Pleural Effusion, MalignantNCT01819363
Relationship Between Pleural Elastance and Effectiveness of Pleurodesis on Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion
An observational study of Pleural Effusion, Malignant, run by Grupo de Pesquisa em Pleura e Oncologia Toracica at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to analyze the correlation between pleural elastance and the radiological effectiveness (measured by chest tomography) of pleurodesis performed via catheters in patients with RMPE. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pleural Effusion, Malignant
- What is being tested?
- Pleural elastance
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy
Who may be able to join
- Malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy;
- Recurrent pleural effusion (new accumulation of fluid after puncture) and symptoms (dyspnea and / or chest pain);
- Complete lung expansion (> 90%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography;
- Karnofsky index (KPS - Karnofsky Performance Status) > 30;
- Agreed to participate in the study and sign an informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity <50% and platelet count <80,000 mm3);
- Endobronchial obstruction by the neoplasm;
- Major pulmonary fibrosis or lymphangitis carcinomatosis ipsilateral to the effusion;
- Volume drained <800 mL;
- No contact between the pleural surfaces after draining;
- Pleural or active systemic infection;
Show all 10Show fewer
- Massive neoplastic infiltration of the skin;
- Inability to understand the quality of life questionnaire;
- Age less than 18 years;
- Previous pleural procedures (except punctures and needle biopsies).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
INCOR - Heart Institute
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
Pedro HX Araújo, MD, 55-11-8316-4791, phnabuco@terra.com.br
Ricardo M Terra, MD, PhD, 55-11-9975-1178, rmterra@uol.com.br
About this study
The objective of this study is to analyze the correlation between pleural elastance and the radiological effectiveness (measured by chest tomography) of pleurodesis performed via catheters in patients with RMPE. The secondary objectives of this study are: correlate pleural elastance with quality of life, analysis of dyspnea and pain after the procedure, clinical effectiveness, complications and mortality in 30 days.
Read the detailed description
- PURPOSE To analyze the correlation between pleural elastance and the radiological effectiveness (measured by chest tomography) of pleurodesis performed via catheters in patients with RMPE. The secondary objectives of this study are: correlate pleural elastance with quality of life, analysis of dyspnea and pain after the procedure, clinical effectiveness, complications and mortality in 30 days.
- METHODS Patients who participate in this study will be selected at the Pleural Diseases Clinic of Department of Thoracic Surgery and Department of Pulmonology of the Medical School of USP. Shall be deemed elected patients with: malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy; recurrent pleural effusion (new accumulation of fluid after puncture) and symptoms (dyspnea and / or chest pain); parcial lung expansion (> 50%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography; Karnofsky index (KPS - Karnofsky Performance Status) > 30; and agreed to participate in the study and sign an informed consent. The investigators will include 140 patients in the study, predicting loss of some patients.
- PROCEDURE After insertion of the tube, this will be fixed to the skin with nonabsorbable sutures and wound covered with a bandage. The catheter is connected to a three-way stopcock. On its output side is connected to a delivery unit for measuring central venous pressure or a gear connected to an electronic transducer of vascular pressure. In the output is connected to the distal extension tube with the proximal end of the valve and the distal end of Heimlich is connected to a collection bag. The pleural pressure level will be zero at the time of the insertion site of the drain on the skin. The pleural pressure is set to the value measured at end-expiration. The pleural pressure is measured at baseline, after withdrawal of 10 ml of liquid and thereafter every 400 ml of pleural effusion evacuated to the pressure to be negative, from that moment the measurement will occur every 200 ml of pleural effusion drained to obtain 800 ml of liquid. Patients that are removed less than 800 ml of liquid will be excluded from the protocol. The pleural elastance is then calculated in cm H2O / L and the data placed in a pressure curve by volume. A chest radiograph is performed and the patient will be eligible for pleurodesis if there is a lung expansion that will allow some contact between the pleural surfaces, even partially. The eligible patients for pleurodesis will be referred to an outpatient procedure room or remain in their ward beds, where, under sterile conditions will be submitted to the instillation of silver nitrate or talc mineral. Analgesia is given only when necessary. The drain is kept closed for one hour, after this period, the drain is opened and the patient discharged and instructed to return within 1 week in outpatient cases. A CT of the chest will be held in the near-pleurodesis, while the patient is still on the drain and with a maximum of five days after pleurodesis. In the outpatient possible complications are evaluated. The drain is removed when less than 100 ml/day of pleural fluid is drained. After removal of the drain will be scheduled one month in return for clinical evaluation and another CT scan of the chest. Since then the returns will be quarterly. In all returns will be evaluated further chest radiographs, questionnaires of quality of life, dyspnea and pain shall be applied and will be actively investigated the occurrence of complications. Patients who fail to attend the consultation will be contacted by phone. Non-scheduled queries occur in case of clinical necessity (relapses, complications, etc. Blinding The investigator will make measurements of pleural elastance not follow the patients. Researchers who make assessments of patients and CT scans of the chest after drainage and pleurodesis will be blinded to the measurements of pleural elastance.
- OUTCOMES 4.1) RADIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVE In this study, the effectiveness will be measured by radiographic tomography of the chest. Will be measured volumes of pleural fluid in chest CT after placement of the drain and 1 month after pleurodesis.
The patient will be subjected to computed tomography of the chest without contrast. This will be measured through the volume of pleural fluid. With use of axial slices, stipulate every 2 cm segments. Will calculate the area occupied by the pleural effusion. Multiplying the height of 2 cm will approximate the volume of this segment. Be inferred from the approximate volume of pleural effusion by adding the volumes of all segments of 2 cm. The unit of volume is milliliter.
The difference between volumes 1 month and near-pleurodesis indicate how much was the re-accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, thus we provide a numerical value to be related to the numerical value of pleural elastance. In case of recurrence within 30 days, the TC will be held and that value will be considered post-pleurodesis.
4.2) CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS In this study, the clinical effectiveness will be considered a binary variable (success or failure). We will consider failure of pleurodesis when, at any time of follow-up procedure was necessary some new procedure for emptying pleural effusion, is puncture, drainage or thoracoscopy. Such procedures shall be appointed by the surgical team of the Pleural Diseases Clinic of the HCFMUSP considering clinical criteria (symptoms: dyspnea, cough and chest pain) and radiological (new fluid accumulation in chest tomography).
4.3) ANALYSIS OF QUALITY OF LIFE To analyze the quality of life the investigators use the WHOQoL-Bref. The WHOQOL-Bref is a reduced version of the questionnaire of quality of life developed by the World Health Organization multi-cultural context, aiming to cover as many countries and cultures as possible and thus can be used internationally, allowing the comparison between the results obtained in different locations. This questionnaire has been validated for the Portuguese language and covers the following areas: quality of life and general health (scored by the patient), physical, psychological, social and environmental. This questionnaire has been previously used for analysis of quality of life after pleurodesis and will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.4) ANALYSIS OF PAIN Pain assessment will be made by patient´s quantifying of the Visual Analog Scale of Pain. The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.5) ANALYSIS OF DYSPNEA The analysis of dyspnea will be made by quantifying the functionality with the dyspnea scale of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.6) SECURITY ANALYSIS For the analysis of safety procedures shall be deemed times of hospitalization and drainage and occurrence of complications. Such data will be obtained during the inpatient and outpatient follow-up as previously described. The expected complications, and actively investigated, as the group's experience and literature are fever, bleeding, infection (pulmonary and / or pleural), abdominal pain, prolonged drainage (> 10 days), air leak, subcutaneous emphysema, respiratory failure, reexpansion edema and death related to the procedure. Other complications will be recorded as the occurrence and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE).
5 - DATA COLLECTION Initial Assessment Will be collected the following data: age, sex, primary tumor and number of puncture. All data will be included in a spreadsheet program SPSS (Chicago, IL) and patients' names deleted after completion of collection. During the initial assessment will also be filled in the questionnaires of quality of life WHO-Qol, MRC dyspnea scale and Visual Analog Scale of Pain.
During the pleural drainage will be collected initial data from PP, the intermediate and final and calculated elastance of the pleural space
Follow-up After chest tube removal patients will return in a month and then every three months or as symptoms. In case of non-attendance, telephone contacts will be established and, in case of death, the date will be noted for purposes of construction of the survival curve.
In all returns the clinical data will be annotated seeking occurrence of any complications. The quality of life questionnaires will be used again as soon as new chest X-rays are performed. Examinations and additional consultations will be conducted according to clinical need.
- ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES Radiation Effectiveness The difference between the pleural volume after 30 days and peri-pleurodesis be correlated with measured pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation is evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Will be used to establish the linear regression equation that can predict the volume of pleural fluid reacúmulo expected based on the measured pleural elastance.
Clinical Effectiveness The clinical effectiveness will be considered as a categorical value and will be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation will be assessed by the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Try Doc through a curve and the area under the curve values of elastance set from which there is reduced clinical effectiveness.
Quality of Life The differences in scores on the questionnaire of quality of life in each of its four areas after pleurodesis and before the same shall be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of these correlations will be assessed through the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Pain The difference in pain scores in the questionnaire after pleurodesis and before the same shall be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation is evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Dyspnea Dyspnea is considered as categorical value and will be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation will be assessed by the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Complications Complications will be considered as categorical value (score ≥ 3 and ≤ 2 by CTCAE) and will be correlated with the pleural elastance. The significance of these correlations will be assessed through the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
6.3) SURVIVAL A survival curve is constructed considering pleurodesis initial time and death as the event. Censored are those which have not undergone the event until the end time of the analysis. Cox regression will be held to the relevance of the following factors on mortality: pleural elastance, KPS and primary neoplasm.
Methodology The measurement of partial elastance (first 800 ml) and not the total value can change, since the pressure x volume curve is not always monophasic. The investigators will measure the pressure until the end of the withdrawal of liquid and analyze the total elastance, noting whether there will be significant changes.
Pleural pressure measurements and the water column pressure transducer vascular are superimposable. Therefore, the investigators don't see problems in measuring pleural pressure by different methods, depending on the non-availability of the transducer in all clinics and wards of our hospital.
- Conditions
- Pleural Effusion, Malignant
- Being tested
- Pleural elastance
- Keywords
- Pleural effusion, Pleural elastance, Pleurodesis, Quality of life, Computed Tomography
- Medical subject headings
- Pleural Effusion, Malignant, Pleural Effusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pleural elastanceProcedure or surgery
The pleural pressure level will be zero at the time of the insertion site of the drain on the skin. The pleural pressure is set to the value measured at end-expiration. The pleural pressure is measured at baseline, after withdrawal of 10 ml of liquid and thereafter every 400 ml of pleural effusion evacuated to the pressure to be negative, from that moment the measurement will occur every 200 ml of pleural effusion drained to obtain 800 ml of liquid. Patients that are removed less than 800 ml of liquid will be excluded from the protocol. The pleural elastance is then calculated in cm H2O / L and the data placed in a pressure curve by volume.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study group | Patients with Malignant pleural effusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Receives: Procedure: Pleural elastance |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiological Effective
The effectiveness will be measured by radiographic tomography of the chest. Will be measured volumes of pleural fluid in chest CT after placement of the drain and 1 month after pleurodesis
Measured: 1 month after the inclusion
Secondary outcomes (5)
Clinical Effectiveness
The clinical effectiveness will be considered a binary variable (success or failure). We will consider failure of pleurodesis when, at any time of follow-up procedure was necessary some new procedure for emptying pleural effusion, is puncture, drainage or thoracoscopy. Such procedures shall be appointed by the surgical team of the Pleural Diseases Clinic of the HCFMUSP considering clinical criteria (symptoms: dyspnea, cough and chest pain) and radiological (new fluid accumulation in chest tomography).
Measured: 1 months after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of Quality of Life
To analyze the quality of life we use the WHOQoL-Bref. The WHOQOL-Bref is a reduced version of the questionnaire of quality of life developed by the World Health Organization multi-cultural context, aiming to cover as many countries and cultures as possible and thus can be used internationally, allowing the comparison between the results obtained in different locations.
Measured: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion, each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of Pain
Pain assessment will be made by patient´s quantifying of the Visual Analog Scale of Pain. The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
Measured: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of dyspnea
The analysis of dyspnea will be made by quantifying the functionality with the dyspnea scale of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
Measured: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Security Analysis
For the analysis of safety procedures shall be deemed times of hospitalization and drainage and occurrence of complications. Such data will be obtained during the inpatient and outpatient follow-up as previously described. Other complications will be recorded as the occurrence and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE).
Measured: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion, each 3 months after inclusion until death
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Study completionJan 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pleural Effusion, MalignantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo de Pesquisa em Pleura e Oncologia Toracica
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ricardo M Terra, MD, PhD, Study chair, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01819363
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GPPOT-01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Pleural Elastance and Effectiveness of Pleurodesis on Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01819363
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GPPOT-01
- Conditions
- Pleural Effusion, Malignant
- Keywords
- Pleural effusion, Pleural elastance, Pleurodesis, Quality of life, Computed Tomography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo de Pesquisa em Pleura e Oncologia ToracicaResearch network
- Collaborators
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to analyze the correlation between pleural elastance and the radiological effectiveness (measured by chest tomography) of pleurodesis performed via catheters in patients with RMPE. The secondary objectives of this study are: correlate pleural elastance with quality of life, analysis of dyspnea and pain after the procedure, clinical effectiveness, complications and mortality in 30 days.
Detailed description
- PURPOSE To analyze the correlation between pleural elastance and the radiological effectiveness (measured by chest tomography) of pleurodesis performed via catheters in patients with RMPE. The secondary objectives of this study are: correlate pleural elastance with quality of life, analysis of dyspnea and pain after the procedure, clinical effectiveness, complications and mortality in 30 days.
- METHODS Patients who participate in this study will be selected at the Pleural Diseases Clinic of Department of Thoracic Surgery and Department of Pulmonology of the Medical School of USP. Shall be deemed elected patients with: malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy; recurrent pleural effusion (new accumulation of fluid after puncture) and symptoms (dyspnea and / or chest pain); parcial lung expansion (> 50%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography; Karnofsky index (KPS - Karnofsky Performance Status) > 30; and agreed to participate in the study and sign an informed consent. The investigators will include 140 patients in the study, predicting loss of some patients.
- PROCEDURE After insertion of the tube, this will be fixed to the skin with nonabsorbable sutures and wound covered with a bandage. The catheter is connected to a three-way stopcock. On its output side is connected to a delivery unit for measuring central venous pressure or a gear connected to an electronic transducer of vascular pressure. In the output is connected to the distal extension tube with the proximal end of the valve and the distal end of Heimlich is connected to a collection bag. The pleural pressure level will be zero at the time of the insertion site of the drain on the skin. The pleural pressure is set to the value measured at end-expiration. The pleural pressure is measured at baseline, after withdrawal of 10 ml of liquid and thereafter every 400 ml of pleural effusion evacuated to the pressure to be negative, from that moment the measurement will occur every 200 ml of pleural effusion drained to obtain 800 ml of liquid. Patients that are removed less than 800 ml of liquid will be excluded from the protocol. The pleural elastance is then calculated in cm H2O / L and the data placed in a pressure curve by volume. A chest radiograph is performed and the patient will be eligible for pleurodesis if there is a lung expansion that will allow some contact between the pleural surfaces, even partially. The eligible patients for pleurodesis will be referred to an outpatient procedure room or remain in their ward beds, where, under sterile conditions will be submitted to the instillation of silver nitrate or talc mineral. Analgesia is given only when necessary. The drain is kept closed for one hour, after this period, the drain is opened and the patient discharged and instructed to return within 1 week in outpatient cases. A CT of the chest will be held in the near-pleurodesis, while the patient is still on the drain and with a maximum of five days after pleurodesis. In the outpatient possible complications are evaluated. The drain is removed when less than 100 ml/day of pleural fluid is drained. After removal of the drain will be scheduled one month in return for clinical evaluation and another CT scan of the chest. Since then the returns will be quarterly. In all returns will be evaluated further chest radiographs, questionnaires of quality of life, dyspnea and pain shall be applied and will be actively investigated the occurrence of complications. Patients who fail to attend the consultation will be contacted by phone. Non-scheduled queries occur in case of clinical necessity (relapses, complications, etc. Blinding The investigator will make measurements of pleural elastance not follow the patients. Researchers who make assessments of patients and CT scans of the chest after drainage and pleurodesis will be blinded to the measurements of pleural elastance.
- OUTCOMES 4.1) RADIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVE In this study, the effectiveness will be measured by radiographic tomography of the chest. Will be measured volumes of pleural fluid in chest CT after placement of the drain and 1 month after pleurodesis.
The patient will be subjected to computed tomography of the chest without contrast. This will be measured through the volume of pleural fluid. With use of axial slices, stipulate every 2 cm segments. Will calculate the area occupied by the pleural effusion. Multiplying the height of 2 cm will approximate the volume of this segment. Be inferred from the approximate volume of pleural effusion by adding the volumes of all segments of 2 cm. The unit of volume is milliliter.
The difference between volumes 1 month and near-pleurodesis indicate how much was the re-accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, thus we provide a numerical value to be related to the numerical value of pleural elastance. In case of recurrence within 30 days, the TC will be held and that value will be considered post-pleurodesis.
4.2) CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS In this study, the clinical effectiveness will be considered a binary variable (success or failure). We will consider failure of pleurodesis when, at any time of follow-up procedure was necessary some new procedure for emptying pleural effusion, is puncture, drainage or thoracoscopy. Such procedures shall be appointed by the surgical team of the Pleural Diseases Clinic of the HCFMUSP considering clinical criteria (symptoms: dyspnea, cough and chest pain) and radiological (new fluid accumulation in chest tomography).
4.3) ANALYSIS OF QUALITY OF LIFE To analyze the quality of life the investigators use the WHOQoL-Bref. The WHOQOL-Bref is a reduced version of the questionnaire of quality of life developed by the World Health Organization multi-cultural context, aiming to cover as many countries and cultures as possible and thus can be used internationally, allowing the comparison between the results obtained in different locations. This questionnaire has been validated for the Portuguese language and covers the following areas: quality of life and general health (scored by the patient), physical, psychological, social and environmental. This questionnaire has been previously used for analysis of quality of life after pleurodesis and will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.4) ANALYSIS OF PAIN Pain assessment will be made by patient´s quantifying of the Visual Analog Scale of Pain. The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.5) ANALYSIS OF DYSPNEA The analysis of dyspnea will be made by quantifying the functionality with the dyspnea scale of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). The questionnaire will be applied by the same investigator during the initial evaluation, the returns one month after the procedure and then quarterly.
4.6) SECURITY ANALYSIS For the analysis of safety procedures shall be deemed times of hospitalization and drainage and occurrence of complications. Such data will be obtained during the inpatient and outpatient follow-up as previously described. The expected complications, and actively investigated, as the group's experience and literature are fever, bleeding, infection (pulmonary and / or pleural), abdominal pain, prolonged drainage (> 10 days), air leak, subcutaneous emphysema, respiratory failure, reexpansion edema and death related to the procedure. Other complications will be recorded as the occurrence and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE).
5 - DATA COLLECTION Initial Assessment Will be collected the following data: age, sex, primary tumor and number of puncture. All data will be included in a spreadsheet program SPSS (Chicago, IL) and patients' names deleted after completion of collection. During the initial assessment will also be filled in the questionnaires of quality of life WHO-Qol, MRC dyspnea scale and Visual Analog Scale of Pain.
During the pleural drainage will be collected initial data from PP, the intermediate and final and calculated elastance of the pleural space
Follow-up After chest tube removal patients will return in a month and then every three months or as symptoms. In case of non-attendance, telephone contacts will be established and, in case of death, the date will be noted for purposes of construction of the survival curve.
In all returns the clinical data will be annotated seeking occurrence of any complications. The quality of life questionnaires will be used again as soon as new chest X-rays are performed. Examinations and additional consultations will be conducted according to clinical need.
- ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES Radiation Effectiveness The difference between the pleural volume after 30 days and peri-pleurodesis be correlated with measured pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation is evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Will be used to establish the linear regression equation that can predict the volume of pleural fluid reacúmulo expected based on the measured pleural elastance.
Clinical Effectiveness The clinical effectiveness will be considered as a categorical value and will be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation will be assessed by the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Try Doc through a curve and the area under the curve values of elastance set from which there is reduced clinical effectiveness.
Quality of Life The differences in scores on the questionnaire of quality of life in each of its four areas after pleurodesis and before the same shall be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of these correlations will be assessed through the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Pain The difference in pain scores in the questionnaire after pleurodesis and before the same shall be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation is evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Dyspnea Dyspnea is considered as categorical value and will be correlated with pleural elastance. The significance of this correlation will be assessed by the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
Complications Complications will be considered as categorical value (score ≥ 3 and ≤ 2 by CTCAE) and will be correlated with the pleural elastance. The significance of these correlations will be assessed through the Spearman test. Will be considered significant p <0.05.
6.3) SURVIVAL A survival curve is constructed considering pleurodesis initial time and death as the event. Censored are those which have not undergone the event until the end time of the analysis. Cox regression will be held to the relevance of the following factors on mortality: pleural elastance, KPS and primary neoplasm.
Methodology The measurement of partial elastance (first 800 ml) and not the total value can change, since the pressure x volume curve is not always monophasic. The investigators will measure the pressure until the end of the withdrawal of liquid and analyze the total elastance, noting whether there will be significant changes.
Pleural pressure measurements and the water column pressure transducer vascular are superimposable. Therefore, the investigators don't see problems in measuring pleural pressure by different methods, depending on the non-availability of the transducer in all clinics and wards of our hospital.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study group | – | Procedure: Pleural elastancePatients with Malignant pleural effusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Malignant pleural effusion diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology and / or pleural biopsy;
- Recurrent pleural effusion (new accumulation of fluid after puncture) and symptoms (dyspnea and / or chest pain);
- Complete lung expansion (> 90%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography;
- Karnofsky index (KPS - Karnofsky Performance Status) > 30;
- Agreed to participate in the study and sign an informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity <50% and platelet count <80,000 mm3);
- Endobronchial obstruction by the neoplasm;
- Major pulmonary fibrosis or lymphangitis carcinomatosis ipsilateral to the effusion;
- Volume drained <800 mL;
- No contact between the pleural surfaces after draining;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pleural elastanceThe pleural pressure level will be zero at the time of the insertion site of the drain on the skin. The pleural pressure is set to the value measured at end-expiration. The pleural pressure is measured at baseline, after withdrawal of 10 ml of liquid and thereafter every 400 ml of pleural effusion evacuated to the pressure to be negative, from that moment the measurement will occur every 200 ml of pleural effusion drained to obtain 800 ml of liquid. Patients that are removed less than 800 ml of liquid will be excluded from the protocol. The pleural elastance is then calculated in cm H2O / L and the data placed in a pressure curve by volume. | Procedure or surgery | Study group |
Primary outcome
Radiological Effective
Time frame: 1 month after the inclusion
The effectiveness will be measured by radiographic tomography of the chest. Will be measured volumes of pleural fluid in chest CT after placement of the drain and 1 month after pleurodesis
5 secondary outcomes
Clinical Effectiveness
Time frame: 1 months after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of Quality of Life
Time frame: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion, each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of Pain
Time frame: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Analysis of dyspnea
Time frame: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion; each 3 months after inclusion until death
Security Analysis
Time frame: at inclusion, 1 month after inclusion, each 3 months after inclusion until death
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2013.
Related trials for Pleural Effusion, Malignant
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Union-LC-MPE Cohort:A Multicenter Cohort Study on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion in Lung Cance
Malignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe), Lung Cancer (Diagnosis)
RecruitingObservational study
UNC Pleural Fluid Registry
Lung Cancer, Lung Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intrapleural Catheter Daily Versus Three Times a Week Drainage
Advanced Cancer, Pleural Effusion
RecruitingObservational study
Indwelling Pleural Catheters With or Without Doxycycline in Treating Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions
Pleural Neoplasm
Recruiting
Safety and Feasibility of Medical Thoracoscopy Using Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Versus SemiRigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion
Malignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe), Medical Thoracoscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ricardo M Terra, MD, PhD study chair
Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pleural Effusion, Malignant, run by Grupo de Pesquisa em Pleura e Oncologia Toracica at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pedro HX Araújo, MD (55-11-8316-4791, phnabuco@terra.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiological Effective (time frame: 1 month after the inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2013.