ObesityNCT02025595
Obesity and Brain: Genes and Environment
An observational study of Obesity, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of genetic and environmental risk factors on central nervous system (CNS) reward and satiety circuits in the etiology of obesity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- How many people
- 92 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects will be recruited from the Netherlands Twin Registry (NTR). All subjects are voluntary participants and have received surveys on lifestyle and health every 2 years. In addition, genome wide data are available in a large number of these individuals.
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-75 years
- Male or female
- Stable bodyweight (<5% reported weight change during previous 3 months)
- Women: regular menstruation cycle (to exclude possible menstruation cycle effects)
- Normal fasting blood glucose
Who cannot join
- Left handedness
- Known diabetes or abnormal fasting blood glucose
- Serious heart, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, malignant or hematological disease
- Metabolic disorders (uncontrolled adrenal/thyroid disease)
- Women: irregular menstruation cycle
- Neurological or psychiatric illness
Show all 14Show fewer
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Alcohol abuse
- Nicotine abuse
- Claustrophobia or metal implants
- Visual disability
- Participation in another study
- Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent
- Current/chronic use of following medication: antihyperglycemic agents, glucocorticoids, centrally acting drugs, cytostatics, immune suppressants, potentially addictive medications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Role of Central Reward and Satiety Centers in the Etiology of Obesity: Genetic and Environmental Influences
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of genetic and environmental risk factors on central nervous system (CNS) reward and satiety circuits in the etiology of obesity. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the alterations in CNS reward and satiety circuits are a cause or a consequence of the development of obesity.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- Brain, Genes, Environment, Etiology, Reward, Satiety Response, Central Nervous System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Twins, Monozygotic, Overweight, Obesity
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Overweight
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monozygotic twin pairs | 15 monozygotic twin pairs discordant for obesity | |
| Genetic predisposition for obesity | 15 obese and 15 non-obese individuals with a high genotype obesity risk score and 15 obese and 15 non-obese individuals with a low genotype obesity risk score. Genotype obesity risk score will be based on genome wide association single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) associated with obesity. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli within obesity discordant MZ twin pairs.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD fMRI signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli between individuals at high verses low genetic obesity risk.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD fMRI signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli between lean and obese subjects with either high or low genetic obesity risk.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
Secondary outcomes (10)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding dietary intake
Dietary intake will be measured as quantitative (kcal/day) and qualitative (energy density (kcal/kg) and macronutrient composition (%)) dietary intake using A) a choice lunch buffet on the visit day and B) the 24 hours recall method on two week days and one weekend day at home.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding physical activity level
Physical activity level will be measured as metabolic equivalent of task (METs)-hours per week using seven-day ActiGraph triaxial accelerometry at home.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding basal metabolic rate
Basal metabolic rate will be measured in kcal/day using oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production measured by indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood system.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding fasting circulating biomarker levels
Fasting circulating biomarker levels (glucose (mmol/l), HbA1c (mmol/mol), insulin (pmol/l), C-peptide (nmol/l), glucagon (pmol/l), triglycerides (mmol/l), HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) and LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)) will be measured in a fasting blood sample.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding autonomic nervous system balance
Autonomic nervous system balance will be assessment based on measurements of A) heart rate variability (HRV; calculated as root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD) in ms2); B) respiratory rate (RR; breaths/min) and C) respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; ms) in resting conditions and in response to a mental arithmetic task using an electro- and impedance cardiogram.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding dietary intake
Dietary intake will be measured as quantitative (kcal/day) and qualitative (energy density (kcal/kg) and macronutrient composition (%)) dietary intake using A) a choice lunch buffet on the visit day and B) the 24 hours recall method on two week days and one weekend day at home.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding physical activity level
Physical activity level will be measured as metabolic equivalent of task (METs)-hours per week using seven-day ActiGraph triaxial accelerometry at home.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding basal metabolic rate
Basal metabolic rate will be measured in kcal/day using oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production measured by indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood system.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding fasting circulating biomarker levels
Fasting circulating biomarker levels (glucose (mmol/l), HbA1c (mmol/mol), insulin (pmol/l), C-peptide (nmol/l), glucagon (pmol/l), triglycerides (mmol/l), HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) and LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)) will be measured in a fasting blood sample.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding autonomic nervous system balance
Autonomic nervous system balance will be assessment based on measurements of A) heart rate variability (HRV; calculated as root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD) in ms2); B) respiratory rate (RR; breaths/min) and C) respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; ms) in resting conditions and in response to a mental arithmetic task using an electro- and impedance cardiogram.
Measured: Baseline (one measurement)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 92 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, RG IJzerman, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02025595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DC2013ObesiBrain001
- Other IDs
- NL 44735.029.13, 91613082
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 10 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Doornweerd S, De Geus EJ, Barkhof F, Van Bloemendaal L, Boomsma DI, Van Dongen J, Drent ML, Willemsen G, Veltman DJ, IJzerman RG. Brain reward responses to food stimuli among female monozygotic twins discordant for BMI. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Jun;12(3):718-727. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9711-1.
PubMed 28597337Doornweerd S, IJzerman RG, van der Eijk L, Neter JE, van Dongen J, van der Ploeg HP, de Geus EJ. Physical activity and dietary intake in BMI discordant identical twins. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Jun;24(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1002/oby.21475. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
PubMed 27106364
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Central Reward and Satiety Centers in the Etiology of Obesity: Genetic and Environmental Influences
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02025595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DC2013ObesiBrain001
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- Brain, Genes, Environment, Etiology, Reward, Satiety Response, Central Nervous System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 92 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of genetic and environmental risk factors on central nervous system (CNS) reward and satiety circuits in the etiology of obesity. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the alterations in CNS reward and satiety circuits are a cause or a consequence of the development of obesity.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monozygotic twin pairs | – | –15 monozygotic twin pairs discordant for obesity |
| Genetic predisposition for obesity | – | –15 obese and 15 non-obese individuals with a high genotype obesity risk score and 15 obese and 15 non-obese individuals with a low genotype obesity risk score. Genotype obesity risk score will be based on genome wide association single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) associated with obesity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects will be recruited from the Netherlands Twin Registry (NTR). All subjects are voluntary participants and have received surveys on lifestyle and health every 2 years. In addition, genome wide data are available in a large number of these individuals.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18-75 years
- Male or female
- Stable bodyweight (<5% reported weight change during previous 3 months)
- Women: regular menstruation cycle (to exclude possible menstruation cycle effects)
- Normal fasting blood glucose
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Left handedness
- Known diabetes or abnormal fasting blood glucose
- Serious heart, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, malignant or hematological disease
- Metabolic disorders (uncontrolled adrenal/thyroid disease)
- Women: irregular menstruation cycle
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli within obesity discordant MZ twin pairs.
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD fMRI signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli between individuals at high verses low genetic obesity risk.
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD fMRI signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli between lean and obese subjects with either high or low genetic obesity risk.
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
10 secondary outcomes
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding dietary intake
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding physical activity level
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding basal metabolic rate
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding fasting circulating biomarker levels
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference within obesity-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs regarding autonomic nervous system balance
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding dietary intake
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding physical activity level
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding basal metabolic rate
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding fasting circulating biomarker levels
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
The difference between individuals at high versus those at low genetic obesity risk regarding autonomic nervous system balance
Time frame: Baseline (one measurement)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28597337Doornweerd S, De Geus EJ, Barkhof F, Van Bloemendaal L, Boomsma DI, Van Dongen J, Drent ML, Willemsen G, Veltman DJ, IJzerman RG. Brain reward responses to food stimuli among female monozygotic twins discordant for BMI. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Jun;12(3):718-727. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9711-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27106364Doornweerd S, IJzerman RG, van der Eijk L, Neter JE, van Dongen J, van der Ploeg HP, de Geus EJ. Physical activity and dietary intake in BMI discordant identical twins. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Jun;24(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1002/oby.21475. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
Related trials for Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined With Lifestyle Intervention for Visceral Fat Reduction in Adults With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight, Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
ELEVATE-LIVER: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps Improve Heart Structure and Function in People With Overweight or Obesity and Fatty Liver Disease
Obesity, Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Pubertal Timing Among Youth With Obesity
Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Obesity, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The difference in neuronal activity in CNS reward and satiety circuits as represented by BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal change from baseline (%) in response to food-related stimuli within obesity discordant MZ twin pairs. (time frame: Baseline (one measurement)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02025595, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2017.