Autistic DisorderNCT01921244
Shared Decision Making to Improve Care and Outcomes for Children With Autism
A study testing Decision Aid in people with Autistic Disorder and Pervasive Developmental Disorder, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) commonly experience behavioral challenges that may be improved with pharmacotherapy, including difficulties with sleep, attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive behavior, mood swings, self-injury, and aggression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Autistic Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
- What is being tested?
- Decision Aid
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 142 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Providers
- Providers must be a licensed professional, either a physician (MD) or a nurse practitioner (APN) in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
- Provider must regularly treat patients within the age range and for the diagnoses of interest in this study (Autism Spectrum Disorders).
- Parents
- Participants must be a parent or legal guardian who self-identifies as the primary caregiver of a child or adolescent with Autism Spectrum Disorder cared for by an enrolled provider in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
- Participants must be able to speak and read English in order to complete the surveys
Show all 10Show fewer
- Children
- Child or adolescent must have a clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder including one of the following diagnoses: a) Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD), b) Asperger's Syndrome, c) Autism Spectrum Disorder, d) Autism, e) Infantile Autism
- Child or adolescent must be between the ages of 4 years 0 months and 15 years 11 months
- Child or adolescent must be scheduled for a follow up visit with a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric provider enrolled in the study.
Who cannot join
- -Parents who are unable to speak and read English are not eligible for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
About this study
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) commonly experience behavioral challenges that may be improved with pharmacotherapy, including difficulties with sleep, attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive behavior, mood swings, self-injury, and aggression. While 34-58% of children with ASD take medication for such behaviors, there is wide practice variation nationally and a lack of evidence to support the use of most commonly prescribed agents. Complex clinical situations such as this where there is no clear "best choice" regarding which behaviors to target and which medications to use lend themselves well to the use of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) tool to ensure that well-informed parent preferences shape every treatment plan.
The primary goal of this study is to modify a previously published decision aid about use of medication to manage challenging behaviors in children with autism to make it easy to implement in practice and then evaluate this version in terms of proximal decisional outcomes and parent/child outcomes 3 months later. Providers in a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric clinic will be enrolled and randomly allocated to intervention or control (treatment as usual) groups. Initially, providers randomized to the intervention group will test and refine the modified intervention. Once the intervention is finalized, eligible patients of participating providers will be enrolled in the randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the intervention. Following the trial, control group providers will be crossed over and receive the intervention. Both proximal decisional outcomes (e.g. parent decisional conflict, provider amount of SDM, parent knowledge of treatment options) and outcomes 3 months later (e.g. parenting stress, decisional conflict, and change in child behavioral symptoms) will be assessed.
Approximately 10 providers and 240 of their patients with autism will be included in the study. Chart reviews, parental surveys, and recordings of provider-parent-patient interactions during the index visit will be collected at baseline (prior to physician allocation), during the intervention trial, and after the control group has crossed over. Between- and within-group analyses will examine factors associated with parental decisional conflict and whether the intervention produces significant improvements in outcomes over and above typical autism care. Analyses will include multiple linear regression modeling and general linear models / repeated measure models, accounting for data clustered by provider.
Read the detailed description
SDM involves clinicians sharing information about treatment options and parents sharing their goals, concerns, and preferences to ensure that treatment plans are based on what matters most to well-informed parents. SDM often incorporates use of decision aids, which are balanced sources of information about treatment options for a particular condition. Decision aids consistently increase knowledge, improve treatment expectations, increase active participation in decision making, reduce uncertainty about the appropriate course of action, and help patients reach decisions that are more aligned with their stated values.
- Conditions
- Autistic Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Asperger Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
- Being tested
- Decision Aid
- Keywords
- Autistic Disorder, Decision Making, Medication Therapy Management
- Medical subject headings
- Autistic Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Asperger Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Decision AidOther
Also called Use of Medication to Treat Challenging Behavior in Autism
Parents will receive an intervention modified from the previously published tool called "Autism: Should My Child Take Medicine for Challenging Behavior?" This packet provides parents with educational information, elicits parent ratings of particular behavioral domains, describes behaviors that are and are not amenable to medication treatment, and elicits parent preferences regarding treatment. Providers will be trained on use of the intervention in practice to promote shared decision making during clinical encounters.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | Approximately 120 families will be asked to participate as "usual care" subjects and will complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months after the visit. These families will not receive the decision aid nor will their provider have been trained how to use the decision aid. All participating providers will have up to 10 "usual care" patients enrolled at baseline prior to allocation. During the trial, the control group ["usual care" providers] will have up to 10 additional patients enrolled for ongoing "usual care" data collection. After the trial is complete, the control group providers will cross over to the intervention arm. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Approximately 80 families/patients with regularly scheduled clinic follow-up visits in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DDBP) at Cincinnati Childrens with providers trained on shared decision making will receive the decision aid prior to their index visit and complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months later. Receives: Other: Decision Aid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Decisional Conflict
The primary outcome of interest for this study is decisional conflict as measured immediately at the end of the Day 1 initial study clinic visit. This measure will also be collected before the Day 1 visit to be able to compare pre- and post- visit levels of decisional conflict. Additionally, this measure will be collected 3 months after the Day 1 visit to determine levels of ongoing decisional conflict that parents of children with autism experience.
This will be measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. This is a validated 16-item questionnaire which reports on the uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about the alternatives, benefits and risks, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice.
Measured: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit
Secondary outcomes (1)
Parent-physician interaction
The OPTION scale (validated 12-item measure) will be used to score parent-physician interactions developing a treatment plan based on coding of audio or video recordings of the clinic visit.
Measured: During the Day 1 (initial study) visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Autistic DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Julia Anixt, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01921244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FP00005038
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Frazier TW, Shattuck PT, Narendorf SC, Cooper BP, Wagner M, Spitznagel EL. Prevalence and correlates of psychotropic medication use in adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder with and without caregiver-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;21(6):571-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0057. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
PubMed 22166171Nickels K, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Weaver AL, Voigt RG, Barbaresi WJ. Stimulant medication treatment of target behaviors in children with autism: a population-based study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Apr;29(2):75-81. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31815f24f7.
PubMed 18478626Blum NJ, Feldman HM, Barbaresi WJ, Schonfeld DJ, Hansen RL, Forrest CB. Research priorities for developmental-behavioral pediatrics: a DBPNet consensus study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Jul;33(6):509-16. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31825a7101.
PubMed 22710856O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR63-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63.
PubMed 15471770Fiks AG, Mayne S, Localio AR, Feudtner C, Alessandrini EA, Guevara JP. Shared decision making and behavioral impairment: a national study among children with special health care needs. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 21;12:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-153.
PubMed 22998626Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
PubMed 21975733Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
PubMed 16908462Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):699-706. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003.
PubMed 21471491Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
PubMed 23768763Brinkman WB, Hartl J, Rawe LM, Sucharew H, Britto MT, Epstein JN. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):1013-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.154.
PubMed 22065181O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
PubMed 7898294Brinkley J, Nations L, Abramson RK, Hall A, Wright HH, Gabriels R, Gilbert JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Cuccaro ML. Factor analysis of the aberrant behavior checklist in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Nov;37(10):1949-59. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0327-3. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
PubMed 17186368Zaidman-Zait A, Mirenda P, Zumbo BD, Georgiades S, Szatmari P, Bryson S, Fombonne E, Roberts W, Smith I, Vaillancourt T, Volden J, Waddell C, Zwaigenbaum L, Duku E, Thompson A; Pathways in ASD Study Team. Factor analysis of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form with parents of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2011 Oct;4(5):336-46. doi: 10.1002/aur.213. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
PubMed 21882359
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Shared Decision Making to Improve Care and Outcomes for Children With Autism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01921244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FP00005038
- Conditions
- Autistic Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Asperger Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
- Keywords
- Autistic Disorder, Decision Making, Medication Therapy Management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) commonly experience behavioral challenges that may be improved with pharmacotherapy, including difficulties with sleep, attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive behavior, mood swings, self-injury, and aggression. While 34-58% of children with ASD take medication for such behaviors, there is wide practice variation nationally and a lack of evidence to support the use of most commonly prescribed agents. Complex clinical situations such as this where there is no clear "best choice" regarding which behaviors to target and which medications to use lend themselves well to the use of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) tool to ensure that well-informed parent preferences shape every treatment plan.
The primary goal of this study is to modify a previously published decision aid about use of medication to manage challenging behaviors in children with autism to make it easy to implement in practice and then evaluate this version in terms of proximal decisional outcomes and parent/child outcomes 3 months later. Providers in a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric clinic will be enrolled and randomly allocated to intervention or control (treatment as usual) groups. Initially, providers randomized to the intervention group will test and refine the modified intervention. Once the intervention is finalized, eligible patients of participating providers will be enrolled in the randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the intervention. Following the trial, control group providers will be crossed over and receive the intervention. Both proximal decisional outcomes (e.g. parent decisional conflict, provider amount of SDM, parent knowledge of treatment options) and outcomes 3 months later (e.g. parenting stress, decisional conflict, and change in child behavioral symptoms) will be assessed.
Approximately 10 providers and 240 of their patients with autism will be included in the study. Chart reviews, parental surveys, and recordings of provider-parent-patient interactions during the index visit will be collected at baseline (prior to physician allocation), during the intervention trial, and after the control group has crossed over. Between- and within-group analyses will examine factors associated with parental decisional conflict and whether the intervention produces significant improvements in outcomes over and above typical autism care. Analyses will include multiple linear regression modeling and general linear models / repeated measure models, accounting for data clustered by provider.
Detailed description
SDM involves clinicians sharing information about treatment options and parents sharing their goals, concerns, and preferences to ensure that treatment plans are based on what matters most to well-informed parents. SDM often incorporates use of decision aids, which are balanced sources of information about treatment options for a particular condition. Decision aids consistently increase knowledge, improve treatment expectations, increase active participation in decision making, reduce uncertainty about the appropriate course of action, and help patients reach decisions that are more aligned with their stated values.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Approximately 120 families will be asked to participate as "usual care" subjects and will complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months after the visit. These families will not receive the decision aid nor will their provider have been trained how to use the decision aid. All participating providers will have up to 10 "usual care" patients enrolled at baseline prior to allocation. During the trial, the control group ["usual care" providers] will have up to 10 additional patients enrolled for ongoing "usual care" data collection. After the trial is complete, the control group providers will cross over to the intervention arm. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Decision AidApproximately 80 families/patients with regularly scheduled clinic follow-up visits in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DDBP) at Cincinnati Childrens with providers trained on shared decision making will receive the decision aid prior to their index visit and complete surveys before and immediately after their visit, and approximately 3 months later. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Providers
- Providers must be a licensed professional, either a physician (MD) or a nurse practitioner (APN) in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
- Provider must regularly treat patients within the age range and for the diagnoses of interest in this study (Autism Spectrum Disorders).
- Parents
- Participants must be a parent or legal guardian who self-identifies as the primary caregiver of a child or adolescent with Autism Spectrum Disorder cared for by an enrolled provider in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Parents who are unable to speak and read English are not eligible for the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Decision AidAlso: Use of Medication to Treat Challenging Behavior in AutismParents will receive an intervention modified from the previously published tool called "Autism: Should My Child Take Medicine for Challenging Behavior?" This packet provides parents with educational information, elicits parent ratings of particular behavioral domains, describes behaviors that are and are not amenable to medication treatment, and elicits parent preferences regarding treatment. Providers will be trained on use of the intervention in practice to promote shared decision making during clinical encounters. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Decisional Conflict
Time frame: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit
The primary outcome of interest for this study is decisional conflict as measured immediately at the end of the Day 1 initial study clinic visit. This measure will also be collected before the Day 1 visit to be able to compare pre- and post- visit levels of decisional conflict. Additionally, this measure will be collected 3 months after the Day 1 visit to determine levels of ongoing decisional conflict that parents of children with autism experience. This will be measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. This is a validated 16-item questionnaire which reports on the uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about the alternatives, benefits and risks, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice.
1 secondary outcome
Parent-physician interaction
Time frame: During the Day 1 (initial study) visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2016.
- Background: PubMed 22166171Frazier TW, Shattuck PT, Narendorf SC, Cooper BP, Wagner M, Spitznagel EL. Prevalence and correlates of psychotropic medication use in adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder with and without caregiver-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;21(6):571-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0057. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 18478626Nickels K, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Weaver AL, Voigt RG, Barbaresi WJ. Stimulant medication treatment of target behaviors in children with autism: a population-based study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Apr;29(2):75-81. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31815f24f7.
- Background: PubMed 22710856Blum NJ, Feldman HM, Barbaresi WJ, Schonfeld DJ, Hansen RL, Forrest CB. Research priorities for developmental-behavioral pediatrics: a DBPNet consensus study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Jul;33(6):509-16. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31825a7101.
- Background: PubMed 15471770O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR63-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63.
- Background: PubMed 22998626Fiks AG, Mayne S, Localio AR, Feudtner C, Alessandrini EA, Guevara JP. Shared decision making and behavioral impairment: a national study among children with special health care needs. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 21;12:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-153.
- Background: PubMed 21975733Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 16908462Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 21471491Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):699-706. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003.
- Background: PubMed 23768763Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 22065181Brinkman WB, Hartl J, Rawe LM, Sucharew H, Britto MT, Epstein JN. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):1013-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.154.
- Background: PubMed 7898294O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
- Background: PubMed 17186368Brinkley J, Nations L, Abramson RK, Hall A, Wright HH, Gabriels R, Gilbert JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Cuccaro ML. Factor analysis of the aberrant behavior checklist in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Nov;37(10):1949-59. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0327-3. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
- Shared Decision AidLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Autistic Disorder
Not yet recruiting
"Family Resilience And Mind-body Enhancement" (FRAME): A Randomised Controlled Trial
Autism
Recruiting
Trial of Center-Based vs. In-Home Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) in Autism
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Neuroimaging Predictors of Improvement to Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) in Young Children With Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Esomeprazole in Children With Autism
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Restricted and Repetitive Behavior in ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julia Anixt, MD principal investigator
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Decision Aid in people with Autistic Disorder and Pervasive Developmental Disorder, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Decisional Conflict (time frame: At the end of the Day 1 (initial study) visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01921244, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2016.