AstigmatismNCT01965288
Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism
A study testing comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Astigmatism
- What is being tested?
- comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to May 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
- Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
- Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
Who cannot join
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
- Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
- Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
- Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
Show all 21Show fewer
- Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
- Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
- Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
- Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
Valencia
About this study
Official title: A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear.
Read the detailed description
Single masked, open label, randomized, bilateral, crossover study design comparing comfilcon A against lotrafilcon B lenses over 1 month of daily wear for each study lens. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
- Conditions
- Astigmatism
- Being tested
- comfilcon A, lotrafilcon B
- Medical subject headings
- Astigmatism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
comfilcon ADevice
Also called Biofinity Toric
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
lotrafilcon BDevice
Also called Air Optix
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| comfilcon A | Experimental | Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period. Receives: Device: comfilcon A; Device: lotrafilcon B |
| lotrafilcon B | Active comparator | Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period. Receives: Device: comfilcon A; Device: lotrafilcon B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Measured: Baseline
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Measured: Baseline
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Measured: Baseline
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Measured: Baseline
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Measured: Baseline
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Measured: Baseline
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: Baseline
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
Measured: Dispense
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
Measured: Dispense
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Measured: Dispense
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Measured: Dispense
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Measured: Dispense
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
Measured: Dispense
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Measured: Dispense
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Measured: Dispense
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Measured: Dispense
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Measured: Dispense
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Measured: Dispense
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
Measured: Dispense
Lens Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)
Measured: Dispense
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Measured: Dispense
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Measured: Dispense
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Measured: 2 weeks
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Measured: 2 Weeks
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Measured: 4 Weeks
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Measured: 2 weeks
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Measured: 4 weeks
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Measured: 2 weeks
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Measured: 4 weeks
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Measured: 2 weeks
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Measured: 4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Measured: 2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Measured: 4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Measured: 2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Measured: 4 weeks
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 2 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Measured: 4 weeks
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Measured: 2 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Measured: 4 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Measured: 2 Weeks
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Measured: 4 Weeks
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Measured: 2 Weeks
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Measured: 4 Weeks
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Measured: 4 weeks
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Measured: 2 weeks
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lens Surface Deposits
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Surface Deposits
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Measured: 4 weeks
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Measured: 2 weeks
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Measured: 4 weeks
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Measured: 2 weeks
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Measured: 4 weeks
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Measured: 2 weeks
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Measured: 2 weeks
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Measured: 4 weeks
Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Measured: 2 weeks
Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Measured: 4 weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Measured: 2 weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (28)
Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Corneal Neovascularization
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: Baseline
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 2 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Measured: 2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Measured: 2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Measured: 4 weeks
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at end of study. (Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)
Measured: 8 weeks
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at study end. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Measured: 8 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)
Measured: 8 weeks
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AstigmatismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CooperVision, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD, Principal investigator, Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01965288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EX-MKTG-42
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01965288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EX-MKTG-42
- Conditions
- Astigmatism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CooperVision, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Nov 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear.
Detailed description
Single masked, open label, randomized, bilateral, crossover study design comparing comfilcon A against lotrafilcon B lenses over 1 month of daily wear for each study lens. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| comfilcon A | Experimental | Device: comfilcon A, Device: lotrafilcon BEach subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period. |
| lotrafilcon B | Active comparator | Device: comfilcon A, Device: lotrafilcon BEach subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
- Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
- Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
- Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
- Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| comfilcon AAlso: Biofinity Torictest lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B) | Device | comfilcon A, lotrafilcon B |
| lotrafilcon BAlso: Air Optixtest lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B) | Device | comfilcon A, lotrafilcon B |
Primary outcome
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Comfort Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time frame: Dispense
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time frame: Dispense
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Time frame: Dispense
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Time frame: Dispense
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Centration
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
Corneal Coverage
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Post Blink Movement
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Lens Marking Visibility
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Stability on Blink
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
Lens Overall Stability
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time frame: 2 Weeks
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Comfort Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Comfort Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Time frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Visual Acuity logMAR
Time frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Lens Surface Deposits
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Lens Surface Deposits
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Centration
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Centration
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Corneal Coverage
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Corneal Coverage
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Post Blink Movement
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Post Blink Movement
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Lens Marking Visibility
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Marking Visibility
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Stability on Blink
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability on Blink
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Overall Stability
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Overall Stability
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time frame: 2 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
28 secondary outcomes
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time frame: Baseline
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time frame: 2 weeks
Limbal Hyperaemia
Time frame: 4 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time frame: Baseline
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time frame: 2 weeks
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Time frame: 4 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time frame: Baseline
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time frame: 2 weeks
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Time frame: 4 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time frame: Baseline
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time frame: 2 weeks
Corneal Stromal Haze
Time frame: 4 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Time frame: Baseline
Corneal Neovascularization
Time frame: 2 weeks
Corneal Neovascularization
Time frame: 4 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Time frame: Baseline
Corneal Infiltrates
Time frame: 2 weeks
Corneal Infiltrates
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Time frame: 8 weeks
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Time frame: 8 weeks
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Astigmatism
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance and Outcomes After Toric Lens Transition
Astigmatism
Not yet recruiting
The EYERISING Study
Myopia, Astigmatism
Active, not recruiting
P1 Toric Vs. Max 1day
Eye, Astigmatism
Recruiting
Evaluation of Two Monthly Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Toric in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Astigmatism, Myopia
Recruiting
Clareon TruPlus Study
Aphakia, Astigmatism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD principal investigator
Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 81 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2020.