Acne VulgarisPhase 1/2NCT01936324
A Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy Study of DRM01B Topical Gel
A Phase 1/2 study testing Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5% in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Dermira, Inc. at 12 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This is a Phase 1/2a study. The purpose of Phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DRM01B Topical Gel in 6 healthy volunteers. The purpose of Phase 2a was to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of DRM01B Topical Gel compared to vehicle in subjects with acne vulgaris on the face. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acne Vulgaris
- What is being tested?
- Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Phase 1 Inclusion Criteria
- Signed informed consent
- Willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol
- Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Was in good health and free from any clinically significant disease, as determined by the investigator
- If female and of childbearing potential, was willing to use an accepted method of birth control during study participation and for 30 days after the last application of study drug. Females were considered to be of childbearing potential unless they had been surgically sterilized (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation), had been diagnosed as infertile, had a same-sex partner or vasectomized male partner, were postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or were abstinent. Acceptable methods of birth control were defined as: abstinence, oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches/implants; Depo-Provera®, double barrier methods (e.g., condom and spermicide) or an intrauterine device (IUD). The birth control method must have been stable/unchanged for 30 days prior to baseline.
- If male, was vasectomized or agreed to use an accepted method of birth control with female partner during study participation and for 30 days after the last application of study drug.
Phase 1 Exclusion Criteria
- Females who were pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study, or were breast-feeding
- Had a known hypersensitivity to DRM01B or its excipients
- Had any skin condition that may have interfered with the safety evaluations during the study
- Had a clinical chemistry or hematology laboratory value at screening that was considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the investigator
- Participated in an investigational drug study within 30 days prior to screening
- Were considered a poor medical risk because of other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections, in the opinion of the investigator. Any other condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would put the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
Phase 2a Inclusion Criteria
- Signed informed consent
- Willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol
- Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating females
- Age ≥ 18 years
- If female and of childbearing potential, was willing to use an accepted method of birth control during study participation and for 30 days after the last study drug application. Females were considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation), had been diagnosed as infertile, had same sex partner or vasectomized male partner, or were postmenopausal for at least 1 year. Acceptable methods of birth control were defined as: abstinence, oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches/implants; Depo-Provera®, double barrier methods (e.g., condom and spermicide) or an IUD. The birth control method must have been stable/unchanged for 12 weeks prior to baseline and must have remained unchanged during study participation.
- If male, was vasectomized or agreed to use an accepted method of birth control with female partner during study participation and for 30 days after the last study drug application.
- Subjects were in good health and free from any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have put the subject at risk during participation in the study.
- Clinical diagnosis of facial acne vulgaris defined as:
- At least 20 inflammatory lesions
- At least 20 noninflammatory lesions
- IGA of 3 or greater
- Willing to refrain from using any treatments, other than the investigational product, including antibiotics, for acne present on the face. Topical acne treatments that did not have significant or measurable systemic absorption (e.g., benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid) were allowed for treatment of acne of the back, shoulders, and chest only.
Phase 2a Exclusion Criteria
- Females who were pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study, or breast-feeding
- Had a known hypersensitivity to DRM01B or its excipients
- Had any skin condition that may have interfered with evaluation of safety or acne vulgaris (e.g., rosacea; seborrheic dermatitis; perioral dermatitis; corticosteroid-induced acne or folliculitis)
- Had excessive facial hair that would have interfered with diagnosis or assessment of acne vulgaris
- Had excessive sun exposure, in the opinion of the investigator, or use of tanning booths
- Had active cystic acne or acne conglobata, acne fulminans, and secondary acne
- Had 2 or more active nodular lesions
- Had a clinical chemistry or hematology laboratory value at screening that was considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the investigator
- Participated in an investigational drug study within 30 days prior to screening
- Subjects who were a poor medical risk because of other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections, in the opinion of the investigator
- Any other condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would have put the subject at unacceptable risk during participation in the study
- Treatment with over-the-counter (OTC) topical medications for the treatment of acne vulgaris including benzoyl peroxide, topical anti-inflammatory medications, corticosteroids, α-hydroxy/glycolic acid on the face within 2 weeks prior to baseline
- Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline (Note: use of intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids was allowed for seasonal allergies and asthma)
- Treatment with systemic antibiotics, systemic anti-acne drugs, or systemic anti-inflammatory drugs within 4 weeks prior to baseline
- Prescription topical retinoid use on the face within 4 weeks of baseline (e.g., tretinoin, tazarotene, adapalene).
- Treatment with a new hormonal therapy or dose change to an existing hormonal therapy within 12 weeks prior to baseline. The dose and frequency of use of any hormonal therapy started more than 12 weeks prior to baseline must have remained unchanged throughout the study. Hormonal therapies included, but were not limited to, estrogenic and progestational agents, such as birth control pills.
- Prior use of androgen receptor blockers (such as spironolactone or flutamide)
- Oral retinoid use (e.g., isotretinoin) within 12 months prior to baseline or vitamin A supplements greater than 10,000 units/day within 6 months of baseline
- Facial procedures (chemical or laser peel, microdermabrasion, etc.) within the past 8 weeks or during the study
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Canada12 sites
Ultranova Skincare
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6L2
Lynderm Research Inc
Markham, Ontario, L3P1A8
Innovaderm Research, Inc
Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5
Siena Medical Research
Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 2S6
Institute of Cosmetic & Laser Surgery
Oakville, Ontario, L6J 7W5
Skin Centre for Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 1Z2
Centre de Recherche Dermetologique du Quebec Metropolitain (CRDQ)
Québec, G1V 4X7
The Centre for Dermatology
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5
Guildford Dermatology Specialist Inc
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Research Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B4
K. Papp Clinical Research Inc.
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Windsor Clinical Research, Inc.
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 5W7
About this study
Official title: A Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of DRM01B Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
This is a Phase 1/2a study.
The purpose of Phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DRM01B Topical Gel in 6 healthy volunteers.
The purpose of Phase 2a was to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of DRM01B Topical Gel compared to vehicle in subjects with acne vulgaris on the face.
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Being tested
- Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, Vehicle
- Keywords
- acne vulgaris
- Medical subject headings
- Acne Vulgaris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%Drug
Also called DRM01
Gel containing Olumacostat Glasaretil
Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, VehicleOther
Vehicle (placebo) gel
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Experimental | Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, applied twice daily to the face for 7 days in healthy volunteers Receives: Drug: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5% |
| Phase 2a | Experimental | Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, or Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, Vehicle, applied twice daily to the face for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%; Other: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, Vehicle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Absolute Change in Acne Lesion Counts (Inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Mean absolute change in acne lesion counts (inflammatory) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Absolute Change in Acne Lesion Counts (Non-inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Mean absolute change in acne lesion counts (non-inflammatory) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator Global Assessment of Acne (IGA) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Percentage of subjects who achieved ≥ 2-grade improvement in the investigator global assessment of acne (IGA) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Scoring Criteria for Investigator Global Assessment 0 - Clear skin with no inflammatory or noninflammatory lesions
- - Almost clear; rare noninflammatory lesions with no more than one small inflammatory lesion
- - Mild severity; greater than Grade 1; some noninflammatory lesions with no more than a few inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions)
- - Moderate severity; greater than Grade 2; up to many noninflammatory lesions and may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than one small nodular lesion
- - Severe; greater than Grade 3; up to many noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodular lesions
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Acne VulgarisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dermira, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janice Drew, Study director, Dermira, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936324
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DRM01B-ACN01
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of DRM01B Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936324
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DRM01B-ACN01
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Keywords
- acne vulgaris
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dermira, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase 1/2a study.
The purpose of Phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DRM01B Topical Gel in 6 healthy volunteers.
The purpose of Phase 2a was to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of DRM01B Topical Gel compared to vehicle in subjects with acne vulgaris on the face.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Experimental | Drug: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, applied twice daily to the face for 7 days in healthy volunteers |
| Phase 2a | Experimental | Drug: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, Other: Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, VehicleOlumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%, or Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, Vehicle, applied twice daily to the face for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5%Also: DRM01Gel containing Olumacostat Glasaretil | Drug | Phase 1, Phase 2a |
| Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, VehicleVehicle (placebo) gel | Other | Phase 2a |
Primary outcome
Mean Absolute Change in Acne Lesion Counts (Inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean absolute change in acne lesion counts (inflammatory) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Mean Absolute Change in Acne Lesion Counts (Non-inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean absolute change in acne lesion counts (non-inflammatory) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator Global Assessment of Acne (IGA) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of subjects who achieved ≥ 2-grade improvement in the investigator global assessment of acne (IGA) from baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a Scoring Criteria for Investigator Global Assessment 0 - Clear skin with no inflammatory or noninflammatory lesions 1. - Almost clear; rare noninflammatory lesions with no more than one small inflammatory lesion 2. - Mild severity; greater than Grade 1; some noninflammatory lesions with no more than a few inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions) 3. - Moderate severity; greater than Grade 2; up to many noninflammatory lesions and may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than one small nodular lesion 4. - Severe; greater than Grade 3; up to many noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodular lesions
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Acne Vulgaris
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO₂ Laser With and Without Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Inflammatory Facial Acne Vulgaris.
Acne, Acne Papulopustulosa
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Effectiveness of Adapalene/Clindamycin Phosphate Gel (Klenzit®-C) in Vietnamese Patients With Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris
Acne
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Study of Denifanstat in Participants With Moderate to Severe Acne (AURORA)
Acne Vulgaris
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparing Nadifloxacin Plus Tretinoin Versus Clindamycin Plus Tretinoin Creams for Mild-to-Moderate Acne
Acne Vulgaris
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janice Drew study director
Dermira, Inc.
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Olumacostat Glasaretil Gel, 7.5% in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Dermira, Inc. at 12 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Absolute Change in Acne Lesion Counts (Inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12 in Phase 2a (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2021.