Sepsis at Intensive Care UnitNCT01981993
Validation of a Urinary Biomarker as Diagnostic Tool for AKI in Sepsis
An observational study of Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis is key to further our understanding this disease and in the evaluation of new interventions for this condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit
- What is being tested?
- Urinary proteomic analysis
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 4 Jun 2009to 27 Mar 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis
Who may be able to join
- sepsis at ICU
Who cannot join
- na
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Value of a Urinary Biomarker Set Obtained by a Proteomics Approach to Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Prognosis in Sepsis Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND:
Early diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis is key to further our understanding this disease and in the evaluation of new interventions for this condition. Many urinary biomarkers have been proposed, but no single one seems to consistently provide additional information on top of clinical and routine biochemical parameters. Some authors have proposed to use a panel of urinary biomarkers to increase the accuracy However, this approach has so far not been tested in a large group of patients with sepsis. In addition, newer and more performant analytical techniques have been developed that warrant testing in the clinical field.
Read more
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
At least 150 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis will be included. After bladder catheterisation, urinary samples will be collected at time points 0, 4 hours and 24 hours after admission, and further daily on day 1-5. Samples will be immediately centrifuged and frozen at -80°C until analysis. Samples will be extracted by removing larger proteins (>20kDa) and de-salting step prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Investigators will use capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) to assess urinary peptides predictive of AKI: 20 peptides constituting the AKI marker pattern previously established from a cohort of ICU patients. Simultaneously, samples will be analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), an alternative platform to CE-MS, which is currently being developed for routine ICU use. A proof of concept of the technique involved has been successfully applied to a set of urine samples from patients diagnosed with diabetes presenting normoalbuminuria (controls) and macroalbuminuria (cases).
Clinical, demographic and biochemical data of patients will be collected during the first 5 days.
PATIENT OUTCOME
- in the short term:
- development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
- death
- need for renal replacement therapy during ICU stay
- on the longer term
- death
- need for renal replacement therapy
- estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Using cut-offs , Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.
In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, investigators will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.
- Conditions
- Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit
- Being tested
- Urinary proteomic analysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Urinary proteomic analysisBiological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients at ICU with sepsis | Not described Receives: Biological: Urinary proteomic analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
Measured: at 3 months after inclusion
Secondary outcomes (3)
change in need for renal replacement therapy
Measured: at 3 months - 1 year and 2 year after inclusion
change in estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD
Measured: at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
death
Using cut-offs determined by Metzger(1) et al, Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.
In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, we will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.
Measured: 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study start4 Jun 2009
- Primary completion27 Mar 2011
- Study completion27 Mar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sepsis at Intensive Care UnitStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01981993
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009/048
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 3 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Value of a Urinary Biomarker Set Obtained by a Proteomics Approach to Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Prognosis in Sepsis Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01981993
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2009/048
- Conditions
- Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jun 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BACKGROUND:
Early diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis is key to further our understanding this disease and in the evaluation of new interventions for this condition. Many urinary biomarkers have been proposed, but no single one seems to consistently provide additional information on top of clinical and routine biochemical parameters. Some authors have proposed to use a panel of urinary biomarkers to increase the accuracy However, this approach has so far not been tested in a large group of patients with sepsis. In addition, newer and more performant analytical techniques have been developed that warrant testing in the clinical field.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
At least 150 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis will be included. After bladder catheterisation, urinary samples will be collected at time points 0, 4 hours and 24 hours after admission, and further daily on day 1-5. Samples will be immediately centrifuged and frozen at -80°C until analysis. Samples will be extracted by removing larger proteins (>20kDa) and de-salting step prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Investigators will use capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) to assess urinary peptides predictive of AKI: 20 peptides constituting the AKI marker pattern previously established from a cohort of ICU patients. Simultaneously, samples will be analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), an alternative platform to CE-MS, which is currently being developed for routine ICU use. A proof of concept of the technique involved has been successfully applied to a set of urine samples from patients diagnosed with diabetes presenting normoalbuminuria (controls) and macroalbuminuria (cases).
Clinical, demographic and biochemical data of patients will be collected during the first 5 days.
PATIENT OUTCOME
- in the short term:
- development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
- death
- need for renal replacement therapy during ICU stay
- on the longer term
- death
- need for renal replacement therapy
- estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Using cut-offs , Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.
In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, investigators will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients at ICU with sepsis | – | Biological: Urinary proteomic analysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- sepsis at ICU
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- na
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary proteomic analysis | Biological | patients at ICU with sepsis |
Primary outcome
development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
Time frame: at 3 months after inclusion
3 secondary outcomes
change in need for renal replacement therapy
Time frame: at 3 months - 1 year and 2 year after inclusion
change in estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD
Time frame: at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
death
Time frame: 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2023.
Related trials for Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit
Not yet recruitingObservational study
EEG Changes and Cognitive Profiles in Sepsis Patients With Different Inflammatory Phenotypes
Sepsis, Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Adjunctive Fludrocortisone in Septic Shock
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Not yet recruiting
Written Sepsis Education for Patients
Sepsis, Sepsis and Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hemodynamic Venous Congestion Ultrasound (VExUS) by ICU Nurses in Sepsis Patients.
Sepsis, Sepsis and Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Transposable Elements in Septic Immune Aging
Sepsis, Sepsis and Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria (time frame: at 3 months after inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2023.