AzTrials
AzTrials

Tibial FracturesNCT01926795

Immobilization Versus Observation in Children With Toddler's Fractures: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Short leg cast and No Immobilization in people with Tibial Fractures, run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Toddler's fractures of the tibia are by definition non-displaced and of a stable pattern. Children have thickened periosteum compared with adults, which therefore may impart stability to the fracture without the need for additional immobilization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 5 years
Conditions the study is for
Tibial Fractures
What is being tested?
Short leg cast and No Immobilization
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2013to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 5 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • • Children ages 1-5 years old with radiographic evidence of a non-displaced spiral or oblique fracture of the tibial shaft or metaphysis.

Who cannot join

  • • Children with clinical suspicion but lack of radiographic evidence for toddler's fracture
  • Fractures displaced >2mm
  • Open fractures
  • Pathologic fracture
  • Fractures involving the physis
  • Previous fracture of the ipsilateral extremity
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Concomitant fracture involving the ipsilateral or contralateral leg
  • Concomitant head injury
  • Non-ambulatory children (i.e., those who have not yet begun to walk)
  • Children with bone-metabolism disorders (i.e., osteogenesis imperfect, rickets)
  • Children who are geographically prohibited from following up in our system
  • Children whose caregivers are not proficient in English
  • Presentation >7 days from injury
  • Cases considered to be non-accidental trauma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Greenville Hospital System

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

Other trials in United States

About this study

Toddler's fractures of the tibia are by definition non-displaced and of a stable pattern. Children have thickened periosteum compared with adults, which therefore may impart stability to the fracture without the need for additional immobilization. The goal of the study is to evaluate whether or not there is a difference in children treated with and without cast immobilization in regards to time to ambulation; perceived pain; difficulty in dressing \& bathing; radiographic displacement or angulation; and time missed from work or daycare. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between the groups.

Being tested
Short leg cast, No Immobilization
Keywords
toddler's fracture, tibial fracture, children
Medical subject headings
Tibial Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Short leg castProcedure or surgery

  • No ImmobilizationProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01926795
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Short Leg CastActive comparatorPatient will be placed in a short leg cast for approximately 3 weeks or until radiographic union
Receives: Procedure: Short leg cast
No immobilizationExperimentalNo cast or splint will be applied to the injured extremity
Receives: Procedure: No Immobilization
ObservationalOtherPatient will be treated based on the parents comfort. This arm will consist of individuals in which the parent/guardian did not agree to randomization, but did consent for observational follow-up regardless of treatment.
Receives: Procedure: Short leg cast; Procedure: No Immobilization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Days to Ambulation

    Recorded in parent journal, date of first ambulation without assistance.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Fracture displacement

    Displacement of the fracture greater than 2 mm in any direction.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01926795
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00025178
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
19 Aug 2013
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Short leg cast and No Immobilization in people with Tibial Fractures, run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Days to Ambulation (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in