Adolescent ImmunizationINSPIRENCT01838161
Improving Adolescent Vaccination in Appalachian Kentucky
A study testing Part II, Part III and Part I in people with Adolescent Immunization, run by University of Minnesota at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The proposed project develops a community and school-based intervention to enhance understanding of the importance all age-appropriate vaccinations, and uses an innovative, comprehensive approach (Project INSPIRE - Instilling Necessary Sickness Prevention with Immunizations Reaching Everyone) to ensure that all… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Adolescent Immunization
- What is being tested?
- Part II, Part III and Part I
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 597 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parents/guardians with legal custody of a minor child
- Parents of children 11-18 years of age.
Who cannot join
- Parents under the age of 18
- Allergy to vaccinations
- Parent has made an informed decision not to vaccinate their child
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40475
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
About this study
Official title: Project INSPIRE: Improving Adolescent Vaccination in Appalachian Kentucky
The proposed project develops a community and school-based intervention to enhance understanding of the importance all age-appropriate vaccinations, and uses an innovative, comprehensive approach (Project INSPIRE - Instilling Necessary Sickness Prevention with Immunizations Reaching Everyone) to ensure that all parents of adolescents are advised of all age-appropriate vaccines for sickness prevention. The investigator will develop a novel set of targeted video vignette persuasive informational decision aids (including target population representatives) to enhance lay understanding of recommended adolescent (or catch-up) vaccines. The Investigator will also partner with school districts to develop a replicable social marketing vaccination event program (Project INSPIRE) to encourage parents and teens to publicly vaccinate at community events and during drop-in school nursing clinic hours. The project will test the efficacy of the video-based health education intervention + standard of care to ideal standard of care (social marketing vaccination event program) approaches to immunize adolescents in this region.
Read the detailed description
This is not an interventional study in which subject will be given a investigator drug or device.
Part I of the INSPIRE intervention development will involve formative research interviews conducted with parents of adolescents. Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Participants will be a convenience sample recruited through contacts in local public health departments and community nurses recruited by flyer and the research study coordinators (UK study personnel). Interview sessions will be scheduled in advance and will take approximately 30 minutes.
Part II of the INSPIRE intervention development will be evaluated in a small clinic-based pilot study using the same pre-test/post-test intervention design as in the planned (Part III) trial. For the pilot testing, the investigators will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents. Eligible parents who are coming in for non-acute care appointments will be asked by a research nurse to enroll in a research study. The Investigator will then administer a pretest survey, expose participants (parents) to vignette condition using the iPad in the clinic, and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines for their child as well as perceived message effectiveness (for the vignette). At the conclusion of the study, the research personnel administering the study will refer the adolescent to the clinic staff who will offer adolescent vaccines at the conclusion of the study (and/or a cue to schedule an appointment for the adolescent to visit the clinic) and will be able to examine actual behavior by receiving informed consent (from parents and adolescent) for limited medical record review (to track adolescent receipt of vaccinations). The Investigator will perform this pilot study in one Kentucky River Area District health department clinic with 30 parents. This method has been used to pilot past interventions, and it is expected that this allow us to correct for any problems in either the design of the survey assessment or the intervention. If needed, the investigator can tweak the intervention and re-pilot using the same procedures before the randomized controlled trial. This pilot test will also provide the advantage of assuring us that the intervention procedure can translate to the clinic setting. The Investigator has experience with this translation from our 1-2-3 Pap video intervention which the investigators began in social settings (recruiting people at school and other community events) and moved into the clinic setting for dissemination.
Part III of the INSPIRE project will be evaluated in a site-based group randomized controlled trial design, with individual-level randomization also occurring within the intervention group. Community vaccination clinic and health education sites (staffed by local health department contracted personnel and project nurses) in the intervention and control conditions will be matched on percentage of free/reduced school lunch and relevant demographics. At the end of Year 1, one health site in each pair will be randomized to the enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care social marketing vaccine event) or a standard of care vaccination campaign (standard of care health department vaccine event) comparison group. Individuals in the intervention group randomized condition also will be randomized when recruitment occurs in non-school based locations. Assessments will be conducted using Automated iPad Audio Assisted Interviewing techniques at pretest, immediate post-test, and then medical record review at 1 month and 9 month follow-up points. The medical record review will entail examining the medical record for each adolescent vaccine received by the patient. Thus, the investigators will be able to examine behavior change (i.e., receipt of vaccination) for each of the different vaccine types and their single or multi-dose outcomes.
- Conditions
- Adolescent Immunization
- Being tested
- Part II, Part III, Part I
- Keywords
- adolescents, immunizations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Part IIBehavioural
Parents will be exposed to an educational video intervention if they are enrolled in this intervention condition.
Part IIIBehavioural
Also called Video Education
•video educational
Part IBehavioural
Parental Interviews
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part I | Active comparator | Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Receives: Behavioral: Part I |
| Part II | Experimental | We will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents.
* a pretest survey
* the video vignette
* and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines Receives: Behavioral: Part II |
| Part III | Experimental | * enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care vaccine event)
* standard of care vaccination event Receives: Behavioral: Part III |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part I - Parent Interviews
Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Participants will be a convenience sample recruited through contacts in local public health departments, community nurses and the research study coordinators.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Part II - Intention to Vaccinate
The investigator will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents. The Investigator will then expose parents to vignette condition using the iPad, administer a pretest survey, the video vignette, and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines for their child as well as perceived message effectiveness (for the vignette).
Measured: 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adolescent ImmunizationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MinnesotaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 597 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, University of Kentucky
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elisia Cohen, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01838161
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13-0026-P4S
- Acronym
- INSPIRE
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 7 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cohen, E. L. and K. J. Head (2014).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Project INSPIRE: Improving Adolescent Vaccination in Appalachian Kentucky
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01838161
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INSPIRE / 13-0026-P4S
- Conditions
- Adolescent Immunization
- Keywords
- adolescents, immunizations
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 597 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, University of Kentucky
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The proposed project develops a community and school-based intervention to enhance understanding of the importance all age-appropriate vaccinations, and uses an innovative, comprehensive approach (Project INSPIRE - Instilling Necessary Sickness Prevention with Immunizations Reaching Everyone) to ensure that all parents of adolescents are advised of all age-appropriate vaccines for sickness prevention. The investigator will develop a novel set of targeted video vignette persuasive informational decision aids (including target population representatives) to enhance lay understanding of recommended adolescent (or catch-up) vaccines. The Investigator will also partner with school districts to develop a replicable social marketing vaccination event program (Project INSPIRE) to encourage parents and teens to publicly vaccinate at community events and during drop-in school nursing clinic hours. The project will test the efficacy of the video-based health education intervention + standard of care to ideal standard of care (social marketing vaccination event program) approaches to immunize adolescents in this region.
Detailed description
This is not an interventional study in which subject will be given a investigator drug or device.
Part I of the INSPIRE intervention development will involve formative research interviews conducted with parents of adolescents. Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Participants will be a convenience sample recruited through contacts in local public health departments and community nurses recruited by flyer and the research study coordinators (UK study personnel). Interview sessions will be scheduled in advance and will take approximately 30 minutes.
Part II of the INSPIRE intervention development will be evaluated in a small clinic-based pilot study using the same pre-test/post-test intervention design as in the planned (Part III) trial. For the pilot testing, the investigators will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents. Eligible parents who are coming in for non-acute care appointments will be asked by a research nurse to enroll in a research study. The Investigator will then administer a pretest survey, expose participants (parents) to vignette condition using the iPad in the clinic, and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines for their child as well as perceived message effectiveness (for the vignette). At the conclusion of the study, the research personnel administering the study will refer the adolescent to the clinic staff who will offer adolescent vaccines at the conclusion of the study (and/or a cue to schedule an appointment for the adolescent to visit the clinic) and will be able to examine actual behavior by receiving informed consent (from parents and adolescent) for limited medical record review (to track adolescent receipt of vaccinations). The Investigator will perform this pilot study in one Kentucky River Area District health department clinic with 30 parents. This method has been used to pilot past interventions, and it is expected that this allow us to correct for any problems in either the design of the survey assessment or the intervention. If needed, the investigator can tweak the intervention and re-pilot using the same procedures before the randomized controlled trial. This pilot test will also provide the advantage of assuring us that the intervention procedure can translate to the clinic setting. The Investigator has experience with this translation from our 1-2-3 Pap video intervention which the investigators began in social settings (recruiting people at school and other community events) and moved into the clinic setting for dissemination.
Part III of the INSPIRE project will be evaluated in a site-based group randomized controlled trial design, with individual-level randomization also occurring within the intervention group. Community vaccination clinic and health education sites (staffed by local health department contracted personnel and project nurses) in the intervention and control conditions will be matched on percentage of free/reduced school lunch and relevant demographics. At the end of Year 1, one health site in each pair will be randomized to the enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care social marketing vaccine event) or a standard of care vaccination campaign (standard of care health department vaccine event) comparison group. Individuals in the intervention group randomized condition also will be randomized when recruitment occurs in non-school based locations. Assessments will be conducted using Automated iPad Audio Assisted Interviewing techniques at pretest, immediate post-test, and then medical record review at 1 month and 9 month follow-up points. The medical record review will entail examining the medical record for each adolescent vaccine received by the patient. Thus, the investigators will be able to examine behavior change (i.e., receipt of vaccination) for each of the different vaccine types and their single or multi-dose outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part I | Active comparator | Behavioral: Part IInterview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. |
| Part II | Experimental | Behavioral: Part IIWe will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents. * a pretest survey * the video vignette * and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines |
| Part III | Experimental | Behavioral: Part III* enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care vaccine event) * standard of care vaccination event |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents/guardians with legal custody of a minor child
- Parents of children 11-18 years of age.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Parents under the age of 18
- Allergy to vaccinations
- Parent has made an informed decision not to vaccinate their child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Part IIParents will be exposed to an educational video intervention if they are enrolled in this intervention condition. | Behavioural | Part II |
| Part IIIAlso: Video Education•video educational | Behavioural | Part III |
| Part IParental Interviews | Behavioural | Part I |
Primary outcome
Part I - Parent Interviews
Time frame: 1 year
Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Participants will be a convenience sample recruited through contacts in local public health departments, community nurses and the research study coordinators.
1 secondary outcome
Part II - Intention to Vaccinate
Time frame: 1 Year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2019.
- Results publicationCohen, E. L. and K. J. Head (2014).
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Adolescent Immunization
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
PREVENT HPV -Related Cancers Trial
HPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Learn About Safety, Tolerability, and Immune Response of a Catch-up Pneumococcal Vaccine in Children and Adolescents
Pneumococcal Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Sleep and Adolescent Vaccine Immunogenicity Pilot/Observational Study
Vaccination
Not yet recruiting
Tailored Vaccine Messaging for Parents/Caregivers of Adolescents
Vaccine Confidence, Adolescent Vaccination
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elisia Cohen, PhD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Part II, Part III and Part I in people with Adolescent Immunization, run by University of Minnesota at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part I - Parent Interviews (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01838161, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2019.