AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasal ObstructionNCT01976039

Rhinopharyngeal Retrograde Clearance is Effective to Adequate Upper Airways Function in Adults

A study testing rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC) in people with Nasal Obstruction and Exposure to Pollution, run by University of Sao Paulo at 2 sites in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Professionals working in polluted areas may present increased clinical airways symptoms and dysfunction. Rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC) has been used to improve mucus clearance in infants with bronchitis and bronchiolitis, and instillation the nasal cavity with saline has been used to reduce nasal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nasal Obstruction, Exposure to Pollution
What is being tested?
rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
2 sitesBrazil
Study dates
Jul 2012to Aug 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Professional motorcyclists aged 18 years to 45 years
  • Minimum of one year in that occupation
  • Agreement with the written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Smokers
  • Inability to understand and to follow commands
  • Previous nasal surgery
  • Respiratory infection in the previous 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Brazil2 sites
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

    Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901

  • Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, 1246-903

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness of Rhinopharyngeal Retrograde Clearance on the Upper Airways Symptomatology and Function in Adults

Professionals working in polluted areas may present increased clinical airways symptoms and dysfunction. Rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC) has been used to improve mucus clearance in infants with bronchitis and bronchiolitis, and instillation the nasal cavity with saline has been used to reduce nasal inflammation in rhinitis and sinusopathies. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of RRC and RCC combined with saline (RRC+S) on nasal mucociliary clearance (MCC), mucus surface property, cellularity and airways symptoms in professional motorcyclists.

Read the detailed description

Male motorcyclists (mean age 36 years) were recruited and randomly assigned to RRC or RRC+S. Subjects were assessed at baseline and 15 days after interventions for saccharin test, mucus contact angle, cellularity in nasal lavage and airways symptoms with the use of SNOT-20 questionnaire. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures with Bonferroni´s correction. A passive monitoring-system of nitrogen dioxide was used to assess the individual air pollution exposure along the study period. The association between nitrogen dioxide and the airways outcomes was analyzed by Spearman correlation test.

Being tested
rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC)
Keywords
motorcyclist, nasal mucociliary clearance, physical therapy
Medical subject headings
Nasal Obstruction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC)Other

    Also called RCC+S

    The rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance is a respiratory physical therapy technique that uses a forced inspiratory maneuver to clear the nasopharynx with the aid of saline instillation

Study groups in NCT01976039
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RRCOtherrhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC) isolated: First patient sits in a chair. Second: patient inhales air deeply and exhales making noise and vibration in the upper airway to facilitate swalling. Third patients finishes with another deep inhalation. This technique is new, simple to use and with no cost. No need of any material or equipment.
Receives: Other: rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC)
RRC+SExperimentalretrograde rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance combined with saline instillation (RRC+S): patient sits in a chair and inhaled air and make noise and vibrate the upper airway at the same instills saline into the nare to facilitate nose washing and swalling. This technique is new, simple to use and with low cost (only saline).
Receives: Other: rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Saccharine transit time test (STT)

    To measure nasal mucociliary clearance. Subjects were asked to report the first perception of a sweet taste after 25 mg of saccharine powder was deposited in the free airflow nostril.

    Measured: 15 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. mucus surface property

    The contact angle of nasal mucus was measured.

    Measured: 15 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01976039
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEP-FMUSP 211-11
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
29 Oct 2013
Last updated
19 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Gomes EL, Postiaux G, Medeiros DR, Monteiro KK, Sampaio LM, Costa D. Chest physical therapy is effective in reducing the clinical score in bronchiolitis: randomized controlled trial. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012 Jun;16(3):241-7. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000018. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

    PubMed 22499404
  • Proenca de Oliveira-Maul J, Barbosa de Carvalho H, Goto DM, Maia RM, Flo C, Barnabe V, Franco DR, Benabou S, Perracini MR, Jacob-Filho W, Saldiva PHN, Lorenzi-Filho G, Rubin BK, Nakagawa NK. Aging, diabetes, and hypertension are associated with decreased nasal mucociliary clearance. Chest. 2013 Apr;143(4):1091-1097. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1183.

    PubMed 23100111
  • Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jan;126(1):41-7. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.121022.

    PubMed 11821764
  • Belda J, Parameswaran K, Keith PK, Hargreave FE. Repeatability and validity of cell and fluid-phase measurements in nasal fluid: a comparison of two methods of nasal lavage. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Jul;31(7):1111-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01133.x.

    PubMed 11468003
  • Nakagawa NK, Franchini ML, Driusso P, de Oliveira LR, Saldiva PH, Lorenzi-Filho G. Mucociliary clearance is impaired in acutely ill patients. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2772-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2772.

    PubMed 16236954
  • Cancado JE, Braga A, Pereira LA, Arbex MA, Saldiva PH, Santos Ude P. [Clinical repercussions of exposure to atmospheric pollution]. J Bras Pneumol. 2006;32 Suppl 2:S5-11. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132006000800003. Portuguese.

    PubMed 17273599
  • Brant TC, Yoshida CT, Carvalho Tde S, Nicola ML, Martins JA, Braga LM, Oliveira RC, Leyton V, Andre CS, Saldiva PH, Rubin BK, Nakagawa NK. Mucociliary clearance, airway inflammation and nasal symptoms in urban motorcyclists. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(12):867-70. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(12)13.

    PubMed 25628001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing rhinopharyngeal retrograde clearance (RRC) in people with Nasal Obstruction and Exposure to Pollution, run by University of Sao Paulo at 2 sites in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Saccharine transit time test (STT) (time frame: 15 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01976039, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in