Peripheral Arterial DiseaseBATTLENCT02004951
BATTLE Trial: Bare Metal Stent Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in the Setting of Primary Stenting of Intermediate Length Femoropopliteal Lesions
A study testing Misago RX and Zilver PTX in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Femoropopliteal Lesions, run by Nantes University Hospital at 11 sites in France.
Trial summary
Over the past years, endovascular interventions have become an important part of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease.1 Indication for endovascular repair of femoropopliteal lesions has been considerably enlarged as shown in the TASC classification.1 Enlargement of endovascular therapy indication was… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Femoropopliteal Lesions
- What is being tested?
- Misago RX and Zilver PTX
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 186 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2014to 7 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient ≥18 years
- Patient has a history of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford classification: 2-5)
- Lesion is eligible for treatment with a maximum of 2 stents per lesion (treatment of both legs is not permitted)
- Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions (and only for swiss centers, has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure)
- Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site
Show all 11Show fewer
- Reference vessel diameter 4 to 7-mm determined by CT scan (RVD obtained from averaging 5-mm segments proximal and distal to the lesions)
- Target lesion has a pre-procedure percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% DS
- De novo atherosclerotic lesions (stenosis and/or occlusion) of the superficial femoral artery, the proximal popliteal artery (P1), or both. The treatment area in the SFA and popliteal artery extended from 1 cm below the origin of the profunda femoris artery to 3 cm above the proximal margin of the intercondylar fossa of the femur.
- Target lesion (single or multiple) has a maximal total length =14-cm and a minimal length = 2-cm
- At least 1 patent runoff vessel (<50% DS throughout its course). The inflow artery(ies) cannot be treated using a drug eluting stent or drug coated balloon.
Who cannot join
- Asymptomatic lesion
- Restenosis
- No atheromatous disease
- Untreated >50% DS of the inflow tract
- Resting ankle brachial index (ABI) unavailable
- Female of child bearing potential
Show all 22Show fewer
- Patient has received, or is on the waiting list for a major organ transplant
- Patient has a history of coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions
- Patient is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 1 year prior to or after the procedure
- Severe concomitant disease with life expectation < one year
- Known allergy to paclitaxel
- Contraindication to Aspirin or Clopidogrel and Ticlopidin (the patient must be able to receive Dual Anti-Platelet Treatment for 2 months after the procedure)
- Patient has an infected wound or osteomyelitis on the ipsilateral extremity or foot.
- Patient has had prior major amputation to the ipsilateral (target) extremity
- Patient is not able to give informed consent (and only for swiss centers)
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have become commercially available since then, are not considered investigational trials
- Patient has previously had, or requires, bypass surgery, endarterectomy or other vascular surgery on any vessel of the ipsilateral extremity
- In the Investigator's opinion patient has (a) co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, compliance with follow-up requirements or impact the scientific integrity of the study
- Target lesion lies within or adjacent to an aneurysm
- Patient with an allergy to contrast agent
- Patient with a severe allergy to metal
- Surgery or endovascular intervention of the target member within 14 days preceding the BATTLE procedure
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
France11 sites
Clinique d'Antony
Antony
CHU de Besançon
Besançon
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux
Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot Bourgoin Jallieu
Bourgoin, 38302
CHU de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil
CHU de Lyon
Lyon
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44000
Clinique Ollioules
Ollioules
CHU de Rennes
Rennes
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse
About this study
Over the past years, endovascular interventions have become an important part of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease.1 Indication for endovascular repair of femoropopliteal lesions has been considerably enlarged as shown in the TASC classification.1 Enlargement of endovascular therapy indication was based on patient choice for a less invasive technique and evidence based medicine. Consequently, TASC classification of lesions has been modified to reflect increased evidence for endovascular treatment of more extensive femoropopliteal lesions, and indication for endovascular repair has been enlarged to more severe TASC types. In summary, endovascular treatment is indicated for TASC A and B lesions which correspond to femoropopliteal lesions ≤15-cm. To treat these lesions, the interventionalists have at their disposal a huge tool box. Evaluation of these tools is crucial to determine the right treatment strategy to avoid further reinterventions and overcosts.
The objective of the BATTLE trial is to compare a bare metal self expandable nitinol stent (Misago RX) versus a paclitaxel eluting stent (Zilver PTX) in the treatment of above-the-knee intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions.
From hospitals in Europe (France, Switzerland) we will randomly assign patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions to be treated either by bare metal stent or paclitaxel eluting stent. In total, 186 patients will be randomized (93 per group).
- Being tested
- Misago RX, Zilver PTX
- Keywords
- Superficial femoral artery, paclitaxel, stent, self expandable, restenosis, endovascular, above-the-knee intermediate length
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Misago RXDevice
Also called Treatment of above-the-knee intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions
Zilver PTXDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Misago RX (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo | Other | The Misago RX is a peripheral stent (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) indicated to treat iliac and femoropopliteal arteries. The Misago RX is a flexible self-expanding nitinol stent that is delivered via a RX monorail delivery catheter. Receives: Device: Misago RX |
| Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) | Other | Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) is a nitinol stent with a polymer-free paclitaxel coating designed to treat the above- the-knee femoropopliteal arteries. The anti-proliferative drug is the paclitaxel, a cytotoxic drug. The Zilver PTX stent is delivered via a over-the-wire system. Receives: Device: Zilver PTX |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom from in-stent restenosis at 1 year
It was defined by restenosis of >50% and by a peak systolic velocity index >2.4 at the target lesion.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (13)
residual diameter stenosis
Technical success defined achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of <30% on the procedural completion angiogram.
Measured: Day 0
Primary sustained clinical improvement
sustained upward shift of _1 category of the Rutherford classification for claudicants and by wound healing and rest pain resolution for patients in CLI, without the need for repeated TLR in surviving patients.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
primary sustained clinical improvement including the need for repeated TLR.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Primary patency
patency without any percutaneous or surgical intervention in the treated segment or in the adjacent areas.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Major adverse events
MACEs including all deaths, major amputation.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Limb salvage
freedom from major ipsilateral amputations
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Death
Death (all cause)
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Ankle brachial index
Ankle brachial index
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Target Extremity Revascularization (TER)
TER is defined as any percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target extremity. The target extremity is defined as the ipsilateral limb arteries proximal and distal to the target lesion, which includes upstream and downstream branches and excludes the target lesion itself.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Target lesion revascularization (TLR)
TLR expresses the frequency of the need for repeated procedures (endovascular or surgical) due to a problem arising from the stent (1 cm proximally and distally to include edge phenomena) in surviving patients with preserved limb.
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Stent fracture
Stent fractures were assessed by biplane x-rays
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
EQ-5D-3L questionnaire
Quality of life - EQ-5D-3L questionnaire EQ-5D-3L = European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions and 3 Lines Scale from 0 to 100. 0 =Worst imaginable state of health 100= Best imaginable state of health
Measured: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Economic analysis objective
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on quality of life for CUA and on freedom from in-stent restenosis for CEA
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start25 Mar 2014
- Primary completion31 Aug 2017
- Study completion7 Aug 2020
Why it stopped: Batch recall for Misago Terumo self-expanding peripheral stent systems.(withdrawal from the market)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yann GOUEFFIC, Professor, Study chair, Nantes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02004951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC13_0290
- Acronym
- BATTLE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Goueffic Y, Kaladji A, Guyomarch B, Montagne C, Fairier D, Gestin S, Riche VP, Vent PA, Chaillou P, Costargent A, Patra P. Bare metal stent versus paclitaxel eluting stent for intermediate length femoropopliteal arterial lesions (BATTLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 30;15:423. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-423.
PubMed 25359394
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BATTLE Trial: Bare Metal Stent Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in the Setting of Primary Stenting of Intermediate Length Femoropopliteal Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02004951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BATTLE / RC13_0290
- Keywords
- Superficial femoral artery, paclitaxel, stent, self expandable, restenosis, endovascular, above-the-knee intermediate length
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Batch recall for Misago Terumo self-expanding peripheral stent systems.(withdrawal from the market)
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Over the past years, endovascular interventions have become an important part of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease.1 Indication for endovascular repair of femoropopliteal lesions has been considerably enlarged as shown in the TASC classification.1 Enlargement of endovascular therapy indication was based on patient choice for a less invasive technique and evidence based medicine. Consequently, TASC classification of lesions has been modified to reflect increased evidence for endovascular treatment of more extensive femoropopliteal lesions, and indication for endovascular repair has been enlarged to more severe TASC types. In summary, endovascular treatment is indicated for TASC A and B lesions which correspond to femoropopliteal lesions ≤15-cm. To treat these lesions, the interventionalists have at their disposal a huge tool box. Evaluation of these tools is crucial to determine the right treatment strategy to avoid further reinterventions and overcosts.
The objective of the BATTLE trial is to compare a bare metal self expandable nitinol stent (Misago RX) versus a paclitaxel eluting stent (Zilver PTX) in the treatment of above-the-knee intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions.
From hospitals in Europe (France, Switzerland) we will randomly assign patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions to be treated either by bare metal stent or paclitaxel eluting stent. In total, 186 patients will be randomized (93 per group).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Misago RX (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo | Other | Device: Misago RXThe Misago RX is a peripheral stent (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan) indicated to treat iliac and femoropopliteal arteries. The Misago RX is a flexible self-expanding nitinol stent that is delivered via a RX monorail delivery catheter. |
| Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) | Other | Device: Zilver PTXZilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) is a nitinol stent with a polymer-free paclitaxel coating designed to treat the above- the-knee femoropopliteal arteries. The anti-proliferative drug is the paclitaxel, a cytotoxic drug. The Zilver PTX stent is delivered via a over-the-wire system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patient ≥18 years
- Patient has a history of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford classification: 2-5)
- Lesion is eligible for treatment with a maximum of 2 stents per lesion (treatment of both legs is not permitted)
- Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions (and only for swiss centers, has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure)
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Asymptomatic lesion
- Restenosis
- No atheromatous disease
- Untreated >50% DS of the inflow tract
- Resting ankle brachial index (ABI) unavailable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Misago RXAlso: Treatment of above-the-knee intermediate length femoropopliteal lesions | Device | Misago RX (Misago RX, Terumo Corp., Tokyo |
| Zilver PTX | Device | Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) |
Primary outcome
Freedom from in-stent restenosis at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
It was defined by restenosis of >50% and by a peak systolic velocity index >2.4 at the target lesion.
13 secondary outcomes
residual diameter stenosis
Time frame: Day 0
Primary sustained clinical improvement
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Primary patency
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Major adverse events
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Limb salvage
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Death
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Ankle brachial index
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Target Extremity Revascularization (TER)
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Stent fracture
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
EQ-5D-3L questionnaire
Time frame: 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Economic analysis objective
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Batch recall for Misago Terumo self-expanding peripheral stent systems.(withdrawal from the market)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25359394Goueffic Y, Kaladji A, Guyomarch B, Montagne C, Fairier D, Gestin S, Riche VP, Vent PA, Chaillou P, Costargent A, Patra P. Bare metal stent versus paclitaxel eluting stent for intermediate length femoropopliteal arterial lesions (BATTLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 30;15:423. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-423.
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yann GOUEFFIC, Professor study chair
Nantes University Hospital
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Misago RX and Zilver PTX in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Femoropopliteal Lesions, run by Nantes University Hospital at 11 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Batch recall for Misago Terumo self-expanding peripheral stent systems.(withdrawal from the market)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom from in-stent restenosis at 1 year (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02004951, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2021.