Wound InfectionPhase 4NCT01939145
Comparing Outcomes for Prontosan Versus Normal Saline for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation
A Phase 4 study testing Normal saline and Prontosan in people with Wound Infection, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing the outcomes for Prontosan versus normal saline as the solution for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NWPTi). Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a well established method of treatment for acute and chronic wounds. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Infection
- What is being tested?
- Normal saline and Prontosan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female greater than 18 years of age
- Admission to the hospital for an infected wound
- Diabetic, ischemic, neuropathic, venous, surgical wounds, any anatomical location
- Subjects requiring serial (more than 1) operative debridement
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Patients with exposed bowel, brain matter, spinal cord
- Patients with exposed peripheral bypass grafts
- Known allergy or sensitivity to Prontosan or components of NPWT
- Known allergy or sensitivity to adhesives
- Uncontrolled bleeding disorders/coagulopathy
- Wounds that tunnel to unexposed areas
- Malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital Center for Wound Healing
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes for Prontosan Versus Normal Saline for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation
This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing the outcomes for Prontosan versus normal saline as the solution for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NWPTi). Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a well established method of treatment for acute and chronic wounds. The combination of negative pressure with instillation of a solution is a relatively novel concept that has gained popularity and is currently used nationally and internationally. NPWTi is the standard of care for our division. Despite the growing use, there is limited information regarding the selection of the ideal instillation solution. This is a single site, investigator initiated, NPWTi study comparing the use of Prontosan with normal saline for the adjunctive treatment of the acutely infected wound that requires hospital admission. A total of 100 subjects will be included with 50 subjects in each treatment arm. The outcomes that will be measured are 1) number of operations, 2) length of hospital stay, 3) % of wounds closed prior to discharge, 4) time to closure prior to discharge, 5)% remained closed at 30 day follow-up, and 6) reduction of qualitative bacterial cultures. The results from this study will better characterize the most appropriate use of NPWTi.
Read the detailed description
Overview This is a prospective, randomized, comparative trial examining 2 different instillation solutions for NPWTi. All wound types that meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment, subjects will be randomized into either the Prontosan NPWTi group (n=50) or the normal saline NPWTi group (n=50). Data will be collected from inpatient hospital records.
Outline of Study Procedures
- Patients meeting the eligibility criteria requiring hospital admission for an infected wound will be identified. Demographic information will be obtained.
- Informed consent will be obtained.
- Subjects will be taken to the operating room for wound debridement within 72 hours of admission per standard of care (SOC). Further, antibiotic therapy and medical management will be performed per SOC.
- Randomization into the Prontosan or normal saline instillation group will be conducted after the informed consent has been signed, but before the first operation.
- For the first operating room visit the following will be conducted:
- Pre- and post debridement qualitative cultures
- Debridement performed in SOC fashion
- Post debridement measurements
- Application of NPWTi
- For subsequent operating room visits the following will be conducted:
- Pre- and post debridement qualitative cultures b. Debridement performed in SOC fashion c. Post debridement measurements d. Application of NPWTi or closure i. The decision to close the wound will be determined by the clinician per SOC. ii. The technique utilized for closure will be determined by the clinician per SOC.
- Subjects will discharged from the hospital
- Criteria for discharge will be per the judgment of the investigator per SOC
- After hospital discharge, the subject will be followed in the outpatient wound clinic per SOC. Information from the one month follow-up period will be collected. Subjects will be exited from the study at that point.
Subject Recruitment No active recruitment strategy will be employed. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be approached to participate into the study.
Participation Completion and Discontinuation:
Subjects may elect to discontinue participation at any time for any reason. Investigators may elect to remove the subject from participating at any time for any reason.
Surgical Technique:
Surgical debridement will be performed in SOC manner and is at the discretion of the investigator.
Postoperative Care:
Will be conducted in customary SOC fashion and is at the discretion of the investigator. The 30 day follow-up visit is part of SOC
Application of Devices/Dressing:
The device that will be utilized is the V.A.C. Ulta with Veraflo Technology (Kinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, TX). This is an FDA approved device that is indicated for wound care. The investigators currently use this device as the SOC for the inpatient management of the acutely infected wound. The device consists of a foam sponge applied to the wound surface with an adhesive drape that keeps it in place. This device applies subatmospheric pressure at -125mmHg to the wound surface. The instillation component includes the delivery of a topical solution at prescribed fashion to the wound surface. This solution is dwelled (no negative pressure during this interval) in the sponge for a specific duration and then is evacuated.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy:
The setting for negative pressure will be -125mmHg, continuous setting, and moderate intensity. The application of the foam and drape will be conducted in the customary fashion. The negative pressure duration will be 2 hours.
Prontosan:
Prontosan (B Braun, Bethlehem, PA) is 0.1% polyhexanide, 0.1% betaine, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The polyhexanide is an antiseptic and betaine is a surfactant. This solution is an FDA approved device indicated for topical irrigation. This solution has high tolerability with robust antimicrobial activity. Polyhexanide has been utilized as the instillation solution for NPWTi with positive clinical results. Prontosan is currently being used as the instillation solution for NPWTi in this facility as the SOC. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies.
Normal Saline:
Normal saline (0.9% NaCl) is an isotonic solution that is widely used for intravenous application but is also used as our SOC for wound irrigation. This solution has high tolerability. Normal saline has been used as the instillation solution for NPWTi. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies.
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Being tested
- Normal saline, Prontosan
- Keywords
- hospital admission
- Medical subject headings
- Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Normal salineDrug
Also called 0.9% Saline
Normal saline (0.9% NaCl) is an isotonic solution that is widely used for intravenous application but is also used as our SOC for wound irrigation. This solution has high tolerability. Normal saline has been used as the instillation solution for NPWTi. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies
ProntosanDevice
Also called Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution
Prontosan (B Braun, Bethlehem, PA) is 0.1% polyhexanide, 0.1% betaine, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The polyhexanide is an antiseptic and betaine is a surfactant. This solution is an FDA approved device indicated for topical irrigation. This solution has high tolerability with robust antimicrobial activity. Polyhexanide has been utilized as the instillation solution for NPWTi with positive clinical results. Prontosan is currently being used as the instillation solution for NPWTi in this facility as the SOC. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Saline | Active comparator | The use of Normal Saline as the solution for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with instillation. Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Prontosan | Active comparator | The use of Prontosan as the solution in Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation. Receives: Device: Prontosan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Operating Room Visits
Compare the number of operative room visits between Prontosan NPWTi and normal saline NPWTi.
Measured: Patients will be followed during their hospital stay which is an average of approximately 2 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Hospital Admission Length of Stay
Compare the hospital admission length of stay between Prontosan NPWTi and normal saline NPWTi.
Measured: Patients will be followed during their hospital stay which is an average of approximately 2 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Georgetown UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Georgetown University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paul J. Kim, DPM, Georgetown University
- Investigators
- Paul Kim, DPM, Study director, MedStar Georgetown University HospitalChristopher Attinger, MD, Principal investigator, MedStar Georgetown University HospitalJohn Steinberg, DPM, Principal investigator, MedStar Georgetown University HospitalKaren Evans, MD, Principal investigator, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01939145
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 06142013
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data collected has not been approved for use beyond the scope of this trial and will not be made available.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes for Prontosan Versus Normal Saline for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01939145
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 06142013
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Keywords
- hospital admission
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Georgetown UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing the outcomes for Prontosan versus normal saline as the solution for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NWPTi). Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a well established method of treatment for acute and chronic wounds. The combination of negative pressure with instillation of a solution is a relatively novel concept that has gained popularity and is currently used nationally and internationally. NPWTi is the standard of care for our division. Despite the growing use, there is limited information regarding the selection of the ideal instillation solution. This is a single site, investigator initiated, NPWTi study comparing the use of Prontosan with normal saline for the adjunctive treatment of the acutely infected wound that requires hospital admission. A total of 100 subjects will be included with 50 subjects in each treatment arm. The outcomes that will be measured are 1) number of operations, 2) length of hospital stay, 3) % of wounds closed prior to discharge, 4) time to closure prior to discharge, 5)% remained closed at 30 day follow-up, and 6) reduction of qualitative bacterial cultures. The results from this study will better characterize the most appropriate use of NPWTi.
Detailed description
Overview This is a prospective, randomized, comparative trial examining 2 different instillation solutions for NPWTi. All wound types that meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment, subjects will be randomized into either the Prontosan NPWTi group (n=50) or the normal saline NPWTi group (n=50). Data will be collected from inpatient hospital records.
Outline of Study Procedures
- Patients meeting the eligibility criteria requiring hospital admission for an infected wound will be identified. Demographic information will be obtained.
- Informed consent will be obtained.
- Subjects will be taken to the operating room for wound debridement within 72 hours of admission per standard of care (SOC). Further, antibiotic therapy and medical management will be performed per SOC.
- Randomization into the Prontosan or normal saline instillation group will be conducted after the informed consent has been signed, but before the first operation.
- For the first operating room visit the following will be conducted:
- Pre- and post debridement qualitative cultures
- Debridement performed in SOC fashion
- Post debridement measurements
- Application of NPWTi
- For subsequent operating room visits the following will be conducted:
- Pre- and post debridement qualitative cultures b. Debridement performed in SOC fashion c. Post debridement measurements d. Application of NPWTi or closure i. The decision to close the wound will be determined by the clinician per SOC. ii. The technique utilized for closure will be determined by the clinician per SOC.
- Subjects will discharged from the hospital
- Criteria for discharge will be per the judgment of the investigator per SOC
- After hospital discharge, the subject will be followed in the outpatient wound clinic per SOC. Information from the one month follow-up period will be collected. Subjects will be exited from the study at that point.
Subject Recruitment No active recruitment strategy will be employed. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be approached to participate into the study.
Participation Completion and Discontinuation:
Subjects may elect to discontinue participation at any time for any reason. Investigators may elect to remove the subject from participating at any time for any reason.
Surgical Technique:
Surgical debridement will be performed in SOC manner and is at the discretion of the investigator.
Postoperative Care:
Will be conducted in customary SOC fashion and is at the discretion of the investigator. The 30 day follow-up visit is part of SOC
Application of Devices/Dressing:
The device that will be utilized is the V.A.C. Ulta with Veraflo Technology (Kinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, TX). This is an FDA approved device that is indicated for wound care. The investigators currently use this device as the SOC for the inpatient management of the acutely infected wound. The device consists of a foam sponge applied to the wound surface with an adhesive drape that keeps it in place. This device applies subatmospheric pressure at -125mmHg to the wound surface. The instillation component includes the delivery of a topical solution at prescribed fashion to the wound surface. This solution is dwelled (no negative pressure during this interval) in the sponge for a specific duration and then is evacuated.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy:
The setting for negative pressure will be -125mmHg, continuous setting, and moderate intensity. The application of the foam and drape will be conducted in the customary fashion. The negative pressure duration will be 2 hours.
Prontosan:
Prontosan (B Braun, Bethlehem, PA) is 0.1% polyhexanide, 0.1% betaine, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The polyhexanide is an antiseptic and betaine is a surfactant. This solution is an FDA approved device indicated for topical irrigation. This solution has high tolerability with robust antimicrobial activity. Polyhexanide has been utilized as the instillation solution for NPWTi with positive clinical results. Prontosan is currently being used as the instillation solution for NPWTi in this facility as the SOC. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies.
Normal Saline:
Normal saline (0.9% NaCl) is an isotonic solution that is widely used for intravenous application but is also used as our SOC for wound irrigation. This solution has high tolerability. Normal saline has been used as the instillation solution for NPWTi. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Saline | Active comparator | Drug: Normal salineThe use of Normal Saline as the solution for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with instillation. |
| Prontosan | Active comparator | Device: ProntosanThe use of Prontosan as the solution in Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female greater than 18 years of age
- Admission to the hospital for an infected wound
- Diabetic, ischemic, neuropathic, venous, surgical wounds, any anatomical location
- Subjects requiring serial (more than 1) operative debridement
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Patients with exposed bowel, brain matter, spinal cord
- Patients with exposed peripheral bypass grafts
- Known allergy or sensitivity to Prontosan or components of NPWT
- Known allergy or sensitivity to adhesives
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Normal salineAlso: 0.9% SalineNormal saline (0.9% NaCl) is an isotonic solution that is widely used for intravenous application but is also used as our SOC for wound irrigation. This solution has high tolerability. Normal saline has been used as the instillation solution for NPWTi. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies | Drug | Normal Saline |
| ProntosanAlso: Prontosan Wound Irrigation SolutionProntosan (B Braun, Bethlehem, PA) is 0.1% polyhexanide, 0.1% betaine, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The polyhexanide is an antiseptic and betaine is a surfactant. This solution is an FDA approved device indicated for topical irrigation. This solution has high tolerability with robust antimicrobial activity. Polyhexanide has been utilized as the instillation solution for NPWTi with positive clinical results. Prontosan is currently being used as the instillation solution for NPWTi in this facility as the SOC. The dwell setting for this solution is 20 minutes. The volume of solution to be used is dependent on the size of the wound hence varies. | Device | Prontosan |
Primary outcome
Number of Operating Room Visits
Time frame: Patients will be followed during their hospital stay which is an average of approximately 2 weeks.
Compare the number of operative room visits between Prontosan NPWTi and normal saline NPWTi.
1 secondary outcome
Hospital Admission Length of Stay
Time frame: Patients will be followed during their hospital stay which is an average of approximately 2 weeks.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data collected has not been approved for use beyond the scope of this trial and will not be made available.
Related trials for Wound Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Sepsis, Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Amicidin-β Topical Solution for Patients With a Contaminated or Infected Surgical or Traumatic Wound or Cutaneous Abscess
Surgical Wound Infection, Traumatic Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruiting
Povidone-Iodine and Ozonated Distilled Water Irrigation in the Management of Maxillofacial Space Infections
Infection, Surgical Site
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Kim, DPM study director
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Christopher Attinger, MD principal investigator
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
John Steinberg, DPM principal investigator
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Normal saline and Prontosan in people with Wound Infection, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Operating Room Visits (time frame: Patients will be followed during their hospital stay which is an average of approximately 2 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2016.