Low Back PainPhase 3NCT01789970
Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets for Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain
A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Low Back Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 87 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets at doses of 30 to 90 mg every 12 hours compared with placebo in alleviating moderate to severe pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients may be opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Hydrocodone ER
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 625 participants
- Where
- 87 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient has had moderate to severe chronic low back pain for at least 3 months duration before screening.
- The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
- The patient is willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the study center for scheduled study visits, as specified in the protocol.
- The patient is 18 through 80 years of age at the time of screening.
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception, agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. - Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method. NOTE: A woman will be considered surgically sterile if she has had a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
- Other criteria apply.
Who cannot join
- The patient is taking a total of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone, or equivalent, during the 14 days before screening.
- The patient's primary painful condition under study is related to any source of chronic pain other than low back pain.
- The patient has radicular (nerve compression) pain or another type of purely neuropathic pain.
- The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in the study drug.
- The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse, with the exception of nicotine.
- The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
- Other criteria apply.
Trial locations and contacts
87 sites in 1 country.
87 sites in 1 country
United States87 sites
Teva Investigational Site 10415
Altoona, Pennsylvania
Teva Investigational Site 10358
Anaheim, California
Teva Investigational Site 10416
Anniston, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10405
Austin, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10418
Avon, Indiana
Teva Investigational Site 10388
Bay City, Michigan
Teva Investigational Site 10408
Bell Gardens, California
Teva Investigational Site 10420
Bellevue, Washington
Teva Investigational Site 10409
Berlin, New Jersey
Teva Investigational Site 10397
Biloxi, Mississippi
Teva Investigational Site 10382
Birmingham, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10403
Birmingham, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10412
Birmingham, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10439
Buffalo, New York
Teva Investigational Site 10425
Carmichael, California
Teva Investigational Site 10390
Cerritos, California
Teva Investigational Site 10411
Chicago, Illinois
Teva Investigational Site 10432
Columbus, Georgia
Teva Investigational Site 10364
Dallas, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10372
Dallas, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10395
Dallas, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10369
DeLand, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10430
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Teva Investigational Site 10744
Edgewater, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10429
El Cajon, California
Teva Investigational Site 10423
Escondido, California
Teva Investigational Site 10380
Evansville, Indiana
Teva Investigational Site 10433
Everett, Washington
Teva Investigational Site 10389
Fall River, Massachusetts
Teva Investigational Site 10379
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10740
Garden Grove, California
Teva Investigational Site 10406
Hazelwood, Missouri
Teva Investigational Site 10417
Henderson, Nevada
Teva Investigational Site 10371
Houston, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 12035
Houston, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10391
Huntington Park, California
Teva Investigational Site 10365
Jacksonville, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10422
La Jolla, California
Teva Investigational Site 10413
Laguna Hills, California
Teva Investigational Site 10442
Laguna Hills, California
Teva Investigational Site 10377
Lake Jackson, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10399
Las Vegas, Nevada
Teva Investigational Site 10445
Leesburg, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10370
Los Angeles, California
Teva Investigational Site 10383
Marietta, Georgia
Teva Investigational Site 10385
Marietta, Georgia
Teva Investigational Site 10386
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
Teva Investigational Site 10431
Meridian, Idaho
Teva Investigational Site 10743
Meridian, Idaho
Teva Investigational Site 10426
Mobile, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10436
Montgomery, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 10419
New Orleans, Louisiana
Teva Investigational Site 10394
New York, New York
Teva Investigational Site 10407
New York, New York
Teva Investigational Site 10410
New York, New York
Teva Investigational Site 10440
Newburgh, Indiana
Teva Investigational Site 10444
Newnan, Georgia
Teva Investigational Site 10404
North Charleston, South Carolina
Teva Investigational Site 10446
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Teva Investigational Site 10376
Omaha, Nebraska
Teva Investigational Site 10396
Omaha, Nebraska
Teva Investigational Site 10362
Orlando, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10381
Ormond Beach, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10375
Overland Park, Kansas
Teva Investigational Site 12036
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10363
Phoenix, Arizona
Teva Investigational Site 10366
Phoenix, Arizona
Teva Investigational Site 10374
Plano, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10357
Plantation, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10443
Raleigh, North Carolina
Teva Investigational Site 10438
Roanoke, Virginia
Teva Investigational Site 10367
Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10435
Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10402
Salt Lake City, Utah
Teva Investigational Site 10378
San Antonio, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 10742
Sanford, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 10392
Sherman Oaks, California
Teva Investigational Site 10359
Shreveport, Louisiana
Teva Investigational Site 10741
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Teva Investigational Site 10401
St Louis, Missouri
Teva Investigational Site 10398
Thousand Oaks, California
Teva Investigational Site 10373
Tipton, Pennsylvania
Teva Investigational Site 10428
Torrance, California
Teva Investigational Site 10437
Tucson, Arizona
Teva Investigational Site 10361
Walnut Creek, California
Teva Investigational Site 10441
Waterbury, Connecticut
Teva Investigational Site 10414
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
About this study
Official title: A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized-Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 30 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets at doses of 30 to 90 mg every 12 hours compared with placebo in alleviating moderate to severe pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients may be opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced.
Read the detailed description
The study consisted of a screening period of approximately 7 to 14 days, an open label titration period of up to 6 weeks, and a double blind treatment period of 12 weeks.
The objective of the open label titration period was to find the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release (ER) tablets that produced stable pain relief without unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Stable pain relief was defined as an average pain intensity (API) score over the previous 24 hours of 4 or less and a worst pain intensity (WPI) score of 6 or less on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) (0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable) for either 4 consecutive days or 4 out of 7 consecutive days, while the same dose of study drug was maintained for up to 7 days. Scores for WPI and API were recorded daily in individual patient electronic diaries. Patients returned to the study center prior to each dose adjustment.
The starting dose of hydrocodone ER tablets depended on whether the subject was opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced. Opioid-naïve participants started at a 15-mg dose of hydrocodone ER tablets every 12 hours. For opioid-experienced participants, the starting dose of hydrocodone ER tablets was to be approximately equivalent to 50% of the dose of opioid analgesic that they were receiving at screening and administered every 12 hours. Investigators switched participants from previous opioid therapy to hydrocodone ER tablets on the basis of predefined dose equivalents.
Participants who met the criterion of a stabilized dose were randomly assigned into the 12 week, double-blind, placebo controlled treatment period on the final day of the open label titration period (baseline visit). Participants began treatment with double blind study drug at the effective dose of hydrocodone ER tablets achieved during the titration period or matching placebo. Rescue medication was permitted in addition to the study drug during the double blind treatment period.
Participants who participated in the study in compliance with the protocol and complete 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with study drug, were considered to have completed the study and could have been eligible to enroll in a 6-month open-label study (study C32337/3104, NCT01922739).
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Hydrocodone ER, Placebo
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, hydrocodone bitartrate, opioids
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hydrocodone ERDrug
Also called CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets
During the open-label, titration period, all participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours to identify a dosage deemed successful for managing their pain.
Hydrocodone ER was taken by participants randomized to the hydrocodone ER treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period at the dose level identified during the titration period.
Participants were instructed to take tablets with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching the active drug dose identified during the titration period was taken by participants randomized to the placebo treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period.
Participants were instructed to take intervention with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets orally at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the treatment period, participants were administered placebo tablets twice a day that matched the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. A step-wise, double-blind schedule to tamper off active drug was implemented during the first 2 weeks of the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects in participants randomly assigned to placebo. Receives: Drug: Hydrocodone ER; Drug: Placebo |
| Hydrocodone ER | Experimental | Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets orally at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, participants randomly assigned to hydrocodone ER were administered tablets twice a day at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. Receives: Drug: Hydrocodone ER |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI)
The WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly WPI scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control.
The analysis included WPI data observed before discontinuation of study drug and was based on the multiple imputations (MI) method to handle missing scores at week 12. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report (Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010), the MI method includes an assumption of missing at random (MAR) and takes into account a potential bias toward the active-drug treatment group for patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events.
Measured: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 of Treatment Period
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API)
The API over the last 24 hours was recorded daily by patients in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described the average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly API scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control.
The analysis included API data observed before discontinuation of study drug and was based on the MI method to handle missing scores at week 12. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report (Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010), the MI method includes an assumption of missing at random (MAR) and takes into account a potential bias toward the active-drug treatment group for patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events.
Measured: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Loss of Efficacy
Time to loss of efficacy was defined as discontinuation of study drug for lack of efficacy or the start of excessive rescue medication while taking study drug. Excessive rescue medication usage was defined as 10 or more days of rescue medication usage in any 14 consecutive days at a total of 15 mg (hydrocodone-equivalent) or higher each day during the post 2-week tapering period of the double-blind treatment period.
Measured: Day 1 to Week 12 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Participants With a 30% or Greater Increase in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API) From Baseline to Week 12 Visit, and an Average API Score of 5 or Higher at Week 12
The API over the last 24 hours was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described the average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly API scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit.
Measured: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final On-Treatment Visit in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score
The RMDQ is a patient-rated, 24-question evaluation used to assess acute disability associated with low back pain. Each question is answered with a YES or NO response, and each YES response is given 1 point. Scores on the RMDQ range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in level of disability.
Measured: Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period
Participants With Adverse Events During Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Measured: Day 1 of Titration Period up to Week 12 of Treatment Period (maximum treatment duration was 127 days)
Participants With Clinically Significant Hearing Changes From Baseline to Final Assessment in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results
Pure tone audiometry was performed by a qualified audiologist and was not done at the study center. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Measured: Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Day 0 of Treatment Period (last day of Titration Period), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scales (SOWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
The results of the SOWS were collected in the e-diary daily during the first 4 weeks of the double blind treatment period and then during clinic visits at week 12 or early termination. The SOWS was a self-administered questionnaire used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates. The scale contained 16 symptoms (such as my nose is running; I feel restless), the participant rated the intensity on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score of 0-64. The daily total score for the first 4 weeks was the largest score observed during the time period preceding that visit. For example, the week 1 score for each participant was the largest total score on any day between baseline and the night before the week 1 visit; the week 4 score for each participant was the largest score observed between the week 2 visit and the night before the week 4 visit.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period
Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales (COWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
COWS is a clinician-rated scale used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates, with ratings based only on apparent relationship to withdrawal. The COWS was performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 (double blind treatment period) or early termination. The scale contained 11 signs/symptoms whose intensity the clinician rated on a scale of 0 to 4 or 5.
A total score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 11 signs/symptoms for a total range of 0-48. Withdrawal severity was classified, based on the total score, as follows:
- 0 to 4=normal
- 5 to 12=mild
- 13 to 24=moderate
- 25 to 36=moderately severe
- 36=severe
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values.
Significance criteria:
- Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L
- Creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
- Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Serum white blood cells: <=3.0 * 10^9/L
- Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
- Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
- Eosinophils: >=10.0 %
- Absolute neutrophils: <=1.0 * 10^9/L
- Urinalysis: Glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Measured: Day 1 up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.
Significance criteria
- Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline
- Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute
- Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg
- Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Measured: Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram Findings During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Data represents the number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) electrocardiogram findings on the final study visit.
Measured: Final study visit (week 12 or end of treatment visit)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionFeb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 625 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Project Leader, Study director, Teva GCO
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01789970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C33237/3103
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized-Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 30 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01789970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C33237/3103
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, hydrocodone bitartrate, opioids
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 625 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets at doses of 30 to 90 mg every 12 hours compared with placebo in alleviating moderate to severe pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients may be opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced.
Detailed description
The study consisted of a screening period of approximately 7 to 14 days, an open label titration period of up to 6 weeks, and a double blind treatment period of 12 weeks.
The objective of the open label titration period was to find the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release (ER) tablets that produced stable pain relief without unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Stable pain relief was defined as an average pain intensity (API) score over the previous 24 hours of 4 or less and a worst pain intensity (WPI) score of 6 or less on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) (0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable) for either 4 consecutive days or 4 out of 7 consecutive days, while the same dose of study drug was maintained for up to 7 days. Scores for WPI and API were recorded daily in individual patient electronic diaries. Patients returned to the study center prior to each dose adjustment.
The starting dose of hydrocodone ER tablets depended on whether the subject was opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced. Opioid-naïve participants started at a 15-mg dose of hydrocodone ER tablets every 12 hours. For opioid-experienced participants, the starting dose of hydrocodone ER tablets was to be approximately equivalent to 50% of the dose of opioid analgesic that they were receiving at screening and administered every 12 hours. Investigators switched participants from previous opioid therapy to hydrocodone ER tablets on the basis of predefined dose equivalents.
Participants who met the criterion of a stabilized dose were randomly assigned into the 12 week, double-blind, placebo controlled treatment period on the final day of the open label titration period (baseline visit). Participants began treatment with double blind study drug at the effective dose of hydrocodone ER tablets achieved during the titration period or matching placebo. Rescue medication was permitted in addition to the study drug during the double blind treatment period.
Participants who participated in the study in compliance with the protocol and complete 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with study drug, were considered to have completed the study and could have been eligible to enroll in a 6-month open-label study (study C32337/3104, NCT01922739).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Hydrocodone ER, Drug: PlaceboParticipants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets orally at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the treatment period, participants were administered placebo tablets twice a day that matched the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. A step-wise, double-blind schedule to tamper off active drug was implemented during the first 2 weeks of the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects in participants randomly assigned to placebo. |
| Hydrocodone ER | Experimental | Drug: Hydrocodone ERParticipants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets orally at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, participants randomly assigned to hydrocodone ER were administered tablets twice a day at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patient has had moderate to severe chronic low back pain for at least 3 months duration before screening.
- The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
- The patient is willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the study center for scheduled study visits, as specified in the protocol.
- The patient is 18 through 80 years of age at the time of screening.
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception, agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. - Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method. NOTE: A woman will be considered surgically sterile if she has had a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The patient is taking a total of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone, or equivalent, during the 14 days before screening.
- The patient's primary painful condition under study is related to any source of chronic pain other than low back pain.
- The patient has radicular (nerve compression) pain or another type of purely neuropathic pain.
- The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in the study drug.
- The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse, with the exception of nicotine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone ERAlso: CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tabletsDuring the open-label, titration period, all participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours to identify a dosage deemed successful for managing their pain. Hydrocodone ER was taken by participants randomized to the hydrocodone ER treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period at the dose level identified during the titration period. Participants were instructed to take tablets with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating. | Drug | Hydrocodone ER, Placebo |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching the active drug dose identified during the titration period was taken by participants randomized to the placebo treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period. Participants were instructed to take intervention with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI)
Time frame: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 of Treatment Period
The WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly WPI scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. The analysis included WPI data observed before discontinuation of study drug and was based on the multiple imputations (MI) method to handle missing scores at week 12. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report (Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010), the MI method includes an assumption of missing at random (MAR) and takes into account a potential bias toward the active-drug treatment group for patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events.
11 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API)
Time frame: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Loss of Efficacy
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Participants With a 30% or Greater Increase in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API) From Baseline to Week 12 Visit, and an Average API Score of 5 or Higher at Week 12
Time frame: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final On-Treatment Visit in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score
Time frame: Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period
Participants With Adverse Events During Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
Time frame: Day 1 of Titration Period up to Week 12 of Treatment Period (maximum treatment duration was 127 days)
Participants With Clinically Significant Hearing Changes From Baseline to Final Assessment in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results
Time frame: Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Day 0 of Treatment Period (last day of Titration Period), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scales (SOWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period
Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales (COWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram Findings During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time frame: Final study visit (week 12 or end of treatment visit)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Project Leader study director
Teva GCO
87 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Low Back Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 87 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 87 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) (time frame: Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 of Treatment Period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017.