Concussion, MildNKI-RIF1NCT01832714
Assessment of Oculomotor, Vestibular and Reaction Time Response Following a Concussive Event
An observational study of Concussion, Mild and Concussion, Intermediate, run by Neurolign at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to evaluate the use of a collection of tests that measure the eye response, balance, oculomotor and reaction time tests to aid in the diagnosis of mTBI. The tests use highly precise measurement tools to assess various neurologic functions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Concussion, Mild, Concussion, Intermediate, Concussion, Severe
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: The Investigational Group includes Service Members (SM) and civilians who had been diagnosed with an mTBI. The Control Group consists of SM and civilians who do not have clinical symptoms consistent with mTBI. There will be at least 90 participants in each group, for a target total of at least 180 study participants.
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Brain injury resulting from a penetrating wound to the head, neck, face or brain (to include gunshot wounds)
- Presence of severe aphasia
- Persons whom have had an mTBI within the prior month and are symptomatic.
- Persons with a previous history of multiple mTBIs and are symptomatic.
- History of neuropsychiatric disorders antedating the head injury (e.g. hypochondriasis, major depression, schizophrenia)
- Pregnancy
Show all 20Show fewer
- Prior disorders of hearing and balance including:
- Meniere's disease
- Chronic migraine
- Multiple sclerosis
- Vestibular neuritis
- Vestibular schwannoma
- Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
- Cerebrovascular disorders
- Systemic disorders: e.g. chronic renal failure, cirrhosis of the liver, etc.
- Medications which depress the sensorium precluding patient compliance with the testing (considered on a case-by-case basis)
- Previous contraindicating surgeries at the discretion of the study physicians or audiologists
- Additional Exclusion criteria for Control Subjects
- Concussion within the last year (12 months)
- Repeated blast exposure
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Naval Medical Center San Diego
San Diego, California, 92134
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98431
About this study
This study is designed to evaluate the use of a collection of tests that measure the eye response, balance, oculomotor and reaction time tests to aid in the diagnosis of mTBI. The tests use highly precise measurement tools to assess various neurologic functions. (For example, high-speed cameras to record eye movement, high-end motors to precisely spin and move the subject, comprehensive analysis to stitch together the stimulus and the response.)
Hypotheses:
- A battery of oculomotor, vestibular and reaction time tests will generate variables that when properly weighted and run through a given multi-variant analysis, will separate the subjects into one of two groups, mTBI or not-mTBI.
- A battery of neurologic assessment tests including reaction time, vestibular and oculomotor tests taxing a range of neurologic functions and executed using one or more of the I-Portal® family of devices, will generate responses that, when used by a trained physician, can aid in the diagnosis of an mTBI.
Read the detailed description
The study uses a prospective, between-subjects design comparing an Investigational (mTBI) Group to a Control Group. The Investigational Group includes SM who had been diagnosed with an mTBI. The Control Group consists of SM who do not have clinical symptoms consistent with mTBI. There will be 90 participants in each group, for a target total of 180 study participants
Existing mTBI evaluation tools will be used to qualify the type and severity of a patient's mTBI symptoms. After the volunteer has been assessed by a physician, the following questionnaires and screening tools will be administered:
- Demographic, included control and patient demographics, education, military service, see Appendix A;
- History of health problems and treatments included medication and mTBI history and stress level before testing, including page 1 of MACE, see Appendix B; History of health problems and treatments included medication and mTBI history and stress level before testing, including page 1 of MACE, used for seconds and third tests only, see Appendix B1;
- Glasgow Coma Scale, use only in 24 hrs after accident, see Appendix C;
- Functional Gait Assessment(FGA) - This is an assessment where the individual is asked to perform ten gait tasks. Each gait task is scored by a trained observer on a 0-3 scale (with 0 being could not perform and 3 being performed well). The individual will end up with a total FGA of between 0-30. The test is very sensitive for demonstrating balance dysfunction and improvement.(see Appendix D)
- Trail Making Test (TMT) - This test is a cognitive test in which subjects use a pencil to draw a line between an ordered series of letters or letters/numbers on a paper. Subjects are instructed to follow the appropriate order without lifting the pencil from the paper. Time to completion is a sensitive measure of cognitive performance. (see Appendix E)
- Dizziness Handicap Inventory,(DHI)-This validated questionnaire is commonly used by clinicians to qualify and quantify symptoms associated with dizziness, light-headedness, vertigo, migraine associated dizziness, and to assist with identifying complaints of dizziness related to anxiety, depression, post-traumatic-stress disorder, etc. This tool will capture subjective symptoms associated with mTBI prior to completing the objective measures (see Appendix F)
Device will be comprehensive oculomotor/ neuro-otologic testing system. System components:
- Motorized Chair that can move in up to 3 axis
- Full field Optokinetic stimulus
- Pursuit Tracker™ - laser target generator
- Isolation enclosure
- Patient monitoring and communication technology
FDA classification: The NOTC is covered under an FDA 510K, and certified to standards 60601-1, 60601-1-1, 60601-1-2, and 60601-1-4.
Modifications to approved device:
Included by manufacturer:
- A new function to existing buttons for reaction time test
- Audio stimulus for audio reaction time test
- 2 stationary LED's installed inside enclosure ceiling for crHIT test
Investigational software which incorporates newly defined oculomotor and reaction time tests designed to investigate mTBI will be installed on the device.
- Keywords
- Concussion, mTBI, military, MACE, NKI, NOTC, VNG, VOG, Neuro Kinetics, oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, I-Portal, eye tracking, Dizziness Handicap Inventory
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mTBI | Subjects who undergo an mTBI event | |
| Control | Subjects who do not undergo an mTBI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variability of latency in reflexive saccades (ms)
Examine the latency of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean latency and standard deviation of control subjects.
Measured: within 7 days of a concussion event
Variability of latency in reaction time test (ms)
Examine the latency of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean latency and standard deviation of control subjects.
Measured: within 7 days of a concussion event
Variability of error in subjective visual vertical test (degrees)
Examine the mean error of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean error and standard deviation of control subjects.
Measured: within 7 days of a concussion event
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Concussion, MildStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Neurolign
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alex Kiderman, PhD ME, Principal investigator, Neuro Kinetics, Inc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01832714
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NKI-W81XWH-12-C-0205
- Acronym
- NKI-RIF1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Oculomotor, Vestibular and Reaction Time Response Following a Concussive Event
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01832714
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NKI-RIF1 / NKI-W81XWH-12-C-0205
- Keywords
- Concussion, mTBI, military, MACE, NKI, NOTC, VNG, VOG
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NeurolignIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Study start
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to evaluate the use of a collection of tests that measure the eye response, balance, oculomotor and reaction time tests to aid in the diagnosis of mTBI. The tests use highly precise measurement tools to assess various neurologic functions. (For example, high-speed cameras to record eye movement, high-end motors to precisely spin and move the subject, comprehensive analysis to stitch together the stimulus and the response.)
Hypotheses:
- A battery of oculomotor, vestibular and reaction time tests will generate variables that when properly weighted and run through a given multi-variant analysis, will separate the subjects into one of two groups, mTBI or not-mTBI.
- A battery of neurologic assessment tests including reaction time, vestibular and oculomotor tests taxing a range of neurologic functions and executed using one or more of the I-Portal® family of devices, will generate responses that, when used by a trained physician, can aid in the diagnosis of an mTBI.
Detailed description
The study uses a prospective, between-subjects design comparing an Investigational (mTBI) Group to a Control Group. The Investigational Group includes SM who had been diagnosed with an mTBI. The Control Group consists of SM who do not have clinical symptoms consistent with mTBI. There will be 90 participants in each group, for a target total of 180 study participants
Existing mTBI evaluation tools will be used to qualify the type and severity of a patient's mTBI symptoms. After the volunteer has been assessed by a physician, the following questionnaires and screening tools will be administered:
- Demographic, included control and patient demographics, education, military service, see Appendix A;
- History of health problems and treatments included medication and mTBI history and stress level before testing, including page 1 of MACE, see Appendix B; History of health problems and treatments included medication and mTBI history and stress level before testing, including page 1 of MACE, used for seconds and third tests only, see Appendix B1;
- Glasgow Coma Scale, use only in 24 hrs after accident, see Appendix C;
- Functional Gait Assessment(FGA) - This is an assessment where the individual is asked to perform ten gait tasks. Each gait task is scored by a trained observer on a 0-3 scale (with 0 being could not perform and 3 being performed well). The individual will end up with a total FGA of between 0-30. The test is very sensitive for demonstrating balance dysfunction and improvement.(see Appendix D)
- Trail Making Test (TMT) - This test is a cognitive test in which subjects use a pencil to draw a line between an ordered series of letters or letters/numbers on a paper. Subjects are instructed to follow the appropriate order without lifting the pencil from the paper. Time to completion is a sensitive measure of cognitive performance. (see Appendix E)
- Dizziness Handicap Inventory,(DHI)-This validated questionnaire is commonly used by clinicians to qualify and quantify symptoms associated with dizziness, light-headedness, vertigo, migraine associated dizziness, and to assist with identifying complaints of dizziness related to anxiety, depression, post-traumatic-stress disorder, etc. This tool will capture subjective symptoms associated with mTBI prior to completing the objective measures (see Appendix F)
Device will be comprehensive oculomotor/ neuro-otologic testing system. System components:
- Motorized Chair that can move in up to 3 axis
- Full field Optokinetic stimulus
- Pursuit Tracker™ - laser target generator
- Isolation enclosure
- Patient monitoring and communication technology
FDA classification: The NOTC is covered under an FDA 510K, and certified to standards 60601-1, 60601-1-1, 60601-1-2, and 60601-1-4.
Modifications to approved device:
Included by manufacturer:
- A new function to existing buttons for reaction time test
- Audio stimulus for audio reaction time test
- 2 stationary LED's installed inside enclosure ceiling for crHIT test
Investigational software which incorporates newly defined oculomotor and reaction time tests designed to investigate mTBI will be installed on the device.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mTBI | – | –Subjects who undergo an mTBI event |
| Control | – | –Subjects who do not undergo an mTBI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The Investigational Group includes Service Members (SM) and civilians who had been diagnosed with an mTBI. The Control Group consists of SM and civilians who do not have clinical symptoms consistent with mTBI. There will be at least 90 participants in each group, for a target total of at least 180 study participants.
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Brain injury resulting from a penetrating wound to the head, neck, face or brain (to include gunshot wounds)
- Presence of severe aphasia
- Persons whom have had an mTBI within the prior month and are symptomatic.
- Persons with a previous history of multiple mTBIs and are symptomatic.
- History of neuropsychiatric disorders antedating the head injury (e.g. hypochondriasis, major depression, schizophrenia)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Variability of latency in reflexive saccades (ms)
Time frame: within 7 days of a concussion event
Examine the latency of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean latency and standard deviation of control subjects.
Variability of latency in reaction time test (ms)
Time frame: within 7 days of a concussion event
Examine the latency of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean latency and standard deviation of control subjects.
Variability of error in subjective visual vertical test (degrees)
Time frame: within 7 days of a concussion event
Examine the mean error of subjects with mTBI with respect to mean error and standard deviation of control subjects.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2019.
Related trials for Concussion, Mild
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Sleep Architecture, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruiting
Pilot TMS in Mild TBI
Persistent Post Concussive Headache, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Non-invasive Stimulation of the Glymphatic System for Slowing Cognitive Decline
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post Concussion Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alex Kiderman, PhD ME principal investigator
Neuro Kinetics, Inc
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Concussion, Mild and Concussion, Intermediate, run by Neurolign at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variability of latency in reflexive saccades (ms) (time frame: within 7 days of a concussion event). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2019.