Acute Heart FailureCHICNCT01834833
Consultation at 8 Days to Reduce Hospitalisations in Heart Failure Patient
A study testing Follow-up in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Evaluate the benefit of systematic appointment with a cardiologist a week after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Randomised, endpoint: number of day alive out of hospital during 6 months Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Follow-up
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 326 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2013to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Criteria of inclusion :
- Patient with decompensated heart failure hospitalized in the hospital BICHAT,
- For whom is planned a return at home,
- Valid (being able to return for a consultation to the hospital)
- Having Nt-ProBNP of exit ≥ 3500 ng /l and/or a non optimized treatment of exit - according to the doctor who has it the responsibility,
- Having signed the consent form by participation in the study.
Criteria of not inclusion :
- Age < 18 years,
- Not membership in a national insurance scheme or in the Universal Health
- Coverage (CMU)(FREE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE)(A patient benefiting from the Medical aid of the State (AME) cannot be included)
- Participation to another protocol of research,
- Not being reachable by telephone in 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Consultation at 8 Days to Reduce Hospitalisations in Heart Failure Patient.
Evaluate the benefit of systematic appointment with a cardiologist a week after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Randomised, endpoint: number of day alive out of hospital during 6 months
Read the detailed description
Background: the risk for rehospitalisation is very high after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Aim: evaluate the benefit of a consultation with a cardiologist, including echocardiography and education of the patient, between 7 and 15 days after discharge, in high risk patients, identified with BNP or incomplete therapy. Parallel randomised study. The main endpoint is the number of day alive out of hospital during the 6 months post discharge; statistics intention to treat comparison of the number of days alive out of hospital in the group with consultation compared with the group without consultation. Recruitment 3 years and 4 months, follow-up 6 months. Patients included have been hospitalised in hospital BICHAT 75018 Paris, France. Financing is by the ministry of health (PHRQHOS)
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Follow-up
- Keywords
- Acute heart failure; rehospitalisation; education; follow-up
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Follow-upOther
Evaluation by a cardiologist using echocardiography, completed by education of the patient if necessary
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | usual care without systematic cardiology evaluation between 1 and 2 weeks |
| Follow-up | Experimental | Evaluation by a cardiologist using echocardiography, completed by education of the patient if necessary Receives: Other: Follow-up |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
days alive out of hospital 6 months post discharge
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
rehospitalisation rate at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
mortality at 3 and 6 months
Measured: 3 and 6 months
number of patients receiving beta-blocker at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
number of patients receiving a ACEI at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
QOL at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
autoevaluation of improvement/alteration of the patient state at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
number of patients receiving beta-blocker at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
number of patients receiving a ACEI at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
QOL at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
autoevaluation of improvement/alteration of the patient state at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
number of patients having an optimal treatment at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
number of patients having an optimal treatment at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionApr 2017
- Study completionJul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guillaume JONDEAU, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01834833
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P110601 - PHRQ1104
- Acronym
- CHIC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Consultation at 8 Days to Reduce Hospitalisations in Heart Failure Patient.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01834833
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHIC / P110601 - PHRQ1104
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Acute heart failure; rehospitalisation; education; follow-up
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the benefit of systematic appointment with a cardiologist a week after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Randomised, endpoint: number of day alive out of hospital during 6 months
Detailed description
Background: the risk for rehospitalisation is very high after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Aim: evaluate the benefit of a consultation with a cardiologist, including echocardiography and education of the patient, between 7 and 15 days after discharge, in high risk patients, identified with BNP or incomplete therapy. Parallel randomised study. The main endpoint is the number of day alive out of hospital during the 6 months post discharge; statistics intention to treat comparison of the number of days alive out of hospital in the group with consultation compared with the group without consultation. Recruitment 3 years and 4 months, follow-up 6 months. Patients included have been hospitalised in hospital BICHAT 75018 Paris, France. Financing is by the ministry of health (PHRQHOS)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –usual care without systematic cardiology evaluation between 1 and 2 weeks |
| Follow-up | Experimental | Other: Follow-upEvaluation by a cardiologist using echocardiography, completed by education of the patient if necessary |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Follow-upEvaluation by a cardiologist using echocardiography, completed by education of the patient if necessary | Other | Follow-up |
Primary outcome
days alive out of hospital 6 months post discharge
Time frame: 6 months
12 secondary outcomes
rehospitalisation rate at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
mortality at 3 and 6 months
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
number of patients receiving beta-blocker at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
number of patients receiving a ACEI at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
QOL at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
autoevaluation of improvement/alteration of the patient state at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
number of patients receiving beta-blocker at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
number of patients receiving a ACEI at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
QOL at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
autoevaluation of improvement/alteration of the patient state at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
number of patients having an optimal treatment at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
number of patients having an optimal treatment at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Early Discharge With Subcutaneous Furosemide Versus Standard Care in Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guillaume JONDEAU, MD, PHD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Follow-up in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
days alive out of hospital 6 months post discharge (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2018.