AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental CariesCMCR09NCT01811420

Chemomechanical Caries Removal Using Papain Gel

A study testing Chemomechanical Caries Removal and Conventional method in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of a papain-based gel in caries removal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 6 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries
What is being tested?
Chemomechanical Caries Removal and Conventional method
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Mar 2009to Mar 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 6 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children with active caries without pulpal involvement in two deciduous molar teeth participated in the trial.
  • The caries were located on the occlusal surface.

Who cannot join

  • Children with pathological process of the dental tissue, with pulpal involvement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Universidade Nove de Julho

    São Paulo, Sao Apaulo, 01156-080

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Chemomechanical Caries Removal Using a Papain-Based Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial

To evaluate the efficacy of a papain-based gel in caries removal.

Read the detailed description

Twenty children with at least two carious molar teeth without pulpal involvement participated in this randomized clinical trial. A total of 40 teeth were randomly divided into two treatment groups: group A, papain-based gel; and group B, conventional technique. Data collection included the time required for caries removal, need for local anesthesia, degree of discomfort, changes in the number of viable bacteria, and clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-cement restorations 6-month post-treatment.

Conditions
Dental Caries
Being tested
Chemomechanical Caries Removal, Conventional method
Keywords
dental caries, caries removal, chemomechanical caries removal
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chemomechanical Caries RemovalProcedure or surgery

    Chemomechanical Caries Removal Using A Papain-Based Gel

  • Conventional methodProcedure or surgery

    Dental caries removal using rotatory instrument

Study groups in NCT01811420
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CHEMOMECHANICAL CARIES REMOVALExperimentalDental caries removal using papain based gel
Receives: Procedure: Chemomechanical Caries Removal
conventional methodActive comparatorDental caries removal using rotatory instrument
Receives: Procedure: Conventional method

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. restauration evaluation

    the restauration will be assessed by clinical examination for detection the current caries

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. discomfort or pain

    The Faces Pain Scale was used to evaluate the need for local anesthesia during the procedure. The child was asked to choose a face matching the intensity of his or her pain experience during the procedure.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01811420
Sponsor's protocol ID
cariesremoval09
Acronym
CMCR09
Status last verified
Mar 2013
First submitted
6 Mar 2013
Last updated
14 Mar 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, Silva AL, Alfaya TA, Godoy CH, Navarro MF. Efficacy of Papacarie((R)) in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(5):319-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)04.

    PubMed 24838896
  • Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, da Silva AL, Alfaya TA, de Godoy CH, Navarro MF. Pain during Removal of Carious Lesions in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:896381. doi: 10.1155/2013/896381. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

    PubMed 24363672

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Chemomechanical Caries Removal and Conventional method in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

restauration evaluation (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01811420, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in