AzTrials
AzTrials

Colon PolypsNCT01986699

Laparascopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy

An observational study of Colon Polyps, run by Stony Brook University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study Objective: To compare the hospital costs between the standard surgical procedure and the Laparascopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy (LACP) technique for patients with advanced polyps in the colon. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Colon Polyps
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2010to Oct 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: GI clinic

Who may be able to join

  • Polyp spanning 2 or more colonic folds
  • Polyp > 20mm
  • Polyp spanning greater than 50% of the colonic circumference
  • Positive "lift sign" following submucosal injection of saline beneath the polyp
  • Difficult location or position of the polyp, thus preventing assurance of complete endoscopic resection.

Who cannot join

  • Polyps with histological evidence of adenocarcinoma
  • Polyps in the rectum (<15cm from anal verge)
  • Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • Patients with known familiar adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome
  • Polyps without known histology (i.e. not previously biopsied)
  • Polyps with large ulcerations, or those that demonstrate a "non-lift sign" during submucosal injection at the time of colonoscopy; as these are indicators of adenocarcinoma .
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Severe cardio-pulmonary disease, or irreversible coagulopathy, preventing abdominal surgery at an acceptable risk.
  • POSSUM predicted mortality score greater than 2%
  • Inability to obtain informed consent
  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Pregnant patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stony Brook Medicine

    Stony Brook, New York, 11794

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial-Laparoscopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy

Study Objective: To compare the hospital costs between the standard surgical procedure and the Laparascopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy (LACP) technique for patients with advanced polyps in the colon.

Read the detailed description

All patients being referred for possible LACP to the Division of Colorectal Surgery at Stony Brook University Medical Center will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion using a computer generated system to undergo either partial colectomy (performed by means of laparoscopy when possible), or LACP for the treatment of advanced polyp(s). Our research assistant will be present in the operating room to record the data.Patients will then undergo standard clinical management while hospitalized at Stony Brook according to the procedure performed.

Conditions
Colon Polyps
Being tested
Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Keywords
polypectomy, laparoscopic
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic Assisted PolypectomyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01986699
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard TherapyPatients are treated as per current standard of care
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy
Laparoscopic Assisted PolypectomyPatients treated with Laparoscopic Assisted Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Assisted Polypectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. hospital cost

    To compare the hospital costs between the standard surgical procedure and the LACP technique for patients with advanced polyps in the colon.

    Measured: 1-3 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. complication rates

    to compare complication rates between both techniques including intra-operative polypectomy related perforaton, polypectomy-related bleeding unable to be stopped endoscopically, post operative wound infection, ileus and anastomic leak.

    Measured: 1-3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01986699
Sponsor's protocol ID
144467
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
29 Oct 2013
Last updated
12 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colon Polyps, run by Stony Brook University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

hospital cost (time frame: 1-3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in