AzTrials
AzTrials

Whiplash InjuryNCT01824810

Whiplash-associated Disorders - Needling Treatments Pilot Study

A study testing Intramuscular Stimulation, myoActivation and Neural Prolotherapy in people with Whiplash Injury, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study is being conducted to provide proof of concept for three recently developed needling treatments, in the treatment of whiplash associated disorder type 2 (WAD-II). The investigators aim to show that these techniques should be considered as regular, effective options for people suffering from WAD-II. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Whiplash Injury
What is being tested?
Intramuscular Stimulation, myoActivation and Neural Prolotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jun 2013to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Between 19 and 75 years of age
  • At least 12 months post-trauma
  • Present with neck and upper back pain (with or without headaches) , matching criteria for WAD-II
  • Presence of palpable painful points, a necessary indicator that a patient is suitable candidate for treatment

Who cannot join

  • Widespread pain
  • History of pre-existing or comorbid chronic pain conditions
  • Use of anti-coagulants (eg: Coumadin, Warfarin, other prescription anti-coagulants/blood thinners)
  • Immune deficiency and/or use of immunosuppressants (especially those with splenectomy)
  • Autoimmune disorders such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis
  • HIV, viral hepatitis and other blood borne communicable disease (for practitioner safety)
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Local infection around needle insertion site
  • Fever or systemic infection (cold/flu)
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable bleeding disorders
  • Less than 6 months post-surgery
  • Metal implants/screws in the gleno-humeral joint
  • History of bacterial endocardititis
  • Heart valve replacement
  • Past history of any of the proposed needle treatments in the treatment of chronic pain disorders
  • Needle-based treatment (including any of the treatments in this study, cortisone or botox injection, etc.) for the whiplash injury in the past 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Krista B Friesen, MSc contact

604-566-9101

krista.friesen@changepain.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHANGEpain Clinic

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z3A4

    Daphne S Galario, (604)566-9101

    Brenda Lau, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Case Randomized Control Study Analysing the Effectiveness of 3 Needling Techniques: Intramuscular Stimulation, Neural Prolotherapy, and Myofascial Release in the Treatment of Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorder.

This pilot study is being conducted to provide proof of concept for three recently developed needling treatments, in the treatment of whiplash associated disorder type 2 (WAD-II). The investigators aim to show that these techniques should be considered as regular, effective options for people suffering from WAD-II. These techniques are Intramuscular stimulation (IMS), neural prolotherapy (NPT), and myoActivation (mA).

Additionally, the investigators plan to begin profiling responders and non-responders in an effort to identify which treatment is likely to work best for different people. In the future, this may help to expedite treatment for WAD-II, helping patients get the most appropriate treatment, more quickly.

The investigators expect to show that all three treatments are significantly better than a placebo treatment, and to collect information on what makes each technique more or less likely to work for individual cases.

Read the detailed description

Evidence shows that people who do not recover from whiplash symptoms within the acute phase (3 months post-injury) may continue to have neck pain and disability years later. The investigators hope to show that these novel treatments offer long-lasting improvement in chronic whiplash symptoms long after the acute phase has passed and other more traditional treatments (standard physiotherapy, massage, etc) fail.

Each of these needling techniques has small bodies of research, anecdotal evidence, and/or patient feedback to support its use. All are currently used in clinical practice throughout British Columbia for the treatment of many types of chronic pain symptoms. However, because they are quite new, many clinicians and insurance companies are resistant to them and will not recommend them to clients/patients, or they may only suggest these treatments as a last resort. Studies like this one are needed to provide concrete evidence of the efficacy of these treatments and increase their use.

The objective of this project is to show proof of concept - all three needling techniques are valid and not because of a placebo effect. The investigators plan to use results from this study to support efforts to secure funding for large-scale, adequately powered studies. Our long-term objective is to make these types of treatments more readily available to those who need more than traditional therapies currently offer.

Secondary objectives are to show relationships between pain and our secondary measures (function, depression, anxiety). The investigators plan to begin profiling patients who are more or less likely to respond to each type of needling treatment. This profiling will help identify people most likely to benefit from each treatment and to get patients the best treatment, sooner.

This is a double-blind, randomized control trial. The person evaluating change in participants will not know what treatment the participant has received. Additionally, the patient will not know if they are in a treatment or a placebo group (though they may be able to use a process of elimination to determine what treatments they are NOT getting, but that is acceptable and unavoidable). Once volunteers have been confirmed as eligible, they will be randomly assigned to one of four groups - three treatment groups or the control group. The investigators will be assessing pain levels (and several secondary outcome measures) at three timepoints: pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-months post-treatment. At each timepoint, our primary and secondary outcome measures will be evaluated, and a number of general questions will be asked.

the investigators hope to show that these three techniques, though somewhat novel and not yet well-supported in the literature, are all effective in treating WAD-II. Additionally, the investigators hope to show that these effects are long-lasting and provide pilot data that these treatments reduce the need to access other types of treatments and reduce the need for medications.

Conditions
Whiplash Injury
Being tested
Intramuscular Stimulation, myoActivation, Neural Prolotherapy, Sham Needling Control
Keywords
Intramuscular Stimulation, myoActivation, Neural Prolotherapy, Whiplash-Associated Disorders, myofascial pain
Medical subject headings
Whiplash Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intramuscular StimulationProcedure or surgery

    Intramuscular Stimulation is the insertion of fine, flexible needles into shortened muscle tissue. No substance is injected. In shortened or supersensitive muscles, stimulation of stretch receptors in the muscle causes a lengthening response in the affected tissue. This reflex response is felt by the patient as a cramping sensation which releases as the muscle returns to a normal length. Needles may be inserted and removed immediately or inserted and left in the tissue for several minutes. Practitioners may also use the approach of "twirling" the needles to enhance the grasping response in the muscle.

  • myoActivationProcedure or surgery

    In myoActivation treatments, a fine needle is used to administer a micro-injection (less than .2 mL) of saline (0.9%) targeted to muscle, fascia, connective tissue, and scar tissue. The needle is inserted into shortened muscle tissue to elicit a reflex response that lengthens the tissue and promotes a healing response. One session includes between 10 and 80 needle insertions, and is a combination of deep and shallow needling techniques. Additionally, the practitioner treats superficial fascia and scar tissue by using multiple shallow needle insertions to a scarred area and/or areas of abnormal elevation and depression in the skin.

  • Neural ProlotherapyProcedure or surgery

    Participants in the neural prolotherapy group will receive micro-injections of a dextrose or mannitol solution directly under the skin using a very fine needle. This treatment targets the superficial cutaneous nerves. It is suggested that these injections quickly reduce cutaneous nerve edema, allowing these nerves to freely cross the fascia to reach the skin. Treatments may include up to 200 micro-injections with a fine needle. Injections follow major nerve routes associated with neck and upper back pain.

  • Sham Needling ControlProcedure or surgery

    The sham needling control group will receive up to 5 needle insertions in areas unrelated directly to whiplash pain. No injection will be given though participants in this group will not be aware of the presence or absence of a substance injection. Sham treatments will take anywhere from 15 to 60 minutes, to preserve blindness.

Study groups in NCT01824810
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intramuscular StimulationExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive up to 12 sessions of Intramuscular Stimulation (IMS). Each session may last from 30 to 60 minutes. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be assessed prior to the first treatment, after completion of the last treatment, and 6 months after treatment is complete.
Receives: Procedure: Intramuscular Stimulation
myoActivationExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive up to 12 sessions of myoActivation treatment. Each treatment is approximately 15 minutes. Primary and Secondary outcome measures will be assessed prior to treatment, one week after all treatments have been completed, and again 6 months after treatment is complete.
Receives: Procedure: myoActivation
Neural ProlotherapyExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive up to 12 sessions of neural prolotherapy. treatment. Each treatment is approximately 30 to 60 minutes minutes. Primary and Secondary outcome measures will be assessed prior to treatment, one week after all treatments have been completed, and again 6 months after treatment is complete.
Receives: Procedure: Neural Prolotherapy
Sham Needling ControlSham comparatorParticipants in this group will receive up to 12 sessions of sham needle treatment. Each treatment is approximately 15 to 60 minutes. Primary and Secondary outcome measures will be assessed prior to treatment, one week after all treatments have been completed, and again 6 months after treatment is complete.
Receives: Procedure: Sham Needling Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form at 6 months post-treatment

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Neck Disability Index at 6-months post treatment

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

  2. Change in cervical range of motion at 6 months post-treatment

    cervical range of motion will be measured with a digital goniometer.

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

  3. Change in 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) 6 months post-treatment

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

  4. Change in Depression as measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) 6 months post-treatment

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

  5. Change in catastrophizing as measured by the Pain-Related Self-Statements Questionnaire (PRSS) 6 months post-treatment

    Measured: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01824810
Sponsor's protocol ID
H13-00027
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
2 Apr 2013
Last updated
26 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intramuscular Stimulation, myoActivation and Neural Prolotherapy in people with Whiplash Injury, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Krista B Friesen, MSc (604-566-9101, krista.friesen@changepain.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form at 6 months post-treatment (time frame: baseline and 6 months after 12-week treatment is complete). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in