Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)Phase 3NCT01802814
International Study for Treatment of Standard Risk Childhood Relapsed ALL 2010
A Phase 3 study testing SR-A + Epratuzumab and SR-B + Epratuzumab in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 17 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
The main goal of this study is to improve the outcome of children and adolescents with standard risk (SR) first relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Furthermore, goal is to set up a large international study group platform allowing for optimization of standard treatment strategies and integration of new agents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
- What is being tested?
- SR-A + Epratuzumab and SR-B + Epratuzumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- May 2014to 31 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Morphologically confirmed diagnosis of 1st relapsed precursor B-cell or T-cell ALL
- Children less than 18 years of age at inclusion
- Meeting SR criteria: late isolated or late/early combined B-cell precursor (BCP) bone marrow (BM) relapse, any late/early isolated extramedullary relapse
- Patient enrolled in a participating centre
- Written informed consent
- Start of treatment falling into the study period
Show all 9Show fewer
- No participation in other clinical trials 30 days prior to study enrolment that interfere with this protocol, except trials for primary ALL Inclusion criteria specific for the epratuzumab randomization
- Precursor B-cell immunophenotype. A specific CD22 expression level is not required
- M1 or M2 status of the bone marrow after induction
Who cannot join
- BCR-ABL / t(9;22) positive ALL
- Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test (urine sample positive for β-HCG > 10 U/l)
- Sexually active adolescents not willing to use highly effective contraceptive method (pearl index <1) until 2 years after end of antileukemic therapy
- Breast feeding
- Relapse post allogeneic stem-cell transplantation
- The whole protocol or essential parts are declined either by patient himself/herself or the respective legal guardian
Show all 11Show fewer
- No consent is given for saving and propagation of pseudonymized medical data for study reasons
- Severe concomitant disease that does not allow treatment according to the protocol at the investigator's discretion (e.g. malformation syndromes, cardiac malformations, metabolic disorders)
- Karnovsky / Lansky score < 50%
- Subjects unwilling or unable to comply with the study procedures
- Subjects who are legally detained in an official institute
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 17 countries.
17 sites in 17 countries
Australia1 site
Australian & New Zealand Childhood Hematology & Oncology Group
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Denmark1 site
Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet)
Copenhagen, 2100
Poland1 site
Dpt. SCT and Hematology/Oncology University Wroclaw
Wroclaw, 50354
United Kingdom1 site
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
Manchester, M13 9WL
About this study
Official title: International Study for Treatment of Standard Risk Childhood Relapsed ALL 2010 A Randomized Phase III Study Conducted by the Resistant Disease Committee of the International BFM Study Group
The main goal of this study is to improve the outcome of children and adolescents with standard risk (SR) first relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Furthermore, goal is to set up a large international study group platform allowing for optimization of standard treatment strategies and integration of new agents.
Read the detailed description
ALL is the most frequent malignancy in childhood and has favourable event-free and overall survival rates. About 15% of patients suffer relapse. At relapse prognosis is much inferior (about 50% survival) leukemic clones exhibit much more resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Patients with relapse require treatment intensification and different therapeutic strategies. At relapse, new targeted agents can provide the chance for better cure rates and need to be investigated in prospective controlled trials before they may be even eligible for frontline treatment strategies.
The IntReALL SR 2010 trial is designed to achieve 2 major aims: Establishment of the best available standard chemotherapy treatment. This is addressed with the randomization of the 2 best developed strategies for treatment of childhood relapsed ALL, the German ALL-REZ BFM 2002 Protocol with the Protocol II IDA arm, and the British ALL-R3 protocol with the mitoxantrone arm. This randomization allows confirming the feasibility of both protocols in a large variety of different countries and study groups with different frontline therapy strategies. As result from this trial a common standard chemotherapy for childhood relapsed ALL will be developed which can serve as backbone for investigation of the most attractive targeted new agents.
The 2nd aim is the investigation of the efficacy and tolerability of the humanized CD22 directed monoclonal antibody Epratuzumab, manufactured and provided by the company Immunomedics, US. The drug will be randomly added to the respective consolidation chemotherapy, using EFS as primary endpoint. Epratuzumab has been developed in adult rheumatology indications and in B-cell malignancies. A phase I and early phase II combination trial in childhood relapse ALL has been conducted and published by the Children's Oncology Group (COG), and results of an extended phase II trial have been recently presented at the ASH meeting (12/2011). The drug showed a very favourable safety profile as single drug and in combination with multidrug chemotherapy. Activity was moderate, the recent trial showed a significantly better elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients achieving a 2nd complete remission. This finding supports the strategy to use Epratuzumab in combination with consolidation chemotherapy after induction in patients having reduced the leukemia burden in the bone marrow to at least below 25%, most of them will be in 2nd complete remission. Epratuzumab will be given weekly at the established dose. Pharmacokinetics will be investigated in a reduced number of patients. The further treatment will be conventional intensive chemotherapy and maintenance therapy in patients with good MRD response after induction, or with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in those with insufficient MRD response. SCT will be considered as standard treatment element and will not lead to censoring of the patients of considered as endpoint. Epratuzumab is not licensed so far and the trial may add to the approval process in case.
Scientific advice for the trial has been requested at the FDA and the EMA. Both institutions have responded supportively. Concerns and recommendations of FDA and EMA have been addressed in the protocol and the corresponding statistical analysis plan.
The IntReALL SR 2010 trial will be financed within the FP7 project IntReALL 2010 supported by the European Commission. Within the project next to the SR trial a strategy for high Risk (HR) patients will be addressed, the establishment of harmonized diagnostic procedures, an international tumour bank and a comprehensive biologic/scientific programme will be set up, a web-based Good Clinical Practice (GCP) conform database will be established, a comprehensive statistical strategy for both trials are established, and drug development in this indication will be promoted and organized from side of the disease experts in cooperation with the established academic structures ITCC (Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer), the ENCCA project (European Network for Cancer in Children and Adolescents) and SIOPe (International Society for Pediatric Oncology Europe), the central authorities (EMA, FDA) and Industry. Parent organisation and former patients are integrated into and accompany the process.
Main aims of the IntReALL FP7 project are to establish a therapeutic platform for children with relapsed ALL in Europe and beyond and to give them access to the most promising new agents under academic control and free from commercial interests.
Randomized evidence for efficacy and tolerability of new drugs are demanded by competent authorities. These trials are conducted beyond the mostly palliative patient group eligible for phase I/II trials in curative indications. Treatment protocols for with curative indications need to be conducted in the best interests of the patients, ideally with an academic sponsor. The design should be driven by medical and scientific evidence and not by commercial interests as is the case in industry sponsored trials. This concept was acknowledged by the European Commission selecting the project for funding from many other powerful applications.
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
- Being tested
- SR-A + Epratuzumab, SR-B + Epratuzumab
- Keywords
- ALL
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SR-A + EpratuzumabDrug
Also called Epratuzumab
SR-B + EpratuzumabDrug
Also called Epratuzumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SR-A | No intervention | Patients randomized to the SR-A Arm receive induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy according to a modified protocol ALL-REZ BFM 2002 with Protocol II-IDA as 1st consolidation element. In this arm patients are randomized not to receive epratuzumab.This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
| SR-A + Epratuzumab | Active comparator | Patients randomized to the SR-A Arm receive induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy according to a modified protocol ALL-REZ BFM 2002 with Protocol II-IDA as 1st consolidation element. In this arm patients are randomized to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. Receives: Drug: SR-A + Epratuzumab |
| SR-B | No intervention | Patients randomized to the SR-B Arm receive induction, post-induction and maintenance therapy according to the protocol ALL-R3. In this arm patients are randomized not to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
| SR-B + Epratuzumab | Active comparator | Patients randomized to the SR-B Arm receive induction, post-induction and maintenance therapy according to the protocol ALL-R3. In this arm patients are randomized to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. Receives: Drug: SR-B + Epratuzumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SR induction/consolidation ALL-REZ BFM 2002 versus UK-ALL-R3 (randomisation 1)
SR induction/consolidation ALL-REZ BFM 2002 versus UK-ALL-R3 (randomisation 1): 10% pEFS superiority of arm B above a 65% pEFS at 4 years of arm A
Measured: Up to 9 years
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab (randomisation 2)
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab (randomisation 2): 10% pEFS superiority of the arm with epratuzumab above an expected 74% pEFS at 4 years of the standard arm
Measured: Up to 9 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
SR induction/consolidation
SR induction/consolidation: comparison of OS, toxicity, rate of CR2, and rate of MRD between treatment groups
Measured: Up to 9 years
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab: comparison of OS, toxicity, MRD levels, rate of MRD and evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters of Epratuzumab
Measured: Up to 9 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completion31 Jul 2023
- Study completion31 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Australian & New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung (Co-Sponsor Austria), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC, University Hospital, Motol, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, Turku University (Co-Sponsor Finland), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Our Lady's Chilrden's Hospital (Co-Sponsor Ireland), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre (Co-Sponsor Israel), Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (Co-Sponsor Italy), National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center (Co-Sponsor Japan), Prinses Máxima Centrum (Co-Sponsor Netherlands), Oslo University Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa (Co-Sponsor Lisboa), Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP) (Co-Sponsor Spain), University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Central Manchester University (Co-Sponsor United Kingdom)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, PD Dr. Arend von Stackelberg, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Investigators
- Arend von Stackelberg, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital of Berlin - Charité
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01802814
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IntReALL SR 2010
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sidhu J, Gogoi MP, Krishnan S, Saha V. Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Feb;91(2):158-167. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04635-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
PubMed 37341952
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- International Study for Treatment of Standard Risk Childhood Relapsed ALL 2010 A Randomized Phase III Study Conducted by the Resistant Disease Committee of the International BFM Study Group
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01802814
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IntReALL SR 2010
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
- Keywords
- ALL
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Australian & New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung (Co-Sponsor Austria), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC, University Hospital, Motol, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, Turku University (Co-Sponsor Finland), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Our Lady's Chilrden's Hospital (Co-Sponsor Ireland), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre (Co-Sponsor Israel), Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (Co-Sponsor Italy), National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center (Co-Sponsor Japan), Prinses Máxima Centrum (Co-Sponsor Netherlands), Oslo University Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa (Co-Sponsor Lisboa), Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP) (Co-Sponsor Spain), University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Central Manchester University (Co-Sponsor United Kingdom)
- Study start
- May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of this study is to improve the outcome of children and adolescents with standard risk (SR) first relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Furthermore, goal is to set up a large international study group platform allowing for optimization of standard treatment strategies and integration of new agents.
Detailed description
ALL is the most frequent malignancy in childhood and has favourable event-free and overall survival rates. About 15% of patients suffer relapse. At relapse prognosis is much inferior (about 50% survival) leukemic clones exhibit much more resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Patients with relapse require treatment intensification and different therapeutic strategies. At relapse, new targeted agents can provide the chance for better cure rates and need to be investigated in prospective controlled trials before they may be even eligible for frontline treatment strategies.
The IntReALL SR 2010 trial is designed to achieve 2 major aims: Establishment of the best available standard chemotherapy treatment. This is addressed with the randomization of the 2 best developed strategies for treatment of childhood relapsed ALL, the German ALL-REZ BFM 2002 Protocol with the Protocol II IDA arm, and the British ALL-R3 protocol with the mitoxantrone arm. This randomization allows confirming the feasibility of both protocols in a large variety of different countries and study groups with different frontline therapy strategies. As result from this trial a common standard chemotherapy for childhood relapsed ALL will be developed which can serve as backbone for investigation of the most attractive targeted new agents.
The 2nd aim is the investigation of the efficacy and tolerability of the humanized CD22 directed monoclonal antibody Epratuzumab, manufactured and provided by the company Immunomedics, US. The drug will be randomly added to the respective consolidation chemotherapy, using EFS as primary endpoint. Epratuzumab has been developed in adult rheumatology indications and in B-cell malignancies. A phase I and early phase II combination trial in childhood relapse ALL has been conducted and published by the Children's Oncology Group (COG), and results of an extended phase II trial have been recently presented at the ASH meeting (12/2011). The drug showed a very favourable safety profile as single drug and in combination with multidrug chemotherapy. Activity was moderate, the recent trial showed a significantly better elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients achieving a 2nd complete remission. This finding supports the strategy to use Epratuzumab in combination with consolidation chemotherapy after induction in patients having reduced the leukemia burden in the bone marrow to at least below 25%, most of them will be in 2nd complete remission. Epratuzumab will be given weekly at the established dose. Pharmacokinetics will be investigated in a reduced number of patients. The further treatment will be conventional intensive chemotherapy and maintenance therapy in patients with good MRD response after induction, or with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in those with insufficient MRD response. SCT will be considered as standard treatment element and will not lead to censoring of the patients of considered as endpoint. Epratuzumab is not licensed so far and the trial may add to the approval process in case.
Scientific advice for the trial has been requested at the FDA and the EMA. Both institutions have responded supportively. Concerns and recommendations of FDA and EMA have been addressed in the protocol and the corresponding statistical analysis plan.
The IntReALL SR 2010 trial will be financed within the FP7 project IntReALL 2010 supported by the European Commission. Within the project next to the SR trial a strategy for high Risk (HR) patients will be addressed, the establishment of harmonized diagnostic procedures, an international tumour bank and a comprehensive biologic/scientific programme will be set up, a web-based Good Clinical Practice (GCP) conform database will be established, a comprehensive statistical strategy for both trials are established, and drug development in this indication will be promoted and organized from side of the disease experts in cooperation with the established academic structures ITCC (Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer), the ENCCA project (European Network for Cancer in Children and Adolescents) and SIOPe (International Society for Pediatric Oncology Europe), the central authorities (EMA, FDA) and Industry. Parent organisation and former patients are integrated into and accompany the process.
Main aims of the IntReALL FP7 project are to establish a therapeutic platform for children with relapsed ALL in Europe and beyond and to give them access to the most promising new agents under academic control and free from commercial interests.
Randomized evidence for efficacy and tolerability of new drugs are demanded by competent authorities. These trials are conducted beyond the mostly palliative patient group eligible for phase I/II trials in curative indications. Treatment protocols for with curative indications need to be conducted in the best interests of the patients, ideally with an academic sponsor. The design should be driven by medical and scientific evidence and not by commercial interests as is the case in industry sponsored trials. This concept was acknowledged by the European Commission selecting the project for funding from many other powerful applications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SR-A | No intervention | –Patients randomized to the SR-A Arm receive induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy according to a modified protocol ALL-REZ BFM 2002 with Protocol II-IDA as 1st consolidation element. In this arm patients are randomized not to receive epratuzumab.This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
| SR-A + Epratuzumab | Active comparator | Drug: SR-A + EpratuzumabPatients randomized to the SR-A Arm receive induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy according to a modified protocol ALL-REZ BFM 2002 with Protocol II-IDA as 1st consolidation element. In this arm patients are randomized to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
| SR-B | No intervention | –Patients randomized to the SR-B Arm receive induction, post-induction and maintenance therapy according to the protocol ALL-R3. In this arm patients are randomized not to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
| SR-B + Epratuzumab | Active comparator | Drug: SR-B + EpratuzumabPatients randomized to the SR-B Arm receive induction, post-induction and maintenance therapy according to the protocol ALL-R3. In this arm patients are randomized to receive epratuzumab. This randomization has been stopped pre-term on 1.2.2019 since the investigational product is not provided anymore by the manufacturer. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Morphologically confirmed diagnosis of 1st relapsed precursor B-cell or T-cell ALL
- Children less than 18 years of age at inclusion
- Meeting SR criteria: late isolated or late/early combined B-cell precursor (BCP) bone marrow (BM) relapse, any late/early isolated extramedullary relapse
- Patient enrolled in a participating centre
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- BCR-ABL / t(9;22) positive ALL
- Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test (urine sample positive for β-HCG > 10 U/l)
- Sexually active adolescents not willing to use highly effective contraceptive method (pearl index <1) until 2 years after end of antileukemic therapy
- Breast feeding
- Relapse post allogeneic stem-cell transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SR-A + EpratuzumabAlso: Epratuzumab | Drug | SR-A + Epratuzumab |
| SR-B + EpratuzumabAlso: Epratuzumab | Drug | SR-B + Epratuzumab |
Primary outcome
SR induction/consolidation ALL-REZ BFM 2002 versus UK-ALL-R3 (randomisation 1)
Time frame: Up to 9 years
SR induction/consolidation ALL-REZ BFM 2002 versus UK-ALL-R3 (randomisation 1): 10% pEFS superiority of arm B above a 65% pEFS at 4 years of arm A
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab (randomisation 2)
Time frame: Up to 9 years
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab (randomisation 2): 10% pEFS superiority of the arm with epratuzumab above an expected 74% pEFS at 4 years of the standard arm
2 secondary outcomes
SR induction/consolidation
Time frame: Up to 9 years
SR consolidation +/- epratuzumab
Time frame: Up to 9 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37341952Sidhu J, Gogoi MP, Krishnan S, Saha V. Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Feb;91(2):158-167. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04635-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
- Public Website of the FP7 Collaborative Project "IntReALL"Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arend von Stackelberg, MD principal investigator
University Hospital of Berlin - Charité
17 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SR-A + Epratuzumab and SR-B + Epratuzumab in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 17 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SR induction/consolidation ALL-REZ BFM 2002 versus UK-ALL-R3 (randomisation 1) (time frame: Up to 9 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01802814, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2024.