AzTrials
AzTrials

Major DepressionNCT01932931

Vitamin D, SSRIs and the Musculoskeletal System

A study testing cholecalciferol (50ug) in people with Major Depression and Osteoporosis, run by Aalborg University at 2 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In recent years it has become evident that some types of antidepressants are associated both with an increased risk of falling and decreased bone mineral density. These factors predispose patients for serious fractures such as hip fractures with substantial morbidity and mortality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 90 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Major Depression, Osteoporosis
What is being tested?
cholecalciferol (50ug)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
71 participants
Where
2 sitesDenmark
Study dates
1 Oct 2013to 1 Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 90 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Current Citalopram or Mirtazapine users < 6 months, or individuals who are going to initiate treatment of either Citalopram, Mirtazapine within the following two months or
  • Healthy controls, i.e. not depressed or receiving antidepressants

Who cannot join

  • Current or use within the past 6 months of drugs which affects bone turnover such as corticosteroids, hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, drugs against osteoporosis or other bone diseases (Paget's disease of bone), vitamin D supplementation (>35 micrograms daily), Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA), Cyclosporine (CsA), Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
  • Impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 150 micromolar/l)
  • Pregnant women
  • Individuals diagnosed with cancer or a metabolic disorder such as diabetes
  • Individuals with prosthetic material in hip or spine
  • Individuals diagnosed with a disease that affects bone such as Paget's disease of the bone, or fibrous dysplasia
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Individuals which is not considered eligible for the clinical trial e.g. individuals diagnosed with dementia, severely psychotic or depressed individuals
  • Individuals that have been taking any kind of antidepressants more than 6 months prior to the inclusion and if this treatment persisted for a period of minimum 12 months
  • Individuals which cannot stand up and stand still without support or a helping device due to physically impairment

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Denmark2 sites
  • Aalborg University

    Aalborg, North Jutland, 9000

  • CCBR

    Aalborg, North Jutland, 9000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Depression - Can Vitamin D Alleviate Symptoms of Depression Not Cured by Antidepressants as Well as Alleviate Negative Skeletal Effects Caused by Antidepressants?

In recent years it has become evident that some types of antidepressants are associated both with an increased risk of falling and decreased bone mineral density. These factors predispose patients for serious fractures such as hip fractures with substantial morbidity and mortality. The specific mechanisms involved in this negative impact on bone and postural control have not been fully elucidated. It is well known that Vitamin D plays an important role for bone health as well as muscle function and thus indirectly postural control. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency has been observed among depressed patients. To our knowledge no study has investigated the involvement of Vitamin D in relation to the increased risk of fractures associated with antidepressants. Therefore, this project will investigate the underlying mechanisms leading to skeletal impairment and musculoskeletal symptoms in patients receiving different types of antidepressants. Moreover, the effect of vitamin D supplementation will be investigated among patients taking these antidepressants.

150 subjects will participate in this study: 50 of which is diagnosed with depression and receive Citalopram (SSRIs); 50 depressed subjects receiving Mirtazapine(NaSRI); and 50 controls. Through randomisation half of the subjects in each group will receive daily Vitamin D supplementation for a period of one year. Through this period all 150 subjects will be followed through different measurements including bone density, muscle function and balance, nociception, quality of life and depression severity.

It is expected that results from this study will provide increasing awareness and knowledge of the side effect profile of antidepressants on bone metabolism. This may prompt clinicians to screen patients at high risk of drug-induced osteopenia or osteoporosis and accordingly provide treatment, which may reduce the incidence of potentially avoidable fractures. Moreover, some types of antidepressants may show to produce a minimal or even no effect on bone turnover, and should be considered as first line treatment in the group of patients at risk of fractures.

Read the detailed description

Background

Antidepressants are widespread in use, with more than 460.000 people in Denmark receiving this type of treatment ("Statens Serum Institut - Statistikker," 2012). Despite advances in medical treatment of depression in the last decades , recent studies have shown an association between the antidepressants Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and increased risks of falls and decreased bone mineral density, resulting in increased risks of bone fractures. As SSRIs are prescribed as first line treatment for depression , such side effects could have detrimental effects for several patients.

Residual symptoms such as tiredness, muscle weakness and muscle pain are observed in patients treated with antidepressants. It is not yet known if some of the residual symptoms of depression, and the negative effects on the skeleton may be mediated via decreased levels of vitamin D. Any decrease in vitamin D may be mediated either by the antidepressants or due to the depression per se (decreased exposure to sunlight and poor dietary habits). The treatment with antidepressants may improve the depression, but may not correct the vitamin D deficiency leaving residual symptoms, which may be interpreted as depression-related and this as incomplete response to the antidepressant treatment. Treatment with vitamin D may thus help alleviate some of the symptoms otherwise attributed to the depression leading to treatment with antidepressants (confounding by indication). Alternatively, antidepressants may interfere with biological processes that affect uptake or metabolism of Vitamin D resulting in low levels of the vitamin D that may have detrimental effects on bone turnover and muscle function.

State-of-the-art For the antidepressants a difference has been observed between SSRI and the newer antidepressants. SSRI are associated with decreased bone mineral density and an increased risk of fractures, whereas for the newer antidepressants no increase in the risk of fractures has been seen , and little is known on their effect on bone density and bone turnover. This is concerning as they are in widespread use.

The effects of SSRI may be mediated via direct serotoninergic effects on the bone cells and SSRIs and the newer antidepressants may affect the cardiovascular system, which may increase the risk of falls. The increased risk of falls may perhaps also be related to muscle weakness stemming from vitamin D deficiency or to effects on the central nervous system affecting postural balance. The risk of falls may explain an early increase in the risk of fractures, whereas any effects on bone density may increase long-term risk of fractures. In depressed patients reduced physical activity may also affect bone via disuse osteoporosis. It is thus not clear if some of the associations previously observed for antidepressants and detrimental skeletal effects may be mediated by the underlying disease (depression), or by factors related to the drugs themselves.

Perspectives and relevance to the community If a cheap and simple treatment with vitamin D may improve quality of life and musculoskeletal status among depressed patients, this may e.g. bring many patients back to work and thus contribute significantly to public health. Moreover, information regarding the influence SSRIs has on bone turnover relative to postural control will contribute significantly to the unravelling of what mechanisms that are affected negatively by different SSRIs leading to increased risk of fractures. This will finally contribute to better understanding of the side effect profile of these drugs and hence enable better management of these in the clinic. This is of great value, since there, as stated earlier, is a large group of patients receiving this class of drug.

Formulation of problem In recent years it has become evident that some types of antidepressants have a deleterious effect on bone metabolism with serious clinical consequences such as increased risk of fractures possibly with subsequent complications. Moreover, the majority of patients treated with antidepressants have residual symptoms including tiredness, muscle weakness and muscle pain, which are similar to symptoms of vitamin D deficiency. Increasing awareness and knowledge of the side effect profile of antidepressants on bone metabolism may prompt clinicians to screen patients at high risk of drug-induced osteopenia or osteoporosis and accordingly provide treatment, which may reduce the incidence of potentially avoidable fractures. Moreover, some types of antidepressants may show to produce a minimal or even no effect on bone turnover, and should be considered as first line treatment in the group of patients at risk of fractures. Therefore, this study, which consists of a cross-sectional and longitudinal study design, will address the following aims through biochemical and clinical characterisation: 1) to unravel underlying mechanisms leading to skeletal impairment and musculoskeletal symptoms or alterations in sensory-motor interactions (such as impaired balance) in patients receiving different types of antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or other newer antidepressants and 2) to investigate the effect of co-administrating vitamin D on bone status, sensory-motor interaction, and parameters associated with quality of life and depression in a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Hypotheses:

  • Decreased levels of Vitamin D may be caused by the depression by itself because of behavioural changes (less time outdoors and thus sun-exposure, and poor dietary habits)
  • Certain types of antidepressants may alter the level of Vitamin D with a negative effect on the musculoskeletal system (residual symptoms) with measurable effects on postural control and bone mineral density (BMD).
  • Decreased vitamin D levels may lead to musculoskeletal symptoms that are not corrected by treatment of the depression with antidepressants (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) or Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic Antidepressants (NaSSAs)).
  • By supplementing with vitamin D some of the musculoskeletal symptoms and disruptions of bone status may be corrected.
  • The increased risk of fractures is either caused by the SSRIs' effect on postural control and thus fall incidence or decreases in BMD, or a result of both.
Being tested
cholecalciferol (50ug)
Keywords
Vitamin D, Major depression, SSRIs, Osteoporosis
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cholecalciferol (50ug)Dietary supplement

    Also called Vitamin D3 supplement

    The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of high dose vitamin D3 supplementation on the muscoloskeletal system among patients treated with antidepressants due to a diagnosis of major depressive disorder

Study groups in NCT01932931
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cholecalciferol supplement (50ug)Active comparatorCholecalciferol supplement is given for 1 year through randomisation of both MDD patients and healthy controls.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: cholecalciferol (50ug)
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo treatment (tablet) is given for 1 year through randomisation of both MDD patients and healthy controls.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: cholecalciferol (50ug)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vitamin D

    Change in Vitamin D

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 1 year

  2. Bone Mineral Density (DXA)

    change in Bone Mineral Density measured through bone scans of hip and spine (DXA)

    Measured: baseline and 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. muscle function

    Timed up and go, chair stand, isomeric handgrip exercise and postural control/balance (force plate measure with and without eyes closed, and standing on firm/soft underlay)

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 1 year

  2. pain sensitivity

    pain induced through deep muscle pain (cuff algometry) and superficial dermal pain (thermal)

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 1 year

  3. Quality of life

    two questionnaires: SF-36 and SYSDIET-intervention 2009

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 1 year

  4. Degree of depression

    Assessed by Hamilton depression scale (HAM-D)

    Measured: baseline, 6 months and 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Oct 2013
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2015
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two models are used, both a cross sectional study and a RCT. Corss sectional study: Patients (n=21) treated with citalopram (SSRI) due to major depressive disorder (MDD) are investigated for changes in bone mineral density, physcial performance (muscle strength, mobility, and balance), and pain sensitivity when compared to healthy controls (n=50). RCT: Half of the patients and half of the controls are randomised (by double-blinding) to recieve either high dose vitamin D supplementation (2000 IU/day) of placebo for 12 months. All the primary endpoints from the cross sectional study will be assessed again after 6 and 12 months.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01932931
Sponsor's protocol ID
N-20130052
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
28 Aug 2013
Last updated
11 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Arvold DS, Odean MJ, Dornfeld MP, Regal RR, Arvold JG, Karwoski GC, Mast DJ, Sanford PB, Sjoberg RJ. Correlation of symptoms with vitamin D deficiency and symptom response to cholecalciferol treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Endocr Pract. 2009 Apr;15(3):203-12. doi: 10.4158/EP.15.3.203.

    PubMed 19364687
  • Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Mar;51(3):364-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51110.x.

    PubMed 12588580
  • Christensen P, Thomsen HY, Pedersen OL, Gram LF, Kragh-Sorensen P. Orthostatic side effects of clomipramine and citalopram during treatment for depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(4):383-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00427895.

    PubMed 3929308
  • Fekadu A, Rane LJ, Wooderson SC, Markopoulou K, Poon L, Cleare AJ. Prediction of longer-term outcome of treatment-resistant depression in tertiary care. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;201(5):369-75. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.102665. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

    PubMed 22955008
  • Gelenberg AJ. A review of the current guidelines for depression treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;71(7):e15. doi: 10.4088/JCP.9078tx1c.

    PubMed 20667285
  • Oderda LH, Young JR, Asche CV, Pepper GA. Psychotropic-related hip fractures: meta-analysis of first-generation and second-generation antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jul-Aug;46(7-8):917-28. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q589. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

    PubMed 22811347
  • Pollock BG. Adverse reactions of antidepressants in elderly patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 20:4-8.

    PubMed 10513851
  • Rabenda V, Nicolet D, Beaudart C, Bruyere O, Reginster JY. Relationship between use of antidepressants and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):121-37. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2015-9. Epub 2012 May 26.

    PubMed 22638709
  • Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Reginster JY, Abrahamsen B, Adachi JD, Brandi ML, Bruyere O, Compston J, Ducy P, Ferrari S, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Karsenty G, Laslop A, Rabenda V, Vestergaard P. Antidepressant medications and osteoporosis. Bone. 2012 Sep;51(3):606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 May 30.

    PubMed 22659406
  • Rodriguez de la Torre B, Dreher J, Malevany I, Bagli M, Kolbinger M, Omran H, Luderitz B, Rao ML. Serum levels and cardiovascular effects of tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depressed patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2001 Aug;23(4):435-40. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200108000-00019.

    PubMed 11477329
  • Schwan S, Hallberg P. SSRIs, bone mineral density, and risk of fractures--a review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;19(10):683-92. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

    PubMed 19541458
  • Vestergaard P, Prieto-Alhambra D, Javaid MK, Cooper C. Fractures in users of antidepressants and anxiolytics and sedatives: effects of age and dose. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Feb;24(2):671-80. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2043-5. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

    PubMed 22669469

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cholecalciferol (50ug) in people with Major Depression and Osteoporosis, run by Aalborg University at 2 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vitamin D (time frame: baseline, 6 months and 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01932931, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in