AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraventricular HaemorrhageNCT01976013

Prediction of Major Bleeding in ELBW-infants (<1000g) by Sequential Coagulation Monitoring

A study testing Coaguchek in people with Intraventricular Haemorrhage and Pulmonary Haemorrhage, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Up to now, only data about early and single coagulation screening exist in extreme low birth weight infants (ELBW) infants. In neonatal practice, coagulation abnormality in preterm babies is primarily investigated by measuring prothrombin time (PT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 minutes to 7 days
What is being tested?
Coaguchek
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Oct 2013to Feb 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 minutes to 7 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm infants with a birth weight <1000g
  • signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Congenital heart disease
  • major congenital birth defects

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Prediction of Major Bleeding in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants (<1000g) by Sequential Coagulation Monitoring

Up to now, only data about early and single coagulation screening exist in extreme low birth weight infants (ELBW) infants. In neonatal practice, coagulation abnormality in preterm babies is primarily investigated by measuring prothrombin time (PT). In fact, FVII activity, which is an important determinant of PT, is strongly associated with bleeding risk. Thus, a method to measure PT with small volume samples (10μL) provides the possibility for serial monitoring even in ELBW infants (CoaguChek®XS, Roche Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria)). Substitution of fesh frozen plasma seemed beneficial in ELBW infants and first trials with rFVII revealed promising results in this patient population. Thus, coagulation monitoring might lead to early and adequate therapy and therefore to a better outcome. The investigators hypothesize that ELBW infants (<1000g birth weight) with primary severe prolongation of prothrombin time or development of severe prothrombin prolongation during sequential monitoring may have more frequent and more severe bleeding incidents (Intraventricular haemorrhage and pulmonary haemorrhage). The investigators aim to explore whether monitoring of PT can predict bleeding events in ELBW children.

Read the detailed description

It was recently reported that "early", i.e. in the first 48h of life, coagulation screening may identify infants at risk of severe IVH. Unfortunately, in the past screening for coagulation abnormalities and correction of haemostatic defects by prothrombin complex concentrate, cryoprecipitate or platelet concentrates) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) had limited effects in preterm infants. This could have been due to the short duration of action, incomplete restoration of coagulation or the water and osmotic load associated with FFP administration. However recently, using a coagulopathy screening strategy (one blood sample within the first 2h after birth) and substitution with FFP decreased the risk of developing IVH in infants born at 23 to 26 weeks of gestation. Recombinant Factor VII (rFVII) provides a new therapeutic option to overcome FFP associated side effects. Small trials, including infants with pulmonary hemorrhage, showed the safety and effectiveness of rFVII in VLBW infants; however no randomised controlled trials have been published so far. As outlined above, bleeding complications are still a major problem in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants and coagulation abnormalities are associated with bleeding. Up to now, only data about early and single screening exist and coagulation monitoring with multiple blood sampling was not applied.

In neonatal practice, coagulation abnormality in preterm babies is primarily investigated by measuring prothrombin time (PT). In fact, FVII activity, which is an important determinant of PT, is strongly associated with bleeding risk. Thus, a method to measure PT with small volume samples (10μL) provides the possibility for serial monitoring even in ELBW infants.

Substitution of FFP seemed beneficial in ELBW infants and first trials with rFVII revealed promising results in this patient population. Thus, coagulation monitoring might lead to early and adequate therapy and therefore to better outcome.

Being tested
Coaguchek
Keywords
PT, INR, intraventricular haemorrhage, pulmonary haemorrhage, ELBW infants

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CoaguchekDevice

    The investigators plan to draw 10μL blood (i.e. approximately 1/5000 of the blood volume of an ELBW infant) within the scope of routine blood sampling. Thus, the number of blood samples will be variable. A cumulative sample volume for the whole study period will not exceed 300μL.

Study groups in NCT01976013
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CoaguchekOtherinfants will receive sequential coagulation checks
Receives: Device: Coaguchek

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. major bleeding

    pulmonary bleeding, intraventricular hemorrhage

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. mortality

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01976013
Sponsor's protocol ID
MUV-Coagu
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
29 Oct 2013
Last updated
5 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Coaguchek in people with Intraventricular Haemorrhage and Pulmonary Haemorrhage, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

major bleeding (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in