AnemiaPhase 2NCT01906489
20-Week Repeat Oral Dose Study of AKB-6548 in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia
A Phase 2 study testing AKB-6548 in people with Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Akebia Therapeutics at 47 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemoglobin response (efficacy), safety, and tolerability of orally administered AKB-6548 in participants with Chronic Kidney Disease (pre-dialysis) with anemia with dosing for 20 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 82 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease
- What is being tested?
- AKB-6548
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 47 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Jul 2013to 3 Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 82 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 to 82 years of age, inclusive
- Chronic Kidney Disease with a GFR category of G3a-G5 and not yet on dialysis
- eGFR ≥ 10 and ≤ 65 mL/minute/1.73 m2
- Anemia secondary to CKD with an ESA status and a Screening HGB as per protocol
- Iron replete with ferritin and TSAT levels as defined per protocol
Who cannot join
- BMI > 44.0 kg/m2
- Red blood cell transfusion within 11 weeks prior to the Screening visit
- Androgen therapy within the previous 21 days prior to the Screening visit
- Intravenous iron within the past 4 weeks prior to the Screening visit
- AST or ALT >1.8x ULN, alkaline phosphatase >2x ULN, or total bilirubin >1.5x ULN
- Screening ECG with QTc > 500 msec
Show all 9Show fewer
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Class III or IV congestive heart failure
- Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or stroke within 6 months prior to the Screening visit
Trial locations and contacts
47 sites in 1 country.
47 sites in 1 country
United States47 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Arlington, Texas
Study site
Arvada, Colorado
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina
Study site
Augusta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Azusa, California
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chula Vista, California
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Columbia, South Carolina
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Downey, California
Study site
Edinburg, Texas
Study site
El Centro, California
Study site
Evergreen Park, Illinois
Study site
Farmington, Missouri
Study site
Flushing, New York
Study site
Glendale, Arizona
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Knoxville, Tennessee
Study site
La Mesa, California
Study site
Lafayette, Louisiana
Study site
Lansing, Michigan
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Macon, Georgia
Study site
Meridian, Idaho
Study site
Mineola, New York
Study site
New Rochelle, New York
Study site
Petoskey, Michigan
Study site
Pontiac, Michigan
Study site
Port Charlotte, Florida
Study site
Riverside, California
Study site
Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Study site
Rosedale, New York
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana
Study site
St. George, Utah
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Westminster, Colorado
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina
About this study
Official title: Phase 2b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamic Response, Safety, and Tolerability to 20 Weeks of Oral Dosing of AKB-6548 in Participants With Anemia Secondary to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), GFR Categories G3a-G5 (Stages 3, 4, AND 5) (Pre-Dialysis)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemoglobin response (efficacy), safety, and tolerability of orally administered AKB-6548 in participants with Chronic Kidney Disease (pre-dialysis) with anemia with dosing for 20 weeks.
- Conditions
- Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease
- Being tested
- AKB-6548, Placebo
- Keywords
- anemia, chronic kidney disease, CKD, chronic renal insufficiency, renal impairment, erythropoietin, kidney, oral anemia treatment, hemoglobin, hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor, HIF-PHI, efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AKB-6548Drug
Oral dose administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol.
PlaceboDrug
Oral Placebo administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AKB-6548 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: AKB-6548 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response
Hemoglobin (Hgb) response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESA) or transfusion.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Secondary outcomes (24)
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Value ≥13.0 g/dL at Any Time During the Study
Participants who have experienced an excursion in Hgb to ≥13.0 g/dL at any time during the study were considered as "failures". Data was presented for failures.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Determined Solely Based on the Hemoglobin Value
Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing). Analysis of this secondary outcome measure is a reanalysis of the primary outcome measure whereby the response was determined solely by the Hgb value and receiving rescue therapy did not make the participant a failure.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Treatment naïve Group
Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Treatment Naïve group, defined as participants who had never received treatment with an ESA and who had a screening Hgb level of ≤10.5 g/dL.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Previously Treated Group
Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Previously Treated group, defined as participants who had previously received ≥1 dose of an ESA, had been off of ESA therapy for ≥11 weeks at the time of screening, and had a screening Hgb level of ≤10.5 g/dL.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Actively Treated Group
Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Actively Treated group, defined as participants who had been actively treated with an ESA for a minimum of 4 months before screening, had received at least 2 doses within the last 4 months, had received their last dose within 6 weeks before screening, and had a screening Hgb level ≥9.5 g/dL and ≤12.0 g/dL.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Analyzed in mITT Population
Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the mITT population.
Measured: Weeks 19 and 20
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Blood samples were collected to assess Hgb. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated Hgb concentration increased.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Hemoglobin
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of hemoglobin
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Blood samples were collected to assess Hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated Hematocrit concentration increased.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Hematocrit
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of Hematocrit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count
Blood samples were collected to assess red blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated red blood cell count increased.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Red Blood Cell Count
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of red blood cell count.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Reticulocyte Count
Blood samples were collected to assess reticulocyte count. Baseline was defined as mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated reticulocyte count increased.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Reticulocyte Count
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of reticulocyte count.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESA Rescue
Participants were administered epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa as a rescue medication who met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Mean Number of ESA Rescue Doses Administered Per Participant
Participants were administered epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Received Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Rescue
Participants were administered packed red blood cell transfusion as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Administered Per Participant
Participants were administered packed red blood cells as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Time to First Transfusion or ESA Rescue Medication Intake
Rescue therapy was defined as red blood cell transfusion or ESA administration in participants meeting Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiological observations occurring in a participant administered with drug, regardless of a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. This also included all suspected adverse medication reactions, reactions from medication overdose, abuse, withdrawal, sensitivity, toxicity, unrelated illnesses, including worsening a pre-existing condition, injury, or accidents. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) was defined as any life-threatening condition; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or death.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values
Parameters assessed for laboratory values included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Parameters assessed for vital signs included sitting (at rest for a minimum of 5 minutes) heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, and blood pressure. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
A standard 12-lead ECG was performed following dosing in a supine position for approximately 10 minutes. ECGs were taken prior to blood draws when possible. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinical significance.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination Findings
A Baseline physical examination was performed at screening. Otherwise, abbreviated physical examinations were conducted and were to include heart, lung, and abdomen. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.
Measured: Up to 20 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study start23 Jul 2013
- Primary completion3 Sep 2014
- Study completion3 Sep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Akebia Therapeutics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chief Medical Officer, Study director, Akebia Therapeutics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01906489
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AKB-6548-CI-0007
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
PubMed 36005278Pergola PE, Spinowitz BS, Hartman CS, Maroni BJ, Haase VH. Vadadustat, a novel oral HIF stabilizer, provides effective anemia treatment in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016 Nov;90(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
PubMed 27650732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 2b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamic Response, Safety, and Tolerability to 20 Weeks of Oral Dosing of AKB-6548 in Participants With Anemia Secondary to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), GFR Categories G3a-G5 (Stages 3, 4, AND 5) (Pre-Dialysis)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01906489
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AKB-6548-CI-0007
- Conditions
- Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease
- Keywords
- anemia, chronic kidney disease, CKD, chronic renal insufficiency, renal impairment, erythropoietin, kidney, oral anemia treatment
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Akebia TherapeuticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemoglobin response (efficacy), safety, and tolerability of orally administered AKB-6548 in participants with Chronic Kidney Disease (pre-dialysis) with anemia with dosing for 20 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AKB-6548 | Experimental | Drug: AKB-6548 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 82 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 to 82 years of age, inclusive
- Chronic Kidney Disease with a GFR category of G3a-G5 and not yet on dialysis
- eGFR ≥ 10 and ≤ 65 mL/minute/1.73 m2
- Anemia secondary to CKD with an ESA status and a Screening HGB as per protocol
- Iron replete with ferritin and TSAT levels as defined per protocol
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- BMI > 44.0 kg/m2
- Red blood cell transfusion within 11 weeks prior to the Screening visit
- Androgen therapy within the previous 21 days prior to the Screening visit
- Intravenous iron within the past 4 weeks prior to the Screening visit
- AST or ALT >1.8x ULN, alkaline phosphatase >2x ULN, or total bilirubin >1.5x ULN
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AKB-6548Oral dose administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol. | Drug | AKB-6548 |
| PlaceboOral Placebo administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Hemoglobin (Hgb) response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESA) or transfusion.
24 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Value ≥13.0 g/dL at Any Time During the Study
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Determined Solely Based on the Hemoglobin Value
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Treatment naïve Group
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Previously Treated Group
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Actively Treated Group
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Analyzed in mITT Population
Time frame: Weeks 19 and 20
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Hemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Hematocrit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Red Blood Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Change From Baseline in Reticulocyte Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Absolute Values of Reticulocyte Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESA Rescue
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Mean Number of ESA Rescue Doses Administered Per Participant
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Received Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Rescue
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Administered Per Participant
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Time to First Transfusion or ESA Rescue Medication Intake
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination Findings
Time frame: Up to 20 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36005278Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27650732Pergola PE, Spinowitz BS, Hartman CS, Maroni BJ, Haase VH. Vadadustat, a novel oral HIF stabilizer, provides effective anemia treatment in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016 Nov;90(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chief Medical Officer study director
Akebia Therapeutics
47 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing AKB-6548 in people with Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Akebia Therapeutics at 47 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 47 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response (time frame: Weeks 19 and 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01906489, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022.