AzTrials
AzTrials

HyperaldosteronismLARFANCT02030587

Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

A study testing Radiofrequency Ablation and Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in people with Hyperaldosteronism and Conn Syndrome, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled study comparing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) versus image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating aldosterone-producing adenoma. The objectives of this study are to 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency Ablation and Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
Jan 2013to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hypertensive individuals
  • Biochemically confirmed primary aldosteronism
  • Radiologically confirmed unilateral adrenal adenoma ≤3cm

Who cannot join

  • Bilateral adrenal disease
  • Multiple adrenal tumors
  • Other concomitant adrenal diseases
  • Potentially malignant adrenal tumors as shown on imaging
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Surgically unfit for general anaesthesia
  • Prior open abdominal surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Aldosterone-producing Adenoma: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospective randomized controlled study comparing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) versus image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating aldosterone-producing adenoma.

The objectives of this study are to

  1. compare the short-term outcomes of LA and RFA in treating aldosterone-producing adenoma.
  2. compare the treatment success rates of LA and RFA during follow-up for primary aldosteronism.
Being tested
Radiofrequency Ablation, Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Keywords
Hyperaldosteronism, Adrenocortical adenoma, Adrenalectomy, Catheter ablation
Medical subject headings
Hyperaldosteronism, Adrenocortical Adenoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency AblationProcedure or surgery

  • Laparoscopic AdrenalectomyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT02030587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiofrequency AblationExperimentalRadiofrequency Ablation
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency Ablation
Laparoscopic AdrenalectomyActive comparatorLaparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Morbidity rate

    Measured: 30-day

  2. Resolution of hyperaldosteronism

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Operative time

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Periprocedural hypertensive crisis

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Mortality rate

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Blood loss

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Analgesic requirement

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Time to resumption of activity

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Resolution of hypokalaemia

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Blood pressure control

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Hospital stay

    Measured: 30 days

  10. Pain score

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02030587
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRE-2012.193-T
Acronym
LARFA
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
5 Jan 2014
Last updated
25 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Liu SY, Ng EK, Lee PS, Wong SK, Chiu PW, Mui WL, So WY, Chow FC. Radiofrequency ablation for benign aldosterone-producing adenoma: a scarless technique to an old disease. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):1058-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318f66936.

    PubMed 21107117

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofrequency Ablation and Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in people with Hyperaldosteronism and Conn Syndrome, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Morbidity rate (time frame: 30-day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02030587, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in