AzTrials
AzTrials

Child DevelopmentNCT01908881

An Intervention for Enhancing Early Attachment in Primary Health Care

A study testing Group Workshop in people with Child Development and Mother-Child Relations, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 2 sites in Chile.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a group intervention for primary health care dyads (two interacting people, in this case: mother-infant or caregiver-infant), which have been screened during pregnancy to be at psychosocial risk, has an impact on parental sensitivity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Child Development, Mother-Child Relations
What is being tested?
Group Workshop
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
181 participants
Where
2 sitesChile
Study dates
Apr 2013to Aug 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Dyad with the child aged 4-12 months old
  • Have screened positive for 1 or more psychosocial risks during pregnancy

Who cannot join

  • Mother or caregiver with severe mental health disorder, specifically: schizophrenia, mental retardation and severe mood disorders with active suicidal ideas
  • Child with important biomedical problems, specifically: genetic syndromes, severe heart disease and extreme preterm birth
  • Severe psychosocial problems, specifically: previous history of child abuse or institutionalization of other children from the family
  • Not signing the Informed Consent Form

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Chile2 sites
  • Centro de Salud Familiar El Roble

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8820814

  • ANCORA Centro de Salud Familiar Juan Pablo II

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8831695

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: Impact of a Group Intervention for Promoting Maternal Sensitivity in Primary Health Care Dyads at Psychosocial Risk. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a group intervention for primary health care dyads (two interacting people, in this case: mother-infant or caregiver-infant), which have been screened during pregnancy to be at psychosocial risk, has an impact on parental sensitivity.

Read the detailed description

The first three years of life of every child is fundamental for their development, these years offer a unique window of opportunity for future health promotion, and different investigations have proved that investing in this period of life not only has great economic benefits, but social ones too.

In Chile the political decision to invest in these valuable years was translated into the creation of a national social program called "Chile Crece Contigo". This Program seeks to intervene in the physical, cognitive and socioemotional areas of development of every Chilean child since they are conceived until they are 4 years old to promote the best development outcome possible. The program identifies families at psychosocial vulnerability and offers them specific interventions according to the risk detected.

In this context different health and social services are provided to pregnant women during their health care visits, such as screening for different psychosocial risks (eg. Low social support, poverty, tobacco or drug use) and according to this screening various interventions are offered by Primary Health Care centers (eg. home visits).

It has been described that in groups at psychosocial risk the prevalence of interactional problems, specifically alterations in the attachment style between the child and the caregiver, is higher than in populations without these risks. This is relevant given that the quality and style of attachment established in infancy predicts subsequent social, emotional and cognitive development. Attachment styles, other than secure, have been associated with behavioural problems in pre-school and school ages, psychopathology during adolescence, later anxiety disorders and higher rates of using emergency health care services.

One of the factors shown to predict the attachment style established between the child and the caregiver is the parental sensitivity (also called maternal sensitivity)- defined as every caregiver's pattern of conduct toward the child that soothes, and increases his comfort and at the same time reduces his stress and disinterest. It also considers the capacity of the adult to pay attention, interpret and respond to the child´s needs. The literature suggests that having an adequate parental sensitivity is associated with a secure attachment style at the end of the first year of life, and having low parental sensitivity detected early in life (even as early as 6-8 weeks) predicts an insecure style of attachment at age 2.

Preliminary Chilean data has shown that 25% of biparental families and up to 52.5% of monoparental families with low income are have low parental sensitivity and are catalogued as having "Interactional risk" (defined as a score of 6 or less points in the CARE-Index scale), indicating the need of offering an intervention specifically aiming to work on the caregiver-child relationship.

Since the creation of the Program "Chile Crece Contigo" there have been great achievements toward the promotion of adequate infant development, especially in the cognitive and physical areas of development, however the initiatives in the socio emotional area are lacking. Issues in caregiver and child relationships are not addressed systematically, which is why counting with interventions that promote parental sensitivity and the development of secure attachment relationships that can be offered to families at psychosocial risk responds to a social necessity and contributes to the promotion of adequate infant mental health and family health.

Considering that up to date an intervention for the means described above and available to be used in Primary Health Care did not exist, during the years 2008-2010 such intervention was designed. The intervention was elaborated according to the method described by the UK Medical Research Council. The intervention was then piloted in two Family Primary Health centers showing an improvement in caregiver-child interactions. Analysis indicate that after 4 months of the intervention: caregivers valued positively having participated, there were no losses to participating, there was an increase of 33% of secure attachment styles (according to the Massie-Campbell Scale) which was not statistically significant, but could result significant in a larger sample size.

The intervention proposed aims to improve caregiver-child relationships, specifically by focusing on parental sensitivity, and is easily applicable and replicable in Primary Health Care considering that it requires little personnel training, the materials used are easily available and are cheap for Primary Health Care. However, the question of "has the intervention proposed any impact on parental sensitivity in dyads at psychosocial risk?" still has to be addressed.

We define the term "dyad" as two interacting people, in this case: mother-infant.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a group intervention on the parental sensitivity of primary health care dyads that have been screened positive for psychosocial risk during pregnancy.

Specific objectives:

  • Evaluate the percentage of dyads catalogued as having "Interactional risk" in the intervention group compared to the control group
  • Evaluate the change in the score of parental sensitivity of the dyads in the intervention group compared to the control group
  • Evaluate the change in the number of depressive symptoms of the mother of the dyads in the intervention group compared to the control group

Methods: randomized clinical trial. Dyads (mother-infants from 4 to 12 months of age) which have been screened during pregnancy to be at psychosocial risk in 2 Family Health Care Centers in the La Pintana district in Metropolitan Santiago, will be randomized to:

  • Receive usual care ("control group") consisting in: home visits, evaluation by social worker and planning interventions according to multidisciplinary team
  • Participate in a group intervention besides receiving usual care The randomization will be done with a computer program and sealed in dark envelopes so the sequence remains occult until the dyad enters the study.

Parental sensitivity and interactional risk will be measured with the CARE-Index scale during 3 timings: at enrollment (when the interview is done), immediately after participating in the group workshop (from 1 to 2 weeks after the workshop is finished) and 4 months after (measuring times are also for control group). The scoring of the CARE-Index scale will be done by expert external coders that are blind to the randomization group.

Symptoms for postpartum depression will also be measured with the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS).

Statistical analysis: the primary outcome is the change in the category of "Interactional risk" in the CARE-Index scale. Secondary outcomes are the changes in the scores in parental sensitivity and number of depressive symptoms. We will describe the data using averages, percentiles and standard deviations for quantitative variables and proportions for nominal variables. The bivariate analysis includes χ2 test statistics and t tests for independent samples using the SPSS 17.0 Software. The sample size was determined to detect significant differences in the percentage of dyads that change their interactional risk category in the CARE-index scale between the intervention and control groups. Each group should have 90 dyads, assuming a change in 5% due only to the pass of time, a change in 20% of the intervened dyads, a power of at least 80% with a 5% significance level, and estimating a 20% loss of the dyads during the execution of the investigation.

The intervention consists in a group workshop (for up to 7 dyads with children aged between 6 and 12 months and two health care professional monitors) of four sessions of two hours each, held weekly. One of the sessions is characterized as including the fathers or other caregivers relevant to the upbringing of the children. Each session is structured around various activities that specifically deal with the skills associated with parental sensitivity and address relevant issues to child rearing, considering the development of the child.

The intervention was designed through the methodology proposed by the UK Medical Research Council and has been tested in a pilot study of 11 dyads in two primary health care centers and showed an improvement of 33 per cent in the secure attachment style in the dyads (not statistically significant).

Recruiting, enrollment and procedures: mothers that have been previously screened positive during pregnancy to be at psychosocial risk will be contacted for an interview if their child is between 4 and 12 months old. In the interview they will be asked if they would like to participate in the study and sign an informed consent form. Once they have done this an interview will take place to collect socio demographic data regarding the family, record a 3 minute video of the dyads playing (to be coded with the CARE-index scale) and an Edinburgh postnatal depression scale applied. The interviewer will then assign the dyad to the intervention or control group (through the use of closed numbered envelopes to which the interviewer is blind).

If the dyad is recruited for the intervention group they will be invited to participate in the group workshop mentioned above, besides receiving the usual interventions the center does for dyads of psychosocial risk. And asked to come to the centers for the measurements of the following CARE-Index and Edinburgh postnatal depression scales.

If the dyad is recruited for the control group they will receive the usual interventions the center offers dyads at psychosocial risk and asked to come for the following measurements (as in the intervention group).

The recruiting will be done by trained interviewers (different health care professionals that work at the primary health care centers) that will follow a strict protocol to avoid missing entering data and maintain confidentiality at all times. The data will also be managed with strict confidential rules.

If the group intervention should prove to have a positive impact on maternal sensitivity it could be used in other primary health care centers, constituting an effective form for promoting adequate socio emotional development the first years of life.

Being tested
Group Workshop, Usual Care
Keywords
Child Development, Mother-Child relations, Primary Health Care, Public Policy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group WorkshopBehavioural

    Also called Group intervention

    The intervention consists in a group workshop (for up to 7 dyads with children aged between 6 and 12 months and two health care professional monitors) of four sessions of two hours each, held weekly. One of the sessions is characterized as including the fathers or other caregivers relevant to the upbringing of the children. Each session is structured around various activities that specifically deal with the skills associated with parental sensitivity and address relevant issues to child rearing, considering the development of the child.

  • Usual CareBehavioural

    According to the screening carried out various interventions are offered by Primary Health Care centers (eg. home visits) in the "Chile Crece Contigo" Program. During pregnancy, if the mother is screened for positive psychosocial risk she would receive different interventions consisting in (usual care at Primary Health Care Centers): home visits, evaluation by social worker and planning interventions according to a multidisciplinary team.

Study groups in NCT01908881
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control (usual care)Active comparatorThis arm receives usual care ("control group") consisting in: home visits, evaluation by social worker and planning interventions according to multidisciplinary team usually done en Family Primary Health Care Centers
Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care
Intervention (group workshop+usual care)ExperimentalGroup intervention (group workshop) described elsewhere
Receives: Behavioral: Group Workshop; Behavioral: Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of dyads that change their category from "Interactional risk" (according to a score of ≤ 6 points in parental sensitivity in the CARE-Index Scale) to category of "Non interactional risk" (score of ≥ 7 points)

    The CARE-Index Scale is a validated method for the evaluation of dyadic interaction through observation and microanalysis (using a video of 3 minute play between the child and caregiver) scored by a trained expert coder. It generates a score in terms of parental sensitivity (or maternal sensitivity) on a scale of 1 to 14 (supposing better sensitivity with higher scores) and another cut off punctuation score for the classification of 2 categories:

    • "Interactional risk": 6 or less points on the parental sensitivity scale, which suggests that the dyad should be intervened
    • "Non interactional risk": 7 or more points on the parental sensitivity scale.

    Measured: To be measured at: enrollment (when the interview is done), immediately after participating in the group workshop (from 1 to 2 weeks after the workshop is finished) and 4 months after (measuring times are also for control group)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Difference in the total score of the parental sensitivity scale (of the CARE-Index Scale) before and after the study in both groups

    Measured: To be measured at: enrollment (when the interview is done), immediately after participating in the group workshop (from 1 to 2 weeks after the workshop is finished) and 4 months after (measuring times are also for control group)

  2. Difference in the percentage of dyads that have a positive Edinburgh postnatal depression scales (≥10 points) before and after the study in both groups

    The presence of depressive symptoms in the mother or caregiver will be measured given the effect of postpartum depression on the emotional availability of the mother and her capacity to respond sensibly to the child's needs. This will be done through the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, which is an instrument used widely in Primary Health Care for screening for postpartum depression. It consists in an auto-administered questionnaire, with 10 multiple choice questions (the higher the score, more depressive symptoms). It has been validated in Chile, and using a cutoff point of 9/10 it has proven to have a 100% sensibility and 80% specificity.

    Measured: To be measured at: enrollment (when the interview is done), immediately after participating in the group workshop (from 1 to 2 weeks after the workshop is finished) and 4 months after (measuring times are also for control group)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
181 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01908881
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-079
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
30 May 2013
Last updated
4 Nov 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group Workshop in people with Child Development and Mother-Child Relations, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 2 sites in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of dyads that change their category from "Interactional risk" (according to a score of ≤ 6 points in parental sensitivity in the CARE-Index Scale) to category of "Non interactional risk" (score of ≥ 7 points) (time frame: To be measured at: enrollment (when the interview is done), immediately after participating in the group workshop (from 1 to 2 weeks after the workshop is finished) and 4 months after (measuring times are also for control group)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in