer the Venham Anxiety and Behavior Rating Scale during the dental visit and will assess inter-rater reliability.
Measured: 6 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental FearStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Inyang Isong, Boston Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- INYANG ISONG, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01784276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-CRX10-09-0486-2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ELECTRONIC SCREEN MEDIA TO REDUCE DENTAL FEAR AMONG CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01784276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-CRX10-09-0486-2
- Conditions
- Dental Fear
- Keywords
- Children, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Electronic Screen Media, Dental fear
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Specific Aims Our study objective is to investigate if video peer modeling before the visit, plus immersive virtual reality during a preventive dental visit, reduces dental fear and uncooperative behaviors among children with ASD.
SPECIFIC AIM: To pilot and test the feasibility and effectiveness of video peer modeling and immersive virtual reality in reducing dental fear among children with autism undergoing preventive dental visits.
Methods: The investigators will enroll eighty (80) subjects aged 7-17 years with a known diagnosis of autism, who had a history of dental fear, per parental report.
Study hypotheses:
The primary hypotheses of interest are:
(i) The mean change in the Venham Anxiety Score (VAS) over the 4 month period in children with ASD who receive the video intervention (Group B) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
(ii) The mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD who receive the immersive VR intervention (Group C) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
(iii) The mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD who receive the video intervention plus the immersive VR intervention (Group D) is different from the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in the control group.
The secondary hypothesis is:
(i) The mean change in the Venham Behavior Score over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group D is different from the mean change in the Venham Behavior Score over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group B or C.
Detailed description
Dental care is a significant unmet health care need for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Many children with ASD do not receive dental care because of fear associated with dental procedures; oftentimes they require general anesthesia for regular dental procedures, placing them at risk of associated complications. Many children with ASD have a strong preference for visual stimuli, particularly electronic screen media; this affinity has been utilized in their educational instruction.
Objective: To determine if an innovative strategy using two types of electronic screen media was feasible and beneficial in reducing fear and uncooperative behaviors in children with ASD undergoing dental visits.
Study procedures
For this randomized control study, we will randomize participants into one of 4 groups: a) control group (Group A); b) video peer modeling only group (Group B); c) immersive VR only group (Group C) and d) video peer modeling plus immersive VR group (Group D). All enrolled children will have a pre-visit in the dental clinic, where they will receive usual care and baseline values of all parameters will be obtained. Medical records of all study children will be flagged so that they are identified upon arrival by the RA. In the exam room, the dental assistant will measure their pulse rate using a pulse oximeter. The dentist and RA will complete the Venham Anxiety and Behavioral Scale during the dental procedure for all study children. All study subjects will be scheduled to return for a follow up preventive dental visit in 4-6 months, which is the usual practice at CHB, depending on the child's oral health status. Children assigned to intervention Groups B and D will be mailed a copy of a DVD of the pre-recorded peer modeled visit 4 weeks before the scheduled return for the preventive dental visit. The parents will be asked to review the video with their child to orient them to all stages of the dental visit. In addition, children assigned to Group C and D will be given a virtual reality headset to watch movies or images during the dental visit. Children assigned to Group A (control group) will receive neither the DVD nor VR headset during the visit. We will repeat all measurements during the return visit for all study children.
Participant randomization: Once we identify the entire sample of eligible subjects, we will generate a list of subjects that have enrolled for the study. With the assistance of the statistician, we will do a random allocation of each subject to Group A, B, C or D.
Sample size calculation:
In order to have an 80% chance of detecting a difference of 1 unit in either the mean change in the Venham anxiety score (VAS) over the 4-month period in children with ASD assigned to Group B, C or D, with the mean change in the VAS over the 4-month period in children with ASD in Group A, allowing for a 20% dropout rate, a total sample size of 80 children will be required. Subjects are being allocated equally between the 4 groups and each group will be randomly assigned 20 subjects. Data Analyses: After obtaining values of the Venham Anxiety and Behavior Scores for each group at baseline and 4 month period, the change in score will be calculated for each subject and a mean change in score and standard deviation generated for each group. WE will use a two-sided t-test to test each of these hypotheses. Bonferroni adjustments will be used to account for the multiple comparisons being carried out. The association of important covariates, such as the level of cognitive functioning, IQ, age, gender and number of hours of ABA received with the change in VAS will be modeled using linear regression analyses, with the outcome variable being the mean change in score for each subject. (A separate model will be fit for each outcome variable). Further analyses will include examining the association of pulse rate (a continuous outcome measure) with the covariates listed above. All analyses will be conducted by the study statistician and PI.
Data Management Methods The RA will collect and manage all study data. We will enter personal information of study subjects obtained at enrollment in the study database. All subjects will be assigned codes which will be used throughout the study. No subject identifying personal information will be used to make up the study code for a specific patient. The link between the study-ID and medical record number will be kept in a locked/double password protected file. The Dr Isong and the RA will be the only ones who know the key/passwords.
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Every 6 months, all study data and protocols will be reviewed by the RA and PI to ensure that they confirm to written stipulations. Any missing data will be noted and collected.
To prevent disclosure, information about participation and the results of the research will not be placed in the medical record. Study data will be coded and the key to the code kept in a separate locked file. All research data will be entered into a database. No names are entered into this database, only the codes assigned to the research record. All results will remain confidential. Only anonymized data will be shared among collaborators.
Safety monitoring Risks associated with this study are expected to be minimal. Any report of risk or discomfort as a result of the study (please see below) experienced by study subjects will be documented and appropriate treatment and referrals will be provided. Subjects will be informed that they can dis-enroll from the study at any time if they experience any adverse effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Children assigned to Group A (control group) received usual care and therefore had no intervention before or during the return visit. |
| Video peer modeling | Experimental | Behavioral: VideoVideo peer modeling (at home, the child watched a DVD recording of a typically developing child undergoing a dental visit); |
| Video goggles or portable DVD only | Experimental | Behavioral: VideoVideo goggles/DVD (during the dental visit, the child watched their favorite movie using sunglass style video eyewear, or portable DVD player); |
| Video peer modeling plus video goggles | Experimental | Behavioral: VideoVideo peer modeling plus video goggles/DVD. At home, the child watched a DVD recording of a typically developing child undergoing a dental visit; During the dental visit, the child watched their favorite movie using sunglass style video eyewear, or portable DVD player. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- subjects aged 7-17 years with a known diagnosis of autism, who had a history of dental fear, per parental report.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- children with motor handicaps (e.g. cerebral palsy), and sensory, vision and hearing impairments (as these would have limited their ability to utilize intervention materials);
- children with parents who did not speak English or Spanish; and
- children who presented to clinic without their legal guardian.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VideoVideo peer modeling: The video demonstrates various stages of the dental visit experience. Children assigned to intervention Groups B or D reviewed the video at least once, but as many times as possible before the follow up visit. Video goggles: This is a sunglass style video eyewear that contains two computer screens that can be used to watch 2 or 3D movies. Subjects randomized to Group C or D watched a 2D movie during the return visit, using the video goggles. Subjects who refused or were unable to wear the goggles watched the movie using a hand held portable DVD player. | Behavioural | Video goggles or portable DVD only, Video peer modeling, Video peer modeling plus video goggles |
Primary outcome
Anxiety
Time frame: 6 month
Primary outcome: Anxiety: To assess the subject's level of anxiety, we will use the Venham Anxiety Rating Scale which assigns numerical values to the child's observable behaviors. It consists of 5 behaviorally defined categories that range from 0-5, and higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety.(ref) The treating dentist and RA will use the Venham Scale to indicate their perception of level of anxiety experienced by the participant during the dental procedure.
1 secondary outcome
Uncooperative behavior
Time frame: 6 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2013.
Related trials for Dental Fear
Recruiting
Pain Perception With Cordless Electronic Local Anesthetic Delivery System
Decayed Primary Molars
Recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of Intranasal Atomized Midazalom Combined With Nitrous Oxide Versus Nitrous Oxide Monotherapy
Dental Anxiety in Children, Child Behaviour
Active, not recruiting
Musical Intervention for Dental Anxiety
Dental Anxiety
Recruiting
Evaluating Operation Calm With Children, Parents, and Clinicians
Preoperative Anxiety Experienced by the Pediatric Patient, Dental Anxiety in Children
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, and Salivary Irisin After Root Canal Treatment
Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment, Dental Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
INYANG ISONG, MD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video in people with Dental Fear, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2013.