Food SelectionNCT01903499
Satiety Effects of Beef Compared to Beans
A study testing Other: Bean patty and Other: Beef patty in people with Food Selection, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The satiety effects of beef will be compared to beans. Beef is hypothesized to be more satiating than beans. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Selection
- What is being tested?
- Other: Bean patty and Other: Beef patty
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- healthy, non-smoking, BMI of 18-27, non-dieting, typically consumes breakfast/lunch
Who cannot join
- distaste for beans, vegetarian, current smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of significant disease of past medical history, pregnant, lactating irregular menstrual cycle
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Department of Food Science and Nutrition
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108
About this study
The satiety effects of beef will be compared to beans. Beef is hypothesized to be more satiating than beans.
Read the detailed description
Subjects will consume 2 different meatloaf lunches and satiety will be measured by visual analogue scales. They will consume an ad lib snack after 3 hours and food intake will be measured.
- Conditions
- Food Selection
- Being tested
- Other: Bean patty, Other: Beef patty
- Medical subject headings
- Food Preferences
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Other: Bean pattyOther
Other: Beef pattyOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bean patty | Active comparator | Bean Patty Receives: Other: Other: Bean patty; Other: Other: Beef patty |
| Beef patty | Active comparator | Beef patty Receives: Other: Other: Bean patty; Other: Other: Beef patty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
satiety
Measure satiety by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Measured: 180 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
food intake
assorted snacks provided to assess food intake variation between treatments
Measured: 180 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionAug 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Food SelectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joanne L Slavin, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1212E25808
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Satiety Effects of Beef Compared to Beans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1212E25808
- Conditions
- Food Selection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Aug 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The satiety effects of beef will be compared to beans. Beef is hypothesized to be more satiating than beans.
Detailed description
Subjects will consume 2 different meatloaf lunches and satiety will be measured by visual analogue scales. They will consume an ad lib snack after 3 hours and food intake will be measured.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bean patty | Active comparator | Other: Other: Bean patty, Other: Other: Beef pattyBean Patty |
| Beef patty | Active comparator | Other: Other: Bean patty, Other: Other: Beef pattyBeef patty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- healthy, non-smoking, BMI of 18-27, non-dieting, typically consumes breakfast/lunch
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- distaste for beans, vegetarian, current smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of significant disease of past medical history, pregnant, lactating irregular menstrual cycle
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Other: Bean patty | Other | Bean patty, Beef patty |
| Other: Beef patty | Other | Bean patty, Beef patty |
Primary outcome
satiety
Time frame: 180 minutes
Measure satiety by visual analogue scale (VAS)
1 secondary outcome
food intake
Time frame: 180 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2014.
Related trials for Food Selection
Not yet recruiting
Exploring the Influence of Glucagon-like Peptide -1 (GLP-1) Medications on Food Cravings, Food Selection, and Food Intake Following Exposure to Food Advertisements
GLP - 1
Recruiting
Influence of Social Media Ads on Food Choice - Master Protocol
Food Selection, Food Choices
Not yet recruiting
Optimization Trial to Empower sElection of Nutritious Foods
Food Insecurity, Healthy Eating
Not yet recruiting
Food Menu Labelling Effects on Individuals With Eating Disorders and Other Mental Health Conditions.
Food Labelling, Eating Behaviour
RecruitingObservational study
Fostering Self-Empowerment in CKD Patients Through Food Choice Mapping
CKD, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stages 3b-5)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joanne L Slavin, PhD principal investigator
University of Minnesota
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Other: Bean patty and Other: Beef patty in people with Food Selection, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
satiety (time frame: 180 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2014.