MDSPhase 2NCT02016781
Allo vs Hypomethylating/Best Supportive Care in MDS (BMTCTN1102)
A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in people with MDS, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 37 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed as a multicenter trial, with biological assignment to one of two study arms; Arm 1: Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT), Arm 2: Non-Transplant Therapy/Best Supportive Care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- MDS
- What is being tested?
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 384 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Dec 2013to 5 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients fulfilling the following criteria will be eligible for entry into this study:
- Patients with de novo MDS who have, or have previously had, Intermediate-2 or High risk disease as determined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Current Intermediate-2 or High risk disease is NOT a requirement.
- Patients must have an acceptable MDS subtype:
- Refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD) (includes refractory anemia (RA))
- Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS)
- Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-1)
Show all 21Show fewer
- Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-2)
- Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD)
- Myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) (5q-syndrome)
- Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), unclassifiable
- Patients must have fewer than 20% marrow blasts within 60 days of consent.
- Patients may have received prior therapy for the treatment of MDS, including but not limited to: growth factor, transfusion support, immunomodulatory (IMID) therapy, DNA hypomethylating therapy, or cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to enrollment.
- Age 50.0-75.0 years.
- Karnofsky performance status > 70 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 1.
- Patients are eligible if no formal unrelated donor search has been activated prior to date of consent. A formal unrelated donor search begins at the time at which samples are requested from potential National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) donors. Patients who have started a sibling donor search or who have found a matched sibling donor are eligible.
- Patients and physicians must be willing to comply with treatment assignment:
- No intent to proceed with alloHCT using donor sources not specified in this protocol, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched related or unrelated donors (< 6/6 HLA related matched or < 8/8 HLA unrelated matched) or umbilical cord blood unit(s).
- No intent to use myeloablative conditioning regimens.
- Intent to proceed with RIC alloHCT if a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor is identified. There is no requirement as to the timing of the transplantation.
- Patients must be considered to be suitable RIC alloHCT candidates at the time of enrollment based on medical history, physical examination, and available laboratory tests. Specific testing for organ function is not required for eligibility but, if available, these tests should be used to judge eligibility.
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with the following will be ineligible for registration onto this study:
- Therapy-related MDS (defined as the occurrence of MDS due to prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation for malignancy)
- Current or prior diagnosis of AML
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (unacceptable MDS subtypes); uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication and with progression or no clinical improvement) at time of enrollment.
- Patients with prior malignancies, except treated non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative surgery without chemotherapy/radiation therapy > 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative surgery < 5 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the Protocol Officer or one of the Protocol Chairs.
- Prior autologous or allogeneic HCT
Show all 9Show fewer
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
- Patients of childbearing potential unwilling to use contraceptive techniques
- Patients with psychosocial conditions that would prevent study compliance
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 1 country.
37 sites in 1 country
United States37 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Maryland Medical Systems - Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Jewish Hospital BMT Program
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Case Western
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State/Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0277
Baylor College of Medicine/The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Texas/MD Anderson CRC
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Kansas Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-8210
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098
Virginia Commonwealth University MCV Hospitals
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Utah Med School
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Stanford, California, 94305
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33624
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center Biologic Assignment Trial Comparing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant to Hypomethylating Therapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients w/Intermediate-2 & High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (BMTCTN1102)
This study is designed as a multicenter trial, with biological assignment to one of two study arms; Arm 1: Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT), Arm 2: Non-Transplant Therapy/Best Supportive Care.
Read the detailed description
Background: MDS is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic precursors and stem cells, which may evolve to a terminal phase resembling acute leukemia. A subject of clinical urgency for researchers, clinicians, patients, and health care underwriters such as Medicare, is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in the treatment of older patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has extended HCT to the care of older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and lymphoma and a number of retrospective and phase II trials for patients with MDS now show the curative potential of RIC alloHCT in selected patients.
This protocol is designed to evaluate the relative benefits of RIC alloHCT compared to non-transplant therapies focusing on overall survival. This will be done by having patients biologically assigned to the alloHCT arm or the hypomethylating therapy/best supportive care arm and following them for survival at 3 years.
- Conditions
- MDS
- Being tested
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell TransplantProcedure or surgery
Also called RIC alloHCT
Bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant.from a fully matched related (6/6) or unrelated (8/8) donor. The specific transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician but is required to be reduced-intensity.
Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive CareProcedure or surgery
Also called Non-transplant
The specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transplant | Active comparator | Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT) Receives: Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant |
| Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care | Active comparator | The specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician. Receives: Procedure: Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
The primary endpoint for this study is overall survival (OS) at three years post-consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy. The results posted are from the February 2020 interim analysis per protocol study design. Two interim analyses for efficacy were performed previously in January and November 2019 and presented to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Results at the second analysis was crossing the efficacy boundary. Subsequently, the DSMB approved early release of study data as of February 2020.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the FACT-G instrument. FACT-G evaluates the health-related quality of life (HQL) of patients receiving treatment for cancer. FACT-G consists of four subscales developed and normed in cancer patients: Physical Well-being, Social/Family Well-being, Emotional Well-being, and Functional Well-being. The FACT-G score ranges 0-108. Each subscale is positively scored, with higher scores indicating better functioning. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. Results shown are FACT-G total scores.
Measured: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)
SF36 is being used in this protocol as a generic measure of quality of life (QOL). The self-reported questionnaires are completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. The MOS SF-36 instrument is a general assessment of health QOL with eight components: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Pain Index, General Health Perceptions, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health Index. The sub scores for each of the eight components were computed based on the raw categorical values from the survey and range 0-100 with higher scores indicating better outcomes for each domain. Then overall Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) are computed using standardized algorithm for SF36. MCS and PCS scores range 0-100 with higher score indicating positive outcome. To facilitate comparison of the results with published norms, PCS and MCS are used as the outcome measures in summarizing the SF-36 data.
Measured: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - EQ-5D
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the EQ-5D survey. The EQ-5D contains a five-item survey with three response levels per item measuring mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D takes approximately 1 minute to complete (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005). The EQ-5D score ranges -0.224 to 1. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent.
Measured: 3 years
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) in As-treated Population
Time to event outcomes will be analyzed from the time of consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three-year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 3 years
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) in As-treated Population
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 3 years
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Overall Survival (OS)
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease Relapse
Outcome Measure Description: The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Disease relapse is defined as: Satisfying criteria for evolution into acute leukemia; or reappearance of pre-transplant morphologic abnormalities, detected in bone marrow specimens; or reappearance of pre-transplant cytogenetic abnormality in at least one metaphase on each of two separate consecutive examinations at least one month apart, regardless of the number of metaphases analyzed; or institution of any therapy to treat relapsed disease (institution of any therapy not meant for maintenance or prevention), including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI. Relapse estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. DFS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Treatment-related Mortality
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. The events are deaths prior to disease relapse. TRM estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD)
Grade II-IV aGVHD is the event. aGVHD will be graded according to the BMT CTN Manual of Procedures (MOP). Staging for skin: Stage 1. <25% rash; 2. 25-50%; 3. >50%; 4. generalized erythroderma with bullae. Staging for GI: Stage 1. Diarrhea>500ml/d or persistent nausea; 2. >1000ml/d; 3. >1500ml/d; 4. Large volume diarrhea and severe abdominal pain +- ileus. Staging for Liver: Stage 1. bilirubin 2-3mg/dl; 2. bilirubin 3-6 mg/dl; 3. bilirubin 6-15 mg/dl; 4. bilirubin>15mg/dl. aGVHD grading is performed by the consensus conference criteria (Przepiorka et al. 1995). Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-4 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Grade III-IV Acute GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Chronic GVHD
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Chronic GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint. Data will be collected and reviewed according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD will also be recorded. This secondary endpoint of chronic GVHD will include mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD based on NIH Consensus Criteria.
Measured: 27 months post-transplant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start16 Dec 2013
- Primary completion5 Oct 2021
- Study completion5 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical College of WisconsinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two arms will enroll and have data collected on them simultaneously.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 384 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary Horowitz, MD, MS, Study director, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02016781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BMTCTN1102
- Other IDs
- 2U10HL069294-11, 5U24CA076518
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
Publications
Saber W, Le Rademacher J, Sekeres M, Logan B, Lewis M, Mendizabal A, Leifer E, Appelbaum FR, Horowitz MM, Nakamura R, Cutler CS. Multicenter biologic assignment trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to hypomethylating therapy or best supportive care in patients aged 50 to 75 with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network #1102 study rationale, design, and methods. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
PubMed 24972249Saber W, Bansal A, Li L, Scott BL, Sangaralingham LR, Thao V, Roth JA, Wright W, Steuten LMG, Pidala JA, Mishra A, Maziarz RT, Westervelt P, McGuirk JP, Cutler C, Nakamura R, Ramsey SD. Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Apr;20(4):572-580. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00413. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
PubMed 38261970Versluis J, Saber W, Tsai HK, Gibson CJ, Dillon LW, Mishra A, McGuirk J, Maziarz RT, Westervelt P, Hegde P, Mukherjee D, Martens MJ, Logan B, Horowitz M, Hourigan CS, Nakamura R, Cutler C, Lindsley RC; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Across High-Risk Genetic Subgroups: Genetic Analysis of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 1;41(28):4497-4510. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00866. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
PubMed 37607457Cusatis R, Martens MJ, Nakamura R, Cutler CS, Saber W, Lee SJ, Logan BR, Shaw BE, Gregory A, D'Souza A, Hamilton BK, Horowitz MM, Flynn KE. Health-related quality of life in reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients aged 50-75 with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: BMT CTN 1102. Am J Hematol. 2023 Feb;98(2):229-250. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26768. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
PubMed 36251401Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, Ramirez A, Scott B, Oran B, Leifer E, Tamari R, Mishra A, Maziarz RT, McGuirk J, Westervelt P, Vasu S, Patnaik M, Kamble R, Forman SJ, Sekeres MA, Appelbaum F, Mendizabal A, Logan B, Horowitz M, Cutler C. Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients 50-75 Years of Age With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 20;39(30):3328-3339. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03380. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
PubMed 34106753
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center Biologic Assignment Trial Comparing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant to Hypomethylating Therapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients w/Intermediate-2 & High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (BMTCTN1102)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02016781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BMTCTN1102
- Conditions
- MDS
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 384 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
- Study start
- 16 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed as a multicenter trial, with biological assignment to one of two study arms; Arm 1: Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT), Arm 2: Non-Transplant Therapy/Best Supportive Care.
Detailed description
Background: MDS is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic precursors and stem cells, which may evolve to a terminal phase resembling acute leukemia. A subject of clinical urgency for researchers, clinicians, patients, and health care underwriters such as Medicare, is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in the treatment of older patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has extended HCT to the care of older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and lymphoma and a number of retrospective and phase II trials for patients with MDS now show the curative potential of RIC alloHCT in selected patients.
This protocol is designed to evaluate the relative benefits of RIC alloHCT compared to non-transplant therapies focusing on overall survival. This will be done by having patients biologically assigned to the alloHCT arm or the hypomethylating therapy/best supportive care arm and following them for survival at 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two arms will enroll and have data collected on them simultaneously.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transplant | Active comparator | Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell TransplantReduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT) |
| Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care | Active comparator | Procedure: Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive CareThe specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Patients fulfilling the following criteria will be eligible for entry into this study:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with the following will be ineligible for registration onto this study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell TransplantAlso: RIC alloHCTBone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant.from a fully matched related (6/6) or unrelated (8/8) donor. The specific transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician but is required to be reduced-intensity. | Procedure or surgery | Transplant |
| Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive CareAlso: Non-transplantThe specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician. | Procedure or surgery | Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 3 years
The primary endpoint for this study is overall survival (OS) at three years post-consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy. The results posted are from the February 2020 interim analysis per protocol study design. Two interim analyses for efficacy were performed previously in January and November 2019 and presented to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Results at the second analysis was crossing the efficacy boundary. Subsequently, the DSMB approved early release of study data as of February 2020.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
Time frame: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Time frame: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)
Time frame: 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL) - EQ-5D
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) in As-treated Population
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) in As-treated Population
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease Relapse
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Treatment-related Mortality
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD)
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Chronic GVHD
Time frame: 27 months post-transplant
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24972249Saber W, Le Rademacher J, Sekeres M, Logan B, Lewis M, Mendizabal A, Leifer E, Appelbaum FR, Horowitz MM, Nakamura R, Cutler CS. Multicenter biologic assignment trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to hypomethylating therapy or best supportive care in patients aged 50 to 75 with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network #1102 study rationale, design, and methods. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38261970Saber W, Bansal A, Li L, Scott BL, Sangaralingham LR, Thao V, Roth JA, Wright W, Steuten LMG, Pidala JA, Mishra A, Maziarz RT, Westervelt P, McGuirk JP, Cutler C, Nakamura R, Ramsey SD. Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Apr;20(4):572-580. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00413. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37607457Versluis J, Saber W, Tsai HK, Gibson CJ, Dillon LW, Mishra A, McGuirk J, Maziarz RT, Westervelt P, Hegde P, Mukherjee D, Martens MJ, Logan B, Horowitz M, Hourigan CS, Nakamura R, Cutler C, Lindsley RC; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Across High-Risk Genetic Subgroups: Genetic Analysis of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 1;41(28):4497-4510. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00866. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36251401Cusatis R, Martens MJ, Nakamura R, Cutler CS, Saber W, Lee SJ, Logan BR, Shaw BE, Gregory A, D'Souza A, Hamilton BK, Horowitz MM, Flynn KE. Health-related quality of life in reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients aged 50-75 with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: BMT CTN 1102. Am J Hematol. 2023 Feb;98(2):229-250. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26768. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34106753Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, Ramirez A, Scott B, Oran B, Leifer E, Tamari R, Mishra A, Maziarz RT, McGuirk J, Westervelt P, Vasu S, Patnaik M, Kamble R, Forman SJ, Sekeres MA, Appelbaum F, Mendizabal A, Logan B, Horowitz M, Cutler C. Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients 50-75 Years of Age With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 20;39(30):3328-3339. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03380. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
- National Marrow Donor ProgramLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
Related trials for MDS
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Horowitz, MD, MS study director
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin
37 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in people with MDS, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 37 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02016781, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.