ADHDNCT01964209
Initial Validation of the Vanderbilt ADHD Measure for Adolescent Patients in the ICISS Project
An observational study of ADHD, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This proposal is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Vanderbilt ADHD screening tool for use with adolescents and young adults aged 13-21 years. The Vanderbilt is a previously developed, freely available set of parent- and teacher-report questionnaires designed to identify ADHD and related disorders in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- ADHD
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2014to 15 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Boston Children's Hospital patients which will be recruited from the following divisions: Adolescent/Young Adult Practice, Developmental Medicine Center and Department of Psychiatry.
Who may be able to join
- Patients ages 13-21 who already have an ADHD diagnosis or are being evaluated for ADHD.
- Parent/guardian will be asked to participate for patients ages 13-21.
- Teachers will be asked to participate for patients ages 13-21.
- All informants should be able to read and understand English at a 5th grade reading level; and enrolled in the ICISS system.
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment or developmental delay.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Children's Hospital, Adolescent/ Young Adult Clinic
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Initial Validation of the Vanderbilt Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disoder (ADHD) Measure for Adolescent Patients in the Integrated Clinical Information Sharing System (ICISS) Project
This proposal is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Vanderbilt ADHD screening tool for use with adolescents and young adults aged 13-21 years. The Vanderbilt is a previously developed, freely available set of parent- and teacher-report questionnaires designed to identify ADHD and related disorders in children. The Vanderbilt measures have been chosen for inclusion in the new computerized Integrated Clinical Information Sharing System (ICISS) being rolled out in five Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) departments/divisions (Adolescent/Young Adult Practice, Children's Hospital Primary Care Center, Developmental Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry). The Vanderbilt was developed and validated for use among children up to age 12 years (Wolraich et al., 2003; Wolraich et al., 2013; Bard et al., 2013), and little is known about its appropriateness for use among older youth. In addition, there is no self-report version of the Vanderbilt that can be administered directly to adolescents and young adults (ages 13-21 years), for whom parents and teachers are often less knowledgeable reporters. To address these shortcomings, a multidisciplinary team of BCH adolescent health clinicians and researchers modified the parent and teacher Vanderbilt questionnaires to make them age-appropriate for adolescents and young adults and created a complementary self-report version for adolescents and young adults. The goal of the current study is to 1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of online administration through the ICISS system of the new parent, teacher, and youth self-report Vanderbilt measures among adolescent and young adult BCH patients aged 13-21 years; 2) test their reliability in terms of internal consistency reliability, temporal stability of responses over a one-month test-retest, and inter-rater agreement across all informants (parents, teachers, and youths); and 3) test their validity by evaluating their convergence with a similar set of ADHD screening tools, the Conners scales, already validated for use with adolescents and young adults.
Read the detailed description
Background and Specific Aims:
Study Design: We will use the ICISS system's capacity for prospective and ongoing collection of data from enrolled patients and their families to conduct our prospective, longitudinal study consisting of a baseline assessment at enrollment into ICISS, a one-month re-test assessment, and a follow-up assessment at either 3 months for patients who were newly-diagnosed with ADHD or had a change in medication, or 6 months for patients with an established diagnosis and no medication changes.
Recruitment and Consent: Once a patient has enrolled in ICISS, they will be asked if they wish to participate in the modified Vanderbilt validation study, initially by phone call. Some patients and/or their parents will want to discuss this in person or may not be reached by phone call, in which case the research assistant will meet with them at the clinic visit. This will take place in a quiet, confidential space.
However, with adolescents it is typical that the parent is not present at the clinic visit. The Vanderbilt validation study will then be discussed with the parent verbally by phone and consent will be implicit in answering the two Conners questionnaires when sent online. Interested and eligible patients will be reminded in this email that participation in this research study is completely voluntary, that a decision not to participate will not affect their medical care in any way and that they may withdraw from the study at any time.
As participation in this study consists simply of answering two Conners questionnaires which represent the standard of care for ADHD both nationally and in our clinics, presents virtually no risk to the participant above the minimal risks associated with the general ICISS study, and the parent, participant and teacher all have the option to simply not respond to the email requesting Conners completion for this study.
Data Collection and Measures: The increase in effort to collect the additional data needed for our study will be small as most of these measures are already being collected as part of the larger ICISS implementation. The added time for each participant to complete the Conners measures is marginal, on the order of 30 minutes total over a few interactions. After enrollment into ICISS, all eligible patients aged 13-21 years will be asked to complete the baseline youth self-report Vanderbilt-Long Form questionnaire and their parents the Parent version. In addition, patients 13-18 years will have teachers complete the Teacher version. All Long-Form versions include 18 items assessing the frequency (using a response scale of 0=Never, 1=Occasionally, 2=Often, 3=Very often) of symptoms and behaviors indicative of the predominant subtype of ADHD (Inattentive, Hyperactive/Impulsive, or Combined). Additionally, all three versions screen for Anxiety/Depression (7 items) and Oppositional-Defiant Disorder (8 items), disorders that often co-occur with ADHD. Lastly, only the Parent and Teacher versions include items assessing Conduct Disorder and School Performance (e.g., academic performance, peer relations, classroom behavior, and assignment completion). To assess test-retest reliability, we will again administer the Long-Forms at one-month follow-up. However, for subsequent follow-ups (i.e., 3- or 6-months), we will administer the Short-Form for all three Vanderbilt measures, which is the Long-Form but with the omission of Anxiety/Depression and Oppositional-Defiant disorder items. We will also collect the following data to address each of our study aims:
Aim 1: Feasibility and Acceptability: We will record patient, parent, and teacher response and completion rates for each Vanderbilt administration. We will also measure the length of time it takes for them to complete the Long Form (administered at baseline and one-month follow-up) and Short Form (administered monthly thereafter), and provide comment fields so that they can describe any difficulties they may have had in answering any of the questions.
Aim 2: Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability: All patients, parents, and teachers will again receive their respective Long-Form version of the Vanderbilt at one-month follow-up. As part of the ICISS system, they will receive an email prompting them to complete the forms and submit them electronically to ICISS where they will be made available to the team and the patient's clinician. We will examine test-retest only for those patients who had no new medications or changes in their medications and stable symptoms during the intervening month. We will use the following two items to identify these patients: 1) "Since your/your child's last medical appointment in the Adolescent Practice, have there been any changes in your/his/her ADHD-related medications or therapies?" (Yes, No, I/My child do/does not receive ADHD-related medications or therapies); and 2) "In general, how would you describe your/your child's ADHD symptoms since your/his/her last medical appointment in the Adolescent Practice?" (They have improved, They have stayed about the same, They have gotten worse). We will only include patients for whom both the parent and patient reports indicate no changes in symptoms or medications/therapies. We will examine both item-level retest agreement as well as reliability of the overall screening outcome within each Vanderbilt domain (e.g., whether criteria are met for ADHD [and the predominant subtype], Oppositional-Defiant Disorder, Anxiety/Depression, etc.).
We will also examine, when data are available, the level of "inter-rater" agreement, at the domain level, across screening results obtained from youth, parent, and teacher forms.
Aim 3: Concurrent and Known-Groups Validity: For patients ages 13-18 years, we will administer concurrent with the Vanderbilt at all assessment time points (see Study Design), the Conners 3rd Edition Self Report Scale - Short Form (39 items); the Parent Rating Scale (43 items); and the Teacher Rating Scale (39 items). For patients ages 19-21 yrs, we will administer the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale Self-Report - Screening Version (30 items), and ask parents to complete the corresponding Observer Report - Screening Version (30 items) (Erhardt et al, 1999; Van Voorhees et al., 2011). We opted to use the adult ADHD rating scales for patients aged 19 years or older since the Conners 3rd Edition measures have only been validated up to age 18 years. We also opted to drop the teacher-based assessment for patients older than 18 years due to concern that many teachers would be unable to assess participants given minimal personal interaction in most college classes and the participant's possible desire to keep ADHD diagnosis private. To test the ability of the Vanderbilt scores to differentiate adolescents who are expected to differ (known-groups validity), we will administer 1) a modified version of the Clinical Global Impression Scale [CGIS], a single-item measure of adolescent global functioning (Busner \& Targum, 2007) that parents and youth both complete; 2) among patients 13-18 years, the PedsQL-Family Impact Module (Varni et al., 2004) a 36-item parent-report measure of the impact a child's health condition is having on parent/family quality of life; and among patients 19-21 years, the 29-item Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) (Matza et al., 2007). We will use these quality of life and functioning measures to categorize youth into low, medium, and high symptom-severity groups, and assess the ability of the Vanderbilt measures to discriminate these groups. Finally, we will identify those patients who experience a change in their scores on the validation measures (Conners, CGIS, PedsQL-Family Impact Module) over the follow-up period (3 months for newly-diagnosed or medication-change patients, 6 months for established/no-medication-change patients) and assess the Vanderbilt's ability to detect that change.
- Conditions
- ADHD
- Keywords
- ADHD, Validation, Quality Improvement, Vanderbilt, Conners 3rd Edition, ADHD Measures, ADHD Adolescent, ADHD Questionnaire, ICISS, Integrated Clinical Information Sharing System
- Medical subject headings
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No treatment | This is a psychometric study of a screening tool for ADHD, so we will not be administering any treatments or interventions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reliability of the Vanderbilt
We will assess for each measure the level of internal consistency reliability, temporal stability of responses over a one-month test-retest, and inter-rater agreement across all informants (parents, teachers, and youths).
Measured: One month after initial administration of Vanderbilt
Secondary outcomes (1)
Validity of Vanderbilt
We will assess construct validity by evaluating the degree to which the Vanderbilt measures show convergence with a similar set of ADHD screening tools, the Conners scales, already validated for use with adolescents up to age 18 years (the Conners 3rd Edition Parent, Teacher, and youth Self-Report scales) and with young adults ages 19-21 years (the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Self-Report and Observer-Report versions).
Measured: One month after initial administration of Conners
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionJul 2018
- Study completion15 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ADHDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joshua Borus, Boston Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Joshua Borus, MD,MPH, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01964209
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 83064
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Barbaresi WJ, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Pankratz VS, Weaver AL, Weber KJ, Mrazek DA, Jacobsen SJ. How common is attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Incidence in a population-based birth cohort in Rochester, Minn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Mar;156(3):217-24. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.3.217.
PubMed 11876664Bard DE, Wolraich ML, Neas B, Doffing M, Beck L. The psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnostic parent rating scale in a community population. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Feb;34(2):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31827a3a22.
PubMed 23363972Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
PubMed 20526405Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker JD, Sitarenios G, Diamond JM, Powell JW. A new self-report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: factor structure, reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Dec;25(6):487-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1022637815797.
PubMed 9468109Erhardt, D., Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Parker, J. D., Sitarenios, G. (1999, October). Self-ratings of ADHD symptoms in adults II: reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3 (3), 153-158
Klassen AF, Miller A, Fine S. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
PubMed 15520087Matza LS, Johnston JA, Faries DE, Malley KG, Brod M. Responsiveness of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life Scale (AAQoL). Qual Life Res. 2007 Nov;16(9):1511-20. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9254-9. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
PubMed 17874207Van Voorhees EE, Hardy KK, Kollins SH. Reliability and validity of self- and other-ratings of symptoms of ADHD in adults. J Atten Disord. 2011 Apr;15(3):224-34. doi: 10.1177/1087054709356163. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
PubMed 20424007Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Parent proxy-report of their children's health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents' reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 3;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-2.
PubMed 17201923Wolraich ML, Bard DE, Neas B, Doffing M, Beck L. The psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnostic teacher rating scale in a community population. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Feb;34(2):83-93. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31827d55c3.
PubMed 23363973Wolraich ML, Lambert W, Doffing MA, Bickman L, Simmons T, Worley K. Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003 Dec;28(8):559-67. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046.
PubMed 14602846
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Initial Validation of the Vanderbilt Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disoder (ADHD) Measure for Adolescent Patients in the Integrated Clinical Information Sharing System (ICISS) Project
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01964209
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 83064
- Conditions
- ADHD
- Keywords
- ADHD, Validation, Quality Improvement, Vanderbilt, Conners 3rd Edition, ADHD Measures, ADHD Adolescent, ADHD Questionnaire
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This proposal is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Vanderbilt ADHD screening tool for use with adolescents and young adults aged 13-21 years. The Vanderbilt is a previously developed, freely available set of parent- and teacher-report questionnaires designed to identify ADHD and related disorders in children. The Vanderbilt measures have been chosen for inclusion in the new computerized Integrated Clinical Information Sharing System (ICISS) being rolled out in five Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) departments/divisions (Adolescent/Young Adult Practice, Children's Hospital Primary Care Center, Developmental Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry). The Vanderbilt was developed and validated for use among children up to age 12 years (Wolraich et al., 2003; Wolraich et al., 2013; Bard et al., 2013), and little is known about its appropriateness for use among older youth. In addition, there is no self-report version of the Vanderbilt that can be administered directly to adolescents and young adults (ages 13-21 years), for whom parents and teachers are often less knowledgeable reporters. To address these shortcomings, a multidisciplinary team of BCH adolescent health clinicians and researchers modified the parent and teacher Vanderbilt questionnaires to make them age-appropriate for adolescents and young adults and created a complementary self-report version for adolescents and young adults. The goal of the current study is to 1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of online administration through the ICISS system of the new parent, teacher, and youth self-report Vanderbilt measures among adolescent and young adult BCH patients aged 13-21 years; 2) test their reliability in terms of internal consistency reliability, temporal stability of responses over a one-month test-retest, and inter-rater agreement across all informants (parents, teachers, and youths); and 3) test their validity by evaluating their convergence with a similar set of ADHD screening tools, the Conners scales, already validated for use with adolescents and young adults.
Detailed description
Background and Specific Aims:
Study Design: We will use the ICISS system's capacity for prospective and ongoing collection of data from enrolled patients and their families to conduct our prospective, longitudinal study consisting of a baseline assessment at enrollment into ICISS, a one-month re-test assessment, and a follow-up assessment at either 3 months for patients who were newly-diagnosed with ADHD or had a change in medication, or 6 months for patients with an established diagnosis and no medication changes.
Recruitment and Consent: Once a patient has enrolled in ICISS, they will be asked if they wish to participate in the modified Vanderbilt validation study, initially by phone call. Some patients and/or their parents will want to discuss this in person or may not be reached by phone call, in which case the research assistant will meet with them at the clinic visit. This will take place in a quiet, confidential space.
However, with adolescents it is typical that the parent is not present at the clinic visit. The Vanderbilt validation study will then be discussed with the parent verbally by phone and consent will be implicit in answering the two Conners questionnaires when sent online. Interested and eligible patients will be reminded in this email that participation in this research study is completely voluntary, that a decision not to participate will not affect their medical care in any way and that they may withdraw from the study at any time.
As participation in this study consists simply of answering two Conners questionnaires which represent the standard of care for ADHD both nationally and in our clinics, presents virtually no risk to the participant above the minimal risks associated with the general ICISS study, and the parent, participant and teacher all have the option to simply not respond to the email requesting Conners completion for this study.
Data Collection and Measures: The increase in effort to collect the additional data needed for our study will be small as most of these measures are already being collected as part of the larger ICISS implementation. The added time for each participant to complete the Conners measures is marginal, on the order of 30 minutes total over a few interactions. After enrollment into ICISS, all eligible patients aged 13-21 years will be asked to complete the baseline youth self-report Vanderbilt-Long Form questionnaire and their parents the Parent version. In addition, patients 13-18 years will have teachers complete the Teacher version. All Long-Form versions include 18 items assessing the frequency (using a response scale of 0=Never, 1=Occasionally, 2=Often, 3=Very often) of symptoms and behaviors indicative of the predominant subtype of ADHD (Inattentive, Hyperactive/Impulsive, or Combined). Additionally, all three versions screen for Anxiety/Depression (7 items) and Oppositional-Defiant Disorder (8 items), disorders that often co-occur with ADHD. Lastly, only the Parent and Teacher versions include items assessing Conduct Disorder and School Performance (e.g., academic performance, peer relations, classroom behavior, and assignment completion). To assess test-retest reliability, we will again administer the Long-Forms at one-month follow-up. However, for subsequent follow-ups (i.e., 3- or 6-months), we will administer the Short-Form for all three Vanderbilt measures, which is the Long-Form but with the omission of Anxiety/Depression and Oppositional-Defiant disorder items. We will also collect the following data to address each of our study aims:
Aim 1: Feasibility and Acceptability: We will record patient, parent, and teacher response and completion rates for each Vanderbilt administration. We will also measure the length of time it takes for them to complete the Long Form (administered at baseline and one-month follow-up) and Short Form (administered monthly thereafter), and provide comment fields so that they can describe any difficulties they may have had in answering any of the questions.
Aim 2: Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability: All patients, parents, and teachers will again receive their respective Long-Form version of the Vanderbilt at one-month follow-up. As part of the ICISS system, they will receive an email prompting them to complete the forms and submit them electronically to ICISS where they will be made available to the team and the patient's clinician. We will examine test-retest only for those patients who had no new medications or changes in their medications and stable symptoms during the intervening month. We will use the following two items to identify these patients: 1) "Since your/your child's last medical appointment in the Adolescent Practice, have there been any changes in your/his/her ADHD-related medications or therapies?" (Yes, No, I/My child do/does not receive ADHD-related medications or therapies); and 2) "In general, how would you describe your/your child's ADHD symptoms since your/his/her last medical appointment in the Adolescent Practice?" (They have improved, They have stayed about the same, They have gotten worse). We will only include patients for whom both the parent and patient reports indicate no changes in symptoms or medications/therapies. We will examine both item-level retest agreement as well as reliability of the overall screening outcome within each Vanderbilt domain (e.g., whether criteria are met for ADHD [and the predominant subtype], Oppositional-Defiant Disorder, Anxiety/Depression, etc.).
We will also examine, when data are available, the level of "inter-rater" agreement, at the domain level, across screening results obtained from youth, parent, and teacher forms.
Aim 3: Concurrent and Known-Groups Validity: For patients ages 13-18 years, we will administer concurrent with the Vanderbilt at all assessment time points (see Study Design), the Conners 3rd Edition Self Report Scale - Short Form (39 items); the Parent Rating Scale (43 items); and the Teacher Rating Scale (39 items). For patients ages 19-21 yrs, we will administer the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale Self-Report - Screening Version (30 items), and ask parents to complete the corresponding Observer Report - Screening Version (30 items) (Erhardt et al, 1999; Van Voorhees et al., 2011). We opted to use the adult ADHD rating scales for patients aged 19 years or older since the Conners 3rd Edition measures have only been validated up to age 18 years. We also opted to drop the teacher-based assessment for patients older than 18 years due to concern that many teachers would be unable to assess participants given minimal personal interaction in most college classes and the participant's possible desire to keep ADHD diagnosis private. To test the ability of the Vanderbilt scores to differentiate adolescents who are expected to differ (known-groups validity), we will administer 1) a modified version of the Clinical Global Impression Scale [CGIS], a single-item measure of adolescent global functioning (Busner \& Targum, 2007) that parents and youth both complete; 2) among patients 13-18 years, the PedsQL-Family Impact Module (Varni et al., 2004) a 36-item parent-report measure of the impact a child's health condition is having on parent/family quality of life; and among patients 19-21 years, the 29-item Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) (Matza et al., 2007). We will use these quality of life and functioning measures to categorize youth into low, medium, and high symptom-severity groups, and assess the ability of the Vanderbilt measures to discriminate these groups. Finally, we will identify those patients who experience a change in their scores on the validation measures (Conners, CGIS, PedsQL-Family Impact Module) over the follow-up period (3 months for newly-diagnosed or medication-change patients, 6 months for established/no-medication-change patients) and assess the Vanderbilt's ability to detect that change.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No treatment | – | –This is a psychometric study of a screening tool for ADHD, so we will not be administering any treatments or interventions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Boston Children's Hospital patients which will be recruited from the following divisions: Adolescent/Young Adult Practice, Developmental Medicine Center and Department of Psychiatry.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients ages 13-21 who already have an ADHD diagnosis or are being evaluated for ADHD.
- Parent/guardian will be asked to participate for patients ages 13-21.
- Teachers will be asked to participate for patients ages 13-21.
- All informants should be able to read and understand English at a 5th grade reading level; and enrolled in the ICISS system.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Cognitive impairment or developmental delay.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Reliability of the Vanderbilt
Time frame: One month after initial administration of Vanderbilt
We will assess for each measure the level of internal consistency reliability, temporal stability of responses over a one-month test-retest, and inter-rater agreement across all informants (parents, teachers, and youths).
1 secondary outcome
Validity of Vanderbilt
Time frame: One month after initial administration of Conners
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 11876664Barbaresi WJ, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Pankratz VS, Weaver AL, Weber KJ, Mrazek DA, Jacobsen SJ. How common is attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Incidence in a population-based birth cohort in Rochester, Minn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Mar;156(3):217-24. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.3.217.
- Background: PubMed 23363972Bard DE, Wolraich ML, Neas B, Doffing M, Beck L. The psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnostic parent rating scale in a community population. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Feb;34(2):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31827a3a22.
- Background: PubMed 20526405Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
- Background: PubMed 9468109Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker JD, Sitarenios G, Diamond JM, Powell JW. A new self-report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: factor structure, reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Dec;25(6):487-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1022637815797.
- BackgroundErhardt, D., Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Parker, J. D., Sitarenios, G. (1999, October). Self-ratings of ADHD symptoms in adults II: reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3 (3), 153-158
- Background: PubMed 15520087Klassen AF, Miller A, Fine S. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
- Background: PubMed 17874207Matza LS, Johnston JA, Faries DE, Malley KG, Brod M. Responsiveness of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life Scale (AAQoL). Qual Life Res. 2007 Nov;16(9):1511-20. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9254-9. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 20424007Van Voorhees EE, Hardy KK, Kollins SH. Reliability and validity of self- and other-ratings of symptoms of ADHD in adults. J Atten Disord. 2011 Apr;15(3):224-34. doi: 10.1177/1087054709356163. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 17201923Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Parent proxy-report of their children's health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents' reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 3;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-2.
- Background: PubMed 23363973Wolraich ML, Bard DE, Neas B, Doffing M, Beck L. The psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnostic teacher rating scale in a community population. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Feb;34(2):83-93. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31827d55c3.
- Background: PubMed 14602846Wolraich ML, Lambert W, Doffing MA, Bickman L, Simmons T, Worley K. Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003 Dec;28(8):559-67. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for ADHD
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Solriamfetol in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
ADHD
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Recruiting
Micronutrient Supplementation and Chronotherapy in Children With ADHD
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Forward Treatment of Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Using Solriamfetol (FOCUS-2)
ADHD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joshua Borus, MD,MPH principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ADHD, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reliability of the Vanderbilt (time frame: One month after initial administration of Vanderbilt). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01964209, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2023.