CancerPhase 3NCT01839721
Impact of Probiotics BIFILACT® on Diarrhea in Patients Treated With Pelvic Radiation
A Phase 3 study testing Bifilact® in people with Cancer and Diarrhea, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial study, investigators assessed probiotic used to prevent or delay radiation induced grade moderate to severe diarrhea with patient treated for pelvic cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain
- What is being tested?
- Bifilact®
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 246 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2006to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- They had a pelvic cancer: gynecologic, rectal, or prostatic,they were to receive radiotherapy treatments for a minimum of 40 Gy at the pelvic level , with or without chemotherapy and they had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- they had previous radiotherapy treatments in the pelvic or abdominal region, medical history of gastro-intestinal inflammation, malabsorption syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease or coeliac disease, ileostomy, daily use of anti-diarrheal medication before radiotherapy, pregnancy or breastfeeding, neutropenia or probiotics intolerance
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial study, investigators assessed probiotic used to prevent or delay radiation induced grade moderate to severe diarrhea with patient treated for pelvic cancer.
Read the detailed description
This study was prospective, unicentric, controlled with comparison to a placebo, randomised and double-blinded. Patients were stratified into three groups: prostatic cancers, gynecologic cancers without chemotherapy and gynecologic or rectal cancers with chemotherapy.
Patients were block-randomized by the research nurse and received a standard dose of Bifilact® probiotics or placebo according to the random list generated by blocks of 2, 4, or 6 patients according to random permutations. A preliminary internal pilot study was performed when the half of the expected sample size were recruited. The goal of this analysis was to test assumptions that lead to chosen sample sizes (N0) and thus, validate the feasibility of the study. Following preliminary results, the sample size re-calculated at the interim analysis is similar to that originally intended. It would be advisable to continue the recruitment as planned. No adjustment to the critical level of the test would be required in analyzes carried out at the end of study. However, another random block using higher probiotics dosage to the randomization was added with preservation of double bind. New random list were generated for each strata with a 3:1:1 ratio (higher dose, standard dose, placebo) to compensate for the starting of the latest higher dose group. All the bottles had a similar aspect, they were all identified by the commercial brand Bifilact. Also the group, either A, B or C, was circled on that bottle, depending on if that bottle belong to the placebo group, standard dose group, or high dose group. Only the nurse knew the coding system, it was also her who would assign the patient to a group, according to the randomization list. She would also hand out the bottle to the patient every week. The two registered dietician, caregivers, were totally excluded of this processes (preliminary study and randomisation) to preserve the double blind.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Bifilact®, placebo
- Keywords
- Probiotics, radiation-induced enteritis, radiation-induced diarrhea, radiation, diarrhea, enteritis, diet, nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain, Enteritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bifilact®Drug
Also called probiotics
placebo, standard dose 1.3 billion twice a day, high dose 10 billion three time a day
placeboOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bifilact® probiotics standard dose | Active comparator | concentration of 1.3 billion of Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. one pill twice a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient Receives: Drug: Bifilact® |
| Bifilact® probiotics high dose | Active comparator | containing 10 billion Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. One pill three times a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient Receives: Drug: Bifilact® |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient. One pill twice a day Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
testing the efficacy of probiotics Bifilact®, in comparison to a placebo to assess its ability to prevent or delay the incidence of moderate or severe symptoms of diarrhea during the period of treatment by radiotherapy
Patients were asked to note in a daily logbook whether they experienced digestive problems such as daily bowel movements. Severity of the diarrhea was evaluated according to toxicity criteria of the WHO: grade 1 = increase of 2-3 stools per day compared to pre-treatment, grade 2 = increase of 4-6 bowel stools per day or nocturnal stools, grade 3 = increase of 7-9 stools per day or incontinence, grade 4 = increase of 10 or more stools, need for IV hydration. The Registered Dietitian assessed symptoms in logbook with the patient once a week.The duration of daily logbook was 4-9 weeks depending of the total dose of external radiotherapy
Measured: day 1-60
Secondary outcomes (5)
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® lowered the interruption of radiotherapy treatments or doses of both radiotherapy or chemotherapy
Registered Dietitian assessed respect of the preview protocol treatment each week (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) if not respected: diarrhea is it involved. For patients that received chemotherapy, a weekly blood profile was obtained and study pills were discontinued if neutrophil count became ≤1.5 X 10(9)/L.
Measured: week 1-9
Secondary objective were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased or delayed the consumption of anti-diarrheal medication
Patients were asked to note, each day during the treatment,in a daily logbook intake of anti-diarrheal medication, laxatives, and antibiotics. The Registered Dietitian assessed symptoms noted with the patient each week.The duration of daily logbook was 4-9 weeks depending of the total dose of external radiotherapy
Measured: day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® reduced abdominal pain
Abdominal pain was evaluated according to the NCI scale version 3.0: Grade 1 = mild pain, not interfering with function, grade 2 = moderate pain: pain or analgesics interfering with function, but not interfering with activity of daily living, grade 3 =: severe pain: pain or analgesics severely interfering with activity of daily living. The Registered Dietitian assessed information with the patient each week
Measured: day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether the overall well-being of patients was improved during treatment.
Quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) assessment was filled three times during the study: once at the outset, once at the end, and then again two weeks after the last radiotherapy treatment.
Measured: week 0, 4-9, 6-11
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased need for hospitalization
Registered Dietitian assessed each week if the patient had need hospitalization and if the diarrhea has involved
Measured: week 1-9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2006
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mimi Demers, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Investigators
- Dagnault Anne, PhD, Study director, CHU de QuebecJosee Desjardins, B.Sc, RD, Principal investigator, Chu de QuebecMimi Demers, B.Sc. RD, Principal investigator, CHU de Québec
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01839721
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5.7.06.09
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 17 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Demers M, Dagnault A, Desjardins J. A randomized double-blind controlled trial: impact of probiotics on diarrhea in patients treated with pelvic radiation. Clin Nutr. 2014 Oct;33(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
PubMed 24200199
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Probiotics BIFILACT® on Diarrhea in Patients Treated With Pelvic Radiation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01839721
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5.7.06.09
- Conditions
- Cancer, Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Probiotics, radiation-induced enteritis, radiation-induced diarrhea, radiation, diarrhea, enteritis, diet, nutrition
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial study, investigators assessed probiotic used to prevent or delay radiation induced grade moderate to severe diarrhea with patient treated for pelvic cancer.
Detailed description
This study was prospective, unicentric, controlled with comparison to a placebo, randomised and double-blinded. Patients were stratified into three groups: prostatic cancers, gynecologic cancers without chemotherapy and gynecologic or rectal cancers with chemotherapy.
Patients were block-randomized by the research nurse and received a standard dose of Bifilact® probiotics or placebo according to the random list generated by blocks of 2, 4, or 6 patients according to random permutations. A preliminary internal pilot study was performed when the half of the expected sample size were recruited. The goal of this analysis was to test assumptions that lead to chosen sample sizes (N0) and thus, validate the feasibility of the study. Following preliminary results, the sample size re-calculated at the interim analysis is similar to that originally intended. It would be advisable to continue the recruitment as planned. No adjustment to the critical level of the test would be required in analyzes carried out at the end of study. However, another random block using higher probiotics dosage to the randomization was added with preservation of double bind. New random list were generated for each strata with a 3:1:1 ratio (higher dose, standard dose, placebo) to compensate for the starting of the latest higher dose group. All the bottles had a similar aspect, they were all identified by the commercial brand Bifilact. Also the group, either A, B or C, was circled on that bottle, depending on if that bottle belong to the placebo group, standard dose group, or high dose group. Only the nurse knew the coding system, it was also her who would assign the patient to a group, according to the randomization list. She would also hand out the bottle to the patient every week. The two registered dietician, caregivers, were totally excluded of this processes (preliminary study and randomisation) to preserve the double blind.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bifilact® probiotics standard dose | Active comparator | Drug: Bifilact®concentration of 1.3 billion of Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. one pill twice a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient |
| Bifilact® probiotics high dose | Active comparator | Drug: Bifilact®containing 10 billion Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. One pill three times a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: placeboEach capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient. One pill twice a day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- They had a pelvic cancer: gynecologic, rectal, or prostatic,they were to receive radiotherapy treatments for a minimum of 40 Gy at the pelvic level , with or without chemotherapy and they had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- they had previous radiotherapy treatments in the pelvic or abdominal region, medical history of gastro-intestinal inflammation, malabsorption syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease or coeliac disease, ileostomy, daily use of anti-diarrheal medication before radiotherapy, pregnancy or breastfeeding, neutropenia or probiotics intolerance
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bifilact®Also: probioticsplacebo, standard dose 1.3 billion twice a day, high dose 10 billion three time a day | Drug | Bifilact® probiotics high dose, Bifilact® probiotics standard dose |
| placebo | Other | placebo |
Primary outcome
testing the efficacy of probiotics Bifilact®, in comparison to a placebo to assess its ability to prevent or delay the incidence of moderate or severe symptoms of diarrhea during the period of treatment by radiotherapy
Time frame: day 1-60
Patients were asked to note in a daily logbook whether they experienced digestive problems such as daily bowel movements. Severity of the diarrhea was evaluated according to toxicity criteria of the WHO: grade 1 = increase of 2-3 stools per day compared to pre-treatment, grade 2 = increase of 4-6 bowel stools per day or nocturnal stools, grade 3 = increase of 7-9 stools per day or incontinence, grade 4 = increase of 10 or more stools, need for IV hydration. The Registered Dietitian assessed symptoms in logbook with the patient once a week.The duration of daily logbook was 4-9 weeks depending of the total dose of external radiotherapy
5 secondary outcomes
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® lowered the interruption of radiotherapy treatments or doses of both radiotherapy or chemotherapy
Time frame: week 1-9
Secondary objective were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased or delayed the consumption of anti-diarrheal medication
Time frame: day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® reduced abdominal pain
Time frame: day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether the overall well-being of patients was improved during treatment.
Time frame: week 0, 4-9, 6-11
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased need for hospitalization
Time frame: week 1-9
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 May 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24200199Demers M, Dagnault A, Desjardins J. A randomized double-blind controlled trial: impact of probiotics on diarrhea in patients treated with pelvic radiation. Clin Nutr. 2014 Oct;33(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dagnault Anne, PhD study director
CHU de Quebec
Josee Desjardins, B.Sc, RD principal investigator
Chu de Quebec
Mimi Demers, B.Sc. RD principal investigator
CHU de Québec
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bifilact® in people with Cancer and Diarrhea, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
testing the efficacy of probiotics Bifilact®, in comparison to a placebo to assess its ability to prevent or delay the incidence of moderate or severe symptoms of diarrhea during the period of treatment by radiotherapy (time frame: day 1-60). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01839721, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2013.