AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraosseous Vascular AccessNCT01866501

Follow-Up Study Validating a Blended Technique to Identify the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Site

A study testing Intraosseous Vascular Access in people with Intraosseous Vascular Access and Vascular Access, run by Vidacare Corporation at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A Follow-up Study Validating a Blended Technique for Identifying the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Insertion Site Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Intraosseous Vascular Access, Vascular Access
What is being tested?
Intraosseous Vascular Access
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2013to May 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently licensed/certified Emergency Medicine Technicians, paramedic, or nurse
  • Have had no formal training on use of the proximal humerus IO insertion site
  • Demonstrate proper use of the device and technique during training portion and obtain approval from the device trainer to participate
  • Age 21 years or older
  • Have no amputation of the upper extremities
  • Able to lay flat on a table for up to 2 hours
  • Self-reported as healthy, as confirmed by the PI

Who cannot join

  • Have an active infection in the body
  • Imprisoned
  • Pregnant
  • Cognitively impaired
  • Fracture in humerus, or significant trauma to the site
  • Excessive tissue and/or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks in humerus
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Infection in target area
  • Humeral IO insertion in past 48 hours, prosthetic limb or joint or other significant orthopedic procedure in humerus
  • Current use of anti-coagulants
  • Current cardiac condition requiring pacemaker or anti-arrhythmic drugs
  • Prior adverse reaction to lidocaine
  • Volunteers with any of the following characteristics may be excluded from the infusion pathway evaluation involving administration of contrast dye at the discretion of the PI:
  • Prior adverse reaction to contrast dye
  • Allergy to any food or drug
  • History of impaired renal function
  • History of impaired hepatic function
  • History of cardiac disease
  • History of pheochromocytoma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Bulverde-Spring Branch EMS

    Spring Branch, Texas, 78070

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Follow-up Study Validating a Blended Technique for Identifying the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Insertion Site

A Follow-up Study Validating a Blended Technique for Identifying the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Insertion Site

Read the detailed description

In 2012, the investigators from Vidacare evaluated 4 techniques commonly used to identify the proximal humerus IO insertion site to determine if one technique resulted in more consistent successful placement of the IO needle set with a higher level of confidence among device operators performing the techniques. Results suggest that a combination of the best features of the 4 techniques may lead to optimal IO needle set placement more consistently. This study is needed to validate the "Blended" proximal humerus IO insertion technique to confirm that use of the technique results in proper site identification among device operators and results in increased confidence.To most closely evaluate the Blended proximal humerus insertion technique and how it is received by clinicians who perform these procedures in actual patients, device operators will include licensed/certified clinicians including, emergency medicine technicians/paramedics and nurses.

Being tested
Intraosseous Vascular Access
Keywords
Intraosseous Vascular Access, IO Access, IO Vascular Access, EZ-IO

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intraosseous Vascular AccessDevice

    Also called EZ-IO, Proximal Humerus IO Access, IO

    Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus

Study groups in NCT01866501
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blended Technique for Intraosseous InsertionOtherClinician device operators will be trained on the Blended Technique site identification method and perform one unilateral proximal humerus (PH) intraosseous needle insertion. The blended technique is: The arm is positioned with the elbow adducted and shoulder internally rotated with the hand over the abdomen. The operator places one hand in the axilla and the other hand along the midline of the upper arm laterally, to define the anterior and posterior borders. The vertical plane of insertion lies in the middle of these borders. Along the vertical axis, deeply palpate the PH until the junction of the surgical neck and humeral head is identified. The insertion site is the greater tubercle, about 1-2 cm superior to the surgical neck. Secondary confirmation is made by palpating the inter-tubercular groove with a 90º rotation of the arm, confirming the insertion site is lateral to the groove, and returning the arm back to a medially rotated position with the hand over the abdomen
Receives: Device: Intraosseous Vascular Access
Healthy Subjects: Blended TechniqueOtherHealthy subjects will receive bilateral intraosseous vascular access established in the proximal humerus performed by device operators using the blended technique.
Receives: Device: Intraosseous Vascular Access

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score

    X-ray images of the inserted IO needle will be used to evaluate placement success and scored. Each insertion is scored by a musculoskeletal radiologist for two measures: Insertion Site Accuracy (scale range 0 - 3) and Needle Tip Location (scale range -7 to 7) as described below.

    The Total score is the sum of Insertion Site Accuracy Score and Needle Tip Location Score. Scale range -7 to 10; higher score indicates greater accuracy.

    Insertion Site Accuracy Score Scale is 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate greater accuracy: 3=center of greater tubercle, 2=perimeter of greater tubercle, 1=junction of greater tubercle and shaft or head, and 0=outside the greater tubercle.

    Needle tip Location Score Scale ranges from -7 to 7 where higher scores indicate more favorable needle tip location: 7=within center of proximal humerus (PH), 5=within PH not centered, 3= Near miss of PH, -3=In humeral head, -3=on epiphyseal line, -5=lateral miss (of the humerus), -7=medial miss (of the humerus).

    Measured: Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure

  2. Time to Intraosseous Catheter Placement

    The amount of time it takes for the device operator to identify the proximal humerus intraosseous (IO) insertion site using their assigned proximal humerus IO site identification method and insert the IO needle. Timing starts from the time the participant begins to palpate the proximal humerus and stops when the IO needle is inserted.

    Measured: 1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure

  3. Level of Confidence Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion

    Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method. The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion. The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where. 1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident. Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.

    Measured: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training

  4. Level of Confidence Score Post-intraosseous Insertion

    Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure. The score was reported after performing the unilateral IO insertion. The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where. 1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident. Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.

    Measured: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion

  5. Ease of Use Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion

    Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure. The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion. The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy. Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.

    Measured: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion

  6. Ease of Use Score Post-intraosseous Insertion

    Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure. The score was reported after completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion. The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy. Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.

    Measured: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Intraosseous Infusion Flow Rates

    Intraosseous infusion flow rates attained at tested infusion pressures, which may include Gravity; 100 mmHg, 200 mmHg and 300 mmHg.

    Measured: Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access

  2. Time in Seconds for Fluid Delivery From the Proximal Humerus to the Heart

    Time in seconds for fluid delivery from the proximal humerus to the heart, using visualization of contrast injection under fluoroscopy was performed and measured once for the participants in the Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique arm.

    Measured: Day 1 after IO insertion

  3. Success Rate of Obtaining Laboratory Results for Both Intraosseous and Peripheral Venous Specimens

    Number of Participants with Laboratory Results Successfully Obtained from both intraosseous (IO) and peripheral venous blood specimens. Success was determined if the point-of-care laboratory analysis system provided laboratory results values for both IO and Peripheral Venous specimens. It was deemed unsuccessful if the point-of-care system provided no laboratory results values and/or noted an error for at least one specimen. An intraosseous blood specimen and a peripheral venous blood specimen were collected from each subject

    Measured: Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01866501
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-06
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
28 May 2013
Last updated
14 May 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intraosseous Vascular Access in people with Intraosseous Vascular Access and Vascular Access, run by Vidacare Corporation at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score (time frame: Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in